DanoneCOSA Final from Nicolas Rolland on Vimeo.
PUT YOUR BEARD IN MY MOUTH
Lint Roller? I Barely Know Her
Not today Justin
Jules of Nature
will byers stan first human second
Three Goblin Art

titsay
Peter Solarz
hello vonnie
Aqua Utopia|海の底で記憶を紡ぐ
One Nice Bug Per Day
i don't do bad sauce passes
todays bird
Claire Keane
TVSTRANGERTHINGS
2025 on Tumblr: Trends That Defined the Year
No title available
DEAR READER
KIROKAZE
Cosimo Galluzzi

seen from United States

seen from Malaysia

seen from Türkiye
seen from Canada

seen from Morocco
seen from United States
seen from Germany

seen from United States
seen from Mexico
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from Malaysia
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Malaysia
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States
@nicolasrolland
DanoneCOSA Final from Nicolas Rolland on Vimeo.
EngieU_Teaser_Festival_100820.mp4 from Nicolas Rolland on Vimeo.
6 Stéphane from Nicolas Rolland on Vimeo.
2_ENGIE_Why_EN from Nicolas Rolland on Vimeo.
3_ENGIE_What_EN from Nicolas Rolland on Vimeo.
4_ENGIE_How_EN from Nicolas Rolland on Vimeo.
1_FILM PRIDE EN from Nicolas Rolland on Vimeo.
Du Leaders Héro au Leadership Distribué
Pour répondre à l'accélération des rythmes du changement dans un environnement plus inconnu qu'incertain, les entreprises souhaitent développer leur agilité organisationnelle.
L'agilité repose sur la capacité à décentraliser et à abaisser le centre de gravité des prises de décisions. Elle s'exprime dans la capacité à remettre en cause les certitudes, à entreprendre, à apprendre continuellement et à penser "solution". Elle doit surtout s'accompagner d'une redéfinition du principe même de leadership. Celui-là même qui a été déployé pendant les années d’or du « Leader Héro ». L’agilité demande au leader d’inspirer, de donner du sens, de développer ses équipes et de construire le futur. Mais pour être plus structurel il convient d’adopter une approche distribuée du leadership. Passer d’un style de leadership qui se focalise sur les attributs et les compétences des « leaders » vers un leadership plus systémique qui est conçu comme un processus collectif social et émergeant au travers des interactions multiples entre les acteurs. Autrement dit, passer d’une approche d’agrégation des contributions individuelles à une approche holistique. Le leadership est alors conçu comme un système dynamique et émergeant plutôt que statique et prédéfini.
Le leadership distribué n’est pas pour autant dépourvu de courage, de charisme et d’authenticité mais fait naître une vision plus collective de l’entreprise que le héro, seul sauveur d’une organisation en péril qui fera tout, tout seul.
Learning Organization Revival
In the 90′s the concept of Learning Organization was a buzz word. 3 decades later, we are witnessing a comeback of the concept embracing new dimensions and new challenges. This revival is due to the financial crisis started a decade ago and to the emergence of the digital era. Most of the companies have now understood that the economic environment will not go back to a stable situation and that volatility is now structural. Business wise we are living in an environment that is continuously changing, where the pace of change accelerates drastically and where business models disruption can appear anytime. Coming together, these changes imply that companies need to be more and more agile to adapt constantly and to improve systematically the way they perform to be at the cutting edge of the competitiveness. To compete in that world, individuals and organizations Learning Organization : what does it means? The concept became famous with the Fifth Discipline in which Senge (1990) described Learning Organization within the field of Organizational Behavior based on a paradigm that sees Learning as a process unfolding over time, links with knowledge acquisition, impacting routines and behaviors and improving performance. A learning organization is an organization able at creating, acquiring, and transferring knowledge, and at modifying its behavior to reflect new knowledge and insights. It's a place “where people continually expand their capacity to create the results they truly desire, where new and expansive patterns of thinking are nurtured, where collective aspiration is set free, and where people are continually learning how to learn together." 20 years before Senge popularized the concept, Schon already postulated that "the loss of the stable state means that our society and all the institutions are in continuous process of transformation.... We must learn to understand, guide, influence and manage these transformations. We must take the capacity for undertaking them integral to ourselves and to our institutions. We must become adept at learning. We must become able not only to transform our institutions but to invent and develop institutions which are learning system, that is to say, systems capable of bringing about their own continuing transformation" (Schon, 1973). If the word "institution" looks old-fashioned, the link between volatility and continuous process of adaptation has already been established. In practice, "learning organizations are skilled at 5 main activities: systematic problem solving, experimentation with new approaches, learning from their own experiences and best practices of others, and transferring knowledge quickly and efficiently throughout the organization" (Senge 1990). Learning Organization: what's up? If the 5 activities remain the core subject and challenge, current Learning Organizations refer to 4 dimensions: the Ecosystem of the company, its Organization, the Technology/expertise and the individuals. Nowadays, what makes the concept of Learning organization even more powerful is the porosity of today's companies with their environment and the diversity of stakeholders that they have to manage. When we talk about learning organization we do not only conceive the organization as a defined social entity but also as an ecosystem in which the progress of the organization has not only an impact on itself but has also a collateral impact on its ecosystem and how it perform. In a volatile environment, the more pioneering companies learn and perform, the more its ecosystem is influenced, learns and follows. Learning organization are able to learn from its ecosystem and the ecosystem of communities that it is made of; but it performs in influencing the learning of these ecosystems and communities. In this VUCA world, companies need to develop the organizational capability to constantly progress and adapt their organization. It looks obvious but it's definitively not the easiest part. Not only it means the company is able to understand foresight of its business and the need of the organization to support this strategy but also it means it is able to adapt smoothly and quickly to this new state of its organization. Building a fully agile organization refers to manage the ego of (senior) managers and could lead to disengagement or to status-quo due to resistant forces. But neurosciences recently stressed-up that it also means being able to unlearn and to explore new opportunities of learning that is not so natural for the human body. That's why it looks better to build a culture of continuous improvement and progress with rituals and values supporting this principle, and to as soon as possible design an agile architecture of the organization supported by a coherence in the process. A Learning Organization is strongly supported by a systemic view of the process, practices and values. Due to the acceleration of the pace of change in the technologies, it looks obvious to declare that companies, to remain competitive (and even to survive) need to be able to constantly adapt to new technologies and to emerging new business models associated. Looking alike the theory of the dominant design (Utterback and Abernathy, 1975) companies, once again have to adapt, quickly but also create the condition to influence when they pioneer new technologies or if the disrupt the environment. Talking about technology and expertise in a VUCA world, a learning organization is no more only a company able to share good practices but a company able to scale-up its key competencies, expertise or technology. The scalability of learning and the capability that organizations develop to scale and replicate quickly strategic competence is a source of competitive advantage. In other words, defining its core competencies is the foundation for competing, but being able to quickly deploying, replicating this capabilities is the main source of sustainability and define the learning organization as the successful organization. An exponential organization (Ismael 2014) is able to scale in keeping the decision making process lean, in distributing leadership and in continuously learning to improve. Last but not least, a learning organization is able to create the conditions to develop the competencies and the employability of its employees to sustain the growth of the company. Jobs are more and more changing quickly due to the emergence of digital and competitive disruption but the impact of AI on some of them set a new tone in the way to thing about upskilling and reskilling. A learning organization is able to create a learning system unlocking the learnability of the employees in leveraging a culture of continuous improvement. It unleashes the flexibility of learning in multiplying learning opportunities with a diversity of modalities and different times. Taking in consideration that progress and continuous improvement are the new fuel for competitivity, sustainability and performance, it looks obvious that the concept of Learning Organization is the buzz word and is a revival paradigm. But with the acceleration of the pace of change, companies must take their ability to learn to a much higher level focusing on the different level of the ecosystem, the organization, the expertise and technology and on the individual.
Evolution of L&D careers
Facing with drastic changes in the corporate world, the L&D jobs are mutating.
http://www.clomedia.com/2017/08/17/future-learning-careers/
Manufacturing is dirty, dull, and outmoded. It’s a slow-moving industry stuck in the past as new technologies out of Silicon Valley threaten to upend it. Stereotypes are fun, and misleading. Let’s not forget manufacturing is the industry that made the modern age. While many were musing about robots in science fiction, manufacturers were putting them …
Delighting the learner experience
Facing with strong acceleration in the pace of change due to shift in the society, the volatility of the economic environment, the globalization, the technological revolution, companies and employees have in common the need to create the conditions for their success. The question about their ability to adapt and change is increasingly crucial.
Companies need to become eager to improve and to transform continuously, to become agile, to think ahead proactively without waiting for the change of the environment, to create its space of competitiveness. It could only be done if internally employees develop eagerness to learn and simultaneously their ability to learn. It’s a right for employees to be trained but it’s also a duty for their employability and a duty to sustain performance and earning.
The Learning department is the cornerstone of this ambition. Our mission is to create the conditions to provide employees with contents that contribute to their capability to sustain company’s economic performance and competitiveness. In the same time, employees have to empower themselves to continuously learn, acquire knowledge, develop competencies to sustain their employability. Our responsibility is to offer them attractive and developing learning formats. To achieve this mission we need to delight the learner experience. That means enhancing 3 principles:
- Unlock the learnability (of the employees and the organization) in leveraging a culture of continuous improvement:
Create a multimodal learning ecosystem : digital, social, experiential
Develop new and innovative practices of open action – high touch learning
Foster learning from outside
- Unleash the flexibility of learning in multiplying learning opportunities with a diversity of modalities
Design adapted interface to push learning objects and revisit the pedagogical model to customized learning paths.
Segment learning offers to address different types of learners.
Use data to predict and to suggest learning objects.
Simplify the evaluation & monitor the impact of learning actions on competencies
- Bring personalized learning offers and paths through modular programs
Let the employees the power to choose their learning approach.
Work on the learning environment: high frequency and short time, continuous feedback, ... that embeds learning in the daily job and put the employee in a learning situation.
Empower the manager to support the development of their team.
To read more, there is a great report from The Economist on the imperative of lifelong learning http://econ.st/2jLNXVa .
Jobs and robots = +
Few months ago Zoe Wiliams were asking “If robots are the future of work, where do humans fit in?” explaining that we need to rethink our view of jobs and leisure – and adapt quickly, if we are to avoid becoming obsolete.
The future of work is the end of meaningless jobs and is a great opportunity for creativity. We will have collectively to imagine and define how to serve the community. To have jobs, people will have to do creative work or work in a service industry that requires the human touch.”
This recent survey from PWC conforts this position. We will still need people and jobs: “Technology also creates new jobs: jobs for people who can design, monitor, maintain and fix technology; jobs for people in sectors that benefit indirectly from technology; and new versions of ‘old-world’ jobs.”
http://www.pwc.com/gx/en/ceo-agenda/ceosurvey/2017/gx/talent.html
We don’t have to be afraid and have to embrace the change.
Exponential leadership
Exponential leadership is the ability to reshape the limits of the leaders’s vision.
In an exponential world, leaders need to get comfortable asking open-ended questions about unspoken assumptions to see new possibilities and business opportunities. A great lesson of leadership: openness to reshape the limits of leaders' world goo.gl/IAT2E5 @lisakaysolomon
Lifelong learning is becoming an economic imperative
Great report from @TheEconomist on the imperative of lifelong learning http://econ.st/2jLNXVa .
Facing with globalization (and all it has changed the nature of the job in mature markets) and with technological revolution (and the acceleration of the pace of change), companies and employees have in common the need to create the conditions for their success. It's no more a right for employees to be trained, it's a duty for their employability but also a duty for the companies to sustain performance and earning.
Companies have to create the conditions to multiply the opportunities for the employees to learn (via all the technics and practices that answer - and are the most adapted - to their employees needs) if they want to sustain economic performance and competitiveness. But in the same time, employees have to empower themselves to continuously learn, acquire knowledge, develop competencies to sustain their employability.
Oui, les formations au management ont un intérêt
J’ai récemment lu le working paper fort intéressant d’un professeur d’HBS intitulé «the great training robery» qui explique pourquoi les programmes de leadership échouent. Dans les grandes lignes, l'article montre, qu'en majeure partie, l'argent investi par les entreprises (américaines) dans les formations en management n'a pas d'impact sur la performance ni l'efficacité organisationnelle. D'après l'étude, cela n'est pas dû à la qualité intrinsèque des formations mais bien: - à la force de gravité du fonctionnement de l'organisation qui fait que les managers se comportent très rapidement dès leur retour à leur poste comme avant la formation (la pesanteur du fonctionnement du système organisationnel et managerial les poussant à cela) - au comportement du top management qui n'est souvent pas exemplaire au regard des attitudes managériales et de leadership véhiculées dans les formations (la fameuse expression roll-model) - du décalage entre la vision souvent très conceptuelle et corporate des universités d'entreprise (qu’il intitule des "infrastructures") et la réalité des besoins du business
Après avoir été confronté à quelques reprises à ce type d’expérience, il est - de mon point de vue - vrai que - plus le système organisationnel est globalement en mouvement, plus les programmes de management ou de leadership prônant des pratiques managériales et des attitudes de leadership nouvelles auront des chances de voir leurs effets sur l’efficacité de l’organisation et de l’entreprise. Il faut une certaine « masse » pour faire avancer un système et il y a toujours un effet de seuil. - si je suis intimement persuadé que le corps social d’une entreprise peut faire évoluer les pratiques et améliorer la performance de l’entreprise sans que le top management soit engagé, il est évident que plus les équipes dirigeantes ne seront pas significativement porteuses des attitudes et pratiques explicitées dans les programmes de leadership et management, moins l’adoption et l’impact sur l’efficacité organisationnelle de ces programmes sera forte. - plus les programmes de leadership feront le lien entre les attitudes, compétences et le business, plus l’intérêt porté par les participants de les adopter sera fort. Il semble clé d’insister sur l’impact du « how » sur le « what », notamment dans les périodes de fort changement comme les industries sont en train de le vivre. Les leaders et managers ont un rôle pivot à cet égard. - il est aussi important de travailler sur le pragmatisme de ces attitudes et de les relier à des pratiques managériales quotidiennes. Il est utile d’équiper les participants avec des outils et des méthodes de management qui traduisent le concept de la compétence de leadership en une pratique managériale.
Les formations au leadership et au management ont donc un intérêt pour l’entreprise et un impact sur l’efficacité organisationnelle. Mais comme toute formation, il faut s’assurer de la qualité du contenu, de bien insister sur l’expérience apprenant (avant, pendant et après les sessions) et travailler sur le contexte interne (convaincre le top management), sur le lien avec le business et sur le pragmatisme des concepts et compétences (qu’est ce que cela veut dire pour moi en tant que manager? comment l’appliquer au quotidien? comment entrainer mes équipes? comment influencer mes pairs?)
L'article: https://hbr.org/2016/10/why-leadership-training-fails-and-what-to-do-about-it Le working paper: http://www.hbs.edu/faculty/Publication%20Files/16-121_bc0f03ce-27de-4479-a90e-9d78b8da7b67.pdf