I Had a Flashback of Something that Never Existed from “Ode à l'oubli” 2002
Louise Bourgeois
No title available

@theartofmadeline

roma★
todays bird

Discoholic 🪩

Origami Around
Misplaced Lens Cap
occasionally subtle

No title available

blake kathryn

Kaledo Art
ojovivo
One Nice Bug Per Day

#extradirty
Peter Solarz
AnasAbdin
DEAR READER

祝日 / Permanent Vacation

oozey mess
wallacepolsom

seen from Malaysia

seen from Malaysia

seen from Germany

seen from Malaysia
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from Canada

seen from India
@mollybbottom
I Had a Flashback of Something that Never Existed from “Ode à l'oubli” 2002
Louise Bourgeois
EZRA MILLER for GQ Style (2018), ph. Yoshiyuki Matsumara.
Reasons to Stay Alive by Mathew Gray Gubler
Too tired.
Can't feel it.
Will disappoint.
Chemical issues persist.
Words private. Paper to skin.
Through a world processed is still yet the purest.
Noticing your bad habits is like realising that you have been building your RPG character the wrong way.
Always an object. The image by Brittany Robinson. The items presented are @mollybottom The ground and chain belong to another.
Wild Capture
Charlie = Joyous = Life
Goodness!
light night
Love this.
What is a life of joy and giving when none writes? One lives and if One life lives than Wisdom has been profound.
Another chase. Over
Pages, not in MacBook but on pulp, dry and inked or with wax or lead.
Distracted. without order it overwhelmed
And age makes it endless.
Sorting over and over and over.
Over is what marks crisis. Over what?
Over when? Over. As in looming.
Here to create a list
Action list
Draw down and sort
As another page is added to the looming presence Over me.
Failure. Is it the media? Is it the ...
Quicker to answer.
It is the time of my life. Over
The hill a midlife crisis looms.
Typical. Question me again?
Who studies the trends of academia?
Who is in the Peer Review?
Who is paying for the studies of academia?
Who is learning from the manuals?
Who is living under the rule of academia?
Who is not?
When did academia begin to realize they were becoming journalists
due to publishing requirements for grants and no longer scientists?
When did studies begin a study and what was to be studied?
When will the reflection of society tell the study what to be?
Did academia just rear in the progress of society?
Article in full referenced below.
*History is written by the winners.*
*In the last analysis our only claim to victory is that if we win the war we shall tell fewer lies about it than our adversaries. The really frightening thing about totalitarianism is not that it commits ‘atrocities’ but that it attacks the concept of objective truth; it claims to control the past as well as the future. In spite of all the lying and self-righteousness that war encourages, I do not honestly think it can be said that that habit of mind is growing in Britain. Taking one thing with another, I should say that the press is slightly freer than it was before the war. I know out of my own experience that you can print things now which you couldn’t print ten years ago. War resisters have probably been less maltreated in this war than in the last one, and the expression of unpopular opinion in public is certainly safer. There is some hope, therefore, that the liberal habit of mind, which thinks of truth as something outside yourself, something to be discovered, and not as something you can make up as you go along, will survive. But I still don’t envy the future historian’s job. Is it not a strange commentary on our time that even the casualties in the present war cannot be estimated within several millions?*
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/As_I_Please
"As I Please" #10 4 February 1944 CEJL III, EL Published in Tribune
http://alexpeak.com/twr/hiwbtw/
Typical.
You have labeled me typical.
Socially I belong to a group and my words are less due to this group I belong to.
I was assigned to this group by you when you saw me as - I can't even label myself because those views of yours were incorrect as you bypassed me and assigned me.
I am not the aggressor. The label is, Macro assigned, to the micro-aggression.
Yes I did question not you but the real layers of what I know. Question me again?
-responsive of the notes and tone in a limited presentation of ‘microaggressions’ and the reality of the mentally male, femme of the dominant shut up and sit down you aggressor face and body and non academic argument presenting personage-
Read Full Article Here:
5 Habits to Boost Self Confidence
Follow @psych2go for more!
When faced with two choices, simply toss a coin. It works not because it settles the question for you, but because in that brief moment when the coin is in the air, you suddenly know what you are hoping for