you don’t hope to shift — you COLLAPSE the WAVE FUNCTION. 🍎✨
the SCIENCE of reality shifting/law of assumption
. ★⋆. ࿐࿔ ✦ . . ˚ .ੈ✧̣̇˳·˖
is there any SCIENTIFIC EVIDENCE that reality shifting is real? what about the law of assumption? you might be surprised by how much QUANTUM PHYSICS already aligns with the shifting/loa concepts you know and love.
in quantum mechanics, there’s this core concept called WAVE FUNCTION COLLAPSE, first introduced by the copenhagen interpretation. it says that particles like electrons or photons don’t exist in one set state — instead, they exist in a state of SUPERPOSITION, meaning all possible states at once. but the moment they are observed, the wave function collapses into a SINGLE OUTCOME (zeilinger, 1999).
Figure 3. The Copenhagen Interpretation: Wave Function Collapse (World Science Association, 2020).
before observation, there is NO FIXED STATE. reality exists as an infinite, limitless wave of probabilities. and the observer’s awareness is what selects one of those possibilities and collapses it into experience (zeilinger, 1999). this doesn’t just tweak physics. it REDEFINES what we call reality.
and in quantum mechanics? this isn’t just hopeful theorizing.
this is experimentally proven FACT.
. ★⋆. ࿐࿔ ✦ . . ˚ .ੈ✧̣̇˳·˖
🤍✨ THE DOUBLE SLIT EXPERIMENT
this experiment is currently one of the CLEAREST PROOFS of how observation determines outcomes. when particles like electrons are fired through two slits without being observed, they act like waves — creating an interference pattern. they behave as if they went through both slits at once (arndt et al., 1999).
but the moment you observe which slit they go through, the interference disappears. the particle behaves like a solid object and chooses one path. the act of observation alone changes the result (arndt et al., 1999). this collapse is not metaphorical — it literally happens.
^ a visual of this experiment! courtesy of tumblr <3
this experiment is truly powerful because it physically DEMONSTRATES how conscious measurement collapses potential into outcome. aka, HOW YOU CONSCIOUSLY SELECT THE REALITY YOU EXPERIENCE!
. ★⋆. ࿐࿔ ✦ . . ˚ .ੈ✧̣̇˳·˖
🤍✨ REALITY SHIFTING = WAVE FUNCTION COLLAPSE
this is what reality shifting and the law of assumption point to. you’re ALWAYS FOCUSING your awareness (consciousness, identity, energy, whatever you want to call it) into ONE specific reality from an infinite quantum field (thaheld, 2005).
that INTENTIONAL ASSUMPTION collapses the wave function, making that version real for you. you don’t chase it. you don’t pull it in. you assume it’s already yours, and the quantum field reflects.
. ★⋆. ࿐࿔ ✦ . . ˚ .ੈ✧̣̇˳·˖
🤍✨ BELL’S THEOREM & EXPERIMENTAL CONFIRMATION
“but what if the particles are ALREADY in a fixed state, even with no observer present?”
WELL…physicist john bell mathematically proved that NO HIDDEN VARIABLES (aka no underlying mechanics) can explain quantum behaviour, UNLESS we accept that observation itself changes outcomes.
(which is literally THE BASIS OF SHIFTING/LOA!! 🤭)
his theory was put to the test in the ASPECT EXPERIMENTS, and the results confirmed it: entangled particles (more on quantum entanglement soon!) react to each other instantly, across vast distances, and ONLY WHEN OBSERVED (aspect, dalibard, & roger, 1982). these interactions defy space and time, and yet they STILL depend on measurement (aka observation).
“SO WHAT’S THE IMPLICATION OF THIS?” 🤨
form doesn’t exist until it’s consciously interacted with. MEANING: realities don’t “lock in” until your awareness CHOOSES one.
. ★⋆. ࿐࿔ ✦ . . ˚ .ੈ✧̣̇˳·˖
🤍✨ WHAT THIS MEANS FOR SHIFTING + LOA
so when we say reality shifting and loa are real, we’re not talking fiction — we’re talking PHYSICS. the universe literally doesn’t finalize outcomes until you observe them. your assumption is the observation. your inner state is the collapse (chalmers & mcqueen, 2021).
. ★⋆. ࿐࿔ ✦ . . ˚ .ੈ✧̣̇˳·˖
this isn’t “woo”. this is physics.
the universe is built on PROBABILITIES, and you are the one collapsing the wave function. every assumption, every shift of identity is a quantum-level decision.
your chosen reality is always waiting. so which version are you READY to assume?
. ★⋆. ࿐࿔ ✦ . . ˚ .ੈ✧̣̇˳·˖
i tried my best to simplify this info so it’s more easily digestible, but as always i recommend doing your own research and reading up on the sources listed below if you’re interested in more! i hope this post helped bring you some insights and clarity. 🫶
. ★⋆. ࿐࿔ ✦ . . ˚ .ੈ✧̣̇˳·˖
feynman, r. p., leighton, r. b., & sands, m. l. (1965). The Feynman lectures on physics: Vol. 3 Quantum mechanics. Addison-Wesley.
aspect, a., dalibard, j., & roger, g. (1982). Experimental test of Bell’s inequalities using time‐varying analyzers. Physical Review Letters, 49(25), 1804–1807. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.49.1804
zeilinger, a. (1999). A foundational principle for quantum mechanics. Foundations of Physics, 29(4), 631–643. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018820410908
arndt, m., et al. (1999). Wave–particle duality of C60 molecules. Nature, 401(6754), 680–682. https://doi.org/10.1038/44348
thaheld, f. h. (2005). Does consciousness really collapse the wave function? BioSystems, 81(2), 113–123. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0303264705000237
chalmers, d. j., & mcqueen, k. j. (2021). Consciousness and the collapse of the wave function. arXiv. https://arxiv.org/abs/2105.02314
a study on the interaction between human consciousness and artificial intelligence in refik anadol’s quantum memories: the creation of quantum memories by the many worlds interpretation of quantum physics – scientific figure on researchgate. (2020). world science association. available from: https://www.researchgate.net/figure/The-Copenhagen-Interpretation-Wave-Function-Collapse-World-Science-Association-2020_fig2_380334190