Barenaked Cardiology: Episode 9; is it a STEMI?
Well Class after a lot of puzzling over this post, I decided my ST changes post would be split into 2. As it turns out, there is a shit ton of things that can cause ST changes and most of them are pretty fucking boring. So rather than wasting time going over ALL the different STEMI mimics and how to determine which of those it is, and can I call it an AMI anyway (IE Scarbossa Critera) We’re going to learn how to tell three things, Is it a STEMI? Is it one of the few easiest mimics? And if it is a STEMI where is it.
The first step in talking about ST changes is to figure out how we measure them. Observe below the J Point.
This is the point where the QRS meets the ST segment. Under normal circumstances this happens at the baseline, any deviation of the JPoint from the baseline is considered an ST change.
The ST change is considered clinically significant if it is more than 1mm in the precordial leads or 2mm in the limb leads. But how the hell do we tell a real STEMI from all the mimics? first thing you gotta do is make sure there is no BBB. its a little different in the hospital because a new BBB can be an indication of fuckery, but out in the streets we cant check old EKGs so we can’t assume much.
First Ventricular Hypertrophy: easy enough TALL complexes in the V leads.
were talking outside the constraints of the normal "boxes" tall here people, look at that shit.
Now on the the Bundle Branch Blocks: With the BBBs you will typically get an RSR’ pattern somewhere, because one of the BBs is transmitting faster than the other so you can see them separately. secondly the QRS will be wider than .12 or 3 little boxes. to determine LeftBBB from RightBBB I look at V1.
If there are 2 R waves in V1 this is a Right BBB. (more Rs is Right) you also have sluring of the S wave in V6 but i’ve yet to find a situation in which i’ve cared. maybe we will find one later.
If the QRS complex in V1 is wider than .12 and only negative (sometimes there is a slight uptick at the beginning if leads are placed improperly) this is a LBBB. (No Rs is not Right=Left) the QRS in V6 should be a sort of M Shape. Again, typically I don’t care unless I’m trying to rule out other things like Hyperkalemia.
Please note fellow nerds that a BBB does NOT mean A STEMI cannot be diagnosed, it just means that WE can't, YET. that shit will be reviewed when we get back to ST changes later.
If you don’t already know, and if you don’t, please start again from episode 1. a STEMI is caused by a loss of blood flow caused by an occluded vessel, first you get ischemia (depression), which progresses to infarct/tissue death, then much later, scar tissue (we won't talk about that here) Here's where the anatomy diagrams come into play.
In this first diagram every color represents a region of the heart. Ignore aVR for now because nobody likes it it just talks nonsense half the time.
This second diagram uses the major vessels to look at anatomy. You can kind of see the association. Everything starts at the aorta, and as we all know shit flows downstream. When something gets fetched up high in the LCA the septal, LAD and circumflex will suffer, if it gets fucked up a little lower only the LAD and Circ will feel it, and so on. How far the damage extends depends on where the vessel is occluded.
In order to declare a STEMI you must have ST segment elevation in 2 “anatomically contiguous” leads. That would be any 2 leads with the same color. With the V leads, it can also be any two sequential leads.
This here is the classic II, III, aVF inferior wall MI. drilled into the heads of everyone everywhere because these MIs can cause the patient to be preload dependent, and giving Nitroglycerine can take away your preload and bottom out your blood pressure really fucking quick. if you want a better idea on the status of the right ventricle, this is when you do a right sided 12 lead, you can reverse full 3-6 or just 4 in an exact mirror pattern to the left leads. Here is a similar case with V4R shown. (when acquiring you should notate V4R as such, however the isolated STE in lead V4 in the presence of an inferior STEMI should set off alarm bells.)
Paramedic says: “No nitrates for YOU!”
now what about this guy right here
We have ST Depression, maybe some ischemia, NSTEMI right? but what happens if we take a deeper look using V7-9 as shown below.
Look what happens
Surprise! its a STEMI after all. Even more shocking is that in the posterior leads we only need .5mm thats HALF a SMALL box of elevation for it to be clinically relevant. When you see that flat depression without T wave inversion in V2-V3 be suspicious for a posterior MI.
One more curveball folks.
HOLY SHIT ITS EVERYWHERE! But wait, because luckily this fucker probably isn’t going to drop dead in front of you. notice how all of the ST elevation is concave, if someone was having this massive an MI we would probably have tombstones by now. Also note that the PR segments are depressed. This is Pericarditis. Probably the more unnecessarily pants shitting of the STEMI mimics.
And with that we conclude the lengthy explanation of most of our ST changes and most importantly, STEMI recognition. Give this time to sink in, go find some practice.









