Hello, my little cherubic jewels of the internet. It's been a damned long while, and it's high time that Maxim de Winter made his long-awaited return to the Tumblrverse. Keep your smelling salts on hand, ladies (and gents). I thought I'd get myself back into the swing of things with a little chat about the unseen guests at our favorite urban auberge.
The McKittrick Hotel, for all its artificiality in the face of some not-insignificant suspension of disbelief, is meant to represent a massive amount of space--a city, an asylum, a hotel, three residences, a forest and a graveyard. To contribute to the illusion that these spaces are "real" and "lived-in" requires a number of props that point to the existence of life outside of what we see in the show. Oftentimes this means implying the existence of other, unseen characters who do or once did occupy the space. The McKittrick would be a dead place indeed if we weren't presented with hints that the twenty characters we see regularly interacted (at least during their ordinary, mortal lives) with other, perhaps less disturbed, folks about town.
So, here I will briefly list some of the off-stage characters of Sleep No More and will explain their significance to the show, such as there is any.
Lennox
While Lennox does not appear as a corporeal character within the McKittrick Hotel, his presence within the town of Gallow Green is remarked upon in several documents found in Malcolm’s detective agency, including the following lines from Act II, Scene iii:
(i) One witness statement in which Lennox is quoted as saying:
"The night has been unruly. Where we lay, our chimneys were blown down; and, as they say, lamentings heard i' the air; strange screams of death and prophesying with accents terrible of dire combustion and confused events new hatch'd to the woeful time. The obscure bird clamour'd the livelong night: some say, the earth was feverous and did shake."
(iii) One set of typed notes taken while following one Mr. George Islay about the town.
Lennox is a largely inconsequential character for much of the early half of Macbeth--his role is essentially reduced to that of Macbeth's loyal agent. However, in Act III Scene vi, Lennox openly and bitterly ridicules Macbeth's alibis regarding the deaths of Duncan and Banquo. Later on, presumably after receiving first-hand knowledge of Macbeth's plan to assault the Macduff estate, Lennox shifts his allegiance to Malcolm and his rebellion, and is present at the invasion of Dunsinane.
It appears that all that survives of his character in Sleep No More is his penetrative knowledge of certain natural phenomena, of which Malcolm does not hesitate to avail himself.
Siward Haulage Co.
Seeing as he is a very minor character in Macbeth, Siward does not appear as a character in Sleep No More, but he is referenced in the delivery notes in the speakeasy. Apparently, at 18 Gallow Green (which would put it in some theoretical space between M. Fulton Tailors and the speakeasy), there exists a company called Siward Haulage Co., which evidently delivers liquor and beers to the speakeasy (or which once existed for this purpose, before our cyclical riddle began). It should also be mentioned that the invoice references Formakin Mill, from which place hailed two of the accused in the Paisley Witch Trials (one of the major sources of material for Sleep No More), namely John and James Lindsay.
George Islay
Unlike the other characters mentioned herein, George has the rare distinction of having actually appeared on-stage, albeit only once, during the MIT Media Lab experiment on May 17, 2012. George Islay, photographer and object of the late Grace Naismith's affection, was confined to the padded cell of the King James Sanitorium.
I don't entirely feel comfortable sharing the details of his story here. This is not only because I am not sure how tight a lid Punchdrunk intended to keep the details of this one-time subplot, but also because it doesn't seem that this story is entirely canonical, seeing as the fate of Grace Naismith is intended to be much more ambiguous, and much less convoluted. But, get a couple of drinks in me and I might tell you.
In any case, at first glance, it appears that his surname is a reference to the island of Islay, which is a large island in the Inner Hebrides off the Western coast of Scotland. This is of interest not only because of the couple references to the Hebrides in Macbeth, but also because of the large LNER billboard which takes up the entire southern wall of the Gallow Green High Street ("Hebrides for Holidays").
Furthermore, in an additional stab of significance, the isle contains a well-known mansion called Islay House, built in 1644 by Sir Hugh Campbell of Cawdor. As such, it is known by its nickname "Cawdor Castle" and it serves as the family’s seat.
Grace Naismith
Again, I won't go into too much detail, but I will say that, based on the letters found in her apartment, Grace Naismith moved to Gallow Green not very long before the action of the show beings. She rented the apartment across the street from Paisley Sweets and got a job as a waitress in the restaurant at the McKittrick Hotel. Based upon some notes in Malcolm's detective agency, she often flirted with George Islay when he came into the restaurant for his meals. She eventually found herself in Hecate's clutches, whereupon a fate befell her that is too terrible to describe. What exactly that fate was is far less important than people would have you believe, as she is, as far as Sleep No More is concerned, a huge MacGuffin.
John Reid
Reid was Malcolm's former partner at the Mac Crínáin & Reid Detective Agency. According to the resignation letter left by Caroline Reville (see below), the agency's former secretary, Mr. Reid left the agency for unknown reasons that may or may not be related to the "bizarre direction" the agency had been taking.
His name is derived from that of John Reid, one of the persons convicted during the Paisley Witch Trials. After the trial of the original six witches was concluded, Reid--no doubt a deeply disturbed individual--took it upon himself to confess as to his own participation in the bewitchment of Christian Shaw. He was promptly thrown into prison. He committed suicide by hanging himself in his prison cell, tying his handkerchief to a nail in the wall. (See, History of the Witches of Renfrewshire. Paisley Repository, 1877. 177-9).
Caroline Reville
Ms. Reville was the former secretary of the Mac Crínáin & Reid Detective Agency. According to the resignation letter found on Ms. Reville's desk, things at the agency took a turn after Mr. Reid's unexplained departure. It is implied that Malcolm's growing obsession with augury, divination and other supernatural phenomena of a "bizarre nature" led to a shrinking caseload--presumably from Malcolm's unwillingness to take on ordinary types of cases (such as the many missing persons filings he had handled in the past). At the time of her resignation, the agency had no outstanding clients, and she was no doubt creeped out by Malcolm's growing obsession with the taking of auspices--his desk is literally covered with bird autopsies and notes on avian behavior. It is unknown where Ms. Reville went after her resignation, but it must be noted that she still receives her mail at the McKittrick Hotel.
Her name is a rather clever combination of those of Alfred Hitchcock’s wife (Alma Reville) and the homely secretary from Psycho (Caroline, actually played by Hitchcock’s daughter, Patricia).
M. Fulton
We know nothing about M. Fulton other than that his/her name is on the door of the Gallow Green tailor shop. He/she was also cursorily mentioned in one of Malcolm's notes as having met with George Islay on the Gallow Green High Street one day.
The name is derived from Margaret Fulton, one of the accused in the Paisley Witch Trials. In all likelihood, M. Fulton is J. Fulton’s father/mother or other close relative, and the inference could be drawn that something unsavory happened to him/her that may have driven our dear, frail, paranoid Fulton to the practice of white magic.
W.B. Robertson
As we all know, the W.B. Robertson & Sons Funeral Home is one of the many shops located along the Gallow Green high street. The proprietor, whilst never seen on-stage, is referenced on occasion amongst the many documents in Malcolm's office. One such document is the same set of notes taken by Malcolm whilst tailing George Islay through Gallow Green. These notes detail that Islay and Robertson met with each other on the street and spoke at length. Unfortunately, other than the mere fact of his existence, we know next to nothing about him.
His name is derived from the Paisley witches' advocate, James Roberston, who tried to convince a superstitious jury that the events surrounding the case could be explained by natural causes. (See, Levack, Brian P. "The Decline and End of Scottish Witchhunting." The Scottish Witch-Hunt in Context. ed. Julian Goodare. Manchester University Press, 2002. 179).
James Lyndsay
Mr. Lyndsay served as counsel for Moriae Legal Services, and evidently as the resident attorney of Gallow Green. As first mentioned by BehindAWhiteMask, Mr. Lyndsay was at one time retained by Hecate for his legal services. According to a written retainer agreement between Hecate and Mr. Lyndsay (found amongst the other documents in Malcolm's agency), Mr. Lyndsay was to oversee and administrate several "transactions" for Hecate. These transactions smack heavily of those Devil's bargains she has brokered with others in the hotel (The Porter, chief among them). In exchange, Hecate has agreed to pay him in trade--namely, "ONE LIMITED SCOPE FAVOR to be paid in the form of a cosmic vapor trail." I leave the implications of this to your imagination.
He is named after John and James Lindsay, two of the accused in the Paisley Witch Trials. Historically, they were brothers from Formakin Mill, aged 11 and 14 respectively. Upon their execution, it was said that they held each other's hands as they were hanged together.
Mrs. Ashleigh
Finally, we have Mrs. Ashleigh, whom I'm almost positive must have been a sweet old lady. After all, she owned a candy shop, and we all know it's impossible for candy to be put to nefarious use. All joking aside, we see in Agnes' most recent (and unfinished) letter to Grace that, having received no response as to her little sister's whereabouts, Agnes has come to Gallow Green to continue her search. Accordingly, Agnes has moved into Grace's old apartment. She apparently was able to get the key to the flat from Mrs. Ashleigh, the owner of Paisley Sweets (and, possibly, Grace's former landlord).
There is no mention of Mrs. Ashleigh anywhere else in the show, and there does not appear to be any referential significance to the name. Perhaps it was enough that her surname sounds Scottish.
That brings us to the end of this little diversion. Nothing written here is of major significance, admittedly. But, it gives one a sense of the depth of the show's complicated web of plot lines and the deference with which the creators handled their sources. In addition, the implied existence of all these unseen people highlights the impression we get that, here in the McKittrick, the world is wrong. On no level can the residents of the hotel be said to be leading normal, mortal lives. They seem to be as alone, paranoid and isolated as we see them each night; and, for some reason we can only guess at, it is they, and not those lucky souls described above, that have been chosen by Hecate to be a part of her wicked, but ultimately remedial, designs.
And speaking of designs, now that Rebecca has passed out on the settee, I think I'll use this opportunity to take down those hideously baroque curtains she bought in Tahiti and fucking burn them. Don't tell.
Rebecca here, writing you all just a quick little note. It recently came to mine and Maxim's attention that there have been some rumblings in the Tumblrsphere as to the Fair Use status of one of our posts. To avoid the trouble of upsetting any of the talented and industrious men and women who work so hard to bring us the naughty chthonian pleasures of our favorite hotel, we promptly redacted some of the allegedly copyrighted material.
In light of this, my darling idiot of a husband and I promise to be more careful in the future about posting original (that is to say, non-derivative) quotes from the show.
Once upon a time, there was a little boy. He was the happiest little boy in the whole world\...
Her gloves were off. And her bare hands felt like a cool burn. The way she told it to me, it sounded like a fairy tale.
With my back against the wall, she buried her soft face against my chest and wept. And the rain swept against my face. And she smelled like a too-early love.
“HELP ME FIND MY RING!!! I know you know where it is.”
Then she gave me a kiss I never earned and sent me away, back into the darkness.
When Maxim and I first began thinking about the Porter's function within the world of Sleep No More, we knew little else except that, in terms of the causal relationships between and amongst all the horrific events that occur within the hotel, he is, with the possible exception of Hecate, the most important character in the show. In every respect that counts, not only is he our eyes and ears into the goings-on of the McKittrick, but he is also, in some sense, responsible for those goings-on.
What’s more: Hecate's story is about him.
What we have to remember about the Porter is that, along with Hecate (and, it could be argued, Matron Lang upstairs), he is aware that the cycle of violence keeps repeating—that he and his constituents are doomed to repeat the same hopeless movements, with the same tragic consequences, time and time again. He is not like Duncan, who wakes up in the morning believing that his violent death was merely a bad dream. Nor is he like Macbeth, who might, upon finding Banquo alive and well in his garret, dismiss his heart-rending dance through Birnam Wood as a flight of a powerful imagination. Unlike the others, the Porter does not have the luxury of forgetting, or of hoping. Instead, he is forced to witness the unending cycle of tragedy, fully aware that he was unwittingly complicit in launching it. And furthermore, he stands alone in that he, in certain moments, takes it upon himself to stop it.
Our Porter is both a perpetual victim and a tragic hero. This poor man found himself to be the patsy in a bitter bargain that cost him his freedom and shocked his conscience; and now he is desperately trying to both extract himself from that fateful contract and to mitigate the horrible consequences it will have for others.
While it's true that there is little in the McKittrick Hotel to indicate that there is a world outside of it—that is, it is both temporally and physically operating within a closed loop—the above story indicates that, in some sense, all the characters at one point entered this world. They all had lives preceding their fateful visit to the McKittrick, and they have all given in to temptation (one of the most important themes in the show) and willfully walked through a door into this horrible purgatory.
The Manderley is that door. More than just a glorious post-Eduardian Cornwall estate, or a musky speakeasy, Manderley is a portal into the world of the McKittrick Hotel—one through which each guest has had to pass, and at a terrible price. And the myriad mentions of Manderley within the hotel contain within them the hopeless wish that they might one day escape from whence they came.
When Agnes Naismith whispers, “we can never to go back to Manderley again,” it is with more than the mournful whimsy of a young girl. It is her painful realization that she will never leave this world, this cycle into which she walked, perhaps with the naive belief that she could operate above the questionable characters around her—and the sinful deeds they commit—and somehow escape unharmed. The Orderly, too, from the within some forgotten alcove of the King James Sanitorium, reminds us that “we can never go back” again. All of the characters are stuck there forever, doomed to live out their most tragic decisions, their most regrettable mistakes, in a loop stuck on repeat for eternity. While many among us who find refuge and solace there may at times refer to the McKittrick as a place something like heaven, I must say, it seems more and more clear that it is some exceptionally terrible kind of a hell.
In Rebecca, Manderley was a physical, almost living, reminder of a dark past and some haunting memories that the characters of the novel (and film) were unable to escape—at least, not until the entire estate burned to the ground. In Sleep No More, the Manderley at the McKittrick occupies a similar symbolic space. It is only too aptly named, and it is by no coincidence that each guest must pass through Manderley to get to the McKittrick. Whereas we may enjoy a gay scene full of booze and jazz and beautiful people, it is only a brief idyll, delaying the moment at which we are forced to bear witness to the cycle of morbid, frightful, atrocious events that seem like an unrelenting case of somnambulant déjà-vu. In this way, we are not unlike the characters themselves, who, for all their talk of going back to Manderley, must have also had to pass through its doors, leaving their previous life for this altogether new form of existence in which Hecate lords over time and circumstance with a velvet-gloved fist. And they remain there still, forced to undergo adversity without end, until she can retrieve what she is looking for.
Of course, when we pass through Manderley and enter the world of the McKittrick, we do so as mere observers. We are to the inhabitants therein not much more than ghosts, dispassionately observing their lot in this half-life; every once in a while, we are offered a closer look and perhaps even a chance to try to help end the madness, but in the end we are entirely inconsequential. As such, it is all-too-easy to forget that, for the characters, this transition into the cold, unforgiving world of the hotel was no kind of vacation.
When it is said that "we can never go back to Manderley again," it is often from our own perspective—that of the of the excited Guest, wishing he could return to the world of Sleep No More again. But we all know better. Put simply, this statement is not meant for us at all. It is meant for them, the poor souls within the hotel who long desperately to escape. They yearn to return to that place that they forsook for this harrowing limbo. To return to Manderley would be to return to a place and time before they found themselves stuck in this excruciating mobius strip of a reality.
We suspect that these characters know that life wasn’t always like this—that something is greatly amiss in the way they act out the events of that fateful night over and over again. There is no shortage of clues within the show that indicate this, many of which we’ve discussed before. And only in moments of the deepest intimacy and confidence do we learn that the residents, like Agnes, suspect that the world is wrong and long to escape.
Thus, "We can never go back to Manderley again" is more than a wistful expression of a fond memory. It is a warning. Manderley is a one-way door. Each one of the human characters has walked through it, their eyes glimmering with hope and intrigue, enticed by the mystery and danger that lurked in the shadows. And what a price they have paid for it.
[A quick note to our friends who take the surrealist point of view (i.e. that the McKittrick Hotel is an interactive snapshot of Macbeth's subconscious, with all its disparate anxieties and desires represented physically): Maxim's and my reading of this aspect of the show should not be construed to exclude or contradict that interpretation, as we’re rather fond of it ourselves.]
In any case, you might be wondering, what does this have to do with The Porter, or, indeed, the story with which we began this discussion? Everything, it seems, as the Porter has the dubious distinction of being, in many ways, the intermediary between the "spiritual" world of Hecate and the "corporeal" world of the McKittrick Hotel. Just as the Porter of Shakespeare's play fancied himself to be the doorman at the gates of hell (and was more correct about that than he could have realized), so, too, does the Porter of Sleep No More feel he is the unwilling gatekeeper of this dreadful limbo to which he has been doomed forever.
That the Porter is the little boy in Hecate’s story is difficult to put one’s finger on at first, but once one becomes aware of it, this fact colors everything the Porter does. Of the more obvious indicators are (i) Hecate’s request that the Guest retrieve her lost engagement ring from the Porter, who spitefully replies with a note enclosed with a worthless brass ring, or (ii) the Porter’s sullen tracing of his palm on a bit of McKittrick stationery, on which he draws his winding trail through the dark forest, as well as the ship that not only gave birth to his tormentor, but might also represent his only means of escape, and (iii) his “one-on-one,” in which he entrusts the Guest with a ring of his own, and, in a moment of dissociation and delusional projection, imitates his tormentor.
Even though the details of the story itself is drowned in metaphor, we see illustrated in examples like these the idea that the Porter has found himself enslaved within a cruel devil’s bargain. This is obvious in almost everything he does. As a little boy, the Porter agreed to aid Hecate in finding her lost ring, to his eternal detriment. While she may have been aware of what a fool’s errand it was, Hecate nonetheless bound the Porter to his hasty promise—imprisoning him within the hotel, and employing him as the human arbiter of her nefarious plans. Where the cyclical nature of time within the hotel is entirely a machination of Hecate’s—to be maintained until such time as she may reclaim her ring—the Porter himself is entrusted with maintaining the status quo that is in line with Hecate’s mission.There are times when he does so dutifully, namely:
● Preparing the lobby table for the witches’ arrival prior to their delivering Banquo’s prophecy, once again making way for the tragic cycle to unfold.
● Placing a phone call to Malcolm, informing him that “On Tuesday last a falcon was hawk’d at and kill’d,” effectively kick-starting Malcom’s cycle of obsession and obfuscation.
● Applying Vapo-Rub to Boy Witch’s eyes, which will allow him to cry during his rendition of “Is That All There Is?” (After all, witches lack the capacity to cry, and it is these falsely-produced tears that allow Boy Witch to seduce his audience).
● Delivering Banquo’s prophesy to the witches.
● Tendering Macbeth’s letter to Mrs. Campbell for delivery to Lady Macbeth’s quarters.
All of these acts—not to mention his administration of the McKittrick Hotel in general—betray the Porter’s begrudging obedience to Hecate, and each help in some way to carry out her master plan. However, it is this last task that proves to be the most important, as we shall see, because it is this moment that effectively queues the cycle to begin all over again. But there is, in our Porter, a very deep conflict between his obedience to Hecate and his basic humanity. This conflict is absolutely central to our understanding of his character.
Like the Porter of Shakespeare’s play, the Porter of Sleep No More is an embodiment of evolving contradictions. Whereas Shakespeare’s Porter is a lecherous character whose dialogue consists of a host of antitheses that speak to the fair/foul binary of the play (provokes/deters, makes/mars, sets on/takes off, persuades/disheartens, etc.), Sleep No More’s Porter is torn between his responsibility to serve Hecate, his tormentor, and his need to honor his more humane moral impulses. That is why we see him do a number of things that appear to be in line with Hecate’s mission, as well as a number of other things that appear to be attempts to throw a wrench into the whole works. In fact, he is driven mad by Hecate’s constant reminder that, until her ring is returned to her, she will force him to witness unjustified murder repeatedly and endlessly. Even when he tries to alter the course of events for the better, such as his attempts to keep Lady Macduff from drinking the drugged milk, or his effort to keep Agnes far away from Hecate’s lair, he fails tragically. With each passing cycle, the faint glimmer of hope that this succession of torment may end is dashed again, and again, and again. No matter what he might do, he seems completely helpless to stop the cycle of tragedy. The death of Lady Macduff in particular seems to have a harrowing effect on our Porter, as he always seems to know when her murder coming—and when it finally happens, all he can manage to do is write to Hecate, his mistress, and beg her to be let out of their bargain. “Will you please accept my tears?” he writes dolefully. But this is all to no avail, as Hecate forces the Porter to bloody his own hands, making him pay an eternal punishment for his failure as a young boy, forcing him to bear witness to, and responsibility for, a host of horrifying scenes.
It goes without saying that this experience has taken a damaging toll on our poor Porter, and the most potent expression of his angst and torment can be found during his one-on-one, where, in a profound moment of psychological pain, he channels the image of his tormentor. In this scene, it becomes clear to us that The Porter is not merely some drunken Shakespearean placeholder, but is rather an artistic reinterpretation of one of cinema’s most famously perverted personages. The Porter is Norman Bates from Hitchcock’s Psycho.
Like our Porter, Norman Bates was once a happy little boy. However, as a result of severe childhood trauma, Bates’ psyche becomes a distorted and perverted quagmire of idolatry, lust, guilt and shame. Having suffered cruel emotional abuse at the hands of his overbearing mother, Norman Bates grew to be both disdainful of and dependent on her, to the point that, when she took a lover for herself, Bates murdered them both. After an implied stint at a sanatorium Bates developed a severe form of dissociative identity disorder, whereby he feels compelled to assume her personality, mannerisms and garments in order to repress the memory of her death and sublimate the guilt of having killed her. By impersonating her, Bates is able to avoid directly confronting the trauma in his conscious mind, and is actually able to sustain the illusion that she is still alive—that he never killed her at all. (See Sandis, Constantine. “Hitchcock’s Conscious Use of Freud’s Unconscious.” Europe’s Journal of Psychology. 3/2009, pp. 56-81). Of course, as we all know, the film goes even further to express the extent of Bates’ psychosis, as Bates also unwittingly takes on the mantle of his mother when he murders women whom he finds sexually attractive. The standard Freudian line is that he adopts the persona of his mother in order to rid himself of the blame and guilt for his crimes. (Id.)
Freud wrote at length about his belief that traumatic events, particularly those from childhood, are systematically repressed by the conscious mind in an attempt to avoid the pain and guilt of having to confront them. However, these destructive memories don’t go away. They remain in the subconscious, where they may blossom into untold varieties of neuroses and psychoses. Where Bates is said to have murdered his mother and her lover after finding them in bed together, we may look to Freud and his theory of repetition compulsion, whereby the traumatized person will actually force himself to relive the traumatic event over and over again—whether through memory, dreams or even actions—in an attempt to gain mastery over it.
One key element of this theory is Freud’s observation of the urge on the part of the patient to put himself into situations where that traumatic event (or a similar sort of experience) is likely to recur. This idea of repetition is vaguely evident in Norman Bates’ dressing like his mother, and in killing others while wearing her clothes (it is also particularly clear in other Hitchcock films from which Sleep No More draws inspiration, especially Vertigo, wherein Scotty compulsively dresses up Judy as “Madeline” in an attempt to rid himself of his guilt for having let the latter die). About this theme of repetition in Freud’s works and in Hitchcock’s films, we need not look very long to notice the same treatment in the McKittrick Hotel, as the very cyclical nature of events taking place within the hotel sees to it that each character repeats traumatic events in their lives over and over, to the most literal degree and at the worst price.
But more to the point, it is by understanding Bates’ compulsive re-enactment of a painful, repressed memory and also his easy dissociation from reality that we can approach and understand Sleep No More’s Porter. Like Bates, our Porter is deeply haunted by memories of an exploitative childhood relationship, which he is both trying to escape and relive. However, rather than an overbearing and repressive mother, the Porter’s tormentor is the goddess of witchcraft herself, Hecate, who found him as a little boy and impressed him into her service. It is Hecate whom the Porter serves with reluctant and resentful devotion.
The subtext of transvestitism in Bates’ character particularly seems to apply to our Porter. Recall his one-on-one scene, in which the Porter, still shaking from Boy Witch’s assault, dons a wig and slowly applies a thick layer of red lipstick in the small mirror, staring in wonder at his reflection for a time, his eyes brimming with tears. This scene mystifies many guests of the hotel who have the good fortune to witness it, but when we remember Norman Bates, it becomes clear that the form of imitation is the same in each case. Have you ever noticed that the Porter’s tube of red lipstick is identical to that which Hecate carries in her purse? Or have you ever noticed how important lipstick seems to be to Hecate and her witches (something about which we are writing soon enough)? Here The Porter is, in a moment of extreme emotional disturbance and psychological weakness, adopting the persona of his tormentor in an attempt to cope with both the torturous memories and the horrible guilt he experiences at the hands of that tormentor. Like Bates, he seeks solace in impersonating his tormentor, vicariously adopting her power, tricking himself into believing that he is in fact the final arbiter of his destiny. It is a fantasy that perhaps he can, for just a moment, be her, and possess her power, and be able to change the course of events for good. With each passing cycle, the Porter, who, you will recall, is only too aware of the endless repetition of events, finds himself compulsively taking on Hecate’s mantle in the same manner, and for largely the same reasons, as Norman Bates.
There are, of course, several other parallels. Let us not forget, too, that in the original film version of Psycho we can clearly see Bates’ undeniably effeminate nature: the film “includes a shot of Bates swinging his hips as he climbs up the stairs. It only lasts a for a few frames but it is sufficient for an observant viewer to infer the film’s denouement from it. As Hitch put it, ‘the basic clue was in the feminine nature of the character altogether.’” (Id.). In this context, it is not so mysterious why the Porter displays rather effeminate and at times stereotypically homosexual mannerisms, even showing signs of being in love with that ever-alluring Boy Witch (and who can blame the poor fellow?). It allows us to draw upon the association between Bates and the Porter, and to, as Hitchcock did in Psycho, offer the “observant viewer” a clue as to the source of the evident trauma in the character’s past.
It bears mentioning that our Porter is, of course, quite unlike Norman Bates in that Bates is, himself, a cold-blooded murderer, but the Porter’s dissociation and Bates’ are justified by remarkably similar psychological motives. Like the Porter, Bates is an odd but seemingly harmless young man who takes the form of his tormentor (and first victim, his own mother) to carry out his crimes, by donning a wig and a dress. By so doing, his subconscious mind navigates his tremendous guilt for his evil deeds by rendering his conscious mind completely unaware that he is responsible for them. To Bates, the murders are actually (in his own psyche) committed by his mother, a woman who has tormented him for his entire life, well after he had gotten permanently rid of her.
The Porter, on the other hand, while blameless, is also escaping his guilt. Remember, Hecate doesn't merely force the Porter to witness the various tragedies that happen on his watch, she forces him to participate. Without the Porter’s obedience—at least toward the beginning of the cycle—it is very possible that many of the tragic events we see might be avoided—Lady Macduff’s in particular. And, despite his feeble resistance in key moments, the Porter utterly fails to put a stop to it. In this way, it’s not that difficult to understand the angst he betrays in his one-on-one. Norman Bates and the Porter both take on the guise of their female tormentors in moments of unbearable weakness--moments in which they are utterly incapable of coping with their own failures and with the evil perpetrated by their oppressors. In one way or another, each must bear witness to murders they are responsible for, however active or willfully they may do so. When you think about it, how different are they, really? Don’t they both have to clean up the mess that remains after a murder? Is there much of difference between the Porter packing up the dead Lady Macduff’s garments in her suitcase and Bates cleaning up Marion Crane’s bathroom?
Drawing the necessary identification between The Porter and Norman Bates illuminates other aspects of The Porter’s actions, mannerisms, and general character as he performs his regular tasks and interacts with other characters inside of the hotel. The Porter, like Bates, awkwardly tends to the needs of his guests while, more often than not, becoming directly involved in the fulfillment of their fates. Toward the beginning of his cycle, The Porter, like Hecate’s other minions, ensures that each character reach their appointed destiny within the hotel. However, as the cycle drags on, particularly after his being rebuked by Boy Witch at the phone booths, he instead tries to engineer a reversal of fortune—a revolt, if you will– as he tries gallantly to stall or prevent the characters’ from fulfilling Hecate’s intentions. He fails in his attempts to prevent Agnes Naismith’s meeting with Hecate in the Replica Bar, for instance. He also tries desperately to save Lady Macduff from her downing the drug-laced milk, which is delivered mercilessly by the maid, aware as he is that it will leave her vulnerable to being murdered. In the end, however, he proves no match for the inertia driving Hecate’s plan forward.
Above all his other attempts to foil the plot, it is the Porter’s resistance to the impending death of Lady Macduff that provides the most insight into this major internal conflict of his character. It seems to be that, of all the tragedy that he is forced to witness on a nightly basis, it is the murder of Lady Macduff that he tries most fervently to prevent; and there are very clear reasons for this. For one, Lady Macduff is the only character he meets who is not interacting with or engaged in witchcraft. In addition, aside from her drug use, she seems to be, unlike almost all her fellow residents, a wholly innocent victim. And finally, the death of Lady Macduff is the only murder that the Porter is forced to witness first-hand. She is the most palpable and horrifying reminder of his enslavement to Hecate, and it is Lady Macduff’s murder that finally drives the Porter to throw in the towel each night—in the form of his pitiful letter to Hecate. And it seems that, of all people, it is Lady Macduff who has a real chance at making a complete escape from the endless torment that this world inevitably exacts upon its inhabitants, if only because the Porter is better placed to help her than anyone else. One could easily imagine that, in the Porter’s troubled mind, there is the hope that Lady Macduff might escape the cycle, and live out a happy life without devastating memories of what has been done to her. Perhaps that is why, each cycle, when he fails to prevent Lady Macduff from drinking the milk, he sulks in his phone booth, and hands Mrs. Campbell the very letter that is sure to start the whole process over again. This action is so significant to the Porter's story: it is an admission of defeat, but also an expression of his resolve to carry on. Just one more try, he seems to say in that moment. One more try and I'll get it right. But alas, as always, the poor Porter simply can’t do enough to save her from Mrs. Campbell’s clutches and from Hecate’s divine plans. In the end, she becomes another victim, just like our Porter.
All of this being said, I might recommend that other travelers consider alternative lodging arrangements for their next visit; the price of checking in at the McKittrick for the night might be more than you bargained for, as its inhabitants would tell you if only they had the chance.
Yes, ladies and gentlemen. Rebecca and I have produced a complete, hand-bound edition of Shakespeare’s Macbeth, annotated with detailed notes about Sleep No More. We have painstakingly cataloged all the show’s references to the play and explained them in some detail using footnotes and cross-references.
We have already given away our first copy to the graceful, slender and painfully beautiful Thane of Glamis, and we will give more away as we produce more copies.
We intended to follow the example and largesse of my man Friday, BloodWillHaveBloodTheySay, whose talent and kindness has benefitted us (as well as countless others on this tag) some lovely, hand-made studded masks.
Therefore, in that spirit, we intend to bind as many as we can (time- and money-permitting) and give them away to you fine folks. So, if you have a hankering to see what’s inside, find us in the Manderley, get us drunk enough to flirt up a storm, and be bold enough to ask. Though, be advised, you may receive more than you bargained for.
In other news, we have a few more essays nearly ready for publication. Rebecca is finishing a real doozy right now that will knock your socks (and trousers) off. Meanwhile, I have been taking a page out of dismantlethepsolc’s book and have worked out the perfect recipe for a martini. You just pour out five measures of gin, then you drink it whilst staring at a bottle of dry vermouth from across the room.
Be well, my fiery scoundrels and libertines of the internet.
I was wondering if you knew what music is playing during both the Sexy Witch/Boy Witch dance in the Telephone booths and the Boy Witch/Porter dance in the booths? They've been stuck in my head, but I can't figure it out!
This is a bit difficult to answer, as the music that plays during the phone booth dance is original to the show and is, as far as we can tell, unidentifiable as such.
We do know that, immediately before Sexy Witch joins Boy Witch at the phone booths, “The Window” and “The Porch” from Bernard Herrmann’s score to Psycho play in succession. This is during Sexy Witch’s delivery of the prophesy to Banquo in the sitting room of the lobby, during which she seduces him to sleep and sprinkles some fairy dust on him. Immediately afterward, however, the music shifts to a very low, humming, ambient piece that seems to consist of an endlessly repeated two-note figure. This ambient music is what accompanies the Sexy Witch/Boy Witch phone booth dance, as well as Boy Witch assault on the poor Porter. Interestingly enough, this same piece also accompanies the first confrontation between the Porter and Agnes Naismith (with the tea tray and the wad of cash).
All told, our final answer is simply “We don’t know.” However, seeing as all the other ambient music in the hotel seems to be heavily-altered, pieced-together sections of the songs and scores you hear elsewhere within the hotel, we’d lay money down that the piece of music you’re referring to is a very fuzzy, very slowed-down version of either the score to Psycho or Brian Tyler & Klaus Badelt’s score to the film Constantine.
Good evening, my dears. My, it has been a while, hasn't it? What with an overwhelming multitude of arrangements to be made, social engagements to keep, and hangovers to be had, I simply haven't had a moment to spare.
As you can imagine, getting sufficient beauty sleep has been of prime importance this last month or so, and I am delighted to report that my favorite hotel has been haunting my dreams during the month I spent away. During my most recent visit, I was struck by a vague feeling of déjà-vu as I watched the faces of its regulars, sometimes gay and laughing, but more often either distressed or painfully vacant, as they moved among the rooms, reenacting the stories I have witness so many times now.
I was especially drawn, and not for the first time, to a few of those eerie and coveted objects that move about the hotel with ease—those that floated across my darkest dreams during the last haunted month. I will refrain from repeating myself in my musings, as my husband and I have already recorded the cyclical journey that the blackbird's corpse takes each night, but that little birdie isn't the only morbid charm to be found making its way through the McKittrick. We have also spent some time with a little bird skull—complete with its spine intact and attached at the base of the skull—that is also traded between characters around the hotel.
[PLEASE NOTE that, for the purposes of this essay, despite the fact that it technically occurs at the end of the cycle proper, I have begun by describing its exhumation and discovery by Mr. Bargarran, the McKittrick’s resident taxidermist, and ended by describing its burial.]
I. Bargarran exhumes a partial bird skeleton and brings it back to his office.
Following an intense fight with J. Fulton, the tailor, Mr. Bargarran draws an “X” in chalk on the funeral shop door behind which Fulton is hiding. He then returns to his shop, and after arranging his tools, he picks up a metal hand file and heads downstairs to the third floor. Sneaking through the entryway to the Macduffs’ apartment, he makes his way into the graveyard. He paces through the yard, scanning the graves, ending up at one plot on the north end, whereat he starts digging with the file. Finding nothing that pleases him, he walks to the south end of the graveyard and begins digging again. He lifts a small object from the dirt which he cleans off with his hand. Holding it up in the dim light and examining it for a few moments, he finds it is the skull of a bird, the vertebrae still attached thereto. Then he turns to look down at the statue of the Madonna overlooking the grave, grabbing a clump of dirt and smearing it across the Virgin Mary’s face. Satisfied, he takes the skeleton upstairs to his private office.
He walks to the office behind his taxidermy shop and examines the skeleton, trying to clean the dirt from it with a handkerchief before going into the bathroom near his office. Mr. Bargarran washes his hands and thoroughly cleans the skeleton, then returns to the shop. While he is behind the counter, he looks up to see Lady Macduff walking through the shop on her way back to her apartment with her suitcase. He seems frozen with fright at the sight of her, and presses himself against the wall. After she has passed, he continues with his work, inspecting the bone and filing away at it carefully. Shortly thereafter, the Speakeasy Bartender walks through the shop and into the street. Bargarran follows to the shop door, as if having heard commotion out in the street. He becomes visibly worried and anxious.
As he watches the street, Hecate appears from behind him. Terrified and startled, he holds the door open for her. Hecate, amused, pauses briefly to stroke his face before walking out into the street. Bargarran immediately returns to his counter.
II. Bargarran brings the bird skull to J. Fulton.
He takes off his white lab coat and begins to almost frantically undo the lining of the sleeve, periodically looking through his front door across the street at Fulton, who is courting Agnes Naismith in his tailoring shop. Once the sleeve is fully ripped open, he places the bird skull in the coat pocket, along with a note that reads: "Banquo traitor." He puts on the coat and walks out the door and across the street to the tailor's shop.
Fulton is in his shop, his advances having just been rejected by Agnes. Mr. Bargarran knocks on the door. Fulton beckons him in. Bargarran takes off his white lab coat with the torn sleeve. The two men dance, and the tension between them is palpable as Bargarran instructs Fulton to mend the sleeve, and all the while Fulton appears reluctant to work for the taxidermist. He finally agrees to mend the coat, and Bargarran leaves.
Fulton spends a some time mending the torn sleeve with his signature red thread. Bargarran, meanwhile, returns to his back office behind his shop and fumbles through a metal container containing several shoulder bones. He selects one and brings it back to the store counter, which he scrubs and cleans furiously, all the while staring across the street at Fulton, who is mending the coat in his shop. After a few minutes, Bargarran returns.
Fulton puts the newly-mended coat on Bargarran and examines the fit. He measures and adjusts the coat with care while “When the Swallows Come Back to Capistrano” by the Ink Spots plays over the speakers. The two men dance as they do this, amicably at first, but then somewhat aggressively as Bargarran begins to threaten the tailor. Furious and crestfallen that Fulton had not noticed the bird skull in the pocket while mending the coat, Bargarran pulls out the skull and note and forces them into Fulton’s hand. He quickly turns to hurry back across the street to his shop.
III. Fulton blesses the bird skull.
Left alone in his shop, a frightened but perplexed Fulton puts on his coat and takes his Bible and the bird skull across the high street to the funeral home. He goes into the back room and lays the items on the mortuary slab. He lays the bone down on top of his Bible, then gingerly removes a few glass bottles from the shelves on the wall and sprinkles holy water on the bone. To finish the charm, he sprinkles salt in a cross pattern around the skull and Bible, murmuring a prayer in Latin as he does so. At last, he bends and prays silently before the Bible and bone. Once he has finished, he stands, inspecting the bone in his hand.
It must be mentioned her that Fulton’s charm appears to be a form of preventative (or white) magic. Reginald Scot, in his Discoverie of Witchcraft, says that, in Sixteenth Century Scotland, men thought it wise to preserve themselves (as well as certain sacramental objects) from witchcraft by through “the sprinkling of holie water, and […] consecrated salt” (London: Elliot Stock, 1886). Given the proximity and prevalence of malevolent witchcraft in Gallow Green, as well as Fulton's evident paranoia thereof, it is not outlandish to assert that the tailor, a devoutly religious man, would attempt to bless the skeleton to both protect it and rid it of its evil power. In a sense, he is defusing and neutralizing the charm from further use as an implement of witchcraft.
IV. Fulton confronts the Bartender.
Fulton, no doubt suspicious about the origins the bird skull, takes the Bible and the skull to the Speakeasy across the street. He stands at the unmanned bar, waiting for the Bartender to return. When he arrives, the Bartender goes to his post behind the bar and pours the tailor a shot of liquor, which the latter takes and quickly spits right back out. The Bartender ducks out of the way, circling around the end of the bar to confront Fulton. They begin to grab at each other, checking one another for witches' marks. The Bartender swings the hanging lamp at Fulton, who ducks swiftly out of its way. The two men then perform an acrobatic dance that transitions into an aggressive fight. After the fight is over, Fulton takes a shot from the Bartender before leaving.
Fulton carries his items down to the hotel lobby and retrieves his coat from the Porter, then returns with his coat to the funeral parlor on the fourth floor. He fishes a black cloth out from the undertaker's desk drawer and wraps the bird skull in it, then lays the bundle over his bible. Donning his coat, the tailor hooks a black umbrella over his arm and descends the east staircase to the third floor. He passes slowly through the entryway of the Macduffs' apartment, his eyes roaming over the pictures hanging on the wall.
V. Fulton buries the bird skull.
In the doorway between the Macduffs' apartment and the graveyard, he pauses to put up his umbrella. Ambient storm sounds fill his ears as he walks slowly, deliberately, through the graveyard, coming to a stop at the south end. There, he hands off his umbrella to a concerned Guest so that he can bury the bone wrapped in cloth, digging a hole in the dirt beneath one of the white crosses. Having covered the bundle with dirt and replaced the white cross, he prays fervently over the burial site with his Bible.
He rises, with a rather sober look across his face, and walks out of the graveyard to the foyer of the Macduff’s apartment. Through the doorway, Fulton watches as Lady Macduff hurriedly carries her packed suitcase from her bedroom to the nursery. At this sight he looks forlorn, and blesses the apartment by kissing his Bible and raising it to the doorway. Then he turns away from the troubled woman and continues on his way upstairs.
The bone rests in the graveyard, until the taxidermist returns at the end of the cycle to the burial site to dig it up again.
This rather bizarre series of dealings, with an object that naturally evokes a sense of unease and morbid disturbance, raises more than a few questions: Why does a bird skeleton enter into play with any of the characters in the first place? Why does the taxidermist appear to be searching frantically for it in the beginning of his cycle, before he finds it buried in the dirt? Why does he then force it upon the tailor, so soon after finding it? Why does the tailor take it upon himself to perform a blessing on this seemingly-cursed artifact? And why does he, in the end, bury it?
These questions lead us to speculate as to the very purpose and motivations associated with each character.
First, we know from his behavior that the taxidermist is an agent of Hecate—not only does he yield to her presence before her “walkabout” through the town, but he will often escort the Guest to her lair to watch the proceedings. Second, we also know him to be, at least in some capacity, in the employ of the Macbeths, given his explicit association with the three murderers of the Shakespeare play.
With this in mind, I think it is fair to say that his primary function within the show is to provide fair warning to others in Gallow Green of the arrival of the detective, Malcolm.
As tempting as it is to believe that he is a character torn between the dueling forces of good and evil, I submit to you that he is, in fact, purely evil—a direct player in ensuring the unraveling of Hecate’s plan. During his “one-on-one” he is the world-wearied sociopath, intent upon evil deeds; and during those ominous scenes in the Macduff children's bedrooms, he becomes something even more sinister and cruel. But while he is in Gallow Green, he is Hecate’s messenger. He not only warns of the fate that certain characters will meet (absolving him of any direct suspicion from his fellow townspeople) but then takes part in delivering that appointed fate. In escaping the eye of scrutiny, he is able to facilitate or carry out some terrible acts.
So, what about the bone, then? Why does the taxidermist need it? What "role" does the bird skull play in the execution of Hecate’s designs? If we consider Bargarran an agent of Hecate, then we must endeavor to understand what other events his dealings with the bone are either promoting or preventing.
In giving the bone to him, the taxidermist is sending a clear message to the tailor. The name “traitor” has not been crossed out on the note that is brought along with the artifact, whereas Banquo’s name has. On first glance, it would appear that this note may simply be referring to the fact that Banquo is a traitor, but when we take into consideration Bargarran’s and Fulton’s respective allegiances, as well as the similarities between this note and the one we see Bargarran pass on to Lady Macduff, we know that this is no friendly warning. It is a hit list.
This suspicion is confirmed for poor J. Fulton when he witnesses firsthand the attack on Banquo, and subsequently goes into panic mode. The rest of his cycle then revolves around trying desperately—and failing—to stop the horrible chain of events from unfolding. This is especially true because, without a doubt, the traitor referred to on the note is Fulton himself. He is the only resident of Gallow Green who is not on Hecate’s payroll, and the meaning of Bargarran’s warning is crystal clear: “stop what you're doing or you're next.”
That Fulton becomes aware of the true meaning of this threat makes his later fight with Bargarran so much more poignant. When Fulton happens upon Bargarran, who is ransacking his shop (no doubt looking for the skull) he is quick to flee into the street, albeit unsuccessfully. Bargarran catches him, and the ensuing fight leads Fulton to being almost brutalized before he manages to run away into the funeral and bar all the windows and doors. And Bargarran, knowing he has failed to kill the tailor, is careful to marked the door of the funeral home with a large chalk “X”—either marking him for death or to ensure that he is never able to leave.
Bargarran’s delivery of the bird skull and note isn’t only meant as a threat, however. In delivering the note with the bird skull, the taxidermist also intends that the tailor remain distracted for much of the cycle, as Fulton is mean to busy himself with the bone. Once the taxidermist hands the bone over to a reluctant tailor, Fulton takes it upon himself to perform a blessing on it. We get the strong sense that the bone is cursed, and that it has either been an instrument used to do harm to someone or has been a victim of harm itself, or both (or, at least, the tailor believes something like this to be true). Since the "harms" perpetrated inside the McKittrick all trace back to the practice of witchcraft, we can easily presume that this bone (or the living creature to which it once belonged) was either used to perform witchcraft or that it was itself the victim of witchcraft. Fulton, as we know, is a religious man who is perhaps tempted but is ultimately repulsed by and deeply afraid of witches and their power. For him to receive such a cursed artifact is, to him, a charge of responsibility. The bird skull is not the first dead bird with which we see him perform superstitious rituals. I have already discussed how he pierced needles into the heart of a black bird corpse, a Scottish ritual said to cause harm to witches.
As stated above, Fulton performs this "charm" as an attempt to divest the bone of witchcraft, and to protect the victim of whatever evil it is being used to conduct, whether he knows who that victim is or not. He then takes the bird skull to a Christian cemetery to give it a proper, blessed burial and a final resting place, safe and unable to be a part of the witches' tragic games.
After all is said and done, this process of spiritually cleansing the bone takes up quite a bit of time, and it pulls the tailor out of the action during a time where he might have been useful. During this long stretch of time, the object of Fulton's lust, Agnes Naismith, is thoroughly engaged. For instance, there is her confrontation with Malcolm, during which she unwittingly distracts Malcolm from decoding the clues that point to his father Duncan's imminent death. Then there is her interaction with the Speakeasy Bartender during which it is revealed to her the nature of the dark forces she is dealing with. By the time Fulton is done burying the bird, Agnes is entirely out of his reach, as she is locked away in her bedroom, where she will stay until she leaves for her second confrontation with the Porter—that pivotal scene which brings her to the cusp of her final encounter with Hecate. As one can imagine, were Fulton not engaged in attempting to divest the bird skull of its power during these confrontations, he might have been able to protect Agnes from falling down the plughole of Hecate’s designs—in other words, Agnes might never have gotten to Hecate, or served her “purpose” of distracting Malcolm from preventing Duncan's murder. But, alas, she is drawn into Hecate’s web, and is ultimately forced to become her servant.
It is in Hecate’s personal interest, then, that Fulton—her enemy, and a man highly aware and suspicious of witches—be removed from the picture. Given that Hecate’s main instrumentality for making sure that the residents’ appointed destinies are fulfilled is her substantial power of distraction, then to give Fulton something to worry about to distract him from protecting or helping Agnes would be a perfect method of ensuring that Agnes will land in Hecate's clutches. The bird skull, delivered by Bargarran is just such a distraction. Whether this bone actually held any power or curse or whether it was merely a ruse, one cannot be absolutely certain. While I would ordinarily be inclined to say it is merely a ruse, and that the bone holds no supernatural powers, it is interesting to note that, at the very moment that Fulton buries the skull in the graveyard, Boy Witch, who is walking through the Gallow Green high street, begins coughing uncontrollably, seizing with fits and holding his neck, as if he were breathing his last breaths. Perhaps, then, we ought to believe there is more to the bone than meets the eye, and that the tailor is in fact correct in guessing that it is cursed and capable of causing great evil. In any case, the use of the skull as a means to distract Fulton long enough to get to Agnes (and all the while having Agnes assist in stopping Malcolm from preventing the death of his father) seems rather clear. The taxidermist, meanwhile, is able to gain some level of trust with certain townspeople - warning others like Lady Macduff of their fate - in order to hide from the detective's scrutiny while he himself commits or acts as an accessory in various atrocities that occur inside the hotel.
Hecate is an impossibly clever woman, isn't she? Killing so many birds, with so few stones...
To the Crack of Doom: Mirrors in the McKittrick Hotel
Apologies all around for the general radio silence from our front lately. I’ve been absolutely swamped managing the estate, and Rebecca, in usual fashion, has been on a mid-Atlantic cruise for the past month (where she was no doubt quartered on the “port” side).
Having been married to Rebecca for what seems like many agonizingly long centuries, and furthermore having allowed her to festoon our precious Manderley with innumerable self-portraits and looking-glasses, I have come to understand some very fundamental truths about vanity. I have also gotten very used to never showing up anywhere on time, as Rebecca has made an obsessive avocation of primping and preening in front of the mirror.
Then the thought hit me—about how important mirrors are to the décor, ambiance, and the stories within that home away from home of ours, the McKittrick Hotel. Please bear with us as we get back into the swing of things with this minor discussion on the significance of mirrors within the world of Sleep No More.
I. Superstitions Regarding Mirrors
The common association of mirrors with death and the supernatural is quite literally as old as civilization itself, and has bled into the popular consciousness in the form of maxims that some still take seriously to this day.
It is common knowledge, for instance, that to break a mirror will bring bad luck. For some, such as the people of Cornwall, breaking a mirror is said to bring “seven years of sorrow,” while in Yorkshire it was believed that it brings “seven years’ trouble, but no want.” (Dyer, Rev. T.F. Thiselton Dyer. Domestic Folk-lore. London: Cassel. 112.) In Scotland, a broken mirror was an even more menacing omen, as it was believed that some member of the family or household would soon die. (Id.)
For such a common household object, the mirror carries a lot of divinatory cultural baggage that cannot be ascribed solely to its relative expensiveness. Some commentators have attributed people’s superstitious apprehension about mirrors to the medieval practice of witchcraft, by which necromancers would make a “waxen image of his enemy, and shooting at it with arrows in order to bring about his death.” (Id. 113) We’ve spoken briefly about the production and uses of “manickins” in European witchcraft as weapons wielded both by witches intending to harm an innocent party and by witch-hunters intending to harm the witches themselves (the pierced toad in Grace Naismith’s apartment and J. Fulton’s charm with the dead blackbird come to mind). It appears that the peoples of Scotland and England had similar beliefs about the power and utility of mirrors with respect to the health and safety of the person reflected, as both of these practices are derived from the anxiety about the reflected human image.
For instance, Brand, in his Popular Antiquities, informs us that mirrors were commonly wielded by magicians in their “superstitious and diabolical operations." Specifically, “[s]ome magicians, being curious to find out by the help of a looking-glass, or a glass full of water, a thing that lies hidden […] to discern therein those images or sights which a person defiled cannot see.” For instance, the infamous Gunpowder Plot to assassinate King James the I was believed to have been discovered by this form of divination, by which Dr. John Dee, with his “Magic Mirror” in hand, determined that the King’s life was in danger, and so warned the proper authorities. (Timbs, John. Things Not Generally Known, Volume 4. London: Crosby Lockwood & Co. 1880. 117.). This association of mirrors with the magical and divinatory is no doubt an extension of the almost universal anxiety about the power of a duplicated human image, to the point where mirrors have figured into some more common charms.
Even more restrictive than the prohibition against shattering mirrors is the common Scottish custom of covering mirrors (along with other household articles) upon the death of a member of the household. (Folk-Lore Society. Notes and Queries. 7th Ser., Vol. 5. London: John C. Francis. 1888. 73). Upon a household death, the Scottish would take care that all the looking-glasses in the house were either covered with sheets or else turned to face the walls. The same was done with portraits and photographs of the recently deceased (notice, for instance, the countless overturned portraits and mirrors in the parlor of the Macduffs’ apartment); and the Scots were careful to stop all the clocks in the house until the body could be buried (something to bear in mind when we inevitably discuss the clock motif as it relates to Duncan’s demise).
The rationales given for this practice are numerous and varied. According to some, mirrors and portraits were covered to serve as a reminder to those in mourning that “all vanity, all care for earthly beauty, are over with the deceased.” (Dyer 113). Others believe that the reason was on account of fear of consequences far more sinister: “[I]f the mirror be not covered in a death-chamber you may see the face of the dead in them.” (Burne, Charlotte Sophia. Handbook of Folklore. London: Sidgwick & Jackson, Ltd, 1914. 66). More specifically, “the invisible world trenches closely upon the visible one in the chamber of death, a superstitious dread is felt […] of some spiritual being imaging himself forth in the blank surface of the mirror.” (Dyer 114). In his Golden Bough, Joseph Frazer goes even further to suggest that it was believed “that the soul, projected out of the person in the shape of his reflection in the mirror, may be carried off by the ghost of the departed, which is commonly supposed to linger about the house till the burial.” (Vol. L, p. 146). It is this same superstitious dread that no doubt prevented many Scottish mothers from allowing their infant children to gaze upon their own reflections: “An infant is forbidden to see its face in the glass before it is a year old.” (Burne 66).
I would like you to bear these explanations in mind as we discuss the mirror motif in Sleep No More, as this understanding of mirrors as passageways by which the ethereal world of the spirits and our own physical world overlap and interact with one another is crucial to how mirror are presented in the show.
II. Mirrors in Popular Culture
Once we get a sense of the superstitious cultural baggage Western culture has associated with mirrors, it helps inform our judgment about how mirrors are handled as literary devices. Even if we limit our focus to strictly those texts that influenced Sleep No More, we are confronted by a few major examples of how mirrors both are imbued with a divinatory power and also credited with being the portals through which we may engage with the spirit world.
For instance, mirrors figure into Shakespeare’s Macbeth in this way. In Act IV, Scene I, after Macbeth asks the witches “Shall Banquo's issue ever reign in this kingdom?”, the Witches present an image of a ghostly procession of eight future kings, led by Banquo, and the last of whom appears with a glass in his hand. In this glass is reflected a line of kings that seems to “stretch out to the crack of doom.”
While there is no definitive answer as to how this effect was achieved on Shakespeare’s stage, many scholars accept the possibility that this scene was done with the clever use of dual reflection—that is, the use of two mirrors to create an effect of infinite regression. Our imaginations run wild with how an effect like this—which comes at the end of a scene already rife with special effects (e.g. thunder and ghosts and flying witches)—would have come off on the Elizabethan stage. No matter how it was done, I do not doubt that it was a rather powerful and effective image that haunted the audience throughout the pay as they watched Macbeth’s tragedy unfold.
It has also been recounted that this mirror, rather than being used merely to achieve a flashy (if poignant) special effect, was actually held up to the face of King James himself, who likely would have been present in the audience at the premiere—"the last [king] holds up a magic mirror to the audience. This is not only a symbol of many more kings in the same line, but also allows King James to see his own reflection” (Ross, Stewart. Shakespeare and Macbeth: The Story Behind the Play. New York: Penguin Books USA, Inc., 1994). Recall that it was believed that James I was a descendant of Banquo. If this account of Macbeth’s original performance is true, then we are forced to notice that the mirror that claims to show Macbeth the unending line of Banquo’s heirs, does so by breaking the fourth wall—it shows a currently-living descendant of Banquo, James I himself. Seeing as the play was written for King James I, a man interested in both the science of demonology and the legitimacy of his claim to the throne, this stage effect very well might have been presented that way.
I must admit, however, that the tale strikes me as almost certainly apocryphal. For one thing, there is no official record of a court performance of Macbeth, though it strikes most scholars as very improbable that James I would not have wanted to see a play that deals with both his ancestry and his avocation—i.e. witch-hunting. (Orgel xxxi) For another, it is very likely that the significance of this effect would have been lost upon Shakespeare’s audience, who weren’t likely to have heard of Banquo.
All this notwithstanding, this is not only a significant stage effect, but it fits in neatly with the common, contemporary belief in mirrors as divinatory objects, associated with the supernatural. That mirrors, widely believed to be divinatory in utility, should be the source of Macbeth’s vision in the play is a significant indicator of some of the superstitions mentioned above. But to consider even just the possibility that Shakespeare may have used the mirror as a sort of link between the living King James and his long-dead ancestor, Banquo, opens up stunning possibilities about the use of mirrors in Sleep No More, whether it actually happened or not.
Another direct source of inspiration for Sleep No More, as has been often said, is Stanley Kubrick’s horror masterpiece The Shining. We are no doubt already aware of some of the connections—both involve a labyrinthine hotel with a violent history, and which is inhabited by the spirits of lost souls from the 1930’s, not to mention the use of music by Ray Noble and his Orchestra or the gigantic hedge maze on the grounds—however, there is another, hitherto unmentioned connection between the two that cracks some of our preconceived ideas about the supernatural wide open. This connection lies in the use and expression of the mirror’s supernatural power and mystery.
In The Shining, mirrors are a major clue with respect to whether the ghosts seen within the Overlook Hotel are “real” (by which I mean that, though they be ethereal, they have the power to exert an influence on the physical world) or merely a tool used in the representation of Jack’s tortured psyche. It is important to note that, in every scene where Jack is seen interacting with a ghost, he is facing a mirror. Whether it be his conversations with Lloyd, the Overlook’s bartender, or his harrowing encounter with Grady, the Overlook’s murderous caretaker, or with the rotted woman in Room 237, there is always a mirror present, leading one to ask all sorts of questions about to extent to which these interactions are merely a product of a tortured psyche (i.e. Jack interfacing with the demons within himself), not to mention the possibility that mirrors serve as a physical medium of transportation between the ethereal world and the corporeal one.
Of course, the importance of the mirror motif in The Shining by no means ends there—we haven’t even mentioned how it took a mirror to reveal the meaning of the word “REDRUM”—but the point that mirrors may be portals between the world of the supernatural and our own is important when we think about their function within Sleep No More.
III. Mirrors in Sleep No More
In the world of Sleep No More, as in the culture of superstition from which it draws so much inspiration, mirrors are presented not only as divinatory objects, but as portals where the ethereal, ghostly world of Hecate and her witches intersects and interacts with the corporeal, physical world of Macbeth and the others. To put it bluntly: for the human characters of Sleep No More, mirrors are bad news, as they almost always are indicators of Hecate’s influence.
For some, like the lovely RememberThePorter, who’s written about the significance of mirrors before, this connection is obvious. In moments too numerous and variable to count, the witches interact with mirrors within the McKittrick. They show neither fear nor awe nor confusion at the sight of them (unlike almost every other character in the show). On the contrary, their interaction with mirrors is almost entirely either seductive or playful. They interact with the Guests through the mirrors, smiling as they dress themselves (and when they ask the Guests to help them). When Sexy Witch sneaks the Guest into Grace Naismith’s apartment, the interaction is conducted almost entirely through the mirror, as she produces a piece of candy from Paisley Sweets and seduces with it. That it is infront of this very dresser mirror that she uses the ruse of a peppermint gift to pluck a hair from the Guest’s head (for some no doubt nefarious purpose) is very telling of how the mirrors of the McKittrick Hotel are tools of Hecate and her three cronies.
As RememberThePorter says, “If mirrors are not the sign that a room is ‘magical,’ they seem very closely associated with the presence of magic throughout the McKittrick.” If we accept that, within the McKittrick, the “magical” is actually the ominous and demonic world of Hecate and her witches, they are absolutely correct. But it is not necessary to always ascribe the presence of mirrors as being indicative of active magic. Often, the mirror is often used as symbols of divination, as well as the foreshadowing of imminent doom.
Take, for instance, the story of Duncan, which is essentially the tragedy of a man who foresees his own death but is completely powerless to avert it. Whenever Duncan is compelled to look upon himself in the mirror, he is always confronted with the looming specter of his impending death. Near the beginning of his cycle, after his anxious solo within his private chapel (which we’ve discussed before), he steps into his bedroom to be shaven by his son, Malcolm. Malcolm takes care to set a large floor mirror in front of Duncan before he begins the shave. And Duncan, already spooked by a few dark forebodings, begins to suspect Malcolm of being the one who will do the deed. While he sits, staring into the large mirror, utterly vulnerable to the whims of his son, who holds a straight razor against his neck, Duncan panics and kicks back in his chair. We learn from their giggly reaction that it was merely a false alarm, but the seed has been planted in Duncan’s mind that his life might be in danger—a suspicion that is never extricated.
It is not until after his death that Duncan comes to realize the depths of treachery to which he has fallen victim. As he returns from the ballroom, and retraces his steps, he stops briefly at the canopy bed, the site of his murder. He then moves on to the large mirror above the hearth in his quarters. He looks at himself in the mirror for a long while before noticing the glass of whiskey—the same poisoned drink served to him by Lady Macbeth. This moment, in front of a mirror, is one of a series of moments wherein Duncan gradually realizes that he has crossed over to the other side of this veil of tears. He is a dead man walking. The omens have come true, and he could never have suspected the culprit.
Notice how the mirror motif forms a lovely parallelism here. Duncan’s story is essentially that of a man who, for the first half of the story, suspects that his death is imminent, and, for the second half of the story, slowly comes to realize that he has died. That he should find out the truth of his demise in the same mirrored spot as where his fear of his own assassination reached its most acute climax makes for a striking parallel.
Lady Macduff’s story, too, makes use of the mirror motif to highlight her anxieties. For instance, the long hallway which spans the length of the flat she shares with her husband is festooned with mirrors. In moments of panic, Lady Macduff will gaze into one of them and flip it over to face the wall, shouting as she does it (only to have the treacherous Catherine Campbell come in much later to turn it back over again).
When we first see this behavior, we wonder about what horrible visions she might be seeing within those mirrors that would terrify her so. For one thing, someone as religiously ritualistic and superstitious as Lady Macduff would be aware of the Scottish superstition of not allowing young children to gaze upon their own reflections. And this might partially explain why she is in such a hurry to flip on towards the wall (and why the walls of the Macduff’s parlor are covered with flipped mirrors), as she currently carries an unborn child whose safety, she fears, is threatened. She would know, too, of the common belief that mirrors served as portals between the world of flesh and the world of demons.
But this fact only makes it more stunning and terrifying when we see the atrocity that awaits us in the Macduffs’ children’s bedroom. Upon the northern wall of the bedroom hangs a mirror that, at first glance, appears to merely reflect the bedroom. However, if we look closely, we see revealed to us the brutal murder of Macduff’s “pretty ones.” Our vision of the bedroom through the mirror reveals a violent mess—the books strewn on the floor, the covers of the bed drawn back. Upon the child’s bed lies a large puddle of blood, punctuated only by a small teddy bear where the body of a living child should be.
There is a scene late in the cycle during which Mr. Bargarran, the Gallow Green taxidermist, pays a visit to the Macduffs’ flat. He walks straight to the children’s bedroom, sits down upon the tiny bed, and carefully sews a small bone into the lining of the teddy bear. It is not until he is finished with this process that he notices this mirror, and adopts a face that dispels us of any notion that he is a well-meaning man. He continues to the nursery to deposit the teddy bear in a wooden cradle which sits beneath a disturbing mobile of headless stuffed dolls.
Someone as superstitious and attentive as Lady Macduff is certainly very aware of the danger that threatens her and her family. She may not know exactly who is a threat to her, but whether through her many rituals or through her drug-induced paranoia, she knows that trouble is afoot—and that her family might pay the ultimate price if she doesn’t try to stop it. Her tragedy, of course, is that her addiction to that drug (represented in the show as rock sugar) leaves her pathetically incapable of defending herself or her unborn child. When we see her at the very beginning of her cycle, dressing herself before her bedroom mirror, we know that she, in spite of all her preparation and ceremony, is completely oblivious to how her addiction will bring about the downfall of her family.
We watch helplessly as she, upon finding Mr. Bargarran’s bone charm sewn within her infant’s teddy bear, heads to Gallow Green to find some answers. Malcolm, having just in that moment discerned the meaning of all the dark signs he has seen, rushes by her as the “alarum bell” rings. He takes little notice of her. Left with no one to help her, the stultified and frightened Lady Macduff heads to the lobby to make her escape.
You know the rest of the story: Lady Macduff rings the bell at hotel reception only to be met by Mrs. Campbell, who waits with a glass of milk. After a heartbreaking pas de trois, in which Mrs. Campbell compels Lady Macduff to drink the milk tincture over the protests of the concerned Porter, Lady Macduff is left in a drunken stupor. She stumbles around the lobby completely stoned and helpless, singing fragments of “Goodnight Children Everywhere,” while the Porter looks on painfully.
She moves to the dresser, which sits inexplicably near the phone booths in the hotel lobby, and is covered by a large white sheet. She uncovers the mirror and dresser, and opens a bunch of drawers. She opens her suitcase, takes out a baby’s onesie, which she looks at sadly and places over her stomach, rubbing it. She goes back to the drawer and pulls out an elegant gown and places it over her body. After several minutes of this, she begins to become lucid again, drops the dress on the ground, and points and mumbles nonsensically at the crowd. Suddenly, as if snapping out of a trance, she quickly covers the mirror again and stuffs the dress back in the dresser and shuts all the drawers. Leaving her suitcase open and its contents strewn about, Lady Macduff walks toward the restaurant as Mrs. Campbell walks toward the dresser, staring at her, leaving her mess untouched.
I need not remind you of the significance of a covered mirror in Scottish superstition, nor need I remind you of poor, benign Duncan, who struggled hysterically to uncover the clocks in his quarters, fully aware that they augured his own death. As in Duncan’s case with the clocks, what is interesting about this scene is how, in her stupor, Lady Macduff panics at the sight of the uncovered mirror. Though the drug has made her passive and blissful, she remains paranoid about the ominous danger of uncovered mirror, wherein she sees the faces of the ghosts around her. Nonetheless, completely victimized by her addiction to this drug, Lady Macduff proceeds much as she would have without this warning.
Note that, unlike Duncan, Lady Macduff ignores the obvious omen that the covered mirror presents, and then willfully uncovers the mirror. She spiritually bears herself before it, exposing herself to the spirits that mean her harm. If these mirrors are the portals through which the spiritual world invades the physical, then this gesture is the final indication that Lady Macduff will become subject to Hecate’s will (i.e. she will be in her appointed place when Macbeth charges through the lobby to murder her). This scene before the dresser, which wonderfully encapsulates everything we have come to know about her—her maternal nature, her helpless addiction, and the fact that she, in spite of her precautions, fell perfectly into Hecate’s clutches—is our final look at one of the few morally good characters within the McKittrick Hotel.
Another character I believe to be morally good (and about as ineffectual as Lady Macduff) is J. Fulton, the Gallow Green Tailor. It is of brief interest to mention how the mirror motif is treated in his story. As RememberThePorter mentions in their post, mirrors are no less indicative of the supernatural when they are present than they are indicative of the absence of the supernatural when absent. For instance, that there is no mirror in the detective agency is perfectly in keeping with Malcolm’s character, whose profession has pit him against supernatural forces in the past, and who would no doubt take every precaution against becoming ensnared by them. We would think that Fulton, given his frequent use of charms and his constant paranoia about Hecate’s presence in town, would take the same precautions; but just as his magic is largely ineffectual in stemming the tide of Hecate’s will, so, too, is his attempt to protect his shop from unwanted intruders.
I am speaking, of course, of the wall-length mirror that comprises the north wall of M. Fulton Tailors. For a man who is ordinarily precautious and paranoid of the potential for supernatural influences to invade his life, this mirror seems like an extraordinary oversight. The two major interactions which kick-start Fulton’s story—his failed seduction of Agnes and the Taxidermist’s ruse to foist upon the unsuspecting tailor the mysterious bird skull—take place in anxious dances that happen before this mirror.
In the first, Fulton not only fails to win the affection of Ms. Naismith, whose motivations are not nearly as pure as they appear, but he falls patsy to her cunning attempt to divest him of his hard-earned money. Fulton is made poor in love and in cash after his confrontation with Agnes—and what’s more, he completely fails to divert her from the chain of events that eventually lead her into Hecate’s clutches.
In the second, as my wife Rebecca will no doubt explain to you when she comes back from her foray, he allows himself to be victimized by the creepy and insidious Mr. Bargarran, who comes to his shop under the guise of a customer needing alterations, but in fact wants merely to force upon Fulton that strange bird skull, a moment which perhaps unwittingly kick starts Fulton’s failed journey to combat the supernatural influences that have overrun the town.
I would now like to move on and mention an absolutely perfect example of where a mirror is used to denote the intersection of the physical and the supernatural worlds. It is during the Porter’s “one-on-one” and I must say—in the hopes that I will not steal the thunder of my wife, who is preparing a doozy of an essay on the Porter, in which she will further explore the significance of this moment—that it cracks the show wide open.
After having been seduced and assaulted by Boy Witch at the phone booths, the Porter takes the Guest to his small office near the storage lockers. He sits the Guest down and stares intently at a small round makeup mirror that sits on the desk, rotating it until he and the Guest are able to stare at each other through it. While holding glaring eye contact, he fetches a wooden crate, opens it, and pulls out a lipstick, which he applies to his lips, then a wig, which he places on his head. He brushes the wig with an ornate hairbrush for a few strokes before offering it to the Guest to finish the job. He then pulls out a brass ring and places it very slowly on the Guest’s finger, then bends down to kiss the ring. Then the concierge bell starts ringing. He hurriedly removes the wig and lipstick, whispers a sullen "Thank you" and flees the room.
I won’t say too much here, as my darling minx of a wife has a much more thorough understanding of this scene than I, but suffice it to say for now that it is this moment where we realize just who the Porter is with respect to Hecate, and just what his function is within the world of the McKittrick. During his transformation before the mirror we bear witness to the interplay between the spiritual world of the witches, and the (relatively) physical world of the other characters. It is in this moment that we realize the Porter is the conduit between them. That this scene is largely conducted through a mirror, where the two worlds are said to overlap, is a perfect manifestation of this concept.
IV. The Double Mirror
As we can see, in both the world of Sleep No More and in the cultural reservoir of superstitions it claims as its source, mirrors are not only implements of prophesy and divination, but they are also seen as thresholds between the spirit world and our own. The more we understand this concept, the more thrilling and terrible we are likely to find the motif with which I conclude this discussion: those places within the McKittrick Hotel where we find mirrors that face each other.
We have already mentioned how Shakespeare may have taken advantage of the double mirror as an exciting stage effect to show the line of Banquo’s heirs, but what we have not yet discussed is the extent to which the practice of facing one mirror opposite another was associated with the bridging of the physical and spiritual worlds.
For instance, there was the ancient Greek practice of scrying, an ancient form of divination which often required the use of mirrors or other reflective media (such as cauldrons of water). Tied intimately to the business of oracles, the ancient Greeks in fact built dedicated mirror chambers for the purpose of bringing the living in contact with the dead.
In 1958, archeologist Sotoris Dakaris discovered one such mirror chamber in Dodona, very near where the oracle was located (Ustinova, Yulia. Caves and the Ancient Greek Mind: Descending Underground in the Search for Ultimate. Oxford University Press, 2009. 73-76). As theorized by Dakaris, people would come from far and wide to speak with their dead loved ones. Patrons would be instructed to sit in complete darkness while waiting to see the oracle. When called, they would make their way through an ill-lit labyrinth to a long mirrored hallway where they could contact the dead. These psychomanteums, as they were called, made use of double-reflection and low lighting to disorient the viewer, preparing their senses for the sort of suggestion necessary to perform the scrying, as well as believe that the shapes they were likely to see were, in fact, their loved ones.
Leaving alone for now the obvious similarity between the ancient Greek psychomanteum and the method by which we enter the Manderley Bar, there is something particularly menacing about those places in the McKittrick Hotel where two mirrors are found to be facing each other, and it is a uniquely powerful element of the mirror motif that may often go unnoticed. The fact is that these places where mirrors face each other are, without exception, places associated with death.
By my reckoning, there are four places where this particular choice in decor may be observed: (i) the room containing Duncan’s canopy bed (i.e. the site of his murder), where the north and south walls consist of a dull mirrored glass; (ii) the hotel lobby, where the mirror on the western wall near the dining room (where Boy Witch twice dresses himself) directly faces the mirror on the eastern wall behind the reception desk (where the Porter often inspects, and sometimes makes out with, himself); (iii) the long mirrored hallway in the Macduffs’ apartment; and (iv) the mortuary in the back of the W.B. Robertson & Sons Funeral Home.
In locations (i) and (ii), the significance is obvious, as these are the locations of two of the three on-stage deaths that occur during the cycles. In the first, Macbeth murders the poisoned Duncan by smothering him with a pillow. In the second, Macbeth brutally murders Lady Macduff. What’s more is that, in both locations, the bodies of the dead are each found directly between two mirrors.
The association of death with locations (iii) and (iv) are perhaps more subsumed, but no less present. For instance, the hallway in the Macduffs’ apartment, covered with laterally aligned mirrors, is bookended by the nursery, in which Mr. Bargarran leaves his gruesome bone charm, and the children’s bedroom, which is ostensibly the site of the children’s murder. That all signs point to the Macduffs’ residence having been besieged by Macbeth’s agents (who would have been the ones responsible for the murders) is obvious.
As to location (iv), it is true that no on-stage death occurs here, but it does not stretch the imagination to see how it relates to at least a figurative “death.” For one, this place is after all a mortuary. The bodies to be found within are already dead—though please recall that, as we noted above, behind the mirrored door of the “freezer” are at least the theoretical bodies that a mortuary is meant to serve. (Also, please note the association between this freezer door and the highly-polished freezer door in The Shining, in which the ghosts of the Overlook Hotel interfere with the physical world, and help Jack escape captivity).
Second, there is one peculiar moment, simultaneously sexy and traumatic, that occurs there only moments before the rave. Sexy Witch, having snuck through the “Narnia door” (that is, the secret passage which connects the walk-in wardrobe in Grace Naismith’s apartment and the freezer of the morturary), lies down on the embalming slab and plays dead. Fulton opens the door to the back room of the funeral parlor, where he finds Sexy Witch lying there, seemingly dead. He enters and begins inspecting her corpse. He grabs at her limbs and measures her body for a few long moments before, suddenly, she comes alive and proceeds to seduce and terrify Fulton. Before long, Sexy Witch laughs and grabs Fulton by his tie, dragging him out into the high street, where she revels insanely in the street with the other witches.
This “death,” although merely a trick used by Sexy Witch to further torment Fulton, still nurtures the association of these dreaded double mirrors with death. In the McKittrick Hotel, it is these hostile places where the characters are most exposed to supernatural terrors—and it is where they are most often confronted with the spectre of death.
It is telling that, of the three murders that occur in the show, two of them occur in spaces that contain these double-mirrors—something to bear in mind the next time you’re stalking the dark passageways of the hotel and find yourself looking at your own reflection. Look hard enough and you’ll never know horrors you might see out of the corner of your eye.
Well, that about wraps it up. Seeing as I’m home alone, I think I’ll sacrifice some of this tobacco to the ghosts that roam these halls.
I feel as if I've heard the song Moonlight and Shadows by Artie Shaw somewhere in the hotel but didn't see it in your most recent (and wonderful I might add) piece on the music of Sleep No More. Could I have heard it in the Manderley?
First of all, darling, I must say that a girl could get used to being interrogated anonymously. It's so much more exciting when it could be just anyone doing the grilling.
Anyway, I have to say, my love, that the song is unfamiliar to me. And my pretentious husband doesn't seem to have heard it, either, despite acting as though he’s got it all figured out. While we can say with confidence that it does not play on the first, second or fourth floors of the McKittrick, it is entirely possible that the song plays in Nurse Shaw's office (whose soundtrack we do not doubt is incomplete) or the Macduffs' Apartment (which has a small unaccounted-for gap that neither of us has investigated yet).
As you suggest, you very well might have heard it in the Manderley. There are a slew of great songs on loop in there (such as Marlene Dietrich's "Falling in Love Again" and "Blue River" by Jack Teagarden) that mesh so well with those heard in the show proper that it's sometimes difficult to distinguish where exactly one heard them.
All this notwithstanding, do we have anyone out there reading these notes and queries who has a better answer for our delicious guest?
The first who manages to come up with a correct answer gets a big kiss from me.
Whenever she’s had a few too many, Rebecca is quick to remind me “Al Jolson is greater than Jesus,” and I don’t disagree. She knows I have an acute sensitivity to music and, between the two of us, we have a formidable collection of records in our library.
And because we are slaves, body and soul, to our hunger for all things McKittrick, our collection has come to include every piece of music played inside the hotel that we have been able to identify. We’d thought we’d take this opportunity to share this part of our collection with you.
What follows is an exhaustive list of all the incidental music that appears in Sleep No More, including notes as to the major action that accompanies each piece of music and, where applicable, very cursory analysis.
Before we go on, I would like you to please note a few things:
While we are confident that we have been able to accurately identify the pieces mentioned herein (as well as accurately noted their accompanying events), we cannot be absolutely sure that this list is exhaustive. So, if you feel as though we’ve missed one, please let us know!
I have neglected to include the few ambient pieces featured on the show (e.g. the low hum that rumbles through the labyrinth on the fifth floor; the low, two-note figure, that scores the first confrontation between Agnes and the Porter, itself most likely derived from a figure in the score to Vertigo; the twinkly, record-scratched music box piece that plays in the Macduffs’ apartment on a loop during quiet moments; etc.). This is for two reasons. Firstly, whereas I have identified with confidence the pieces listed herein, I cannot say the same for the ambient works, which are all but unrecognizable as heard in the show. Secondly, despite the fact that all the ambient pieces can be safely said to be original compositions arranged by the sound designers themselves, they are most likely derivative works (i.e. heavy distortions of brief samples of the music cited below—particularly the Bernard Herrmann scores), and therefore already are covered in some form herein.
I. The Macbeths
The music that scores the plot line of Macbeth and Lady Macbeth is an extremely important element of the show, as it informs our perception of the emotions and intentions of these main characters. A large portion of this soundtrack consists of the music of Bernard Herrmann, whose Hitchcock scores are intimately woven into the most poignant moments of the show.
To begin with, we have “I’ll Never Smile Again” by Tommy Dorsey, which plays in the lobby while Macbeth receives his prophesy from the witches. While the original song was a lament by a new widow about the death of her husband, the song here takes the form of a prophetic warning of the bloody chain of events that Macbeth is about initiate. His ambition takes a dramatic toll on each of the lives within the McKittrick, in ways ranging from the romantic to the fatal.
The Macbeths’ first duet of the cycle is scored by three pieces from Herrmann’s score to Alfred Hitchcock’s Psycho, namely “The Hotel Room,” “The Package,” “The Window,” and “The City,” in that order. The scene unfolds in the Macbeths’ bedroom, wherein Lady Macbeth overpowers Macbeth and they tentatively unite in their plan to murder Duncan. The scene ends with a broken Macbeth placing shoes on his wife’s feet before she leaves to attend the ball.
During the ball held by Lady Macbeth in Duncan’s honor, we hear a three-song suite, consisting of a slightly sped-up and abridged “Tuxedo Junction” by Glenn Miller, which bleeds into “Boulder Bluff” by Glenn Miller and eventually “Sandman” by Benny Goodman. It is during this ball that Lady Macbeth is able seduce Duncan (while Macbeth watches), laying the groundwork for her eventual poisoning of the unsuspecting king.
After Macbeth, leaves the ball to return to his room, furious at Lady Macbeth's behavior, “Carlotta’s Portrait” from Vertigo plays. He shuffles around the room, reading and re-reading his original letter to his wife. The sudden arrival of Lady Macbeth does nothing to break the tension, and they begin to have an anxious struggle during which she is able to convince him to follow through on their plan. As the song comes to a close, Lady Macbeth and Macbeth find themselves on the bed, and she thrusts her finger out in the distance. Macbeth leaves to go murder Duncan.
Immediately thereafter, “The Window” and “The Package” from Psycho play as Lady Macbeth waits in her room. She attempts to balance on the lip of the bathtub, and flies about the room with dread and anxiety. The music comes to a stop as a far off “alarum bell” rings.
Much of the rest of Lady Macbeth’s “soundtrack” is either soundless or ambient, but Macbeth soon finds himself in the “replica bar” of Gallow Green, where he is sucked into a witches’ Sabbath of orgiastic, bacchanalian proportions. The music that plays there, in marked contrast to the Herrmann scores or the period music that scores the rest of the show, is a grimy jungle/breakbeat suite that infuses the orgy with a lecherous and vigorous quality. The music consists of a mix of “Reece” by Ed Rush & Optical and “Mute (Jokers of the Scene Remix)” by The Brash.
Immediately after the rave, when Macbeth comes to his senses and storms across Gallow Green toward the speakeasy, an excerpt from “The Nightmare and Dawn” from Vertigo (from about 0:37 to 2:20) blares through the streets. Fuming with rage and paranoia at the thought of Banquo’s issue potentially reigning in the kingdom, he enters the speakeasy intent upon murdering him.
The music that plays during the banquet consists of a medley of excerpts from the soundtrack to David Lynch’s Mulholland Drive by Angelo Badalamenti, namely “Diner” (with the closing orchestral crash corresponding with Banquo’s ghost sitting down at the table) and “Mr. Roque/Betty’s Theme” (with the odd high-pitched reverberation corresponding with Macbeth’s and Banquo’s ironic toast).
Immediately after the banquet, an orchestral suite (which we’ll refer to hereinafter as the “Hitchcock Suite”) plays in almost every floor and room of the hotel that not only brings all the stories to an emotional climax, but also serves to restart all of the characters’ cycles. This consists of the following: “The First Floor” from Psycho, the last few minutes of “The Nightmare and Dawn” from Vertigo, the first few minutes of “The Diamond Revealed” from Family Plot (a Hitchcock film to which John Williams did the score), and “Prelude/Nightmare” from Vertigo. Over the course of this suite, so much happens within the hotel that it would be a needless digression to list them all, but suffice it to say that pivotal events occur to nearly every character during this time.
II. The Speakeasy and Gallow Green
This soundtrack, which we will tentatively call the “Speakeasy soundtrack” is the sequence of incidental music that emerges from the large radio in the Gallow Green speakeasy. It is notable for being wholly made up of diagetic music, and seeing as this particular soundtrack can be heard simultaneously in several “indoor” places in Gallow Green, it appears to represent a sort of radio station, the source of which is unknown to us. The speakeasy soundtrack also plays in Mac Crínáin & Reid Detective Agency, W.B. Robertson & Sons Funeral Home, M. Fulton Tailor’s and Bargarran Taxidermy.
We begin with “Every Night About This Time” by the Ink Spots. In an ironic play on the title, each cycle begins again with this song, as the Bartender walks into the speakeasy to clean up the mess from the cycle before. It should be noted that, in those rare instances when Nurse Shaw visits the speakeasy to share a drink with the Bartender, this is the song that is usually playing in the background. Meanwhile, next door, Agnes enters Fulton’s shop, and the latter tries clumsily to seduce her.
Next, “I’ll Never Smile Again” by the Ink Spots plays in the speakeasy somewhat simultaneously with the Tommy Dorsey version of this tune that plays down in the hotel lobby (See Section I, supra). The Bartender continues to clean the bar, and pours out a glass of champagne in preparation for the arrival of Sexy Witch. Meanwhile, back in M. Fulton Tailors, Fulton finishes his attempt to seduce Agnes and chases her out into the street. One can easily see the irony of the song’s title in the context of these two simultaneous failed seductions.
Next on the soundtrack is “It’s a Sin to Tell a Lie” by the Ink Spots, during which the Bartender is sexually teased and tortured by Sexy Witch within the speakeasy. Meanwhile, Bargarran the taxidermist sits in his shop. He undoes the lining of his coat sleeve and places a bird skull in the coat pocket, along with a note that says “Banquo traitor.” Before the song comes to a close, Bargarran heads across the street to Fulton’s shop and drops the coat off to be mended.
While the Bartender continues to dance with Sexy Witch on the pool table to “Maybe” by the Ink Spots, Agnes is leaving the “Plant this seed” note in the Detective agency. Across town, Fulton mends Bargarran’s coat, while Bargarran himself watches Fulton from his store counter, ostensibly tidying up his shop and arranging his tools.
Bargarran, upon returning to the tailor’s, intimidates Fulton into taking the bird skull and note, while "When the Swallows Come Back to Capistrano” by the Ink Spots plays—make what you will of the potential significance of the title with respect to this exchange. Meanwhile, the Bartender enters the funeral home and dances a solo atop the mortuary slab.
The Bartender goes into the detective agency and seals the blackbird from Reid's desk to the tune of “Alone With My Dreams” by Jack Buchanan. He then reads Agnes’ note and accordingly dials down to the lobby to speak with her. Immediately thereafter, he goes to the taxidermist’s to give the blackbird to Bargarran. While this occurs, Fulton performs a charm on the bird skull in the funeral home.
Fulton enters the speakeasy, where “Now That I Found You” by Jack Buchanan is on the radio, to confront the Bartender. They search each other for witch’s marks and have a very tense confrontation that includes the service of a potentially poisoned shot of liquor.
“You Forgot Your Gloves” by Jack Buchanan, interestingly enough, begins just as Fulton heads down to the hotel lobby to retrieve his coat. Meanwhile, the Bartender sits alone in the speakeasy.
As “Weep No More My Baby” by Jack Buchanan comes on the speakeasy radio, the Bartender plays a devious card game with the Guest and drinks a shot with them. Meanwhile, Agnes walks into the detective agency, looking for information about her sister, Grace, whereupon she is confronted by an exasperated Malcolm.
Agnes’ confrontation with Malcolm turns into a bewitched seduction, as they dance to “Hallelujah I Love Him So” by Peggy Lee, and he chases her out into the street where they kiss again. She then heads to the speakeasy and sits down with the Bartender. They share a drink together before Boy Witch interrupts the proceedings.
Around the time the music changes to “Close Your Eyes” by Ray Noble and His Orchestra, ft. Al Bowlly, Agnes leaves the speakeasy in a fright and goes to make a locket charm in the tailor’s. Bartender bounces Boy Witch into the locked box. Bargarran is confronted by Lady Macduff in his shop. Fulton, having buried the bird skull in the graveyard, returns to the funeral home.
Fulton performs an “autopsy” on Sexy Witch to “Moonglow” by Jack Teagarden, that ends in a shock. The Bartender dances briefly with Bald Witch before going to the detective agency to steal the crime scene photos from Malcolm’s cork board. Agnes continues making her locket in the tailor’s.
Fulton watches as the witches converge upon the “replica bar” while “Why Don’t You Do Right?” by Peggy Lee plays, and stays in the street to see a possessed Macbeth wander after them (in most instances, Fulton then takes this as his cue to walk down the alleyway and observe the rave for himself. Shortly thereafter, Macduff, Malcolm and Banquo converge upon the speakeasy and explore their suspicions toward each other regarding Duncan’s murder.
The Bartender watches Macduff, Malcolm and Banquo play a peculiar card game to “My Man” by Peggy Lee, during which their suspicions about each other are brought to an agonizing tension. Meanwhile, across town, Fulton steals the blackbird from Bargarran’s shop and returns to his own shop to perform a charm with it.
Macbeth storms into the speakeasy, interrupting the card game as “On the Sunny Side of the Street” by Ted Lewis comes on. The volume of the music is lowered significantly, only to be replaced by ambient noise, as Macbeth assaults and murders Banquo. Meanwhile, at the tailor's, Fulton finishes his ritual with the blackbird.
Here, curiously, the soundtrack appears to start over for a bit as the cycle winds down, and “Every Night About This Time” by the Ink Spots plays. Fulton returns the blackbird to the detective agency, then heads to the funeral home, where he watches Macbeth and Lady Macbeth rave in the street. It is also during this song that Banquo awakens and leaves the speakeasy.
Fulton returns to his shop to clean up his space, and we hear “I’ll Never Smile Again” by the Ink Spots for the second time in the cycle.There is a distinct parallelism here, as this marks the second time that Fulton returns to his store, dejected. We are no doubt meant to draw a parallel between his failure to seduce Agnes—a failure that leaves her vulnerable to Hecate’s machinations—and his shock and dejection at having seen the rave, knowing full well that, despite his efforts, he was unable to thwart the evil that surrounds him.
Bargarran storms into Fulton’s shop to confront him while “It’s a Sin to Tell a Lie” by the Ink Spots plays again, and though Fulton tries to run away, they end up fighting in the street. After Fulton escapes, Bargarran searches through Fulton’s shop. This song, like the last, is meant to highlight a parallel. When the song first plays, Bargarran destroys the hem of his coat and presents it to Fulton as a ruse for planting the bird skull on his person. This time, Bargarran returns, knowing that Fulton has performed a ritual to divest the skull of its power, and has taken the skull who-knows-where; one might say the power, or at least the possession over this seemingly important artifact, has been reversed.
Finally, “Maybe” by the Ink Spots plays to an empty speakeasy before the prominent “Hitchcock Suite” plays on nearly every speaker in the hotel.
III. Hecate’s “Replica Bar”
In Hecate’s Gallow Green hideout, which consists of a dead, darkened, worn-out husk of the Manderley Bar through which we enter the hotel,
While heavily distorted, a close listen will reveal that this is indeed Tony Bennett’s voice singing “Is That All There Is?” (pay close attention to the way he says “Is that all there is to a fire?” and especially the long outro).
After this quite significant musical moment, there is a little-noticed soundtrack that plays during the middle portion of the cycle. Seeing as Hecate is largely absent during this time, usually in her lair performing serial “one-on-ones,” the music that plays here is not meant to underscore any action, though each of the songs is vaguely thematic and tells us something about the goings-on within the hotel.
After Hecate enters her lair for the first one-on-one of her cycle, “Weep No More, My Baby” by Ray Noble and His Orchestra, ft. Al Bowlly plays. The title appears to be a sly reference not only to Hecate’s avocation of harvesting the tears of others, but also to the common medieval belief that witches were unable to produce tears.
“When the Swallows Come Back to Capistrano” by Glenn Miller is likely a cursory reference to the prevalence bird motif within the show, which we've discussed before.
Next plays “Slumber Song” by Glenn Miller. While I cannot speculate as to the thematic significance of this song (should one even exist), it should be mentioned that this song appears in several other instances throughout the cycle—it also plays in Nurse Shaw’s office in the King James Sanitorium and in the Macduffs’ apartment.
“A Nightingale Sang in Berkeley Square” by Glenn Miller is another cursory reference to the prevalence bird motif within the show, which we’ve discussed before.
The song that concludes this section of Hecate’s cycle—“That Old Black Magic” by Glenn Miller—is such an on-the-nose musical cue in the context of this show that it warrants no explanation.
Shortly thereafter, during the rave “Reece” by Ed Rush & Optical and “Mute (Jokers of the Scene Remix)” by The Brash Well after the rave, the “Hitchcock Suite” plays as Hecate goes on her “walkabout” through Gallow Green.
IV. The Macduffs’ Flat
The Macduffs’ apartment has its own soundtrack that sometimes compliments the impression we are meant to get that Lady Macduff is, at least in part, a very maternal, protective woman.
“Goodnight Children Everywhere” by Vera Lynn begins just as Macduff comes home to find his wife scratching at the face of the Madonna statue on their china closet. They share a dance during which he is able to coax her down and into the parlor.
“Lights Out” by Greta Keller plays as they perform their duet amongst the couches in the parlor. Lady Macduff, clearly showing withdrawal symptoms, does not manage to calm down until the song draws a close, and “A Nightingale Sang in Berkeley Square” by Glenn Miller comes on. Macduff and his wife then begin to dress themselves for the ball.
“Moonglow” by Benny Goodman begins playing as they head down to the ball. This song, along with “Adapted from the French” by Jack Buchanan that follows it, plays to an empty apartment.
Much later in the cycle, after a long stretch of silence and ambient music, three songs, “Let Us Be Sweethearts” by Leslie “Hutch” Hutchinson, “You Stepped Out of a Dream” by Glenn Miller, and “Slumber Song” by Glenn Miller play in the apartment. During this time, Catherine Campbell visits to tidy up the place, though she isn’t afraid to express her contempt for the Macduffs while she is there.
After the maid has left, the “Hitchcock Suite” resounds through the empty apartment, with a freshly reincarnated Lady Macduff returning there only shortly before the music fades away.
V. King James Sanitorium
The sanitorium seems to have two major sources of music, the large hedge maze, where Nurse Shaw and Matron Lang share some interactions, and Nurse Shaw’s office, where surprisingly little happens. Nonetheless, this is a (no doubt incomplete) account of the incidental music that occurs within the sanitorium.
Early in the cycle, when Matron Lang first steps from her hut to wander the maze, she comes upon a column and scrawls on it in chalk. She is interrupted, however, by a bright white light, which causes her to collapse. She is found shortly thereafter by Nurse Shaw, who walks her back to the hut to share a moment of comfort and empathy together. As this action plays out, the piece “Destiny” from Constantine by Brian Tyler and Klaus Badelt resounds through the maze.
There is a small radio in Nurse Shaw’s office that, for the most part, is silent, but occasionally plays some pop music. Around the middle of the cycle, “Guilty” by Ray Noble and His Orchestra ft. Al Bowlly plays, followed immediately by “Slumber Song” by Glenn Miller. Now, while Nurse Shaw’s cycle is highly variable, one of the few actions she performs in every cycle is that she will go to her office and carve out patterns and messages from the medical dictionary there. It is the “Slumber Song” which accompanies this action.
During this process, the alarum bell rings over the loudspeakers, and Nurse Shaw is interrupted from her work. She gets up from the office and wanders through the maze toward the Matron’s hut. They then perform their beautiful “mirror dance” through the hedges while “Humanity” from Constantine by Brian Tyler and Klaus Badelt plays.
Later on in the cycle, a long silence in the hospital is interrupted by “It’s a Sin to Tell a Lie” by the Ink Spots, which resounds from Nurse Shaw’s office, followed immediately thereafter by “A Nightingale Sang in Berkeley Square” by Glenn Miller.
At the end of the cycle, the “Hitchcock Suite” can be heard paying from the floors below.
VI. McKittrick Hotel Lobby
The hotel lobby is largely silent with respect to identifiable incidental music, but the few moments of sound are so significant that they deserve a mention.
“I’ll Never Smile Again” by Tommy Dorsey. (See Section II, supra)
“Is That All There Is?” by Peggy Lee. Our first taste of the Porter’s unrequited love (and perhaps also fear) of Boy Witch occurs during this iconic scene, where Boy Witch hops on stage and, having just been slathered below the eyes with Vick’s Vapo-Rub, lip-synchs a teary-eyed rendition of the song. This is simultaneous with Hecate’s own version of the song, playing upstairs. (See Section III, supra)
During the ball, the sound of the music coming from downstairs—namely “Tuxedo Junction” by Glenn Miller, “Boulder Bluff” by Glenn Miller, and “Sandman” by Benny Goodman—resounds through the lobby as the Porter dances about.
Shortly after the ball ends, Banquo arrives to receive his prophecy from the Porter and Sexy Witch, the latter of whom manhandles him and charms his eyes to sleep. This all occurs while “The Window” and “The Porch” from Psycho play.
Much later on, we hear a slightly distorted version of “Moonlight Becomes You” by Glenn Miller, which plays whilst an intoxicated Lady Macduff wanders the lobby in a heartbreaking stupor, during which she stands before the mirrored dresser, trying on dresses and baby clothes. Immediately after the song fades away, Lady Macduff, having recovered some of her lucidity, walks into the restaurant of the lobby, where she sits and waits for the arrival of Catherine Campbell, who again tempts her with the milk tincture. The song that plays here, appropriately enough, is “Temptation” from Psycho.
VII. Miscellaneous Music
In this section we will mention the few musical cues that occur in various places that do not, in any major sense, have a constant soundtrack.
For one, we have the prominent theme that accompanies the Guest's entrance to the Manderley. The music heard in this dark labyrinth is the "Prelude" to Hitchcock's The Man Who Knew Too Much by Bernard Herrmann.
One major cue occurs early in the cycle in the Gallow Green High Street. After Agnes leaves Fulton’s shop, Fulton chases her out into the street with flowers and candy. As he leans in to try and kiss her again, there is a very brief swell of music—the first few measures of Franz Waxman’s “Opening and Main Theme” from Hitchcock’s Rebecca—that fades away as quickly as it begins.
A little while afterward, we can hear a bit of music in Duncan’s bedroom. As far as we can tell, Duncan’s bedroom has its own soundtrack, although, for the most part, the source of the music seems to be one very, very faint-sounding speaker in the far corner of his bed, which tends to play only music that is heard somewhere else in the hotel. For example, the very faint sounds of “The Hotel Room” can be heard during Duncan’s morning prayers, while the same music is playing upstairs in the Macbeth’s bedroom. In addition, when no one else is in the room, an almost imperceptibly faint rendition of “Slumber Song” by Glenn Miller plays at the same time a much louder iteration of it is playing upstairs in the Macduffs’ Apartment. These little moments of synchronicity I will leave to you to find, as I imagine they are rare enough not to impact our reading of the show too much; although the point could be made that this apparent synchronicity is meant to signify Duncan’s kingship—i.e. that he (ideally) surveys all that occurs under his auspices.
This point notwithstanding, there are some musical moments in Duncan’s room that are far less ambiguous and perplexing. During his shaving scene with Malcolm, for instance, two songs can be heard: “Moonlight Becomes You” by Glenn Miller and “Frenesi” by Glenn Miller. Once the latter fades away, the loud music from the ballroom can be heard, overpowering all other sound in the bedroom.
Much later on, in the ballroom, there is a beautiful moment where Catherine Campbell wakes up the dead Duncan with a kiss, and they dance in the ballroom to “Moonlight Becomes You” by Glenn Miller. It is a tender moment that ends with a twinge of guilt and heartbreak—and that fact that this music also accompanies Lady Macduff’s stupor upstairs adds a touch of irony to Mrs. Campbell’s all-too-brief moment of joy and eventual dejection.
And finally, we come to the exit music, which pays after Macbeth is hanged and the actors usher the Guests back to the Manderley, which is “A Nightingale Sang in Berkeley Square” by Glenn Miller.
And there you have it. This is our humble attempt at an exhaustive account of songs featured within the McKittrick Hotel. If you have any corrections or additions (or questions), feel free to let us know.
Until next time, my lovelies.
[EDIT: Thank you to Nick and the lovely behindawhitemask for their corrections.]
Bird-Watching at the McKittrick, Part Two: Sleep No More
Hello, again, my lovelies. Whilst Rebecca has been off for two days now mucking about at God-knows-where (and with God-knows-whom), I’ve taken a sort of stay-at-home holiday. I’ve been taking my tea in the library, playing patience by the fireside, and riding through the estate with the vigor of a much younger man. I’ve even managed to get though a sizeable chunk of Samuel Pepys’ Diaries—I’m particularly partial to the scene in which Mrs. Pepys catches her husband “embracing” a scrumptiously young Deb Willet beneath her petticoat.
In any case, this essay is long overdue. I had begun many months ago to write on the bird motif as it appears in Sleep No More, only to stop short of actually mentioning the show at all. In the time since, my beautiful, impetuous hellion of a wife took it upon herself to help me with a bit of the legwork, but here I shall at last round out my discussion of birds.
Let’s get to it.
As discussed in my previous essay, the prominence of the bird motif in Shakespeare’s Macbeth is a powerful literary device for underscoring the malevolence and unnaturalness of Macbeth’s usurpation of the throne. One of Macbeth’s most impressive aspects is its haunting, vivid and violent imagery. The bird motif is a powerful contributor to this menacing atmosphere, as well as to the idea that Nature itself is recoiling at Macbeth’s actions. As A.C. Bradley put it:
In Nature, again, something is felt to be at work, sympathetic with human guilt and supernatural malice. She labours with portents. ‘Lamentings heard in the air, strange screams of death, / And prophesying with accents terrible’ burst from her. The owl clamours all through the night; Duncan's horses devour each other in frenzy; the dawn comes, but no light with it. Common sights and sounds, the crying of crickets, the croak of the raven, the light thickening after sunset, the homecoming of the rooks, are all ominous. Then, as if to deepen these impressions, Shakespeare has concentrated attention on the obscurer regions of man's being, on phenomena which make it seem that he is in the power of secret forces lurking below, and independent of his consciousness and will […] All this has one effect, to excite supernatural alarm and, even more, a dread of the presence of evil not only in its recognized seat but all through and around our mysterious nature. (Shakespearean Tragedy: Lectures on Hamlet, Othello, King Lear and Macbeth. London: Macmillan & Co. 1926. 337-338.)
Bradley’s point here could just as easily be applied to the set of Sleep No More, which impresses not only because of its vivid atmosphere, but also because of the abominable and unsettling character of its imagery—all of which contribute to one’s sense that Nature is recoiling in horror from the unnatural acts occurring within the set. In that regard, I will endeavor here to illustrate the major instances in which the bird motif serves this effect in the show.
In Part One, I found it convenient to subdivide the bird motif in Macbeth into three major categories: (i) the recurring analogy of Macbeth as a bird of prey who subverts the natural order through his murder of Duncan, (ii) birds as symbols of Nature and of harmony with the natural order, and (iii) birds as auspicious instruments of Nature’s subsequent revolt against Macbeth. I will continue said subdivision here, as the repeated incidence of the bird motif in Sleep No More serves to underscore all three forms of the motif.
I. BIRDS OF PREY AS A METAPHOR FOR MACBETH
To begin with, the metaphor in which Macbeth is likened to a bird of prey is sustained in a couple moments throughout the show.
During Malcolm’s one-on-one, for instance, while he is explaining some recent divinatory signs to his unnamed “student,” he directly quotes Macbeth: “On Tuesday last / A falcon, towering in her pride of place, / Was by a mousing owl hawk’d at and kill’d” (II.iv.11-13). As explained in Part One, this is in large part an analogy for Macbeth (the lowly mousing owl, a nocturnal bird of prey) murdering Duncan (the falcon, a graceful, diurnal bird with royal associations) after the recent re-securing of the throne subsequent to Macdonwald’s rebellion. That this line appears twice within Sleep No More—Malcolm also types an abridged version of it in his “auspicey report”—emphasizes its importance. Here, as in the play, Macbeth is likened to a dark harbinger of death who subverts Nature by killing a bird of a more majestic order.
But Sleep No More goes even further to hammer home this association. In cycle three, for instance, during Macbeth’s hanging, and as the ambient Angelo Badalamenti score rumbles through the hall, loud bird sounds can be heard over the crescendoing music. From the moment Macduff places the noose over Macbeth’s head until well after the hanging, the flapping of birds’ wings as well as the caws and shrieks of carrion birds are heard thundering on the soundtrack. Macbeth’s chickens rather literally come home to roost in that moment.
This notion of Macbeth as a predator, however, is not limited in the show to him and his “fiend-like queen.” In fact, there are many indications that the world of Sleep No More—not unlike the Scotland of Shakespeare’s play—is a ruthless, dog-eat-dog hunting ground, full of callous predators looking for a leg up.
The predatory character of the court intrigue that makes up a large proportion of the character interactions within the McKittrick is reflected in the décor. This is particularly true in places such as Duncan’s bedroom, the book shelves of which are littered with trophies from successful hunting expeditions, or Bargarran’s Taxidermy—wherein many of the seemingly benign objects and displays in fact show symptoms of what Felix Barrett described as “slight abominations,” such as the roaring wolverine holding the dead mouse in its mouth, or the ring-necked pheasants suspended from the ceiling and circling the center table like vultures.
II. BIRDS AS METAPHORS FOR THE “NATURAL” ORDER
With this in mind, I think it is important to recall that, as I argued in Part One, Shakespeare occasionally used the bird motif in Macbeth to draw attention to the ordinary course of Nature. He used birds as symbols of harmony to contrast the dark universe of the play against the peace, safety, sweetness and virtue of a universe where the Natural Order is undisturbed. Whatever might be said about the ruthless world of medieval Scotland, it is clear from the text of the play that Shakespeare at least acknowledges that, but for Man’s actions, Nature is “bounteous,” and that “nature’s germains” are a treasure. While, in the world of Sleep No More, there are some examples to support this idea, they are minor, and serve more to tie the show to the play than to exemplify the order and tranquility of Nature.
This is because, in essence, the world of Sleep No More is one that has already been transformed by evil. I think it’s safe to say, given the fact that the show diegetically acknowledges that the characters are locked in an endless cycle of evil, that the McKittrick Hotel is a sick and unnatural place, as far removed from the Natural Order as Macbeth’s murders are removed from moral order. That this cursed space is itself wholly divorced from the “ordinary use of nature” is clear to us even in those moments where, like in Shakespeare’s play, the bird motif is presented as a symbol of Nature and communion therewith. In other words, there is an unsettling perversion that runs through even the most innocuous of effects, where even examples of the “natural” within the McKittrick Hotel are marked by aberrance and peculiarity.
(i) The Macduffs as Birds
You will remember that, in Part One, I pointed out how, in order to express conformity with the Natural Order, bird metaphors are sometimes employed by Shakespeare as analogues for the Macduffs, who are foils to the Macbeths in most respects. Sleep No More also does this to some extent. For one, there is the egg motif as seen in the Macduffs’ Apartment, which we’ve discussed before. For another, the number of ring-necked pheasants strung up on a line within the hotel’s storage room near the lobby. The Sleep No More program (2nd Ed.) explicitly points out that this is a reference to Macduff’s lament upon receiving the news that his family has been slaughtered: “All my pretty ones? / Did you say all? O hell-kite! All? / What, all my pretty chickens and their dam / At one fell swoop?” (Notice, again, the implication of Macbeth as a predatory bird, swooping in and terrorizing the Macduffs).
Despite the fact that it is only “natural” for pheasants to be hunted for sport, the physical presence of these poor birds strung up on a line is, in our eyes, nonetheless unsettling—and it becomes even more disturbing once we realize that these strung-up creatures are of the same species as those in Bargarran’s shop. And once we recall what role Bargarran plays in the slaughter of the Macduffs, we finally understand to what extent Shakespeare’s metaphor is perverted. We then understand that there is nothing “natural” about this place at all.
(ii) “When the Swallows Come Back to Capistrano.”
This brand of irony is one that crops up again and again within the show. One of the most noticeable examples of this is the inclusion of the song “When the Swallows Come Back to Capistrano.”
Written by Leon René as a tribute to the annual return of the American Cliff Swallow to Mission San Juan Capistrano in Southern California, “When the Swallows Come Back to Capistrano” references the beauty inherent in the regular recurrence of a natural event, referred to by some as the “Miracle of the Swallows.” This phenomenon has become the “signature icon" of the Mission (Yenne, Bill. Missions of California. 78).
The song plays multiple times within each cycle. The show makes use of both the Ink Spots’ 1940 recording (as heard on the radio in the speakeasy and several Gallow Green shops) as well as The Glenn Miller Orchestra’s version recorded in the same year (as heard in Hecate’s replica bar around the time Lady Macbeth’s ball is wrapping up downstairs). In the show, this song could be seen as a cogent expression of the eternal recurrence of the character’s storylines as they relive their most harrowing moments with the hotel.
While the recurrence of cycles (or “loops”) is largely a technical conceit, constructed as to allow the audience a chance to see several characters’ storylines in a single evening, the show does not shy away from calling attention to the fact that these characters are, even within the continuity of the show, essentially doomed to relive the fateful night over and over again.
Everything from the prominence of eggs (themselves symbols of regeneration) to the appearance of the concentric octagram (the symbolism of which will be explored at a later date) to the recurrence of the song “Every Night About This Time” (also by the Ink Spots, and which plays in the speakeasy at the immediate restart of each cycle) all unquestionably refers to the endless feedback loop in which these characters are helplessly stuck. Even Matron Lang’s black fairy tale, which describes the stars as “little golden flies, stuck up there like the shrike sticks them up on a black thorn,” paints a picture of a bleak, unforgiving cycle of horror from which the residents can never escape (something we are encouraged to be reminded of when we see the dead quail sitting in her pagoda).
“When the Swallows Come Back to Capistrano,” which is nothing if not an ode to the eternal recurrence of the seasons, expresses within the show a sentiment that Sleep No More exploits to a chilling (and ironic) effect—that the nature of the space is warped by and around the abominable actions of its inhabitants, such that, by whatever design, they are doomed to re-experience the same fateful night over and over. This is, again, a chilling example of how Sleep No More inverts a positive symbol of the symmetry and constancy of Nature into a distressing reminder of how disrupted and perverse its errant world has become.
(iii) “A Nightingale Sang in Berkeley Square”
Just about the only ray of hope we see in this mess of despair is to be found in the show’s closing moments. After Macbeth is hanged, and Glenn Miller’s rendition of “A Nightingale Sang in Berkeley Square” (sung by Ray Eberle) fills the ballroom. This song constitutes a sort of denouement for the show—offering a stunned and exhausted audience some catharsis after the tremendous emotional blow of the hanging.
While the song itself merely consists of a man reminding his lover of the night they met, I for one cannot help but be struck by the thought, whilst being ushered out of the hotel by the cast, that, somehow—if at least for tonight—order has been restored in the McKittirick.
Historically, the nightingale represented the coming on of Spring, as well as the first blooming of romantic love. “In some places, […] there is a popular prognostication from the fact of the cuckoo or nightingale being first heard.” (Hardy, James. “Popular History of the Cuckoo.” The Folk-Lore Record, Vol. II. London: The Folk-Lore Society. 1879. 56). Should the nightingale be heard first, it was thought to be a good omen for farmers, who would then feel secure in sowing their crops. (Id.).
In his poem “Of the Cuckow and the Nightingale,” Geoffrey Chaucer wrote: “And among hem it was a commune tale, / That it were good to here the nightingale / Rather than the leud cuckow sing.” John Milton wrote something much the same in his “Sonnet to the Nightingale”: “Thy liquid notes that close the eve of day, / First heard before the shallow cuckoo's bill / Portends success in love.”
This augurs well for the narrator in the song, but it remains to be understood whether or not the appearance of the song at the end of the show says anything about the recurring cycle of violence to which we have borne witness. Should we be tempted to believe that, because justice has finally been done, and that Macbeth has been rightfully executed, that the chain of misery that these characters are put through can finally end? I believe that it wouldn’t be a stretch to imagine that it does.
III. BIRDS AS SYMBOLS OF NATURE’S REVOLT AGAINST MACBETH
As we have seen, the majority of the examples of bird imagery employed within Sleep No More are expressions of the distinctly unnatural. As I mentioned in Part One, Macbeth’s murder of Duncan is written by Shakespeare as “a violation of Nature’s organic unity and creative cycle” (McAlindon, T. Shakespeare’s Tragic Cosmos. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991. 217.). Recall that not only was Duncan Macbeth’s king, but he was also his kinsman and a guest in his home. To convey the atrocity inherent in Macbeth’s act, Shakespeare largely uses the bird motif, in all its attendant abominations, to express Nature’s revolt against Macbeth for having so brutally subverted the Natural Order. In the universe of the play, Macbeth’s murder of Duncan is such an outrage that Nature itself recoils in disgust. The producers of Sleep No More closely adopted this imagery for largely the same purpose.
Like in Macbeth, the bird motif in Sleep No More not only serves to contribute to a cumulative sense of dread, but also highlights Macbeth’s subversion of Nature and Nature’s subsequent revolt against him. Some of this I have mentioned already, such as the disturbing sounds of carrion birds that fill the ballroom during Macbeth’s hanging; however, something very similar occurs much earlier—only moments before the king’s murder—that highlights this point.
(i) Banquo’s Ballroom Solo
Not long after having received his prophesy (and subsequently having been charmed and taunted by both Sexy Witch and Bald Witch), Banquo stumbles out of the hotel lobby and down the long staircase to the ballroom. Finding the space all to himself, Banquo does a writhing, tortured solo in the middle of the dance floor, complete with flips and somersaults and large grasping gestures. The room is dim and the sound of birds flapping their wings and cawing fills the air. In a stunning acrobatic display, Banquo dives about the room as if dodging the birds. As the unsettling bird sounds crescendo, Banquo hears an alarm bell toll in the distance. He throws his hand up toward the sky and shouts before rushing up to the mezzanine to find Malcolm standing over Duncan’s dead body.
There are two major things about this scene that are relevant. First of all, one wonders during this solo whether or not Banquo is beginning to give in to the temptation instilled in him by the witches’ prophesy (i.e. that he would sire a line of kings). Certainly, a part of Banquo’s behavior in this scene conforms to this reading, especially in light of the fact that the Banquo of Shakespeare’s play also shows signs of ambition—though he is murdered before the audience has a chance to learn whether he would have yielded to it.
Secondly, it is difficult to watch this scene and not understand that it, much like Shakespeare’s own avian imagery, was meant to inspire fear and awe. Watching Banquo narrowly avoid the low swoops of predatory birds is a frightening exercise, forcing us to bear witness to Nature’s violent upheaval. As in the play, the night of Duncan’s death in Sleep No More is fraught with foreboding signs and strange unnatural happenings—of which this scene is the most intense expression. The birds themselves are in revolt.
(ii) Malcolm’s Detective Agency
Of course this scene represents only the pinnacle of this unnatural agitation. As you know, by this point in the story, Malcolm has been noticing and cataloging these strange occurrences for months, as can be seen from both his behavior and the litany of bird references contained within his detective agency.
Littered throughout the front portion of the agency are a number of loose papers, files, and large Redwelds, most of which contain material pertaining to the practice of augury. Among them are autopsy reports detailing the dissection of various birds; typed reports and witness statements (from parties such as Lennox and Macbeth) relaying information about the flight patterns of various birds; and one page of handwritten notes by Malcolm talking about some strange avian behavior of late (including one reference to a cuckoo call being heard from the “north-south”—yet another reference to Woyzeck). At the bottom of the latter is written “ASK LENNOX”. On top of Malcolm’s desk is a metal card index containing notes regarding different bird species and the various superstitions associated therewith (which seemed to be largely quoted from books published by the Folklore Society, a number of which have been cited by Rebecca and I on this blog).
There are ostrich eggs in some of the drawers (not to mention the number of eggs stowed away in Malcolm’s nearby depository). In the office safe (from which Malcolm gets his office mail at the beginning of the cycle) there is a quantity of bird talons. In the back of the agency is a large dark room, the walls of which are covered with documents, files and bird-related miscellany, including photos and diagrams of various birds, a number of feathers and talons, Audubon society postcards and cut-out pages from R.H.J. Brown’s The Flight of Birds. On the table below is a small sterilization tray with a dead bird inside—its various parts are labeled with bits of paper stuck thereto with pins.
And then there are objects put to active use, such as the dead blackbird in the drawer of Reid’s desk, or the typed auspicey report, a portion of which becomes attached thereto. There is the Audubon Society postcard (which, for the majority of my visits, depicted a yellow-billed cuckoo, but which must have been stolen by a zealous audience member, as it now depicts a whippoorwill). There is also the ominous envelope in which said postcard comes enclosed before it is placed inside Grace’s apartment by the Bartender; the envelope is sealed with a shiny raven sticker.
These items, and the actions performed therewith, give one the sense of the scope of Malcolm’s desperation to unlock the meaning of the omens to which he has borne witness—omens which have become irresistibly compelling, apparently to the point of alienating his partner, Mr. Reid, and his secretary, Caroline Reville.
NOTE: Has anyone noticed that her name is a combination of Alfred Hitchcock’s wife (Alma Reville) and the homely secretary from Psycho (Caroline, actually played by Hitchcock’s daughter, Patricia)?
The abominable character of many of the omens matches that of the bird imagery in Macbeth—they not only contribute to the psychological stress of the characters, but they also help portray the fact that Nature itself is recoiling against the coming bloodshed. As we’ve mentioned in much greater detail before, the obsessive and paranoid Malcolm figures this out all too late, and it isn’t until he hears the alarm bell ring that he understands the signs.
(iii) Duncan’s Canopy Bed
Notwithstanding the fact that Malcolm seems to be the character most attuned to the sinister implications of strange occurrences in the hotel, there are a slew of other examples in Sleep No More where, unbeknownst to the characters, bird imagery is used to underscore the many dark works afoot.
For one, we have Duncan’s canopy bed. There is one curious fact about this space that might escape all but the most obsessive of “insomniacs” that is every bit as much of an omen as it is a stunning example of dramatic irony. We have all seen the balcony outside Duncan’s library. There is a large white canopy, underneath which is a large rug containing the fleur-de-lis (the counterflory has been a prominent part of the Royal Standard of Scotland since James I), and many pillows, which are arranged by Catherine Campbell into a sort of makeshift bed.
This “canopy bed” is notable for being the site of Duncan’s murder, but what is fascinating about this spot is the feathers that make up the pillows (and which subsequently go flying about the room during Duncan’s struggle to fight off Macbeth). Upon inspection, I have determined that these feathers are, in fact, guinea fowl feathers, which is interesting considering the common Scottish superstition with respect to the feathers of game birds.
“Nobody can die happy, or painlessly, on a feather bed if the feathers come from pigeons or game birds” (Radford, Edwin. Encyclopedia of Superstitions 1949. Whitefish, MT. Kessinger Pub. 2004. 118). Most often, this superstition was construed in such a way that, should a person be on their death bed and in a state of acute suffering, the mattress and pillows would be checked for game bird feathers so that they could be removed and thereby ease the dying man’s suffering. But in Duncan’s case, particularly with respect to the brutal and painful manner of his death, the composition of the pillows is a particularly menacing omen that the occupant of that bed would die neither happily nor painlessly.
IV. BIRDS AS INDICATORS OF THE SUPERNATURAL
It is examples like these, where bird imagery takes the form of dark omens that tie the set of Sleep No More so tightly to the themes and atmosphere of Macbeth. Underneath the upscale, refined façade of the McKittrick Hotel is a violent, supernatural battleground that, like the Scotland of Macbeth, has been forsaken by Nature. As we have seen, the use of bird imagery in this manner, while creepy and unsettling in itself, also clues in the audience to the fact that some sinister work is afoot. In particular, much of the bird imagery in Sleep No Moreserves as a marker for the supernatural.
(i) The Peacock
Take, for instance, the prominent symbol of the peacock feather. We know by now that, like Malcolm and Mr. Bargarran, Hecate is an haruspex—that is, one who inspects the entrails of birds for the purposes of divination. (Rathe, Adam. “Welcome to Their World.” Out Magazine. Mar 3, 2012.). We’ve spoken before about the empty bird cages in Hecate’s apothecary, and theorized about the prospect that the mysterious blackbird which so often exchanges hands within the hotel might actually have come from there. What we have not discussed is the extent to which the prominent, recurring symbol of the peacock is an indicator of the supernatural—specifically a symbol of Hecate’s presence and influence.
For one thing, we have Hecate’s hand fan, made of peacock feathers. It can often be found sitting on the raised table in Hecate’s “replica bar,” and she often expands it and waves it about whilst conducting the rave. One is compelled to notice—for instance, when Hecate raises the fan upward as Sexy Witch is lifted upward by the other witches—that the fan seems to be an indicator of her power. Hecate wields it as if it were a magic wand.
In this context, the peacock feather fan may seem like little more than a stage prop; however, as we begin to notice its appearance in several other areas of the hotel, we also notice that we are meant to draw an association between the feathers and Hecate. In the McKittrick, peacock feathers are very clear symbols of Hecate’s omnipresence and influence.
(Source)
For instance, we see a vase full of peacock feathers in the witches’ dressing room on the second floor, where Bald Witch and Sexy Witch prepare for the next cycle to begin. We also find them in Duncan’s quarters, in the bookshelf amongst his many volumes and hunting trophies. We also see them in the taxidermy shop, where they serve as reminders of Bargarran’s desire to placate the red goddess.
A history of the superstitions surround the peacock proves very useful for our purposes.
To begin with, “[t]o have a peacock's feather in the house will bring misfortune to the owner and his family.” (Radford 187). The origin given for this was that the “bird was sacred among the Greeks and the Romans to Hero or Juno. In later years they were used to adorn Holy Temples, and none but the priest was allowed to touch them.” (Id.) To do so was not only a sacrilege, but it was believed that Juno’s anger was believed to be “in some way excited by the plucking of the feathers of her favourite bird.” (Elsworthy, F.T. The Evil Eye. London: J. Murray. 1895. 120.)
Ernest Ingersoll in his Birds in Legend, Fable and Folklore ascribes the observance of this superstition to the fact that peacock feathers appear to have eyes:
“A quaint relic of ancient ideas survives in the prevalent notion that the beautiful tail-plumes of the peacock are unlucky or worse, for it is widely feared that illness and death speedily follow putting them into a house, especially as affecting the health of youngsters. It occurred to me that this superstition, as foolish as it is baleful, was probably connected with the far-reaching dread of the Evil Eye, having in mind the gleaming ocellse that decorate these splendid feathers.” (London: Longmans, Green & Co. 1923. 146.)
That peacock feathers appear in Duncan’s quarters should testify as to not only their dark divinatory character, but also to the ease with which they may symbolize Hecate’s omnipresence. We have written before of how there is little that occurs within the McKittrick Hotel that is not somehow a product of Hecate’s influence; and that the peacock feather should be a signifier of the “Evil Eye” serves to emphasize the extent of Hecate’s influence. In the McKittrick Hotel, Hecate truly does have eyes everywhere.
(ii) The King James Sanitorium
With this in mind, the careful observer will notice the use of birds as indicators of the supernatural even where it might not at first be evident. For instance, in the padded cell of the sanitorium, one sees a number of black feathers stuck into the back wall, forming the shape of the concentric octogram. That this same symbol is found on the ballroom floor and in Hecate’s apothecary (not to mention the Matron's myriad chalk sigils within the hedge maze) permits the inference that the inhabitants of the sanitorium, too, are subject to Hecate’s influence and dominion.
When one sees it, one is reminded not only of Malcolm’s coughing fit in the dark of the depository (during which he expels black feathers into the guest’s hand), but also of the fact that the historical Christian Shaw (Nurse Shaw’s namesake) was said to have coughed up feathers, along with hair, nails and other objects, after having been bewitched by Catherine Campbell and the other “Paisley Witches.”
Whoever placed that pattern there was either greatly disturbed or severely bewitched; and, given Nurse Shaw’s own coughing fit behind the closed door of her office, and the many indications that Matron Lang is suffering under the influence of some supernatural tormentor, all signs point to bewitchment.
While on the topic of these coughing fits, I would even go so far as to say that the repeated references to pica throughout the hotel constitute even more instances of Sleep No More employing the bird motif to evoke the supernatural.
Pica is the medical term for the “persistent eating of nonnutritive substances.” American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. 4th ed., text rev. Washington: American Psychiatric Assoc., 2000. 103.). In the case of the many residents of the McKittrick, these nonnutritive substances include feathers (Malcolm), nails (Nurse Shaw), as well as a slew of other objects on display in the swallowed objects room near the infirmary.
Pica was first used as a medical term by Ambrose Paré in the Sixteenth Century, who derived the term from the medieval Latin name for the magpie, who, it is claimed, has a penchant for eating almost anything. (T. E. C., Jr. “The Origin of the Word Pica.” Pediatrics. Vol. 44, No. 4. 1969. 548.). This Latin nomenclature survives today in the Linnaean designation of the magpie, which is pica pica.
In the context of Sleep No More, even the clinical symptoms of bewitchment are couched in the language of birds.
And so I reach the end of this frightfully long essay.
Now I must go. Rebecca will be back tomorrow morning, and I'll have to spend the evening locking up (or drinking) all the good liquor.
You remember: James sailed across the sea to marry Anne. On their way back, there was a terrible storm\...
Rebecca here. Some of you may have heard this story before—hissed through the musky darkness inside the McKittrick Hotel. Those who have may be familiar with the rather significant bit of history upon which the tale is based. For those of you who aren’t so familiar, I spent the better part of the last week cozying up to the fire in the Manderley library. I had Jasper and a bottle of rye keeping me company as I pored through our rather extensive collection of historical volumes, to find just the right bits to share with you.
The story above is a direct reference to an event that transpired during the proxy marriage between King James IV of Scotland (later James I of England) and Anne of Denmark, daughter of King Frederick II—an event that ignited James’ intense interest in witches and inspired Shakespeare (to whom the king was patron and sponsor) to create the three witches in Macbeth.
Tonight, my dears, I am recording each event or object in the McKittrick that relates to boats and shipwrecks, to illustrate the integral role that they play in this bloody story with respect to the common themes between Macbeth and Rebecca. I will begin by briefly recounting the key stories that weave the source materials together, before listing places inside the hotel where we notice suggestions of shipwrecks or boats, particularly in the hotel décor.
(Source)
(Please beware: this post contains a tiny bit of information regarding the Sixth Floor, so if you have yet to explore this part of the hotel, you may not wish to continue reading—or, you will at least want to skip over the seventh paragraph of section II).
I. The Source Materials
(i) James and Anne. In 1589, King James IV of Scotland was promised by Frederick II of Denmark his daughter Anne’s hand in marriage. Only 14 years of age at the time, Anne was married to James by proxy on August 20th, with George Keith, 5th Earl Marischal, standing in as the executor. The earl-marischal, as ordered by his king, set sail for Scotland a week or so later with the new bride in a fleet of twelve ships.
Anne’s voyage to her new husband’s kingdom was a rough one, and terrible storms threatened the safety of the fleet. “Twice the Danish squadron, with the bride-queen, made the coast of Scotland so near as to be within sight of land, and twice they were beaten back by baffling winds” (Strickland, Agnes. Lives of the Queens of England. London: Bell & Daldy, 1873. 15). It was at this time that there were stirrings amongst the crew that the storms were the work of some sorcerer who bore them some ill will. Nonetheless, the fleet made one more try for Scotland, only to be beaten back by a third storm, which was orders of magnitude worse than the first two:
The whole fleet was dreadfully tossed: the admiral’s ship, in which the young queen sailed, fared the worst. Nor were its disasters confined to the effects of winds and waves. A cannon suddenly broke from its fastenings, and rolling over the deck, killed eight Danish sailors before the eyes of the young queen, and very nearly destroyed her; and, withal, before this cannon could be pitched overboard, the admiral’s ship was so strained and damaged, that she could scarcely be kept above water, but was forced to take refuge in a sound in Norway. The other ten ships returned to Denmark in a deplorable state. (Id.)
Upon hearing this news, King James soon took it upon himself to perform his husbandly duty, and risk life and limb to safely bring his queen back to Scotland. Accordingly, a few weeks later, King James took a fleet across still-stormy waters to Norway to retrieve his Queen. The trip was similarly beset by ravaging storms:
[James] was not to land without a sharp taste of the dangers he had voluntarily encountered, for, on the fifth day, a furious tempest sprang up: during four and twenty hours the king’s little barque was in great danger of wreck. (Id. 20)
Once there safely, in the spring of 1590, he married her in a small French ceremony on the stormy Norwegian coast, before journeying safely back to Scotland.
This story is remarkable less for the events themselves as for the aftermath, as, within a few months of Anne’s arrival in Scotland, witch trials had begun in both Denmark and Britain.
As you can see, this history clearly differs from the story told in the McKittrick. For one, in Hecate’s tale, it is claimed that the storms that wracked the fleet occurred on James and Anne’s voyage back to England, whereas in reality, James and Anne’s passage back to England was a very calm one. In addition, Hecate claims that the ship bearing James and Anne sank into the sea. Historically, however, not only did James and Anne survive, but James’ survival precipitated a tragic period in English history marked by ignorant superstition and the tragic murder of thousands of women (including the Paisley Witch Trials, many elements of which are present within the show).
While I must admit that Hecate’s story makes for a more dramatic tale, familiarity with the true history of the story gives us some keen insight into the world of Sleep No More.
The story of the executions that occurred in England and Denmark in the wake of Queen Anne’s perilous voyage make for fascinating reading. I will not go into too much detail, as we will no doubt discuss the specifics of these episodes in the future, but given their importance with respect to the show, the major details are as follows.
The Stuart period “was a time when Satanic and other conspiracies were likely to come to light. The kingdom was unsettled, if not discontented. There were plots, and rumors of plots. The effort to expose them, as well as to thwart the attacks of the evil one on the king, led to the conception and spread of the monstrous story of the conspiracy of [the North Berwick Witches].” (Notestein, Wallace. A History of Witchcraft in England from 1558 to 1718. Washington: American Historical Assn. 1911. 94).
In Denmark, the source of the panic was the conviction of Peter Munch, the Danish Admiral, that “some very potent sorcerer bore him an ill-will, and was now tampering with the winds to prevent him from bringing the fair young queen of Scotland safely into harbor” (Strickland 15).
While Queen Anne and the Danish fleet remained in Norway awaiting clear weather that Munch voiced his suspicions that witches were to be blamed for the tempests. Munch had recently been involved in a minor scandal wherein he was alleged to have publicly assaulted a prominent Copenhagen baillie (or magistrate) whose wife, according to popular gossip, was a witch. “The witch-wife had, in the sapient opinion of the admiral, raised those contrary winds, to be revenged for the blow given to her husband” (Id.).
After Queen Anne was brought safely to Scotland, the city of Copenhagen held an investigation into the matter. At first, it was found that Christoffer Valkendorff, the city’s minister of finance, was to be blamed for having poorly equipped the fleet. (Williams, Ethel Carleton. Anne of Denmark. Longman, 1970). Valkendorff stated as his defense that the storms were in fact caused by witches—a claim which was corroborated by the statements of Peter Munch and his sailors. (Id.)
The city therefore instituted a mass witch hunt in the summer of 1590, in which a total of twelve women—including one Anna Koldings, who was purportedly a very dangerous sorceress and who had been known locally as “The Devil’s Mother”—confessed to raising the above-described storms. They also confessed that they had dispatched demons to climb the masts of the ships and caused them to sink.
By September, all twelve women were burnt at the stake.
King James, upon hearing the news of the Copenhagen trials, decided to begin his own inquiry into the cause of the unprecedented storms.
In England, the motivation of the witches to cause harm to Anne’s fleet differed greatly from that given by the inquiry in Copenhagen. Whereas in Denmark, the motivation was petty revenge, King James made clear that the true motivation of the witches was to do harm to himself and his loved ones, on account of his being a loyal servant of God—an important bit of propaganda for the newly-crowned king. James’ investigation lay blame on a coven of witches, attributed in various histories a size ranging from nine to two hundred, including one Agnes Sampson, who came forward as the group’s leader. Sampson claimed to have engaged in a bizarre ritual with the Devil himself during which he ordered they obstruct the fleet’s journey.
"[Agnes Sampson] affirmed, that she, in company with nine other witches, being convened in the night beside Prestonpans, the devil their master being present, standing in the midst of them, a body of wax, shapen and made by the said [Agnes Sampson], wrapped within a linen cloth, was first delivered to the devil; who, after he had pronounced his verdict, delivered the said picture to [Agnes], and she to her next neighbour, and so everyone round about, saying, 'This is King James VI, ordered to be consumed…'(Collection of Rare and Curious Facts on Witchcraft and the Second Sight; with an Original Essay on Witchcraft. Edinburgh: Thomas Webster. 1820. 36).
This purported ceremony is described differently in various contemporary writings about the trials, but each feature the ritual of the effigy (or “manikin”) of James, as well as an endorsement from the devil himself to plot against him (Strickland 34).
As a result of Agnes’ testimony, James’ safe return despite the perilous weather was taken as a sign of the King’s divine sanction as ruler over Scotland—a fact that was cited in royal propaganda as evidence that God actively protected the king and his kin. Some historical accounts of Agnes Sampson’s confession—such as Newes from Scotland, a popular pamphlet written by King James describing the course of the trials—even go so far as to say that the devil himself, when asked during the witch’s Sabbath described above why no harm came to the king, said of James that “il est un homme de Dieu” (i.e. he is a man of God). This, of course, was likely fabricated to not only promote the image of James I as being a pious king, but also to legitimize his less-than-legitimate claim to the throne. (Does this remind you of any other kings we know who boasted the support of divine powers and even fate itself in their rise to power?)
The story of the witch hunts in both Denmark and England bears a direct relevance to Sleep No More, to the extent that many plot elements in the later were inspired by the saga of James I’s interest in witchcraft.
(ii) The witches’ role in shipwrecks in Macbeth. It has been remarked that “witchcraft came into England with the Stuarts and went out with them” (Notestein 93). While witchcraft had been of common interest since the middle ages, it was the reign of King James that accelerated the movement to a fever pitch. It was written that the king “took great delight to be present at the examinations” of Agnes Sampson and other witches, and the prosecution of witches remained a morbid fascination of James’ throughout his reign—a fascination that bled into the popular consciousness via propaganda actively put forth by those within the royal court itself. (Id.) King James “attended witch trials whenever he could, and considered himself an expert on the theory and practice of sorcery. His dialogue on the subject, Daemonologie, first published in Ediburgh in 1597, was reissued (three times) upon his accession to the English throne in 1603." (Orgel, Stephen. “Introduction.” Macbeth. By William Shakespeare. New York: Penguin Group. 2000. xxxii.) It is the king’s interest—both personal and political—in witches and witch trials that led to their inclusion in Shakespeare’s Macbeth.
It has been argued, for instance, that the shipwreck story in Act I was a direct reference to Anne of Denmark’s turbulent voyage to Scotland.
King James, in his Daemonologie, wrote of witches: “They can raise stormes and tempests in the aire, either upon sea or land, though not universally, but in such particular place and prescribed bounds, as God will permit them so to trouble.” (II.v) In the case of James and Anne’s voyage, it was concluded by the King’s tribunal that the reason the accused witches could not sink James’ ship was because he was a “man of God,” to whom no harm could come. This sense of limitation with respect to witches’ powers manifests itself in Macbeth, wherein witches, like the Fates upon whom they were based, could only interfere in an indirect manner, by manipulating external factors such as the weather to cause a desired effect on their victim, rather than being able to directly manipulate their victim in either a physical or psychological manner. This idea that witches can have only an indirect influence over the lives of others is present in Sleep No More, particularly in the behavior of the witches as they interact with the other characters within the hotel.
Of particular interest to this essay is the scene in Shakespeare's play just before Macbeth and Banquo receive the first prophecy, when they encounter the three witches. One witch is telling the other two a story of a sailor’s wife, who was carrying chestnuts in her apron. The witch asked for one of the chestnuts, but the sailor’s wife refused to give her one, so the witch swore that she would get revenge on the woman. According to her story, she spent the next eighty-one weeks conjuring storms around the woman’s husband’s ship so that he would be unable to find port.
FIRST WITCH: A sailor's wife had chestnuts in her lap,
And munch'd, and munch'd, and munch'd:--
'Give me,' quoth I:
'Aroint thee, witch!' the rump-fed ronyon cries.
Her husband's to Aleppo gone, master o' the Tiger:
But in a sieve I'll thither sail,
And, like a rat without a tail,
I'll do, I'll do, and I'll do.
[...]
And the very ports they blow,
All the quarters that they know
I' the shipman's card.
I will drain him dry as hay:
Sleep shall neither night nor day
Hang upon his pent-house lid;
He shall live a man forbid:
Weary se'nnights nine times nine
Shall he dwindle, peak and pine:
Though his bark cannot be lost,
Yet it shall be tempest-tost.
Those last lines are of particular importance: “Though his bark cannot be lost, / Yet it shall be tempest-tossed.” (I.iii.24-26). This means that the witch did not have the power to sink the ship or directly cause the sailor’s death, but she did have power to cause the ship danger so that its natural fate, whether to sink or to remain afloat, could be met while in any case causing worry and unhappiness to her victim, the sailor’s wife.
This story is not altogether very different from one of the reasons offered as motivation for the witches’ alleged attacks against Anne’s fleet. The witches might have wanted to cause worry and dread to King James over his beloved Anne, or to cause the magistrate who had beaten their fellow witch to fear for his life, but they had not the power to determine the fate of their victims—they only had the power to test it.
(iii) The “shipwreck” in Rebecca. Those of you who have read Du Maurier’s 1939 novel Rebecca or seen the beloved Alfred Hitchcock film of the same title will already know all about that sad, little broken sailboat that was pulled up from the waters just off the shore near Rebecca’s beloved boathouse, bringing with it memories treachery and distress that would rather have been forgotten.
The novel is written from the point of view of a young, unnamed woman—an orphan of the lower class—who falls in love with and marries one Maxim de Winter, and becomes the mistress of the reputed Manderley Estate. During her time there, as she grows used to her higher station, she finds that she is living in the shadow of Rebecca, Mr. de Winter’s dead wife who, by all accounts, was the model woman—beautiful, charming, sopisticated, well-regarded—perfect for her beloved Manderley.
Drama and suspense ensue, as you can imagine, as the second Mrs. de Winter is driven to ever-increasing emotional extremes, thanks to the psychological torture put upon her by the late Rebecca’s loyal housekeeper, Mrs. Danvers. I won’t continue in great detail, but suffice it to say that eventually, when a military ship runs ashore, the police search the water behind the estate and discover a wrecked sailboat containing the body of the late Rebecca’s. Mr. de Winter, finding that the past has come back to haunt him, comes clean with his new wife. He reveals that, rather than having died in a tragic sailing accident, he killed Rebecca under duress. In a fit of rage after Rebecca’s relentless taunting over her many love affairs—and on the heels of her claiming to be pregnant with another man’s child—he murdered her, dragged her body to her boat, and took the boat out into the night to sink it in the sea, drowning the evidence of his crime forever (or, so he thought).
At the thematic center of Rebecca is the struggle of both Maxim and the Second Mrs. de Winter to escape the past. Maxim, for instance, is tortured by the memory of his traumatic sham marriage to Rebecca, and his subsequent act of murder. The narrator is similarly haunted by the presence of the seemingly perfect Rebecca at Manderley, specifically via the psychological torture dispensed by Mrs. Danvers. Upon becoming the new mistress of the estate, the Second Mrs. de Winter not only steps into Rebecca’s enormous and imposing shadow, but she also assumes the burden of Maxim’s attempts to cover up the murder of his treacherous wife. Underscoring the drama of the whole novel is the anxiety that one can never truly escape the past; and it isn’t until the narrator and Maxim learn to embrace the past that they can move on with their lives.
The Second Mrs. De Winter, for example, is only able to step out from Rebecca’s shadow—and thereby achieve some sort of catharsis—when Maxim reveals to her that he never loved Rebecca in the first place. Maxim, meanwhile, manages to finally and directly confront the tragic memory of his misdeed, and thereby overcome it.
In the end, the couple only manages to conquer the looming spectre of Rebecca’s memory when Manderley itself is destroyed, after a chain of events that is sparked by that sunken sailboat running ashore. As such, the shipwreck is, within the novel, a symbol for the persistence of memory, and the idea that the past is never quite through with us—something that Sleep No More, with its many references to shipwrecks and the perennial repetition of the phrase “We can never go back to Manderley again,” captures poignantly. Where we see haunted, tortured characters roaming the halls of the McKittrick, being forced to repeat their mistakes over and over again, trapped in an endless cycle of acute trauma, we have the visual of the shipwreck, reminding the nightly guest that the past is truly inescapable.
II. Shipwrecks in Sleep No More
It is no secret to you that many elements of the plot, characters, and set of Sleep No More draw inspiration directly from Alfred Hitchcock’s 1940 film Rebecca, in addition to some of the director’s other films. But what might be less obvious is exactly how or why Rebecca was selected (of Hitchcock’s many suspenseful noir films), and how, within the show, this story is tied to Shakespeare’s Macbeth. I find that there are two crucial similarities: (1) both Rebecca and Macbeth center around characters who are, in different way, usurpers of their station, and (2) both texts operate around the principle that one can never truly escape the past, as it seeps into our present reality.
The first major similarity between the two stories is that their protagonists—Macbeth and the Second Mrs. de Winter, respectively—are usurpers of sorts. Macbeth’s plotline consists entirely of striving to acquire and maintain a firm hold of a throne that is not “rightfully” his, to rule over a land that is meant to be lead by another. As we know, his usurpation of the throne has fatal consequences as he is overthrown and executed at the hands of those loyal to the rightful King. The second Mrs. de Winter, on the other hand, becomes the second woman assigned the task of overseeing the distinguished and renowned Manderley Estate—an accidental mistress of a dominion that did not belong to her—specifically on account of her low station and her inability to live up to the memory of her predecessor. In attempting to make the estate her own she must face resistance and even endure emotional torture from Mrs. Danvers, Rebecca’s ever-loyal maid bent on destroying the second Mrs. de Winter, whom she sees as an unworthy mistress of Manderley. This major connection is beyond the scope of this essay, and will be explored further at a later date.
The second major connection between Rebecca and Macbeth is the principle that one is hard-pressed to escape the past. As stated in the previous section, it is this theme which gives Rebecca most of its dramatic tension. The same is true with Shakespeare’s Macbeth. Whether it be the Macbeths’ frantic attempts to cover up the evidence of their crime, or Macbeth seeing Banquo’s bloody ghost haunting his banquet hall, or the frenzied reminder that “blood will have blood,” Macbeth’s efforts to escape his bloody past make up the foundation of the play’s psychological tension.
Within the context of Sleep No More, shipwrecks serve as a sort of linchpin connecting the two texts via this theme. To begin with, on an emotional level, it is not difficult to connect the near-death experience Queen Anne had on the water with Rebecca’s aquatic tomb at the bottom of the sea—and let us not forget that the journeys of James and Anne are a critical reason for James’s obsession and Shakespeare’s inclusion of witches as central characters in the play. And we are reminded that Macbeth also contains a reference to shipwrecks, as noted above, in a story that demonstrates of the extent to which the witches are (and are not) able to interfere in and directly control the affairs of others.
By my way of thinking, shipwrecks function in two major ways within the show and its set: (i) as one of Hecate’s “markers”, and a reminder of the reaches—and perhaps the limits—of her power; and (ii) as symbols or reminders of the fact that, as in both Rebecca and Macbeth, we can never truly escape our past, and that our past remains so much a part of our present reality.
After hearing Hecate’s story, any Guest traversing the hotel’s corridors will be hard pressed not to be reminded of her influence. Each time they see an image of a shipwreck or of a boat—the many landscape paintings of ships braving stormy seas that line the long staircase behind the banquet hall; the countless origami boats in many of the lobby cubbies (all of which resemble the paper boat that Hecate may have folded for you at one time or another); the origami-napkin ship that Matron Lang can sometimes be seen folding in her quarters—are all chilling reminders of Hecate’s sphere of influence.
The many references to ships and shipwrecks inside of the hotel also remind one of the major lesson learned from Rebecca’s shipwreck, or from Macbeth’s own bloody fate: that it may indeed be impossible to truly escape the past, no matter how sure you may be that you have buried it for good. We watch helplessly as the characters each repeat their actions over and over inside the McKittrick.
This theme of being haunted by the past thematically unites Macbeth and Rebecca rather beautifully, and much of this legwork is carried by the shipwreck motif, such as when we see the model ship on the writing desk inside of Matron Lang’s hut, and perhaps most of all when we travel to the elusive Sixth Floor of the McKittrick Hotel. The scenery here is among the most moving pieces of the set decor in the entire hotel. On this floor, a portion of the ceiling consists of a reproduction of the famed Manderley estate, including its long drive shrouded in overgrowth, its large iron gates, a magnificent hedge maze, as well as the manor itself, lit up hauntingly from within… And, of course, there is the boathouse by the shore that, during her life, housed Rebecca’s darkest secrets and most scandalous transgressions, and that eventually became the scene of her murder. Just off the shore along which the boathouse sits, one can see the half-sunken remains of the boat in which Rebecca’s corpse was drowned by her husband in order to hide his murderous crime. This cover-up, of course, was only temporarily successful, since eventually his ex-wife’s boat was dredged from the sea, with her corpse and all remaining evidence of her murder inside. The recovery of the boat forced the perpetrator to openly and directly face his crime. Maxim had long been unable to psychologically escape his guilt, but once that boat was brought to the surface, he and his new wife were forced to face the truth of the past, and in so doing, enable themselves to determine their future.
One thing is as true of sunken ships as it is of the crimes and transgressions of the characters in Sleep No More: even if you cannot see the evidence or effects at the moment, they are always there, waiting quietly, and the remains can always wash ashore when you least expect it, no matter how certain you were that they were drowned for good.
I must be off now—I do believe I hear my cousin Jack coming up the drive now. Oh, of course, I know it’s considered indecent for a lady to receive a male visitor at this hour, but the shore down by the boathouse is just so lovely about this time, and what with the recent storms it has been a most dreadfully dull week spent alone with Maxim. One can tire of that man rather quickly, no matter how wonderful he may be.
In a hamlet or in a forest, in the deep water or on the dry land, wherever venerable persons dwell, that place is delightful.
Friedrich Max Muller
What a dazzling time last night was!
We met the Thanes of Glamis and Cawdor for drinks at Ovest. They brought us some fascinating gifts: a stone for each of us that, after selecting, the Thane of Cawdor researched to discover the powers ostensibly held by each. I received a Tiger’s Eye stone with mesmerizing gold and brown stripes that shift under the light, to bring financial gain (oh, goodie!) and help de-stress and focus the mind. Cawdor brought a Dalmatian Jasper for Maxim, to provide stamina, reduce discouragement and aid in memory retention–-goodness knows he (and I, frankly) needs all the protection against his apparent early-onset dementia he can get.
Later on, BloodWillHaveBloodTheySay came in with Caoine and another very sweet girl who had never been inside the hotel, and without hesitation offered us a choice among his lovely decorated masks. We tried to contain our excitement as we selected our color, as Maxim and I have coveted those masks for a long time. Maxim’s is studded in gold. Mine is a slick, translucent black.
When we got in the queue, we met FleepNoMore, who’s as handsome as a young Randolph Scott, and BrightEyesBigCity, who, in addition to being a very charming and sweet man, now has the distinct privilege of calling himself a New Yorker. Welcome home, sir.
WashThisBlood was there, looking as dashing as ever, as was akaJakeEdwardMarks, a man after my own heart. Maxim was not ashamed in the slightest to nerd out with them while on line, despite that there a few attractive women right behind who’ll, as a result, likely never see him as a viable sexual candidate. C’est la vie.
Both Maxim and I had a very fruitful stay. Maxim was finally Popped (about which I am a bit envious). I was finally blessed by Lady Macduff (played beautifully by Ms. Ockwell last night). Not a few minutes after I was being tempted with sweets by Ms. Chang’s Sexy Witch, Ms. Lugosch-Ecker’s lips grazed Maxim’s in the dark of the wardrobe (or so he tells me). We were both tempted to find a private room and relive our honeymoon in Marrakesh, but we’re not ready to be permanently evicted from the hotel just yet.
On the way out, I got to watch and giggle as Maxim was practically sexually assaulted by David Botana (in the show as Boy Witch last night). Maxim said to me "I would have consented, but that would have taken all the fun out of it." I'm not at all surprised.
After the show, Maxim and I got good and bladdered and managed to get through the night without a row, even though my husband didn’t seem to like the way I was glancing at Nick Bruder. Glamis also kindly introduced us to some other Tumblrers we’ve greatly admired but hadn’t had the pleasure to meet.
ToManderleyAgain had the energy and charisma of a young rake in his prime, while WhoKeepsWithWolves and SheWolf made an extraordinarily handsome couple. I couldn’t decide what I admired more: his beard or her dress.
All three were kind enough to pretend that my darling fool of a husband’s tactless brand of humor is actually amusing—and for that I thank them. You have made a man with no filter whatsoever very happy. And I, for my part, delighted in sharing laughter and insights over drinks with you fine people.
In closing, all of you are just the loveliest. We thank you for making last night so downright fun, and our hangovers this morning so worth it.
News about the general election saturated our headlines here, with Labour making big gains, though Baldwin’s National Government managed to hang on for the majority.
Rebecca, in fine form as ever, has spent the last month babbling on about tariffs and unemployment—no doubt all to be forgotten about in a week’s time—and I was desperate to shut her up about it. So I decided to take her to Florida. It had been a while since we’d visited Miami, and I thought the warm air would do us good. But alas, the bloody hurricane spoiled our travel arrangements and we’ve been stuck at home—each neck deep in liquor as if it were going out of style.
But now we are as ready as ever to resume publishing about all things McKittrick, and where better to start than with our dream cast?
Macbeth
Paul Zivkovich is Macbeth, through and through. Even if he possessed a fraction of the skill he exhibits night after night, he’d be our Macbeth merely on account of that spectacularly fierce beard. His glossolalic shouting, his imposing physique, his ability to sustain, for a full 64-minute cycle, a state of motion that rests ever on the edge of panic—all contribute to what is for us the definitive take on the character. He possesses an extraordinary control over his own body that never makes it seem like he’s emoting, and he flaunts a masculine power that every great Macbeth needs.
Lady Macbeth
Having been treated to Natalie Thomas’ wonderful, powerfully cunning and erotic performance on many an occasion, her departure from the show left Rebecca and me wondering just who could (for us, at least) step into her mighty shoes. Little did we know that Tori Sparks would be returning to the role. When we finally got to see her perform, it was a revelation. To date, she is by far the most vocal performer we have seen in the show—during her possessed wandering through the streets of Gallow Green, Ms. Sparks is not shy about reciting a number of lines from the Shakespeare. She imbues Lady Macbeth with an acute and potent sexual aggression that, particularly during the post-ball duet in her bedroom, contributes to some very exciting romantic drama.
NOTE: It must also be said here that Leslie Kraus also plays a formidable Lady Macbeth, and seems to be growing in this role in a very exciting way. We look forward to watching her perform in the future.
Duncan
Eric Jackson Bradley. I’ve seen a number of Duncans perform ably in the role (Ted Johnson is wonderful), but Mr. Bradley, particularly during his ballroom duet with Catherine Campbell and his subsequent walk through the mezzanine, during which he pieces together the circumstances of his own murder, struck me as being particularly powerful. Rebecca and I only regret that we never got to see him play Macbeth, as we imagine we'd have been in for quite a show. However, by way of full disclosure: he will always be particularly endeared to me on account of his having been the first person to escort me back to Manderley.
Macduff
Seeing as, for our first many visits, Rebecca and I were treated to largely the same cast, this choice essentially must be made by default. Joe Poulson is a superlative Macduff. Forget for the moment that he's a spectacular dancer. And forget for the moment his handsomeness, or his debonairness, or the way he fills out a tuxedo, or the fact that he looks like a Scottish prince. Merely focus on what he does with his face. There is something truly affecting about his ease of movement from stoicism to temptation, and from suspicion to grief. On your next visit, get as close to him as you can when he is stalking up the long staircase, overhearing the desperate pleas of a woman in distress from within the lobby nearby. Then watch the expression that washes over him as he stumbles upon the body of his wife, and as he mourns over her death upon the sterile couch. Then try to emotionally recover yourself in time to see him try to exact retribution upon Mrs. Campbell.
NOTE: The now-retired Matty Oaks also made a damn fine Macduff, but alas, we have only seen him in this role in small bits too insufficient to warrant a decent judgment.
Lady Macduff
As with our choice of Macduff, this is an easy one, and not just because we consider her to be a part of a package deal. Our Lady Macduff simply has to be the delicate and achingly beautiful Haylee Nichele. Watching Mr. Poulson and Ms. Nichele together is a revelation. And her inherent fragility and soft voice both lend to that maternal feeling we are supposed to get from a great Lady Macduff. She particularly shines during the "Temptation" scene in the hotel restaurant (with her agile but desperate climbing of the tables and shelves), and during her brutal murder, which she plays so convincingly it just as easily could have a scene out of Irréversible.
NOTE: We have never seen Ms. Isadora Wolfe in this role, though we have heard great things about her.
Malcolm
Ben Thys. After this man is done playing Malcolm, someone should go ahead and cast him in a ballet adaptation of James Bond. Sure, he plays Malcolm's panic and desperation very, very well, but the real draw here is his charm and physicality--particularly with respect to the way he suavely manhandles poor (or not so poor) Agnes in the detective agency. He does such a superb job there, infusing the scene with paranoid tension and a dripping noir sexuality--and throwing in a few quasi-rapey elements also works quite nicely for Mr. Thys (as Rebecca will be only too happy to tell you). I can't watch his Malcolm without getting the sense that he's just one scotch away from hitting somebody.
NOTE: It must be noted that I also have a particular affection for Zach McNally in this role. He does such a tremendous job hitting the emotional notes of Malcolm's arc. In addition, I'm told that William Popp also plays one hell of a Malcolm, but Rebecca and I have never been fortunate enough to follow him around as he roughs up the audience like a bent cop on the take.
Banquo
Apparently mutant powers are real, as Tony Bordonaro seems to manipulate gravity at his whim. To my wholly deficient eye (in matters of dance, at least), it appears to me that the role of Banquo is the most physically demanding, but it doesn't seem to matter to Mr. Bordonaro, who suspends and inverts and hurls himself in stunning displays of energy. His solos in the coat check and in the ballroom are particular moments of beauty, and his appearance during the banquet is bone-chilling.
Catherine Campbell
Being early fans of Marla Phelan's icy portrayal of Mrs. Campbell, we began to take certain colder aspects about Mrs. Campbell's personality for granted--and it's difficult to believe, in our eyes, that anyone could do as good a job as Ms. Phelan in channeling the sternness and sterility of Judith Anderson. However, our Catherine Campbell has to be Emily Terndrup. Coldness, she has in spades, to be sure, but there is a pathos to her performance that we can't ignore. We love how she lets her hair down after Duncan's death, almost turning it into a prop, or how she imbues the "door dance" with Macduff with an almost erotic urgency. And don't get us started about "Moonlight Becomes You," as Rebecca and I have wasted many hours waxing orgasmic about how she plays that scene. And the fact that she, like Ms. Phelan, is so easy on the eyes makes it easy to see that, far from the frigid, sapphic housemaid of Hitchcock, the Mrs. Danvers of Sleep No More is not at all immune to the stings and vagaries of romantic obsession.
The Porter
I have only seen Conor Doyle's portrayal of the Porter for a brief moment, but Rebecca absolutely raved over her few minutes alone with him in his office on a recent visit to the hotel (she did not have a chance to spend much more time with him, apart from that one-on-one, but that was enough to completely sell her on Mr. Doyle's Porter). Rebecca won't shut up about how he brings an extraordinary depth and darkness to the role, playing a somber Porter who feels trapped in miserable circumstances. Utterly hopeless and entirely heartbreaking.
My Porter, however, is a real tossup, and dependent entirely on my mood. When I'm in a sanguine mood, I prefer Matty Oaks's Porter, whose relentless optimism belies the gravity of his situation. There's something to be said about a Porter who can give you some pleasurable catharsis in the midst of victimization and dejection. On my more morose nights, however, I prefer Zach McNally in the role, as he suits the character in two major respects. On the one hand, I am impressed by how he portrays the Porter with a great balance of stoicism and existential angst. On the other hand, this subdued style of performance is only as dramatically useful as it is because of how this balance is upset during his one-on-one, wherein all the stifled emotional energy comes out in a burst of pathos. It completely blows me away.
Hecate
This selection could have just as easily been made by coin toss. Each of the three women we’ve seen in this role is as moving as the rest, even though their interpretations differ so wildly. Rebecca and I find it difficult even to narrow it down to just two. Careena Meila’s Hecate has a tremendous poignance, and plays the lady in red almost as if she longs to forsake her own immortality. This is such a potent element that the Playbill should read “Hecate No More." Mia Mountain’s Hecate is by degrees more tentative and curious than Ms. Melia's, but there is a great sense of urgency in everything she does. More than anyone else’s, Ms. Mountain’s Hecate is a character who is desperate for her plan to go off without a hitch. Elizabeth Romanski, however, gives Hecate an extraordinary cruelty and playfulness that is just a hoot to watch. There are particular moments where she is not unlike a cat toying with a mouse carcass. Her Hecate feels no remorse or compassion or empathy. Her Hecate is a force of nature.
Boy Witch
Austin Goodwin is all there is.
Well, not exactly. We've never seen a Boy Witch we didn't love, if only because it is difficult to imagine an actor not having a blast portraying him. The character has a lot of fun elements to chew on, and is a perfect opportunity for an actor to ham it up. However, Mr. Goodwin's Boy Witch strikes us as being the best balance. Flirtatious and seductive, as opposed to aggressive and over-the-top, Mr. Goodwin injects the role with enough emotion to keep a regency costume drama on air for an extra season.
Bald Witch
Although suspiciously less bald than her counterparts, Chelsea Bonosky is perhaps the most haunting Bald Witch of them all. Far be it from us to say that Omagbitse Omagbemi and Kelly Bartnik aren't incendiary in the role. They are mind-manglingly great. However, it's difficult to capture in words our very acute thrill at having seen Ms. Bonosky in the role for the first time. At first it felt very wrong ("She's not even bald!"), but after watching her even for a few moments, it was difficult to see her as an actress. To us, she was a bloody witch, body and soul. And she is absolutely terrifying. During the rave, she whips her hair about like a crazed animal, and every inch of her body heaves and contorts in a possessed frenzy. A great Bald Witch has to be, above all else, intimidating. Chelsea Bonosky is effortlessly that.
Sexy Witch
Seeing as my romantic history consists essentially of villainous pixies who'd just as soon have killed me as fucked me, I find Lily Ockwell to be my ideal Sexy Witch. Ching-I Chang's witch is bubbly and deceptively innocent. Marla Phelan's witch is evil incarnate. Ms. Ockwell, however, has all the marks of a femme fatale. She flits around the hotel like Barbara Stanwyck in Double Indemnity, brandishing a dastardly leer that never fails to seduce, and she also gives off a powerful sense of intelligence. Ms. Ockwell's Sexy Witch, even in moments of vulnerability, always seems to be in control.
Rebecca does not understand my infatuation with Ms. Ockwell, though she acknowledges that she is a magnificent performer. She ostensibly doesn't do as much for her as Marla Phelan. Rebecca tells me that Ms. Phelan's Sexy is the embodiment of a rough, aggressive yet feminine sexual power that a good Sexy Witch must not only possess but be capable of wielding unabashedly and at her will. Rebecca often gushes about Ms. Phelan's ability to capture the emotional subtleties or complexities of the character, as is evident in certain vulnerable moments, such as her exhausted bar dance immediately after the witches' rave. Both Rebecca and I are sad to see her leave the show.
Bartender
I wouldn't even have had to ask Rebecca for her choice in Bartender to know that it would be Nick Bruder, if only because he is an enthralling performer no matter which role we have seen him in, and because he is essentially a requisite in any lady's "dream cast." His carelessly gruff sexuality is to be envied and admired.
NOTE: She and I also LOVE Tony Bordonaro's drunken boor and David Botana's rakish pervert.
Agnes Naismith
The beautiful Mariel Lugosch-Ecker. What an actress! Not only can she act her way out of a cardboard box, we're convinced that she rips through cardboard boxes with telekinesis. And frankly, she doesn't even deserve to be mentioned in the same breath as cardboard boxes. Rebecca and I first got a glimpse of her after a rave, during Agnes' confrontation with Hecate. Ms. Lugosch-Ecker's tears fell out of those big blue eyes like rain through a shack roof. Either she's cornered the market on Vick's VapoRub or she's every bit as talented as Rebecca and I suspect.
NOTE: Leslie Kraus also plays a magnificent Agnes, choosing to play her as equal parts paranoid victim and sly coquette. And seeing her get knocked around by Malcolm is a particular pleasure for us.
J. Fulton
If paranoia had a face, it would look like Jeffrey Lyon's tailor. And to those of you who haven't had the unique pleasure of having him escort you to the final banquet, I must mention that the creepy way he plays your body like marionette during Macbeth's assassination is something that will leave you feeling dirty for a week.
Rebecca spent an entire evening with Matty Oak's Fulton and was completely charmed by his performance. In various moments, including the relatively-insignificant, he found ways to make her his only loyal follower for an entire cycle-feel as though she herself were a part of the show, as if they were comrades moving through the world inside of the McKittrick together. His almost-fatherly (if borderline-incestuous) tenderness in their one-on-one sealed her loyalty to his tailor, even though he has since left the show.
Mr. Bargarran
We love David Botana. We are unabashed fans, if for one reason: No matter which role you put the man in, he'll find a way to do it half-naked, and probably drooling. That man couldn't keep his clothes on if you slapped him with a cabaret violation. All this notwithstanding, watching him perform as Bargarran for even a minute will give you chills. Perhaps it's his shifty gaze, or the lip-licking, or the drooling, or the sly way he tries to comfort Fulton, as if he is a friend bearing a warning. Whichever the case, Rebecca and I like our Bargarrans filthy and foaming at the mouth.
NOTE: Luke Murphy is a very close second.
Nurse Christian Shaw
Ching-I Chang is not the only Nurse Shaw who carries a flashlight, but she's easily the most illuminating. In addition to being a superlatively talented dancer--anyone who has seen her possessed dance in the operating theater can attest to that--she is remarkable in how she plays Nurse Shaw with both an authoritative power (at least with respect to the Matron) and a crippling vulnerability (suggesting the prior influence of Hecate and the witches. And her take on "mirror dance" is breathtaking.
NOTE: It must also be mentioned that I've had the distinct pleasure of watching Ms. Omagbemi perform as Nurse Shaw. She was thrillingly good.
The Matron
Careena Melia is simply the loveliest. Rebecca and I could sing her praises until our fifth divorce, but suffice it to say that Ms. Melia could even make an episode of J.A.G interesting. When I first saw her I was just a poor little boy, lost in the woods and with blood on his mask. We walked hand-in-hand through the forest, carefully jumping over sigils and causing mischief in the infirmary. Having already fed me tea, she took me into the sanitorium and tucked me into bed, wiping the blood off my mask and telling me that everything would be alright. When I was with her I couldn't shake the feeling that the Matron was the only character in the show worth following. And during the course of that evening, it was true.
Man/Woman in Bar
It strains our collective wits to imagine a night at the McKittrick without William Popp's Calloway in the bar to greet us. He has the air of an alcoholic sex offender mixed in with the charm of Ted Bundy. Add in a clever pansexual back story and a few subtle hints about a history of abuse, and you have someone with whom it's a pleasure to drink. Joining him, ideally, would be either Mia Mountain's Celeste de Winter, who's so beautiful and intimidating it's obscene, or Nick Atkinson's Maximillian. With respect to the lovely Celeste, neither Rebecca nor I have ever had the courage to speak with her before the show, as we shudder to think of what would happen if we managed to break that icy-cold exterior. However, we must confess that it was a unique pleasure to see the ever-exciting "Mandergay." There was one particular evening when the elevator to the hotel was giving the proprietors some trouble, so Calloway and Maxim had to improvise a bit to keep the evening interesting. The chemistry between Maxim's eccentric, loquacious dandy and Calloway's brooding, sinister creep was electric. Whereas Ms. Mountain gets us in the appropriate mood to stalk through the hotel, Mr. Atkinson makes us want to spend the entire night in the bar.
Finally, we must mention that, during our first eight visits to the hotel, we only got to see one particular cast, and we were under the impression for the longest time that the roles were static. Since then, we have gotten to see many more performers in the roles, and realized that the cast shifts rather often. That being said, there are a number of performers whom we have either not had the chance to follow, or missed entirely. These include: Hope Davis, Maya Lubinsky, Sam Meredith, Sai Samboon, Edward Rice and Isadora Wolfe.
Anyway.
Rebecca recently bought some new lingerie--including some newfangled brassiere built upon the principle of the Cantilever Bridge. I'm raring to break it in before half the redheaded louts in the county Galway have their chance. I must move with haste.
Hi there, where do you find all of the magnificent books you use in your research?
As you may have noticed, most of the books we've cited are quite old. Some of them even predate Shakespeare. As such, a good proportion of them fall into the public domain. You may find many of them published on the Internet Archive or Google Books. Also, there are a number of facsimile editions available in print form on Barnes and Noble or Amazon. For some of the harder to find books, there is a slew of third-party publishers who print inexpensive, arcane public domain works, such as Forgotten Books.
Recently, Rebecca and I bought the indispensable three-volume edition of John Brand's Observations on the Popular Antiquities of Great Britain, which we would recommend to anyone interested in the history of common charms and folklore.
On an unrelated note, Rebecca and I are aware of the unforgivable lapse in time since we last published an essay, for which we profusely apologize. However, we assure you that we have a few posts on the assembly line that are very soon forthcoming.
Where and how do you find the sources you use in your analyses?
Since having checked into the McKittrick for the first time in May, Rebecca and I have unearthed a veritable library of information on witchcraft, Scottish superstition, and ceremonial magic. We’ve also uncovered a great deal of academic sources relating to the history of James I’s England and the composition of Shakespeare’s tragedies.
While we intend in the near future to publish a bibliography of sources cited in our blog, it should suffice for now to say that we are confident that a good proportion of our references were read (or at least accounted for) by the creators of the show themselves.
We began by reading through the many sources directly referenced in the show, such as A.W. Moore’s Folklore of the Isle of Man, a page of which located in M. Fulton Tailor’s, or R.H.J. Brown’s The Flight of Birds, which decorates the walls of Malcolm’s darkroom. If you look closely in Hecate’s apothecary, you will find a vintage edition of The Magus by Francis Barrett, as well as pages from Arthur Edward Waite’s Book of Ceremonial Magic.
After mining the show for cited sources, we expanded our search outward to sources directly mentioned by the creators themselves, either in published interviews, or in the program from the Boston run of Sleep No More, which cites largely to books and journals published by the Folklore Society of Great Britain, such as Notes on the Folk-lore of North-East Scotland and Notes on the Folk-lore of the Northern Counties of England and the Borders. We also found some particularly useful information in the “Notes and Queries” sections of the Folklore Society’s quarterly periodical, the Folk-Lore Record (which later became the Folk-Lore Journal, and then simply Folk-Lore).
All told, we have been wary of including any additional sources that we weren’t confident either (a) directly inspired the creators in some fashion, or (b) had some very direct bearing upon the material presented in the show. With respect to the latter, for instance, my wife has recently purchased History of the Witches of Renfrewshire, a rather fascinating facsimile compilation of original accounts of the bewitchment of Christian Shaw and of the Paisley Witch Trials.
Rebecca and I are very lucky that Sleep No More is as dense and complex as it is, as it gives us an awful lot to chew on in terms of research and analysis—and more than enough to warrant the effort we have put in so far. Also, we are very pleased that we have had such a kind and enthusiastic readership as well, and we hope you continue to enjoy what we publish in the future.
Early Gaelic clans living in Scotland, Ireland, and the Isle of Man chose their leaders using a succession system called tanistry. When a new king assumed power, the clan’s nobles would elect a successor, whom they called the tanist. This...
Maxim here. There was a clever item in yesterday's gazette that Rebecca and I quite enjoyed, so we thought we ought to bring it to your attention.
The question of the historical Macbeth's legitimacy is something that Rebecca and I have been thinking about for some time now. As Bendemolina mentions, Scottish government at the time was not a hereditary monarchy. Under the principles of tanistry, Macbeth was elected king by the thanes, and duly anointed" (Orgel, Stephen. "Introduction." Macbeth. By William Shakespeare. New York: Penguin Group. 2000. xxxvii.). Accordingly, in Holinshed's Chronicles, from which Shakespeare derived the stories for a number of his plays, Macbeth not only has a legitimate claim to the Scottish throne, but he also has a genuine grievance against Duncan--things that are not mentioned in the play.
It is a little known fact that the historical Macbeth, far from being an "untitled tyrant," was actually a legally-appointed placeholder for the "legitimate" heir to the throne, who was Lulach, Lady Macbeth's young son from a prior marriage. Upon his accession, the historical Macbeth ruled as Protector until Lulach came of age, all under the auspices of the Scottish thanes.
Historically, therefore, it was Duncan who was the usurper. In fact, "merciless" Macdonwald's rebellion depicted at the beginning of the play was actually a political struggle by forces loyal to Malcolm II, Duncan's predecessor, to depose Duncan, an illegitimate king. And the war conducted at the end of the play by Malcolm, Macduff and Siward (who, as Earl of Northumberland, represented the interests of the English crown) was not, as Shakespeare depicts it, a campaign to restore the crown to its rightful heir, but essentially an English invasion--one that ended the ongoing war between the Celts of Scotland and the Anglo-Norman peoples of England.
Malcolm's war was, for the most part, about the "enforced anglicization of Scotland, which Macbeth is resisting" (Id. xxxv). Shakespeare takes pains to avoid confronting these issues of legitimacy head-on, for political and aesthetic reasons that are worthy of discussion.
Aesthetically speaking, Shakespeare's revision of historical fact is actually of great service to the content of the play. Sidestepping the major issues of legitimacy and political contrivance allows Shakespeare to make the play less about "usurpation than about the divided self" (Id. xxxvii). Like in Hamlet, where issues of legitimacy and heredity are also in dispute, the political drama of Macbeth takes a back seat so as to highlight the philosophical and emotional struggle within the mind of its hero.
But this decision was more than merely aesthetic. Shakespeare's decision to exclude any mention of Macbeth's legitimacy also served an important political purpose: to please his king and patron, James I.
Essentially, James I's claims to the throne aren't all that different from the historical Duncan's. "[H]eredity requires a great deal of ceremonial apparatus to make it appear a natural mode of succession. James I himself became king of England not because he was the legitimate heir (he was one of a number of people with a distant claim to the throne), but because he was designated the successor by Queen Elizabeth" (Id. xxxvi).
This ceremonial apparatus appears (to a slight extent) in Macbeth when Duncan attempts to legitimize Malcolm's succession by appointing his son as Prince of Cumberland. This appointment is depicted as legitimate notwithstanding the fact that Scotland's system of succession simply didn't work that way--and for Shakespeare to ignore this problem is also to avoid drawing attention to the fact that James I's accession was secured by the same means. This was a smart move by Shakespeare to avoid ruffling the feathers of the man who paid his bills.
This is only one of a number of aspects in the play composed by Shakespeare to placate King James. For one, we have the inclusion of witchcraft, in which the king was thoroughly interested, and about which he even wrote a dialogue, Daemonologie. For another, we have Shakespeare's minor flight of sycophancy in Act IV, when Malcolm talks about the king of England's healing gifts:
A most miraculous work in this good king,
Which often since my here-remain in England
I have seen him do. How he solicits heaven,
Himself best knows, but strangely visited people,
All swoll'n and ulcerous, pitiful to the eye,
The mere despair of surgery, he cures (IV.iii.149-154)
This was no doubt a reference to King James himself, about whom it was claimed that, like Edward the Confessor in the play, the king's touch could cure diseases. There are also numerous references to equivocation, which were meant to reference and condemn the infamous Gunpowder Plot to assassinate King James (Huntley, Frank L. "Macbeth and the Background of Jesuitical Equivocation." PMLA. Vol. 79, No. 4. 1964. 390-400.).
And finally, we have the character of Banquo, from whom James I claimed to descend. Banquo was represented in the play as a moral man, loyal to both his friend Macbeth and the crown of Scotland. The historical Banquo, however, played a direct role in Duncan's assassination and was, for the duration of his life, an accomplice of Macbeth's. This fact "would be very touchy for Shakespeare precisely because Banquo is King James' ancestor, and if Duncan is a saint, then Banquo is a real problem, the ancestor one wants to forget." (Orgel xxxv). Shakespeare deftly glossed over this issue in the play, and avoided the risk of insulting the king's lineage while taking advantage of the fact that he, as a playwrite working during his time, could essentially re-write the popular knowledge of the king's history and lineage.
I mention all this not only because it informs our reading of Macbeth, but also because this information is cursorily relevant to Sleep No More, in which the question of Macbeth's legitimacy is altered and/or avoided for aesthetic ends.
According to the second edition of the Sleep No More program, it is not Malcolm who is "Heir to the McKittrick Estate," but Macbeth. This creative choice by the producers of the show was likely made for two reasons. First, the medium of dance, being primarily a medium of emotional expression and psychological tension, does not lend itself easily to complex plots, and it is difficult to imagine how Malcolm's flight to England--and the resultant suspicion that falls upon him for Duncan's murder--could be easily expressed through dance.
The second reason Sleep No More sidesteps the problem of Macbeth's legitimacy is the same reason as Shakespeare's--to shift the focus of our attention to Macbeth's moral and psychological struggle with his own ambition. Sleep No More thrives on its emotionally-charged moments and the psychological epiphanies of its characters, and to muddle the plot with political intrigue and modes of heredity would distract the audience from core of the show's tremendous appeal.
All in all, an excellent find by Bendemolina. Cheers.