Jacob's Ladder, Peak District, England
peaklass
PUT YOUR BEARD IN MY MOUTH
Sade Olutola

Love Begins
ojovivo
No title available
tumblr dot com
The Stonewall Inn
No title available

Andulka
he wasn't even looking at me and he found me
$LAYYYTER
2025 on Tumblr: Trends That Defined the Year
trying on a metaphor
Claire Keane
h
Jules of Nature
Sweet Seals For You, Always
The Bowery Presents
I'd rather be in outer space šø
Xuebing Du

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Colombia
seen from Bolivia
seen from Brazil

seen from United Kingdom

seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from Malaysia
seen from Türkiye

seen from Ecuador

seen from United States

seen from Mexico
seen from Ecuador
seen from Italy
seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from Jamaica
@miavar
Jacob's Ladder, Peak District, England
peaklass
Peaches
(via Pin on for the birds)
Asia Spettel
(via Priestās House, Sissinghurst Castle, Sissinghurst) Bob RadlinskiĀ / Flickr
Apricots
The view of North Yorkshire looks so absolutely flawless, there's nothing to be change, it is perfect as it is. - Author: Sweet_Temptation3178
https://pin.it/4z3Ewy24i
Good Morning, have a nice day āļø
Portree Harbour, Isle of Skye from Scotland Painting and Art Prints
What do you see here?
https://streamable.com/tl4rb8
This moment at the tartan parade
This video
Sam is trying to escape.š§
ā¤ļø
Damn it, Sam, what do you want with this brazen woman? Who doesn't shy away from anything.š«£
Soft Dinner Rolls
š¼ļø Official Royal Family Portrait š¼ļø
I have to admit, Iām thoroughly entertained. Not despite the absurdity - but because of it.
This entire āromanceā has all the production values of a bargain-basement soap opera written for viewers who arenāt inclined to ask too many questions. Itās gloriously low-rent. Think D-movie territory: tiny budget, wooden acting, paper-thin script. And now, with the Official Royal Family Portrait proudly occupying the Instagram profile picture? Chefās kiss.
SQUEEEEE! š
That said, letās focus for a moment on the childās cap at the bottom of the photo.
From the earliest images at the distillery, there has been a recurring pattern. š appears to use her daughter as emotional body armour, as though the daughterās presence discourages criticism and shields her from accusations of being an inadequate mother.
And once again, in Mallorca, the daughter is there.
Think about it for a moment. If this was supposed to be a romantic getaway for a newly āin loveā couple - the kind of trip where the lovers are supposedly spending every waking moment having wild, passionate sex - why bring a child? And why choose family-oriented Mallorca instead of party-centric Ibiza (if theyāre already opting for budget Spain)?
As for the endlessly repeated fantasies about SRH and šās supposedly extraordinary sex life, most parents will recognise how implausible they are. Children sleeping in the next room, unfamiliar surroundings, interrupted nights, and days spent at the pool, eating ice cream or sightseeing - family holidays rarely resemble the fantasies imagined by online commentators.
So perhaps we can file the fantasies spun on a certain blog - about this extraordinary sex life flourishing with a nine-year-old sleeping just beyond the wall - under fairy tales.
[ Leaving aside the fact that this entire āromanceā is nothing more than a setup.]
*** *** ***
Meanwhile, over on X, formerly Twitterā¦
.
.
.
Yes, this story is clearly aimed at people who struggle with even the most basic social perception. Some genuinely fail to see the dynamic between these two people or to read their body language. They donāt notice SRH repeatedly shaking š off in public as though she were an annoying fly. They donāt see the distance, the indifference, or the lack of reciprocal engagement. To me, thatās an extraordinarily poor reading of human relationships.
Instead, they see a picture-perfect family: a lifelong bachelor, a woman twice married, and a child whose father is alive, present, and actively involved in her life.
If thatās someoneās definition of a fairy-tale family, I can only conclude that their understanding of human relationships is remarkably poor.
[17 July, 2026]
For my next trick, Iāll need ChatGPT, Gemini, and Grok.
With huge thanks to @benfeldmanlove21-blog , who first spotted the differences between the images, and to @hopelostinmemories for helping with the search, I spent far too much time trying to understand the photo MW posted last night.
The conclusion seems fairly clear. The question of why is another matter, and thatās where Iāll need your help.
Let me walk you through what I did.
First, @benfeldmanlove21-blog pointed out the differences between the images, and there are simply too many of them to dismiss as a resolution issue. I stopped counting after five.
So we know that the version P posted appears to have undergone fairly extensive AI retouching. The differences are visible, as are the unnaturally smooth skin and hair.
My first thought was that P had taken the circular profile picture posted here and used an AI prompt to fill in the missing parts, turning it into a complete square image.
So I tried doing exactly that using three of the leading AI platforms. Iām attaching one of the results.
What did I learn?
The circular image doesnāt give the AI enough information about the man. With most of his face cut off, it has no way of knowing that the person is supposed to be Sam Heughan, so it simply invents someone.
Then I tried again, this time specifically telling it that the man was Sam Heughan. This time it did generate him. Iām including more examples here.
Grok:
ChatGPT:
(Not posting Gemini because it just created something completely different.)
So what did that show me?
Even when the AI knows who the man is supposed to be, it still doesnāt recreate him as perfectly as he appears in the image P posted. The angle and features are always slightly different and things are missing or added.
The most obvious conclusion is that Purv received the full image rather than generating the missing section herself. But the version she received had already been heavily retouched using AI.
Who would have access to the complete original photo? One guess.
Why retouch this particular image when she herself had already uploaded a different version? Excellent question.
But at the very least, this strongly suggests that AI is indeed being used by her, as Iāve suspected and mentioned here several times before.
As for whether the original image itself is real?
At this point, with her, who knows?
Eilean Donan Castle, Scotland