I keep thinking about that guy on twitter who wrote something like "most problematic character this year" (or something like that idk I can't quote it verbatim) with a pic of Eva Stratt and people absolutely jumped his ass.
The funny thing, though, is that I think he's kinda right...? Now the thing is, I love Eva as a character. She is SUPER interesting. But the choices she makes are absolutely morally abhorrent, objectively speaking. The road to hell is paved with good intention, and all that, you know?
I feel like the discourse is swinging too much in the opposite direction when it comes to 'defending' her, and it's a very interesting phenomena to observe. Like yes, she is doing everything she can to save humanity, up to and including some seriously questionable stuff. And the 'wanting to save humanity' bit does not cancel the fact that plenty of choices she makes are still morally wrong.
Like this isn't just about forcing Grace onto the mission against his will. It's also about literally kidnapping people. About destroying ecosystems. And the fun thing is is that the plot itself recognizes that these things are wrong. In the movie we get that neck tattoo at the end to let us know she's done time in prison. In the book she quite literally says she knows she's going to jail once the Hail Mary is launched. That's what makes her a compelling and interesting character, this dichotomy between the choices she makes and the knowledge they are all, objectively, wrong from a moral perspective.
So yeah, I gotta admit it does grind my gears a little when people go on and on about how she's a perfect angel who did nothing wrong, or reply to people pointing out that she does some Pretty Bad Stuff with "freeze to death, then". Like yes, people on the internet are often hyperbolic when expressing ideas, I know most people who say things like "she did nothing wrong" are fully aware she did plenty wrong, actually, but I feel like we have created this atmosphere of untouchability around the character, and expressing even mild criticism of her actions in the story often ends up in getting mocked with hyperbolic statements at best, or being accused of being misogynistic at worse-- Which I gotta admit, I find it endlessly funny, because to me it is far more misogynistic finally having a female character who is complex and deeply flawed and multifaceted, and deciding as a fandom that She Is Exempt From Criticism because she is a female character? But maybe that's just me.
And I find this phenomena sad because it just flattens any attempt at interesting analysis of the characters and the story, and that drives me up a wall, because I like thinking about that stuff, actually! I like that, in a way, Grace and Eva are foils to one another! I like that they are both right and wrong at the same time!
Like yeah, from a narrative standpoint Grace's character arc is about him overcoming his 'cowardice' and embracing the idea of making sacrifices for the sake of somebody else's... But from a humane standpoint I can't even really call him a coward. I feel like people often forget that even the characters themselves knew the chances of the mission leading to any sort of good outcome was slim to none. Eva herself says something like "it almost certainly won't work". And Grace gets suddenly told he is, in fact, being asked to go on a suicide mission with basically almost no chances whatsoever of success. Is he really a coward for saying no? For running? Narratively, yes. Humanly, hell no, imo.
So I find it reductive to say that Eva's choices were ok because 'she saved the world'. She had no idea if she was going to save the world, that's the thing. There's kinda a reason the whole thing is called Project HAIL MARY.
Her choices did lead to the world being saved, absolutely. They are still wrong. Like, we need to recognize that those choices are still morally wrong. Can we do that? The story and the character is interesting because of this fact, not in spite of it. I don't want Eva to be a Perfect Angel Who Did Nothing Wrong Ever. I want her to have done Everything Wrong and somehow still be in part right about it.