(via https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MSKdIEJi9cY)
PUT YOUR BEARD IN MY MOUTH
Game of Thrones Daily
Cosmic Funnies
🩵 avery cochrane 🩵
I'd rather be in outer space 🛸

pixel skylines

No title available
2025 on Tumblr: Trends That Defined the Year
KIROKAZE
Misplaced Lens Cap
TVSTRANGERTHINGS

No title available

bliss lane
todays bird
Monterey Bay Aquarium
macklin celebrini has autism

No title available
he wasn't even looking at me and he found me
Jules of Nature
The Bowery Presents

seen from TĂĽrkiye

seen from TĂĽrkiye

seen from Netherlands

seen from United Kingdom

seen from United States

seen from TĂĽrkiye

seen from Russia

seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from Egypt
seen from United States

seen from Brazil

seen from Russia
seen from United States

seen from United Kingdom
seen from United States

seen from Egypt

seen from Australia

seen from United Arab Emirates

seen from Colombia
@mrelmergray-blog
(via https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MSKdIEJi9cY)
(via https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FwJCq8gGj0A)
Wil Wheaton is right: Stop expecting artists to work for free — or worse, for “exposure”
Do artists, writers, photographers, musicians and others deserve to be compensated for their work? The debate over working for free goes back a while now. But there are still people who haven’t heard the argument and think that “exposure” of creative work is reason enough for people to give away their labors.
The cult actor Wil Wheaton – best known for his roles on “Star Trek: The Next Generation” and “Big Bang Theory” — has written a short piece that should spread the word that giving your stuff away to a wealthy company is almost never a good idea. And his Twitter rant is standing up for the rights of creatives as well.
Wheaton recently wrote a post on his personal blog called “Seven Things I Did To Reboot My Life” that included drinking less, working out more, and so on. A Huffington Post editor approached him about reprinting it there, and he asked how much they paid for the right to use his nearly 3,500-word piece — which will drive their traffic, hence their advertising, hence their revenues. He was tempted if they offered him something that seemed respectful.
Well, it turns out, the editor responded with: “Unfortunately, we’re unable to financially compensate our bloggers at this time. Most bloggers find value in the unique platform and reach our site provides, but we completely understand if that makes blogging with us impossible.”
Wheaton said no, and sent out two angry tweets to his nearly three million followers. It was about the principle of it, he said. “Huffington Post is valued at well over fifty million dollars, and the company can absolutely afford to pay contributors,” he wrote on the blog. “The fact that it doesn’t, and can get away with it, is distressing to me.”
Full Article Here