Why Freelancing is Failing
The current freelancing model is broken. For a few years now, online contracting has been overwhelmed by an increasing amount of supply and in a frenzy of growth, big players are slow to adapt.Â
There is so much competition coming from developing countries that rates have been dropping too low for a good part of contractors, removing them from the supply pool.Â
Here's why.
The problem lies with a lack of segmentation. The freelancing market needs to be split into smaller, manageable vertices addressing an increasingly complex demand. Case in point, there is no service currently absorbing outsourcing demand from enterprise buyers. The products they require are very different from what you can now buy on freelancing boards. Established businesses need support more than anything else; they need warranties, accountability and reliable services. As long as this product is not in store, no serious business will dare outsource critical systems online.
But a lack of enterprise services is just a small part of what's wrong with the current model. Due to the same lack in segmentation, freelancing boards have become a disaster. They're cluttered with garbage projects and bad requirements, which are bid on by unreliable, low-quality workers. It's impossible for serious work to get done, and professional contractors are slowly abandoning this avenue. Proof of this issue are many projects asking bidders to include a custom sentence in the middle of their offer, thus proving they at least read the details - a feeble attempt at treating a symptom instead of the underlying disease. At the same time, buyers are generally looking for "gurus" willing to work for unreasonable rates, thus feeding the vicious circle. Â
No accountability.
Freelancing is failing because the process is simply too easy. Submitting a project or bid is always a free, non-invasive and painless process, having no incentive to think about what you're submitting.Â
There's nothing to lose if you waste someone's time and the worst you can get is a slap on the wrist in the form of a bad review. Having little information about other participants doesn't help either. You can easily drop off the grid once you decide you no longer want to work with the other party. This is a classic example of letting the user stab himself with the knife you just sold him.Â
We need to take a step back and look at our real-world equivalents. In a race to bring in more money to the table, we've lost contact with how a real-world service auction really works. It's difficult, requires accountability and takes training to master, but it provides real value in return. We're free to improve this design, but removing accountability out of the equation will lead to its implosion and prevent a fair balance.Â
What now?
We don't have a proven alternative, and if we don't promote a fair work model, any real talent will soon disappear into full-time employment.Â
Good news is the current state hasn't gone unnoticed. There's a new breed of services brewing in stealth mode, and I'm willing to bet towards the end of 2012 we'll be seeing a few startups pushing for new models, fresh ideas and fixes for these problems.Â
Use the comments to share your thoughts.














