The Hair (or lack thereof)

PR's Tumblrdome
h
Lint Roller? I Barely Know Her
d e v o n

@theartofmadeline

Andulka
Misplaced Lens Cap
No title available
Monterey Bay Aquarium

roma★
hello vonnie
Today's Document
Jules of Nature
🪼

tannertan36
Cosmic Funnies

Kiana Khansmith
"I'm Dorothy Gale from Kansas"
PUT YOUR BEARD IN MY MOUTH
taylor price
seen from Israel
seen from Mexico
seen from Kazakhstan

seen from Venezuela

seen from United States

seen from Ukraine

seen from United Kingdom
seen from Tunisia
seen from Guadeloupe

seen from Türkiye
seen from Argentina

seen from France
seen from Singapore
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from Congo - Kinshasa

seen from Russia
seen from United States
seen from Canada

seen from Pakistan
@nymphtrance
The Hair (or lack thereof)
Jill St. John / photos by Martin Mills, Los Angeles, 1967.
Women are beautiful.
For the younger followers: in the 1950s, cars didn't park backwards and halfway on the sidewalk like the blue car here, parking meters were on the edge of the sidewalk, not in the street, and most blocks weren't so fortunate as to have two Joe's Diners.
Courtney Thorne Smith - One of most underrated sexy actresses out there
One of two iconic dresses from that movie.
Why We Pull Down Your Panties
All naughty girls know the consequences of misbehaving, even if they’re yet to actually experience it themselves.
A good hard spanking on the bare bottom.
But have you ever contemplated why we disciplinarians always pull down your panties?
One obvious reason is the highly charged erotic theatre of the undressing ritual, a simple act that can simultaneously flood a naughty girl’s mind with a heady mixture of trepidation, excitement and shame.
Some girls think their panties must come down because a spanking on bare skin hurts more. But in reality, a barrier of thin fabric rarely has much moderating effect, and could easily be negated by pulling the panties up tight to expose her buttocks anyway. So dispensing with protective cover isn’t a strong reason to pull them down at all.
A more compelling reason it is provides an opportunity for her to confirm her consent. When a disciplinarian tells her to pull down her own panties, they are offering her an option: she can acquiesce to their instructions and signal her willingness to submit to her impending punishment, or she can assert her right to say no and call a halt the scene.
Another part of the reason is, of course, that spankers tend to find the buttocks and the intimate areas that lie within both aesthetically beautiful and sensually arousing. Even though disciplinarians often prefer to keep their appreciation to themselves, especially when needing to project a stern, austere professional demeanour. After all, a girl who reports to be spanked should be thinking about the smacks on her bottom, not how pretty it looks.
But perhaps the most important reason we pull down your panties is because it allows us to see how excited you are.
To we disciplinarians, little details matter. We notice the sticky smears inside your underwear as you slip them down your thighs, and the glistening wetness of your slit that you do your best to hide. We know arousal prior to punishment is inseparable from the act of physical discipline. It is not a mere side-effect, but something just as important as the pain you’ll soon be experiencing.
As stories like Abstract Art and Ups and Downs demonstrate, the discovery of a sticky mess in the panties of one about to be spanked speaks volumes.
A wet slit tells a disciplinarian something she dares not say aloud: that her brattiness is an act, and her protests a charade. Her arousal demonstrates that in reality, she needs this discipline. It might even reveal how much she craves it.
We disciplinarians inspect those we put across our knees to assess how much this spanking will actually hurt. We know any girl who bends over with a dripping slit will already be high on a heady cocktail of arousal hormones, her body awash with adrenaline, estradiol and oxytocin. Her spanking might still hurt, but we know it will only be a transient sting, her pain soon transmuted to a fuzzy pleasure by the endorphins it triggers.
When a girl with a wet slit is being spanked, we know it is because she needs to be spanked.
To take your spanking like a good girl, is to submit without fuss. Aroused, contrite and accepting.
But what if a girl is spanked without being aroused at all?
An unaroused girl is one who had not anticipated her spanking, one who’ll receive little satisfaction from her punishment, one who will be dismissed with a bottom that’s hot, pink and sore, uncomfortably stinging and throbbing.
This is what happens to Bad Girls. Those who receive abrupt, sudden punishments. The ones taken unawares, whose misbehaviour results in a wrist being grasped, to be dragged over a lap or bent over in front of the class. Bad Girls are not aroused because they didn’t think their misdemeanour would ever be discovered, they believed they’d got away with it.
But now her skirt is being raised and her panties are being tugged down. True punishment spankings are always performed without delay, so the miscreant doesn’t have time to get aroused. Not for her the mercy of visiting the headmistress after school, clit hard and pussy moist after a quick rubbing in a nearby toilet cubicle. Bad Girls are spanked immediately. Their pleas ignored.
Her disciplinarian nudges a Bad Girl’s legs apart, noticing how the lips of her slit are slim and dry, not swollen and puffy. In this state, two dozen hard whacks with the cane, slipper or wooden ruler can suffice. Her arousal will come later, as she stands in the corner with her red cheeks on display, or replays her humiliation as she lies on her bed, with her fingers between her legs.
A Bad Girl rarely feels contrition, and only begins to regret her naughtiness as her bottom reddens. She resents being punished as she doesn’t really feel she’s done anything wrong. She may kick and whine and struggle and cry, but we disciplinarians already know what to expect. We have foreseen it.
Not that we needed to read your mind. A bare slit reveals everything we need to know.
And that is why we pull down your panties.
What a perfectly lovely essay.
A piece of art
Nice spanking but, Lord, what a beautiful ass.
Marie McDonald by Alfred Cheney Johnston
That's Julie Newmar, photographed by Alfred Cheney Johnston in 1950. Julie was 17.
The one and only --and sadly, retired-- Remy LaCroix (34B-24-35, W:H ratio 0.69, 5 ft 2 in, 105 lbs, 1988- ). Remy was active from 2011 to 2017. She retired when she became pregnant with the announcement "Goodbye tiny waist, hello tiny person." A class act all the way.
British actress/model Lily Cole (32G-24-36, W:H ratio 0.67, 5 ft 10½, 132 lbs, 1988- ).
by Bad--Ass
Bad--Ass my ass. That's Female Nude, Seated by Edward Weston. He made this photograph in 1934.