Art By IG: @floortjesart
Instagram: @artwoonz
hello vonnie
Not today Justin

oozey mess
Peter Solarz
Mike Driver

titsay
Misplaced Lens Cap
Sweet Seals For You, Always
Keni
NASA
ojovivo
I'd rather be in outer space đ¸

No title available
official daine visual archive
Noah Kahan
Game of Thrones Daily
trying on a metaphor
YOU ARE THE REASON
TVSTRANGERTHINGS

ellievsbear
seen from United States
seen from Saudi Arabia

seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from T1

seen from Germany
seen from United States
seen from Paraguay
seen from Paraguay

seen from Malaysia
seen from Spain
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Argentina
@myhyunni
Art By IG: @floortjesart
Instagram: @artwoonz
dA
Help, Iâm addicted to these two. May they become addicted to eachother.
ALL đđž OF đđž THEM đđž
This post goes harder than any post has ever gone before.
the sheer amount of Fucks Not Given in these photos is creating a Black Hole Of Ungiven Fucks, sucking in all the bullshit over the Fuck You event horizon and trapping it so the bullshit canât escape. Itâs gorgeous.Â
You donât have to love your body
I really needed to read this today. Thank you.
when christian artists change the line in hallelujah from âmaybe thereâs a God aboveâ to âI know that thereâs a God aboveâ >:c
#idk why iâm so unreasonably angry#maybe cuz itâs my fav line
itâs also because Leonard COHEN (!) was Jewish and this is a quintessentially Jewish line, and changing it to that level of Annoying Certainty is stripping it of its Jewish meaning and imbuing it with that particularly American smug evangelical Christian attitude that makes me tired, so very tired
THAT IS EXACTLY WHY
I donât think Iâve heard any cover artist sing my favorite verses You say I took the name in vain I donât even know the name But if I did, well really, whatâs it to you? Thereâs a blaze of light In every word It doesnât matter which you heard The holy or the broken Hallelujah I did my best, it wasnât much I couldnât feel, so I tried to touch Iâve told the truth, I didnât come to fool you And even though It all went wrong Iâll stand before the Lord of Song With nothing on my tongue but Hallelujah
um woah
I will always hit the reblog button so hard for Hallelujah but ESPECIALLY mentions of the elusive final verses which are just about my favorite lyrics ever. Why do people always omit the best part of the song??
In Yiddish
In Hebrew
In Ladino
Yeah, I wonder why the verses that reference specific Jewish mystical and chassidic concepts that arenât readily understood by American âI love Jews, you know, Jesus was Jewish!â Christians never get any airtime. Funny that.
You say I took the name in vain I donât even know the name But if I did, well really, whatâs it to you? Thereâs a blaze of light In every word It doesnât matter which you heard The holy or the broken Hallelujah
These are specifically about Chassidic Jewish theories of the holy language, how each letter and combination of letters in Hebrew contains the essence of the divine spark and if used correctly, can unlock or uncover the divine spark in the mundane material word. And of course, there are secret names of God which, when spoken by any ordinary human would kill them, but if you are worthy and holy and righteous can be used to perform miracles or even to behold the glory of God face-to-face. The words themselves have power. Orthodox Jews often wonât even pronounce the word âhallelujahâ in itâs entirety in conversation, because the âyahâ sound at the end is a True Name of God (there are hundreds, supposedly) and thus too holy to say outside of prayer.
None of this is to mention how Davidâs sin in sleeping with Batshevah (the subject of much of the song, with a brief deviation to Shimshon and Delilah) is considered the turning point in the Tanach that ultimately dooms the Davidic line at the cosmological level and thus dooms Jewish sovereignty and independence altogether. From a Christian perspective this led to Jesus, the King of Kings, and thatâs all very well and good for them, but for the Jews, the Davidic line never returned and is the central tragedy of the total arc of the Torah. Like, our Bible doesnât have a happy ending? And thatâs what this song is about? Thereâs no Grace - you just have to sit with the sin and its consequence.
Of course, Cohen is referencing all of this ironically, and personalizing these very high-level religious concepts. Like the point of this song is that Cohen, the songwriter, is identifying with David, the psalmist, and identifying his own sins with Davidâs. The ache that you hear in this song is that the two thousand year exile that resulted from one wrong night of passion and Cohen feels that the pain he has caused to his lover is of equally monumental infamy. Basically, in a certain light, the whole of Psalms is a vain effort for David to atone for his sin and I think Cohen was writing this song in wonderment that David could eternally praise the God who would not forgive him and would force him and his people into exile. But he ultimately gets how you have to surrender to the inexorable force of God in the face of your own inadequacies and how to surrender is to worship and to worship is to praise - hence, Hallelujah. You can either do the right thing and worship God from the start, or you can fuck up, be punished, and thus be forced to beg for His forgiveness. Itâs the terrible inevitability of praise thatâs driving him mad.
Like honestly, I identify with this song so strongly as an off-the-derech Jew, I sometimes wonder what Christians can possibly hear in this song, as it speaks so specifically to the sadomasochistic relationship that a lapsed Jew has with their God. Itâs such a different song from a Christian theological perspective itâs almost unrecognizable, man. This song continues to be a wonder of postmodern Jewish theology and sexuality from start to finish. Donât let anyone give you any âJudeo-Christianâ narishkeit. This is a Jewish song.
(Sorry about the wild tangent itâs just 2AM and I love this song so dang much, you guys.)
this is the most powerful image on the internet.. reblog to join the circle
Reblog to destroy all evil energies in your life
Once a boy looked very sadly at me after a little bit of conversation. âyouâre so smartâ he said, âI feel like I couldnât keep upâ. And then he did that sad boy face where youâre supposed to agree to tone yourself down. So I said âprobablyâ and fucked his mate.
some top advice from a slut, here, 90% of the time when some boy looks sad and tells you youâre too âxâ to keep up with itâs a ploy to get you to cut bits off yourself so you can come down to his mediocre level; instead, agree with him and fuck his mate
I am a slut Wen on a dayte With Boye who would Manipulate Iâm not swayâd by His saddened state- I say okay I fuck his mayte
The only good addition to this post
I didnât know Mr. T pityed foolâs that werenât woke, but thatâs awesome. #respect
âI think about my father being called âboyâ, my uncle being called âboyâ, my brother, coming back from Vietnam and being called âboyâ. So I questioned myself: âWhat does a black man have to do before heâs given the respect as a man?â So when I was 18 years old, when I was old enough to fight and die for my country, old enough to drink, old enough to vote, I said I was old enough to be called a man. I self-ordained myself Mr. T so the first word out of everybodyâs mouth is âMr.â Thatâs a sign of respect that my father didnât get, that my brother didnât get, that my mother didnât get.â
-Mr. T on the subject of his name
Traders Joeâs employees are almost to happy to call what they do working. Check this blog!
A classic | he was fuckin it up đ
So then I found this and it all made sense
And i found god in this gamestop
@occasionally-sketchy
This is the most Peter Parker thing I have seen all day
reminder that 30 isnât old, itâs very normal to not accomplish everything in your 20s, and that it is never too late to learn that thing youâve always wanted to learn. youâre always growing. thatâs a good thing.Â
Who the hell accomplishes everything in their 20s? Who made that a thing?
I was 48 when I started my apprenticeship to become a tattoo artist. I was 50 when I married the love of my life.
Youâve got time.
I needed this right now. Iâve got time!!!
Concerning Julietâs age
I find a big stumbling block that comes with teaching Romeo and Juliet is explaining Julietâs age. Juliet is 13 - more precisely, sheâs just on the cusp of turning 14. Though itâs not stated explicitly, Romeo is implied to be a teenager just a few years older than her - perhaps 15 or 16. Most people dismiss Julietâs age by saying âthat was normal back thenâ or âthatâs just how it was.â This is fundamentally untrue, and I will explain why.
In Elizabethan England, girls could legally marry at 12 (boys at 14) but only with their fatherâs permission. However, it was normal for girls to marry after 18 (more commonly in early to mid twenties) and for boys to marry after 21 (more commonly in mid to late twenties). But at 14, a girl could legally marry without papaâs consent. Of course, in doing so she ran the risk of being disowned and left destitute, which is why it was so critical for a young man to obtain the fatherâs goodwill and permission first. Therein lies the reason why we are repeatedly told that Juliet is about to turn 14 in under 2 weeks. This was a critical turning point in her life.
In modern terms, this would be the equivalent of the law in many countries which states children can marry at 16 with their parentsâ permission, or at 18 to whomever they choose - but we see it as pretty weird if someone marries at 16. Theyâre still a kid, we think to ourselves - why would their parents agree to this?
This is exactly the attitude we should take when we look at Romeo and Julietâs clandestine marriage. Today it would be like two 16 year olds marrying in secret. This is NOT normal and would NOT have been received without a raised eyebrow from the audience. Modern audiences AND Elizabethan audiences both look at this and think THEY. ARE. KIDS.
Critically, it is also not normal for fathers to force daughters into marriage at this time. Lord Capulet initially makes a point of telling Julietâs suitor Paris that âmy will to her consent is but a part.â He tells Paris he wants to wait a few years before he lets Juliet marry, and informs him to woo her in the meantime. Obtaining the ladyâs consent was of CRITICAL importance. Itâs why so many of Shakespeareâs plays have such dazzling, well-matched lovers in them, and why men who try to force daughters to marry against their will seldom prosper. You had to let the lady make her own choice. Why?
Put simply, for her health. It was considered a scientific fact that a womanâs health was largely, if not solely, dependant on her womb. Once she reached menarche in her teenage years, it was important to see her fitted with a compatible sexual partner. (For aristocratic girls, who were healthier and enjoyed better diets, menarche generally occurred in the early teens rather than the later teens, as was more normal at the time). The womb was thought to need heat, pleasure, and conception if the woman was to flourish. Catholics might consider virginity a fit state for women, but the reformed English church thought it was borderline unhealthy - sex and marriage was sometimes even prescribed as a medical treatment. A neglected wife or widow could become sick from lack of (pleasurable) sex. Marrying an unfit sexual partner or an older man threatened to put a girlâs health at risk. An unsatisfied woman, made ill by her womb as a result - was a threat to the family unit and the stability of society as a whole. A satisfying sex life with a good husband meant a womb that had the heat it needed to thrive, and by extension a happy and healthy woman.
In Shakespeareâs plays, sexual compatibility between lovers manifests on the stage in wordplay. In Much Ado About Nothing, sparks fly as Benedick and Beatrice quarrel and banter, in comparison to the silence that pervades the relationship between Hero and Claudio, which sours very quickly. Compare to R+J - Lord Capulet tells Paris to woo Juliet, but the two do not communicate. But when Romeo and Juliet meet, their first speech takes the form of a sonnet. They might be young and foolish, but they are in love. Their speech betrays it.
Juliet, on the cusp of 14, would have been recognised as a girl who had reached a legal and biological turning point. Her sexual awakening was upon her, though she cares very little about marriage until she meets the man she loves. They talk, and he wins her wholehearted, unambiguous and enthusiastic consent - all excellent grounds for a relationship, if only she werenât so young.
When Tybalt dies and Romeo is banished, Lord Capulet undergoes a monstrous change from doting father to tyrannical patriarch. Juiletâs consent has to take a back seat to the issue of securing the Capulet house. He needs to win back the princeâs favour and stabilise his family after the murder of his nephew. Julietâs marriage to Paris is the best way to make that happen. Fathers didnât ordinarily throw their daughters around the room to make them marry. Among the nobility, it was sometimes a sad fact that girls were simply expected to agree with their fathersâ choices. They might be coerced with threats of being disowned. But for the VAST majority of people in England - basically everyone non-aristocratic - the idea of forcing a daughter that young to marry would have been received with disgust. And even among the nobility it was only used as a last resort, when the welfare of the family was at stake. Note that aristocratic boys were often in the same position, and would also be coerced into advantageous marriages for the good of the family.
tl;dr:
Q. Was it normal for girls to marry at 13?
A. Hell no!
Q. Was it legal for girls to marry at 13?
A. Not without dadâs consent - Friar Lawrence performs this dodgy ceremony only because he believes it might bring peace between the houses.
Q. Was it normal for fathers to force girls into marriage?
A. Not at this time in England. In noble families, daughters were expected to conform to their parents wishes, but a girlâs consent was encouraged, and the importance of compatibility was recognised.
Q. How should we explain Julietâs age in modern terms?
A. A modern Juliet would be a 17 year old girl whoâs close to turning 18. We all agree that girls should marry whomever they love, but not at 17, right? Weâd say sheâs still a kid and needs to wait a bit before rushing into this marriage. We acknowledge that sheâd be experiencing her sexual awakening, but marrying at this age is odd - sheâs still a child and legally neither her nor Romeo should be marrying without parental permission.
Q. Would Elizabethans have seen Juliet as a child?
A. YES. The force of this tragedy comes from the youth of the lovers. The Montagues and Capulets have created such a hateful, violent and dangerous world for their kids to grow up in that the pangs of teenage passion are enough to destroy the future of their houses. Something as simple as two kids falling in love is enough to lead to tragedy. That is the crux of the story and it should not be glossed over - Shakespeare made Juliet 13 going on 14 for a reason.Â
Romeo and Juliet is the Elizabethan equivalent of  âwonât someone please think of the childrenâ  itâs a romantic tragedy  not a romance  romantic in that itâs a love story  but not a romance in the sense that it is supposed to be emulated  and is likely a social commentary of something happening at the time  whether it was ongoing religious feuds  which did tear families apart  uprisings across the country  or just general malaise with how the world was going in the 1590s  itâs also worth noting that R+J was based heavily on a poem writen  some 30ish years prior  by Arthur Brooke  known as The Tragical History of Romeus and Juliet  which in turn was based on the work of Matteo Bandello  who supposedly based most of his work on real life events  making his association to Lucrezia Gonzaga  an Italian noblewoman  who was married off at the age of 14  likely to solidify some sort of alliance during turbulent times all the more poignant  Shakespeare was and never has been the reserve of the intellectual and elite  that we are taught his work without historical context  robs us of the true value of his work social commentary  and this social commentary would like to have a few words with your false ideas of âhistorical accuracyâ (via @thebibliosphere)
I saw this in my emails and couldnât see why Iâd been tagged in it (all the while nodding vehemently along) and then I saw my tags and ah. Yep. Still forever mad at how badly Shakespeare is taught in most schools.
Jamil plays flighty socialite Tahani al Jamil on the NBC sitcom The Good Place, but in real life she's a disability rights advocate who speaks out against body shaming and extreme beauty standards.
At any given time, the urge to sing âthe lion sleeps tonightâ is just a whim away, a whim away, a whim away, a whim away
What was it he did? I cant miss an opportunity to drag Ross
So! First! He made out with Rachel while he was still dating Julie
THEN, he couldnât decide which one he wanted to date more, so he kept dating Julie and didnât tell Rachel anything about his decision after they had kissed
THEN he made a pros and cons list to decide whether or not to dump Julie so he could date Rachel and he wrote shit like: Too ditzy, too spoiled, too into her looks, not much in common since sheâs just a waitress, and she has fat ankles
THEN, after he finally decided to dump Julie and be with Rachel, he tried to hide the list from her but she found it anyway and got rightfully pissed off
THEN he tried to make all sorts of excuses for the list without actually apologizing
THEN he ignored Rachelâs choice to be alone by CLIMBING UP THE SIDE OF THEIR BUILDING INTO THEIR FUCKING BALCONY to try and force her to listen to him read her âPro-listâ
THEN he gets his other friends to let him into the house after Rachel makes it clear that she doesnât want to see him by going into her room
THEN Rachel tries to explain to him why sheâs so hurt by the list by telling him that all the things he wrote on the list were things she actually hates about herself and it sucks he not only agrees with her but actually uses those things as reasons not to be with her
THEN he CONTINUES to try and make excuses for himself and even try to make her feel bad about being mad at him by turning the situation around by saying âIf things were the other way around, thereâs nothing you could write about me that would make me not want to be with youâ
THEN, after Rachel makes it clear that sheâs not interested in talking to him, he calls Monica and asks her to turn on the radio since he made a song request for her so heâs basically forcing Rachel to listen to him
SO IN CONCLUSION: He didnât apologize ONE TIME for the list, he tried to manipulate Rachel into forgiving him by saying sheâs overreacting, AND proceeded to ignore Rachelâs wishes for a little bit of space continuously
This has been an anti-Ross psa
big SQuish
@mrserinajoestar babe this is really important