MOVED

MOVED

[ngc-6853-moved]

To preface          —           this is post is in no way, shape or form directed at mutuals (I assure you, it is not...).

Now, I find I will be putting a figurative 'lid' on ships going onwards. This does not mean I am completely against the idea of shipping or that I will refuse outright if there’s genuine chemistry          —          it merely means I will be approaching things more carefully, especially when it comes to male characters.

I am trying to phrase this as respectfully as possible, but I want to be clear: my character is not here to be another's character f*** folder. She has agency outside of a sexual dynamic. She has agency outside of a ship. I do not seek for her to exist solely within this type of dynamic or only be engaged with through that lens. It is not only disrespectful to me, but it is disrespectful to her character.

Please, let her not be reduced her to:

a ship

smut

her face claim(s)

[ngc-6853-moved]

To preface          —           this is post is in no way, shape or form directed at mutuals (I assure you, it is not...).

Now, I find I will be putting a figurative 'lid' on ships going onwards. This does not mean I am completely against the idea of shipping or that I will refuse outright if there’s genuine chemistry          —          it merely means I will be approaching things more carefully, especially when it comes to male characters.

I am trying to phrase this as respectfully as possible, but I want to be clear: my character is not here to be another's character f*** folder. She has agency outside of a sexual dynamic. She has agency outside of a ship. I do not seek for her to exist solely within this type of dynamic or only be engaged with through that lens. It is not only disrespectful to me, but it is disrespectful to her character.

Please, let her not be reduced her to:

a ship

smut

her face claim(s)

[ngc-6853-moved]

To preface          —           this is post is in no way, shape or form directed at mutuals (I assure you, it is not...).

Now, I find I will be putting a figurative 'lid' on ships going onwards. This does not mean I am completely against the idea of shipping or that I will refuse outright if there’s genuine chemistry          —          it merely means I will be approaching things more carefully, especially when it comes to male characters.

I am trying to phrase this as respectfully as possible, but I want to be clear: my character is not here to be another's character f*** folder. She has agency outside of a sexual dynamic. She has agency outside of a ship. I do not seek for her to exist solely within this type of dynamic or only be engaged with through that lens. It is not only disrespectful to me, but it is disrespectful to her character.

Please, let her not be reduced her to:

a ship

smut

her face claim(s)

[ngc-6853-moved]

To preface          —           this is post is in no way, shape or form directed at mutuals (I assure you, it is not...).

Now, I find I will be putting a figurative 'lid' on ships going onwards. This does not mean I am completely against the idea of shipping or that I will refuse outright if there’s genuine chemistry          —          it merely means I will be approaching things more carefully, especially when it comes to male characters.

I am trying to phrase this as respectfully as possible, but I want to be clear: my character is not here to be another's character f*** folder. She has agency outside of a sexual dynamic. She has agency outside of a ship. I do not seek for her to exist solely within this type of dynamic or only be engaged with through that lens. It is not only disrespectful to me, but it is disrespectful to her character.

Please, let her not be reduced her to:

a ship

smut

her face claim(s)

[ngc-6853-moved]

To preface          —           this is post is in no way, shape or form directed at mutuals (I assure you, it is not...).

Now, I find I will be putting a figurative 'lid' on ships going onwards. This does not mean I am completely against the idea of shipping or that I will refuse outright if there’s genuine chemistry          —          it merely means I will be approaching things more carefully, especially when it comes to male characters.

I am trying to phrase this as respectfully as possible, but I want to be clear: my character is not here to be another's character f*** folder. She has agency outside of a sexual dynamic. She has agency outside of a ship. I do not seek for her to exist solely within this type of dynamic or only be engaged with through that lens. It is not only disrespectful to me, but it is disrespectful to her character.

Please, let her not be reduced her to:

a ship

smut

her face claim(s)

[ngc-6853-moved]

To preface          —           this is post is in no way, shape or form directed at mutuals (I assure you, it is not...).

Now, I find I will be putting a figurative 'lid' on ships going onwards. This does not mean I am completely against the idea of shipping or that I will refuse outright if there’s genuine chemistry          —          it merely means I will be approaching things more carefully, especially when it comes to male characters.

I am trying to phrase this as respectfully as possible, but I want to be clear: my character is not here to be another's character f*** folder. She has agency outside of a sexual dynamic. She has agency outside of a ship. I do not seek for her to exist solely within this type of dynamic or only be engaged with through that lens. It is not only disrespectful to me, but it is disrespectful to her character.

Please, let her not be reduced her to:

a ship

smut

her face claim(s)

[ngc-6853-moved]

To preface          —           this is post is in no way, shape or form directed at mutuals (I assure you, it is not...).

Now, I find I will be putting a figurative 'lid' on ships going onwards. This does not mean I am completely against the idea of shipping or that I will refuse outright if there’s genuine chemistry          —          it merely means I will be approaching things more carefully, especially when it comes to male characters.

I am trying to phrase this as respectfully as possible, but I want to be clear: my character is not here to be another's character f*** folder. She has agency outside of a sexual dynamic. She has agency outside of a ship. I do not seek for her to exist solely within this type of dynamic or only be engaged with through that lens. It is not only disrespectful to me, but it is disrespectful to her character.

Please, let her not be reduced her to:

a ship

smut

her face claim(s)

[ngc-6853-moved]

To preface          —           this is post is in no way, shape or form directed at mutuals (I assure you, it is not...).

Now, I find I will be putting a figurative 'lid' on ships going onwards. This does not mean I am completely against the idea of shipping or that I will refuse outright if there’s genuine chemistry          —          it merely means I will be approaching things more carefully, especially when it comes to male characters.

I am trying to phrase this as respectfully as possible, but I want to be clear: my character is not here to be another's character f*** folder. She has agency outside of a sexual dynamic. She has agency outside of a ship. I do not seek for her to exist solely within this type of dynamic or only be engaged with through that lens. It is not only disrespectful to me, but it is disrespectful to her character.

Please, let her not be reduced her to:

a ship

smut

her face claim(s)

[ngc-6853-moved]

To preface          —           this is post is in no way, shape or form directed at mutuals (I assure you, it is not...).

Now, I find I will be putting a figurative 'lid' on ships going onwards. This does not mean I am completely against the idea of shipping or that I will refuse outright if there’s genuine chemistry          —          it merely means I will be approaching things more carefully, especially when it comes to male characters.

I am trying to phrase this as respectfully as possible, but I want to be clear: my character is not here to be another's character f*** folder. She has agency outside of a sexual dynamic. She has agency outside of a ship. I do not seek for her to exist solely within this type of dynamic or only be engaged with through that lens. It is not only disrespectful to me, but it is disrespectful to her character.

Please, let her not be reduced her to:

a ship

smut

her face claim(s)

[ngc-6853-moved]

To preface          —           this is post is in no way, shape or form directed at mutuals (I assure you, it is not...).

Now, I find I will be putting a figurative 'lid' on ships going onwards. This does not mean I am completely against the idea of shipping or that I will refuse outright if there’s genuine chemistry          —          it merely means I will be approaching things more carefully, especially when it comes to male characters.

I am trying to phrase this as respectfully as possible, but I want to be clear: my character is not here to be another's character f*** folder. She has agency outside of a sexual dynamic. She has agency outside of a ship. I do not seek for her to exist solely within this type of dynamic or only be engaged with through that lens. It is not only disrespectful to me, but it is disrespectful to her character.

Please, let her not be reduced her to:

a ship

smut

her face claim(s)

[ngc-6853-moved]

To preface          —           this is post is in no way, shape or form directed at mutuals (I assure you, it is not...).

Now, I find I will be putting a figurative 'lid' on ships going onwards. This does not mean I am completely against the idea of shipping or that I will refuse outright if there’s genuine chemistry          —          it merely means I will be approaching things more carefully, especially when it comes to male characters.

I am trying to phrase this as respectfully as possible, but I want to be clear: my character is not here to be another's character f*** folder. She has agency outside of a sexual dynamic. She has agency outside of a ship. I do not seek for her to exist solely within this type of dynamic or only be engaged with through that lens. It is not only disrespectful to me, but it is disrespectful to her character.

Please, let her not be reduced her to:

a ship

smut

her face claim(s)

[ngc-6853-moved]

To preface          —           this is post is in no way, shape or form directed at mutuals (I assure you, it is not...).

Now, I find I will be putting a figurative 'lid' on ships going onwards. This does not mean I am completely against the idea of shipping or that I will refuse outright if there’s genuine chemistry          —          it merely means I will be approaching things more carefully, especially when it comes to male characters.

I am trying to phrase this as respectfully as possible, but I want to be clear: my character is not here to be another's character f*** folder. She has agency outside of a sexual dynamic. She has agency outside of a ship. I do not seek for her to exist solely within this type of dynamic or only be engaged with through that lens. It is not only disrespectful to me, but it is disrespectful to her character.

Please, let her not be reduced her to:

a ship

smut

her face claim(s)

[ngc-6853-moved]

To preface          —           this is post is in no way, shape or form directed at mutuals (I assure you, it is not...).

Now, I find I will be putting a figurative 'lid' on ships going onwards. This does not mean I am completely against the idea of shipping or that I will refuse outright if there’s genuine chemistry          —          it merely means I will be approaching things more carefully, especially when it comes to male characters.

I am trying to phrase this as respectfully as possible, but I want to be clear: my character is not here to be another's character f*** folder. She has agency outside of a sexual dynamic. She has agency outside of a ship. I do not seek for her to exist solely within this type of dynamic or only be engaged with through that lens. It is not only disrespectful to me, but it is disrespectful to her character.

Please, let her not be reduced her to:

a ship

smut

her face claim(s)

[ngc-6853-moved]

To preface          —           this is post is in no way, shape or form directed at mutuals (I assure you, it is not...).

Now, I find I will be putting a figurative 'lid' on ships going onwards. This does not mean I am completely against the idea of shipping or that I will refuse outright if there’s genuine chemistry          —          it merely means I will be approaching things more carefully, especially when it comes to male characters.

I am trying to phrase this as respectfully as possible, but I want to be clear: my character is not here to be another's character f*** folder. She has agency outside of a sexual dynamic. She has agency outside of a ship. I do not seek for her to exist solely within this type of dynamic or only be engaged with through that lens. It is not only disrespectful to me, but it is disrespectful to her character.

Please, let her not be reduced her to:

a ship

smut

her face claim(s)

[ngc-6853-moved]

To preface          —           this is post is in no way, shape or form directed at mutuals (I assure you, it is not...).

Now, I find I will be putting a figurative 'lid' on ships going onwards. This does not mean I am completely against the idea of shipping or that I will refuse outright if there’s genuine chemistry          —          it merely means I will be approaching things more carefully, especially when it comes to male characters.

I am trying to phrase this as respectfully as possible, but I want to be clear: my character is not here to be another's character f*** folder. She has agency outside of a sexual dynamic. She has agency outside of a ship. I do not seek for her to exist solely within this type of dynamic or only be engaged with through that lens. It is not only disrespectful to me, but it is disrespectful to her character.

Please, let her not be reduced her to:

a ship

smut

her face claim(s)

[ngc-6853-moved]

To preface          —           this is post is in no way, shape or form directed at mutuals (I assure you, it is not...).

Now, I find I will be putting a figurative 'lid' on ships going onwards. This does not mean I am completely against the idea of shipping or that I will refuse outright if there’s genuine chemistry          —          it merely means I will be approaching things more carefully, especially when it comes to male characters.

I am trying to phrase this as respectfully as possible, but I want to be clear: my character is not here to be another's character f*** folder. She has agency outside of a sexual dynamic. She has agency outside of a ship. I do not seek for her to exist solely within this type of dynamic or only be engaged with through that lens. It is not only disrespectful to me, but it is disrespectful to her character.

Please, let her not be reduced her to:

a ship

smut

her face claim(s)

[ngc-6853-moved]

To preface          —           this is post is in no way, shape or form directed at mutuals (I assure you, it is not...).

Now, I find I will be putting a figurative 'lid' on ships going onwards. This does not mean I am completely against the idea of shipping or that I will refuse outright if there’s genuine chemistry          —          it merely means I will be approaching things more carefully, especially when it comes to male characters.

I am trying to phrase this as respectfully as possible, but I want to be clear: my character is not here to be another's character f*** folder. She has agency outside of a sexual dynamic. She has agency outside of a ship. I do not seek for her to exist solely within this type of dynamic or only be engaged with through that lens. It is not only disrespectful to me, but it is disrespectful to her character.

Please, let her not be reduced her to:

a ship

smut

her face claim(s)