Everyone, the man has screwed us, its time to make the movement #TitsoutforTumblr a reality. Female presenting or otherwise, its titty time

ellievsbear
Claire Keane
No title available
Misplaced Lens Cap

pixel skylines

#extradirty
TVSTRANGERTHINGS
Not today Justin
Cosimo Galluzzi

oozey mess

JVL
One Nice Bug Per Day
Peter Solarz
tumblr dot com
todays bird

Product Placement

★
noise dept.
$LAYYYTER
we're not kids anymore.

seen from Malaysia

seen from Malaysia

seen from Malaysia

seen from Canada
seen from South Africa
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from Singapore

seen from Singapore
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from Australia

seen from Germany
seen from Brazil

seen from Sri Lanka

seen from Malaysia
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from T1
@nemeansky
Everyone, the man has screwed us, its time to make the movement #TitsoutforTumblr a reality. Female presenting or otherwise, its titty time
A better, more positive Tumblr
Since its founding in 2007, Tumblr has always been a place for wide open, creative self-expression at the heart of community and culture. To borrow from our founder David Karp, we’re proud to have inspired a generation of artists, writers, creators, curators, and crusaders to redefine our culture and to help empower individuality.
Over the past several months, and inspired by our storied past, we’ve given serious thought to who we want to be to our community moving forward and have been hard at work laying the foundation for a better Tumblr. We’ve realized that in order to continue to fulfill our promise and place in culture, especially as it evolves, we must change. Some of that change began with fostering more constructive dialogue among our community members. Today, we’re taking another step by no longer allowing adult content, including explicit sexual content and nudity (with some exceptions).
Let’s first be unequivocal about something that should not be confused with today’s policy change: posting anything that is harmful to minors, including child pornography, is abhorrent and has no place in our community. We’ve always had and always will have a zero tolerance policy for this type of content. To this end, we continuously invest in the enforcement of this policy, including industry-standard machine monitoring, a growing team of human moderators, and user tools that make it easy to report abuse. We also closely partner with the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children and the Internet Watch Foundation, two invaluable organizations at the forefront of protecting our children from abuse, and through these partnerships we report violations of this policy to law enforcement authorities. We can never prevent all bad actors from attempting to abuse our platform, but we make it our highest priority to keep the community as safe as possible.
So what is changing?
Posts that contain adult content will no longer be allowed on Tumblr, and we’ve updated our Community Guidelines to reflect this policy change. We recognize Tumblr is also a place to speak freely about topics like art, sex positivity, your relationships, your sexuality, and your personal journey. We want to make sure that we continue to foster this type of diversity of expression in the community, so our new policy strives to strike a balance.
Why are we doing this?
It is our continued, humble aspiration that Tumblr be a safe place for creative expression, self-discovery, and a deep sense of community. As Tumblr continues to grow and evolve, and our understanding of our impact on our world becomes clearer, we have a responsibility to consider that impact across different age groups, demographics, cultures, and mindsets. We spent considerable time weighing the pros and cons of expression in the community that includes adult content. In doing so, it became clear that without this content we have the opportunity to create a place where more people feel comfortable expressing themselves.
Bottom line: There are no shortage of sites on the internet that feature adult content. We will leave it to them and focus our efforts on creating the most welcoming environment possible for our community.
So what’s next?
Starting December 17, 2018, we will begin enforcing this new policy. Community members with content that is no longer permitted on Tumblr will get a heads up from us in advance and steps they can take to appeal or preserve their content outside the community if they so choose. All changes won’t happen overnight as something of this complexity takes time.
Another thing, filtering this type of content versus say, a political protest with nudity or the statue of David, is not simple at scale. We’re relying on automated tools to identify adult content and humans to help train and keep our systems in check. We know there will be mistakes, but we’ve done our best to create and enforce a policy that acknowledges the breadth of expression we see in the community.
Most importantly, we’re going to be as transparent as possible with you about the decisions we’re making and resources available to you, including more detailed information, product enhancements, and more content moderators to interface directly with the community and content.
Like you, we love Tumblr and what it’s come to mean for millions of people around the world. Our actions are out of love and hope for our community. We won’t always get this right, especially in the beginning, but we are determined to make your experience a positive one.
Jeff D’Onofrio CEO
@staff “female presenting nipples”??? Just say you want to propagate the criminalization of and shame surrounding non cis male bodies and go
B/W
since im on a roll with people in clothes
prince zuko got you all out here thinking every dark haired antagonist boy is gonna do right in the end when zuzu was the exception not the rule
I really wish it weren’t though? I think it’s really telling that a lot of people like redemption arcs because we want to see people be good despite their pasts. The fact that there are so little redemption arcs in media is very upsetting because it just sends the message that people can’t change which we know is not true. I absolutely don’t mean this for characters like Kylo Ren though lol
Redemption arcs are hard and Zuko’s was successful for a couple of reasons:
1) Zuko wasn’t the worst character in the Fire Nation. From really early on it was shown that, compared to Zhao, Azula, and other Fire Nation leaders, Zuko was consistently more noble. He tried to be a good person and do the right thing, even when doing so led to him suffering for his actions.
2) Zuko suffered for his mistakes. He suffered when he turned away from Iroh, he suffered when he betrayed Iroh, and he suffered even after his face turn. There were consequences for his mistakes; he didn’t get off scot free because his childhood was hard. He was still held accountable by the narrative and made to take responsibility for the wrongs he did.
3) Zuko made tangible amends to the people he hurt. He rescued Hakoda, helped Katara get closure, and became Aang’s firebending master. He put in work to make up for the things he did and rebuild bridges with his new allies.
Most redemption narratives fail because the guilty party is guilty of much greater crimes than failing to capture the hero, never works to make amends, and never suffers for their mistakes. You wanted to see Zuko redeem himself because he had the capacity, wanted to do the work, and paid dearly for his mistakes.
you’re right and you should say it
Best pun for “Dog Hat” wins. And GO! “Good Characters” here. More D&D Stories.
😢 ❤️ 👏🏽
I love how he let him cry, told him, “We cry as men” and didn’t hit him with the whole, “Big boys don’t cry” mess. That was lovely.
Phenomenal. Allowed him to emote, then worked with him to understand the what and the why.
This gave me chills; this man is a true teacher. Children are definitely intelligent enough to understand the hard truths of life if you are intelligent and patient enough to know how to teach it to them. This is such an amazing example of respect to this kid’s emotions and maturation that you don’t always see adults extending to a young person.
Fucking finally.
@warriormale
Yes, Manliness involves showing emotions.
Emotions mean we are human.
To cry means we are human.
WarriorMale
In your opinion, what is the line between the bury your gays trope and a lgbt character dying? And do you have advice to not fall into that trope if you have any. Hope this isn't coming off as rude just a genuine question
bury your gays: one lgbt character (or more) is killed. they are one of very few lgbt characters in that piece of media, or at the very least they are one of the few MAIN queer characters of that media. in proportion to the cishet characters, the queer characters have a much higher death toll, for no particular reason.bury your gays often quickly follows a character being revealed as gay/in a relationship with a same-sex character.
if you have already buried your gays, here’s how you can fix it: make more queer characters and DON’T kill them off (or make them suffer disproportionate abuse). you can also just. straight up bring them back if the story allows it somehow (see: the adventure zone- they brought back a dead lesbian couple as driads and made more queer characters)
killing off an lgbt character without it fitting into previous trope: have plenty of lgbt characters in your story, so that you’re not killing the one representation there is in it. make that death matter. it can’t be some unceremonious/dumb or avoidable death presented as a casualty (see: voltron, the 100 - both unceremoniously killed gay characters quickly after they were revealed to be in a relationship. DONT DO THIS). if an lgbt character dies, then that means other characters mustve died before as well, they can’t be the one death toll there is (this is a problem pretty similar to “the black guy dies first”)
all in all, just make diverse characters and respect them as well as your audience, and don’t go for cheap plot twists by killing off characters for pure shock value.
I understand the sentiment behind this but it worries me at the same time because it could set the precedent of making lgbt characters untouchable. I want my lgbt characters treated the same as their straight counterparts, and that includes killing them too.
about half of the answer to this ask is literally dedicated to telling you how to kill an lgbt character without it being a homophobic trope. i am telling you to treat your lgbt characters like any other characters (ergo: with fucking respect).
and the thing is, if you only have one (1) queer character and you kill them off, no matter how well it is written, it’s still gonna be in the bury your gays category.
so really what im saying is: just write a bunch of queer characters into your stories and you wont have to fear playing into shitty tropes
Yes I’m aware of what you wrote. I have eyes. I already do what you suggested in my writing anyways and have done for years. I can worry about the issue without being part of the other side of the problem.
Regardless, it could set a precedent if left unchecked. Certain people will not stop at that even if loads of the characters were gay, and will complain that the killing of any gay character is queer baiting or burying the gays or whatever other bullshit they want to throw up instead of just accepting their favourite character is dead.
I was wondering aloud. That’s all.
and the thing is, if you only have one (1) queer character and you kill them off, no matter how well it is written, it’s still gonna be in the bury your gays category.
Bullshit.
You say treat gay characters like any other character. That means killing them if it is required. Shielding them because they’re gay is you actively protecting them for ideological reasons.
The LGBT makes up something like 5% of any given population. Expecting multiple LGBT characters in some settings are not reasonable. Expecting those characters to be treated with kids gloves is infantalizing.
If a straight character is killed as a cheap ploy for drama or to ratchet up tension, nobody cares that they’re straight. The same should be said for gay characters. Call out the practice of shock deaths all you want, keep the LGBT out of it.
Your stupid approach to this creates a ‘checklist’ of characters, AKA TOKENS. Having an extra gay character just so you can have the option of killing the first gay character is just as much tokenism as blatantly inserting a black character for asspats.
Your entire post is just a guilt trip, to try and twist creative’s arms to insert more of what you want into their story. You don’t need to insert more LGBT characters into your story if you don’t want to. Having one LGBT character in your story is okay. Killing off that character is fine. You do not need “back up gays”.
-Sincerely, A lesbian writer and creative
Making characters some kind of stupid deites just because their sexual orientation is ridiculous. Their sexuality shouldn’t matter, their personalities should. If you are gonna have a character centered only in what and how they are dating, that character is gonna be a plain coodboard.
Agree with the person above in all, this post is guiltripping bullshit.
Sincerely,
A bisexual writer and performer.
I can’t help but wonder how many of these people saying @polyglotplatypus is wrong are too young to remember when every queer character ever got killed off. Or, if they were lucky they got to live, but they never got to be happy (i.e. killing off one half of couple). It’s still a common trope in mainstream media to this day, for fuck’s sake, so fucking sue us if we want to see that trope subverted and see characters that represent us actually get to live and be happy. And they even said, it’s not that you can never kill a queer character, just don’t kill the only queer character. It’s advice, not a mandate. It’s still up to individual creators to decide whether or not to perpetuate a trope that was nothing more than homophobia disguised as performative allyship. “Treat them like any other character, that means killing them if necessary” is straight out of the performative allyship handbook btw. “Look, I’m progressive! I have one gay character in my novel/movie/tv show! However, I don’t actually care about the inner lives of queer people and I for sure don’t want to have to write a same sex romantic subplot (ick!), sooo I’ll just kill them off.* Tragedy is much more compelling anyway, right?”
*Corollary: I’ll write a hot lesbian couple because lesbians are more acceptable to the 18-40 male demographic, then kill one of them because tragedy is more compelling anyway, right? Then I get the most coveted viewership AND woke points.“
And now young lgbtq+ writers on this site are like, excuse you, but choosing to not kill a queer character just because they’re queer is tokenizing LGBT and having more than one or two queer characters is not even that realistic, anyway, not even realizing that queer characters in mainstream media are considered so disposable BECAUSE they are nothing more than token characters. Not even realizing they are rejecting the radical concept of including more than one queer character and maybe not killing any of them because “only 5 percent of the population is gay, it’s not realistic” and “I have to treat my gay character the same, that means killing them if the plot requires it (funny how often that happens, right?)” Because they have been STEEPED in these tropes all their lives.
Go ahead and give your queer characters plotshield, fuck, the straight male hero ALREADY ALWAYS has plot shield, so why the fuck not?
I think people calling this bullshit are missing this point
“in proportion to the cishet characters, the queer characters have a much higher death toll, for no particular reason”
If you kill your queer character in similar proportions than your cishet ones, it’s not a “kill your gays” situation.
That’s it.
That’s all.
It’s a slasher ? Kill your queers as you wish, ‘cause everybody’s dying horribly anyway.
It’s a soft romance and you want only one terrible death ? Don’t choose the only one important queer character if you have more than one important cishet character.
(and 5% of queer people only IRL ? O_o)
*Color*face
Since Tumblr cannot tell racism apart from sharing culture, I would like to point something out.
This is yellowface:
This is not:
This is blackface:
This is not:
*color*face is the intentional mockery of a race by imitating an epitomized and perceived stereotype,typically for comedy purposes. *color*face is not a person sharing in a culture or doing something you assume was ‘invented’ by another race. *color*face is not an actor who happens to play a character of a different race. *color*face is not someone with a tan. *color*face is not someone cosplaying as a nonhuman.
So to recap,
Blackface:
not blackface:
Yellowface:
not yellowface:
There ya go
-Yuki
👏🏾👏🏾👏🏾👏🏾👏🏾thanks op
My dumbass thought the first pic was a screencap of the black face in Always Sunny when they film Lethal Weapon 6
Nope, Dave Chappelle doing his Yellowface Asian stereotype, which was only one of many. He also did a hispanic one, multiple white ones, and black one.
He even frequently colors his skin for the white one.
Despite him literally wearing a race as a costume, people havent really gotten mad at him for this (But they will get mad and cry racism at Chris pratt for getting a tan).
dave Chappell is funny tho yall are just little babeys comedy should be pushed to the limits of being uncomfortable because shock value is funny if done right. its very hard to do but he did it right and more comedians need to explore this level of comedy before it becomes illegal because waahhh my feelings got hurt
Just sort of a double standard. The same people overreacting and calling dreadlocks blackface dont have a problem with black people doing yellow or whiteface.
Like literally Japanese people doing blackface was considered bad, but Dave Chappelle doing Yellowface got nothing but laughs.
Either *color*face is acceptable or it isnt. You have to choose.
White people wearing dreds without understanding their meaning to black culture or even that they came from black culture is all too common in the hippie town i come from. They were a symbol of black resistance and whities wear them like their cute little accessory, thats still cultural appropriation. I agree with the rest of this post but using dreds was a bad example.
trickster gods having a dance-off
That’s alot of chaotic energy in one video
i looked up the song thats playing in the background only to discover that the guy in the smiley face hoody literally wrote and recorded it this is his song
Shit slaps tho like that’s impressive
We live in a society
ITS MINGUS
cool dog
Shrek (2001)
Why is this so well rendered?
I’m fucking speechless
this is what anxiety is like
a kid who went to my school last year sent me this
I’ve finally managed to make a vine compilation short enough that Tumblr will let me post it!
I thought it wasn’t possible to crack an egg in your palm like that how to fuck did he
This is a good one 12/10
this is legit my favorite vine compilation ever, i’m crying
#Erin your friend Jackie is in it and it’s a different vine than usual! – lmao omg elvira your tags are the best