Literary Analysis
Rough Draft
Scientist have been known to have loose morals when it comes to experimentation. Throughout history in the United States, as well as internationally, âmad scientistsâ have been known to go to great lengths in order to solve a medical mistery. I have analysed the links between immoral human medical experimentation with the testing and genetic modification of the honeybees illustrated by Jake Kosek, in âEcologies of Empireâ. Kosek explains how the honeybees have been through a series of experimentation for scientists to study their desirable traits. The scientists are essentially looking for the traits that are most useful to the military, such as being able to detect locations of mines through their sense of smell. The honeybees are connected to the tests done on humans because both types of experimentation were done in an attempt to âmodifyâ them and their way of life. Both types of experimentations involve immoral actions from the scientists, and here are a few articles to prove it.
In âTop 10 Evil Human Experimentsâ, written by Jamie Frater, a few examples of immorality in science are given. For example, throughout history and warfare, many of the tests were done on prisoners and slaves, in horrible conditions such as making them stand outside in below freezing temperatures to study hypothermia, injecting them with deadly diseases to study their effects, and cutting their limbs off (without anesthesia) and sowing them back on to other parts of their body to see if they could successfully create a conjoined twin. Those are only a few examples of grotesque techniques that were often used on subjects.
In an article written by CCNS, the author explains further into âOperation Sunshineâ which was mentioned in âEcologies of Empireâ. It gives evidence about how certain British and American researchers and scientists, such as Willard Libby, were involved in the operation. The article also informs the public about how scientists would exchange and ship bones with each other in order to share their findings about radiation in the childrenâsâ bones. Most importantly, it brings up the issue of consent. The article clearly states that the childrenâsâ parents were definitely not informed that their bones and bodies were being taken, and definitely not for scientific purposes. This ties in directly with the âBiopolitical Bodiesâ section in Kosekâs piece.
In another article called âRadiation and Human Radiation Experimentsâ, the author provides data on how radiation test subjects (children, prisoners, pregnant women, and black and or brown people were typically used for these experiments) were hardly ever informed of the fact that they were being exposed to plutonium, radioactive iron, and other deadly chemicals. The scientists performing the tests deceived the subjects and knowingly violated their human rights in order to follow through with the experiments. Articles also confirm that the government knew about these experiments and kept it a secret from both the test subjects and the public. This article connects to the Jake Kosek piece as it gives literal and accurate data and information about the tests that he introduces in the âBiopolitical Bodiesâ section of the chapter. The article also provides a short clip/preview of Hole in the Head, a movie about Vertus Hardiman, a man who was tested on at the age of five. The tests eventually lead to the maldevelopment of his head and brain.
Tests have also been done throughout the 1900âs in order to learn more about the effects of plutonium on the human body. Studies were conducted on animals, but researchers wanted to go in depth on the retention and excretion of plutonium if introduced to the human body. These experiments only began because the earlier animal studies did not provide appropriate data. The species that were used for the experiments provided different excretion rates as humans, therefore the data was not capable of being correlated correctly. This is another example of the human experimenting Jake Kosek writes about.
All of these articles express a common understanding of the experiments and the effects on the test subjects, whether it be short or long term. It interests me to know how far scientists will go in order to solve a medical mystery, or to simply feed their curiosities. These scientists are all seen as evil and malicious, and immorality seems to be a characteristic given to them by the authors of each article. Considering that the majority of these experiments occurred in both the 19th and 20th century, it gives the readers a better understanding as to why these scientists were so persistent with expressing their curiosities with the world around them. Science had not been very advanced, and there was many scientific questions to be answered, yet throughout the entirety of the articles, the authors all project their voices of disgust towards the scientists. Many of these experiments were done without the consent of the test subjects, which makes me wonder if there have been any (known or unknown) cases of immoral human testing anytime recently.
Final Draft
Scientist have been known to have loose morals when it comes to experimentation. Throughout history in the United States, as well as internationally, âmad scientistsâ have been known to go to great lengths in order to solve a medical mystery. I have analyzed the links between immoral human medical experimentation with the testing and genetic modification of the honeybees illustrated by Jake Kosek, in âEcologies of Empireâ. Kosek explains how the honeybees have been through a series of experimentation for scientists to study their desirable traits. The scientists are essentially looking for the traits that are most useful to the military, such as being able to detect locations of mines through their sense of smell. The honeybees are connected to the tests done on humans because both types of experimentation were done in an attempt to âmodifyâ them and their way of life. Both types of experimentations involve immoral actions from the scientists, and here are a few articles to prove it.
In âTop 10 Evil Human Experimentsâ, written by Jamie Frater, a few examples of immorality in science are given. For example, throughout history and warfare, many of the tests were done on prisoners and slaves, in horrible conditions such as making them stand outside in below freezing temperatures to study hypothermia, injecting them with deadly diseases to study their effects, and cutting their limbs off (without anesthesia) and sowing them back on to other parts of their body to see if they could successfully create a conjoined twin. The âAversion Projectâ took place in the 1970âs and 1980âs during South Africaâs apartheid. The army forced sex-change operations on white lesbian and gay soldiers, and were all done without any form of sedative. Former apartheid surgeons claim that the experiments included chemical castration, electric shock, and other forms of âsexual reassignmentâ on about 900 subjects. These experiments were done in hopes to root out homosexuals from the army, and were weeded out skillfully. Many were treated at psychiatric units, and the subjects who âcould not be cured with drugs, aversion shock therapy, hormone treatment, and other radical psychiatric meansâ were then sent to the surgeons for the forced sex-change operations. Aubrey Levin, the head of the Aversion Project, is now a Clinical Professor in the Department of Psychiatry at the University of Calgaryâs Medical School, as well in private practice as a member of the College of Physicians and Surgeons of Alberta.
In an article written by CCNS, the author explains further into âOperation Sunshineâ which was mentioned in âEcologies of Empireâ. It gives evidence about how certain British and American researchers and scientists, such as Willard Libby, were involved in the operation. The article also informs the public about how scientists would exchange and ship bones with each other in order to share their findings about radiation in the childrenâsâ bones. Most importantly, it brings up the issue of consent. The article clearly states that the childrenâsâ parents were definitely not informed that their bones and bodies were being taken, and definitely not for scientific purposes. This ties in directly with the âBiopolitical Bodiesâ section in Kosekâs piece.
In another article called âRadiation and Human Radiation Experimentsâ, the author provides data on how radiation test subjects (children, prisoners, pregnant women, and black and or brown people were typically used for these experiments) were hardly ever informed of the fact that they were being exposed to plutonium, radioactive iron, and other deadly chemicals. The scientists performing the tests deceived the subjects and knowingly violated their human rights in order to follow through with the experiments. Articles also confirm that the government knew about these experiments and kept it a secret from both the test subjects and the public. This article connects to the Jake Kosek piece as it gives literal and accurate data and information about the tests that he introduces in the âBiopolitical Bodiesâ section of the chapter. The article also provides a short clip/preview of Hole in the Head, a movie about Vertus Hardiman, a man who was tested on at the age of five. The tests eventually lead to the maldevelopment of his head and brain.
Tests have also been done throughout the 1900âs in order to learn more about the effects of plutonium on the human body. Studies were conducted on animals, but researchers wanted to go in depth on the retention and excretion of plutonium if introduced to the human body. These experiments only began because the earlier animal studies did not provide appropriate data. The species that were used for the experiments provided different excretion rates as humans, therefore the data was not capable of being correlated correctly. This is another example of the human experimenting Jake Kosek writes about.
One of the most recent examples of human testing is Project 4.1. In 1954, the United States tested the effect of bomb fallout on the Marshall Islands. The test was called âCastle Bravoâ that was exploded at Bikini Atoll. Jamie Frater explains how the effects of the test were âambiguous and statistically difficult to correlate to radiation exposureâ in the first decade. Signs of the effects were seen through miscarriages, stillbirths, impaired growth in children, and peaks in thyroid cancer. The Department of Energy Committee (DOE) wrote that âThe dual purpose of what is now a DOE medical program has led to a view by the Marshallese that they were being used as âguinea pigsâ in a âradiation experimentââ. Bikini Atoll has been abandoned throughout the years because of the fear of the radioactivity that still resides.
All of these articles express a common understanding of the experiments and the effects on the test subjects, whether it be short or long term. It interests me to know how far scientists will go in order to solve a medical mystery, or to simply feed their curiosities. These scientists are all seen as evil and malicious, and immorality seems to be a characteristic given to them by the authors of each article. Considering that the majority of these experiments occurred in both the 19th and 20th century, it gives the readers a better understanding as to why these scientists were so persistent with expressing their curiosities with the world around them. Science had not been very advanced, and there were many scientific questions to be answered, yet throughout the entirety of the articles the authors all project their voices of disgust towards the scientists. Many of these experiments were done without the consent of the test subjects, which makes me wonder if there have been any (known or unknown) cases of immoral human testing anytime recently.Â
Reflection-Peer Review by Selvio
When making changes to my piece, I mostly used the Grammar and Usage SLO. I had to make a few changes in my paragraphs because of spelling errors or incoherent sentences.
I used the Research SLO to add more examples of the unethical experimentations done in the past. For example Selvio suggested that I add information about the Marshallese Islanders. He also encouraged me to add more examples of the different ways subjects were used in experiments. I then added information about the âAversion Projectâ. Adding these examples gave a more meaning to my claim that throughout history, scientists have been undoubtedly unethical when it comes to experimentation.
















