We should take all the semen from men and then kill them all. We can then maintain life by farming the new born males semen and killing them so girls donât get any wrong ideas. fucking men are pigs anyway
I donât know if you know this, but society doesnât place any fucking value on menâs virginityâŠnor has it ever systemically trained men to think of themselves as only being worthy of marriage if theyâre still a virgin.
Society doesnât tell men theyâre tainted or dirty when they lose their virginity it praises them.
Societyâs never PAID menâs families for their virginityâŠNOR HAS IT EVER PROMISED WOMEN who do good that theyâll get to âhave sex with a 1000 virgin menâ when they go to heaven.
GET THE FUCK OUT MY REBLOGS WITH YOUR BASIC ASS SHENANIGANS.
no society does the opposite. it shames men who donât immediately fuck someone when their balls drop. BUT HEY itâs not a real problem if it happens to men.
See before you start whining about how it shames men for not conquering womenâŠ.
How about you research what patriarchy isâŠand how the original caption totally covered all the âdamageâ that happens to the precious men in the world.
If you think men being shamed/made fun of is comprable to women being systematically deprived of dignity, shelter, food, employment etcâŠand being raped, beaten and murdered for ANY of their sexual choices [either abstinence or activity] not only have you derailed this post you are a disgusting person and have succeeded in proving why this image is so important.
Iâm fairly sure we need to kill off 98% of the worlds men, because theyâre all assholes. Iâm actually being serious here, can we please just burn 98% of all boys/men/males? And leave alive only the 2% that are deemed good enough. If you think Iâm joking, Iâm not. I think it would solve most of the worlds problems if the current male population was reduced that drastically.
Men wouldnât have the numbers to gang rape anymore, and the ones that would be left alive wouldnât do that anyway because theyâd have to pass stringent tests. I donât think women even need males to continue the species anymore, I mean weâve got sperm banks now.
And I wouldnât care if I got burned in that 98%. I donât care about the families. Because when it comes down to it, men had it coming.
Earlier this year, women became the majority of the workforce for the first time in U.S. history. Most managers are now women too. And for every two men who get a college degree this year, three women will do the same. For years, womenâs progress has been cast as a struggle for equality. But what if equality isnât the end point? What if modern, postindustrial society is simply better suited to women? A report on the unprecedented role reversal now under wayâ and its vast cultural consequences
Why do you think lesbian separatism is interesting to women? I'm genuinely curious. I've just started learning about it, and it sounds like a dream.
Personally, I long to be a part of an environment of complete sisterhood, where women are freed from the constraints of male dominance and can work together to create something better than what we have now. Female solidarity is powerfulâŠimagine the kind of world that we could create for ourselves. It might be just a dream at the moment, but itâs an inspiring dream, and one worth pursuing.
As women, we need spaces to self-actualise and communicate ideas away from the scrutiny of males. Lesbians have always been the leaders and innovators in the struggle for female rights, and a move towards lesbian separatism could only empower all women as a consequence of lesbian voices becoming amplified. We might not have the resources to go big right now (although I still daydream about winning the lottery and starting a lesbian commune somewhere) but practicing separatism in our daily lives, prioritising our lesbian sisters, supporting female-centred businesses and organisations, being seen to actively criticise patriarchy and male supremacy, these all go a long way towards the eventual goal of total lesbian separatism.
The unfortunate fact is that lesbian separatism is no longer a hypothetical ideal, imo - itâs imperative if we are to survive as a community.
Feminists have been trying to work within patriarchal power structures to reform male supremacy since the second wave, and it has become increasingly clear that this approach just isnât working. Patriarchal society continues to attack the rights of women and seeks to undermine previous feminist gains wherever possible. The LGBTQA community ignores the needs of lesbians, and seeks to coercively redefine our sexuality to the point that we are effectively erased as homosexuals. The pushback against female autonomy is escalating beyond anything that we could have prepared for - from abortion rights, to the rights to safe spaces, to the right to determine for ourselves what the words âwomanâ and âlesbianâ even mean, we are under attack from every angle. The support structures that feminists and lesbians started with the second wave have been eroded into nonexistence. While lesbianism as an inborn sexuality will always be around, the fact is that we are dying as a community and a political force. It is vital that we regroup and focus on reprioritising ourselves, and thatâs where I believe that the need for lesbian separatism arises.
Hope that wasnât too much of a rant, but thanks for the ask!
In the future, the world is controlled by a sororiarchy, female clones who have exterminated the male population. With time travel they indirectly control our world and have infiltrated the worldâs governments and womenâs organizations and they conspire to kill all men so that their totalitarian feminist dystopia will exist.
Itâs not all bad, the remaining 10 percent will be used for breeding.
This is, of course, the logical conclusion of Feminism. Most Feminists, on some level, agree with her they just donât have the courage to acknowledge that this is where their ideology leads them to.
Most Feminists are sort of like Nazis who know that their ideology demands that the Jews be liquidated but donât have the actual courage to openly talk about it. But that doesnât stop them from being Nazis. Or Feminists.
Most of us in the Anti-Feminist community have known about Femitheist (and the nature of Feminism) for a while so this is nothing new.
Whatâs surprising isnât that this person exists, or that the interview happened or that Feminism is like this.
Whatâs surprising is the degree to which the Interviewer is on HER side.
I mean even if we ignore that the tagline involves a joke about a holocaust unprecedented in human history, reading the article the interviewer doesnât actually challenge her at all. In any capacity.
Compare the EXACT SAME INTERVIEWER interviewing a White SupremacistâŠ
This is how he describes the woman that wants to remove 90% of men from the population, the Feminist Supremacist:
Two years later she is an emergent cult leader, a ball-stepping villainess, or clear-thinking realist â depending who you ask.
Now hereâs that self same interviewer describing the White Supremacist:
Kyle Hunt is a reclusive man, paranoid enough to log my IP details when I contact him.
Neo-paganism, check. Kyle imagines himself some kind of all-odds hero of the bad-odds white race, envisioning this article as a grandiose Portrait of a Man titled âKyle Confronts Cultural Marxism.â
I decided to nudge his superiority complex into asserting itself in a way I suspected would work
Are we noticing ANY kind of bias here kids? When it came to the Feminist that wanted to kill off 90% of men in some we get nothing but fawning acceptance.. when it comes to a guy that is pro-white we get absolute contempt.
If nothing else, the interviewer knows who butters his bread. But most people know which church not to offendâŠ
I really donât get how tumblr can be like âkill all menâ.
Did you not have a dad??? Any male figure in your life????
Because I have a dad. That I love. That would make me fucking depressed if he died.
Donât. There are young kids with only dads and not everyone wants to commit genocide. :)
I came across this pretty amazing article: Feminist Science Fiction Is the Best Thing Ever by Claire L. Evans on Motherboard (part of Vice).
It also has a good reading list if youâre into feminist science fiction.
(Iâm glad to see Margaret Atwood made their list):
Joanna Russ â The Female Man & When It Changed
Marge Piercy â Â Woman on the Edge of Time
Sally Miller Gearhart â The Wanderground
Ursula K. Le Guin â The Left Hand of Darkness & Always Coming Home
Margaret Atwood â The Handmaidâs Tale
Octavia Butler â The Xenogenesis Trilogy & Kindred
Sheila Finch â Triad
James Tiptree Jr. â Houston, Houston, Do you Read?
Pamela Sargent â Women of Wonder
Sheri S. Tepper â The Gate to Womenâs Country
How can we keep women from killing all men? There are programs to keep artificial intelligence from killing us, but there is nothing to stop feminists from releasing a bioweapon to wipe out the male population.
discoholicmusic
gummygunk
snowghoul
theartofmadeline
germansingergirl
baratheonpilled
titsay
dailybridgerton
