I believe artwork’s capacity to be “good” or “bad” can, in large part, be subjective, with the artist themself and those who view it each rightfully and influentially having a role in determining what is art and what art is. Nonetheless, I believe aspects that can contribute to an artwork being good can include thoughtful purpose and craftsmanship as well as a significant impact and influence on its viewers. While each piece of art can hold its own forms of excellence, beauty, and artistry, I believe artwork that is consciously created, thought about and purpose-driven can hold a greater sense of quality and meaning. Begin with and drawing a great portion of its value from the hands and mind of the artists, I believe art that is created with purpose (even if the purpose is to have no purpose at all) and is intentional can add tremendous worth to the work. Not to say that artwork that wasn’t planned or was unexpected doesn’t hold value (for these types of art are extraordinary and can form the basis for experimentation, exploration, and creative nature of art-making), but I do consider art that is thoughtful, methodical, and well-crafted to elicit its own sense of uniqueness and beauty that is treasurable. In addition, I believe art that is influential and mind-provoking also constitutes a work as “good”. While art that doesn’t also has invaluable worth, I think art that has a way of connecting people with new ideas, questions, and contemplations has effects that go beyond words in terms of their value. Being a form through which people can express ideas, construct thoughts, and promote change, art that does this well in terms of its reach and range holds especial “goodness”. Art that allows us to feel, think, and wonder I believe is an effect so powerful and ever so incredibly valuable. While art that is considered “bad” is significantly subjective in numerous ways, I believe art that alternatively lacks thoughtfulness and passion can definitely impact its consideration as a “good” piece of art. As a form of creativity that is so dynamic, expressive, and hold limitless potential, I think art should, in one form or another play off of such aspects. Having purpose (or a lack of it) in what you do can significantly alter your creative process as well as the final product that is produced, with some that appear rushed or with less intentionality placed into them at times conveying little direction or investment into their value. Art can in many ways not have a purpose and still be magnificent and beautiful, however this was the direction (presumably) that the artist consciously chose to take that work. Art that lacks such thought I believe can certainly take away from its “goodness” and hold it to a lower degree of worth. While not seeking to categorize explicity what is “good” and what is “bad”, for I believe much can be said and varied depending on who you talk to about said work(s), art, at is simplest definition, should certainly have meaning, purpose, and, with great hope, expression, creativity, and influence on those who witness it.