todays bird

blake kathryn
Noah Kahan
No title available
Not today Justin
No title available
ojovivo
Monterey Bay Aquarium
taylor price
The Stonewall Inn
Sade Olutola
"I'm Dorothy Gale from Kansas"
KIROKAZE
NASA

ellievsbear

titsay
No title available
occasionally subtle

No title available
Doug Jones
seen from Russia
seen from Panama
seen from United States

seen from Albania

seen from Vietnam
seen from United States

seen from Spain
seen from United States

seen from Brazil

seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from Malaysia
seen from United States
seen from Kuwait
seen from Philippines
seen from Indonesia
@pansexualkiba
Orientalism is every South Asian being assumed Indian. The amount of times my Maldivian friends have heard "Namaste" when they're out of the country...
And many of them don't care to learn about Maldives when they're corrected
this is orientalism.
All my soriku treats for my friend, she likes those guys
One maladaptive coping mechanism that turns very toxic when you’re not defending against abuse is to read any uncomfortable situation as a deliberate personal attack, and sometimes extrapolate one incident into a whole pattern of malicious intent.
Examples:
“Hey, I have a headache, could you please lower your voice a little?” - “FINE I guess I just won’t say anything at all!”
“Hey thanks for inviting me, but I’m not feeling well, so I’m sorry but I can’t make it. Maybe (x day) instead?” - “Sorry for asking! I guess I’m just too needy for you!”
(Someone forgets to call you back.) - “Yeah I don’t think we’re friends anymore, she acts like she hates me.”
“Hey, what you just said about me was literally not true. Why did you say that?” - “Right, I’m just a piece of shit who should never talk at all I guess!”
“I don’t really feel like sex tonight.” - “Sorry I’m so repulsive to you!”
“You really hurt my feelings. Why did you do that?” - ”Go ahead and just break up with me, I know you’ve been wanting to.”
This kind of response escalates an interaction from a two-way conversation about a specific problem into a fight about your own self-worth. Instead of responding to what’s actually happening or trying to figure out whether an attack was intended, this response immediately changes the conversation into a defensive argument where the only relevant question is if you’re an okay person that people care about.
Like I get feeling this kind of reaction, I get having a knee-jerk response of fear and shame and self-loathing. Sometimes when you’re feeling vulnerable it is very, very difficult not to read super far into anything negative. Sometimes it just reflects off all your internal fears and amplifies inside of you until a polite “no” feels like everyone you’ve ever liked is telling you they hate you.
But it is possible, with some work, to separate your feelings from your actual knowledge of the situation. It’s possible to feel one thing in your heart and still recognize with your mind that the reality is different. You can learn to notice the difference between someone actually attacking you and something just feeling like an attack because you’re extra vulnerable.
You can also learn not to react based solely on your feelings. You can learn to take another person’s actual words and actions into account and respond based on what you think - not just feel - their intent actually was. That work is as necessary as it is difficult.
People need to be able to tell you things that aren’t overwhelmingly positive without you making them feel guilty for saying anything and treating their concerns as an attack.
Otherwise, you wind up in a position where they can’t be honest with you. They can’t say no to you, can’t tell you when something you do hurts or scares them, can’t point out worrying things as friends do to take care of each other, can’t bring up their own needs without the conversation devolving into comforting you again.
This habit interacts especially badly with the way many other trauma survivors are terrified of upsetting anyone – when your reaction to them bringing up problems or saying no is consistently disproportionate, they may find it easier to just do what you want even against their own will.
It is possible to deal with those awful feelings and get the comfort you need without resorting to lashing out when you feel bad. It’s okay to be honest about the fact your emotions don’t always line up with reality so people know what you’re going through. It’s okay to just ask for the emotional support you need or for confirmation that they mean what they say.
You may even find that when you make a continuous effort not to treat these uncomfortable experiences as crises, they deescalate and you wind up feeling more secure each time.
Look, this coping mechanism, like many forms of manipulation, is a useful survival tool in the context of an abusive relationship where you really are being attacked insidiously, and where you can’t just ask for comfort and expect to get it. But if you are no longer in that kind of situation, it’s time to reevaluate the usefulness/danger ratio and figure out what other strategies might be better for you and the people you love.
The Lion King 2 is the only sequel media that's allowed to make the former main character a kinda bad parent bcs that's the only time it's been done right. This sounds insane but LoK wishes it had what The Lion King 2: Simba's Pride did.
Anyway the REASON it gets a pass is because it actually grounds Simba's bad parenting in things that it would make sense for him to be worried about or reactive too based on the trauma he's gone through, and on top of that he still gets to have a character arc despite not being the main character that follows from the character arc he had in the first movie.
I don't believe Aang was a bad father in the way the show said he was because it's contrary to his entire personality. Someone who helped form the Air Acolytes would never neglect his son because he's not a bender or his daughter because she's not an air bender. Just like I don't believe Luke "There Is Still Good In Vader" Skywalker would try to kill his nephew, it's contrary to his entire personality, Luke would not see his nephew any differently than he saw Anakin, especially when he hadn't yet done anything wrong while Vader had genocided half the galaxy and murdered a bunch of children.
I believe that Simba struggled to raise his daughter because he was overprotective BECAUSE he knows how fucking easy it is for someone to die in the savanna. It happened right in front of him. He also didn't get raised to adulthood with his parents so ofc he's not the best as knowing how to talk to his daughter or explain things to her, he got raised in the wilderness by two gay weirdos. Of course he's insanely hostile to outsiders including the lionesses that decided to follow Scar, Scar killed his dad and nearly caused a collapse of the local ecosystem. And during the course of the movie he has to actually come to terms with how he's letting his trauma control him and it's drive his daughter away. He gets to apologize and admit he was wrong, he gets to grow.
And yeah you could argue we don't really get to see Aang or Luke interacting with their families because that's not when the story is set but there are still ways to make sure your characterization is consistent, and I'd argue in cases like Aang and Luke where you don't get to see them when they were raising/interacting with their young families it's even more important for you to keep the characterization consistent because we don't get to see the character grow and change we just see where they started and where they ended up, so if you change too much it's gonna feel weird.
You can do the "they grew up to be bad and/or flawed parents/guardians" thing without it feeling like character assassination and for some reason The Lion King 2: Simba's Pride does it better than most media that tries it.
Arguably for Luke, he was strongly tempted but he withdrew his lightsaber
Luke is a character who makes decisions based on his attachments. When he saw Han and Leia in danger in Cloud City, he abandoned his training to go rescue them. When Vader threatens to turn Leia, Luke goes apeshit and nearly kills him. When he sees the vision of Ben destroying everything (killing han and leia), Luke pulls the saber on him, but then he almost instantly remembers that it's his family he's pulling the saber on, and stops himself.
And that split-second caused Luke to lose Han and Leia's son, and get most of his students killed. You really think Luke isn't feeling immense guilt over that?
At the end of the day, Luke was still young when the original trilogy ended, and he likely hadn't fully processed everything he'd been through. On top of that, he was immediately burdened with the massive responsibility of rebuilding the Jedi Order completely by himself.
In the sequels, his fear and anger over the possibility of losing everything cause him to make mistakes —which ultimately results in him losing everything anyway. I get that it’s not the heroic direction fans wanted to see, but that doesn't make his failure any less believable or human.
In the end, I think many fans came in with a very idealised version of Luke and disappointed that Luke ended up as a despondent and disillusioned Jedi, which TFA already set out and The Last Jedi tries to address. That said, I always love Luke's final stand against the First Order, because using Jedi trickery to stall them is very Jedi-like
(ofc all aside that TFA really wrote things into a corner to have Luke give up everything so eh)
As for LOK and Aang, I haven't watched LOK to give a proper assessment but I just find there's less justification given things generally went well between the series and LOK... Eh
I def can see why people didn't disagree with the take on him in TLJ and that's fine, but I'm just gonna have to agree to disagree with you and them. I hate that movie a lot for tons of resons, not just the Luke thing. I don't really think it did anything good at all, and imo it felt vastly out of step with everything TFA and every other SW movie set up, but that's just me. You don't have to agree either, just giving a heads up to where I'm coming from.
It's also been a bit since I rewatched any of these movies, but based on my understanding of Luke I 100% don't think he would be or should have been a flawless beacon of all that's good or inherently a good parent/guardian, or even that he couldn't end up all cynical and disillusioned, I still was fully down with him having failed Ben and his students and with him deciding to go into exile over it, I just think it would make more sense for him to have the fatal flaw of giving Ben/Kylo the benefit of the doubt to a disproportionate degree and thinking he could get through to anyone when that's not how the world has ever worked, over a copy past of Anakin's fatal flaw. He was able to save Anakin at the end, and I figure that would give him a sense that he could save anyone if only he tried, and that would be what's tested. He thought he could get through to anyone after Vader, but that's not true, and he believed he could save Vader to the degree he was willing to risk his life over it. That feels like a setup for over confidence, not paranoia.
Imo it made sense for Anakin's issue to be fear of losing people, for sure, but I at least didn't get the vibe from the original trilogy that that was something Luke would fixate on to the point of it being his downfall. It's a stretch for me to see him that cynical and paranoid, even him abandoning his training to me was a sign that he was rejecting what had destroyed Anakin, he wasn't adhering to the idea that attachment is a weakness. I came away assuming Luke had, through choosing to try to save Vader and to abandon his training to try to save his friends, overcome what Anakin fell to and was fixing the big issue with the Jedi Order as a whole. Luke won because of his connections with others, not in spite of them or through letting them go.
I also just think Luke falling to the same flaw as Anakin was just...lazy? I've already seen "crashed out because he was scared of losing everyone" and I liked it the first time, but it's not exactly breaking new ground, and I just do not see anything in Luke that would hint that he'd struggle with the same fatal flaw, and unfortunately, to me, having his flaw also be "cared too much about his family" reinforces the idea that the Jedi Order was right about attachment being a weakness which again, was the big issue they had that could be fixed by Luke choosing not to see his emotional attachments as secondary to anything. And as funny as "The Sacred Texts!!!" is, idk having Yoda kinda show up to be like "oh you took all this shit seriously?? idiot!" just feels narratively incoherent and retroactively fucks up a lot of the story including the reason Anakin was tempted in the first place. Plus I didn't get the vibe that Luke cared that much about worshiping the way of the Order before or anything, to me Luke would be the first to blow all that shit up, based on what I saw in the original trillogy he clearly knew things needed to change going forward, and that's why he tried to save Vader, because he understood what went wrong.
So like, idk again, I think it would make FAR more sense for Luke's flaw to be born of his optimism that came from saving his friends and his father. He won, he thinks things are simple, and he fails to see the threat Kylo/Ben had become because he figured it was something they could just talk out eventually and it wouldn't turn into a big issue. But things aren't that simple, and Ben falls to the dark side despite Luke's best effort to stop him, and that is what shakes him fundamentally. He was wrong about being able to save everyone by being kind and understanding and forgiving. Things are more complicated than that.
But again, def just my take. You don't have to agree and I'm probably not gonna change my mind on it either. I'm not the biggest SW fan in the universe, I haven't seen/read/played all the tie in media, and it's been a hot minute since I watched the movies (not that there is an amount of money on this earth that could get me to agree to watch TLJ again) so I could be missing things, but that's the crux of my disagreement. Not that he should act like he's perfect or a beacon of endless optimism and forgiveness who did nothing wrong, just that I don't think the flaw of "too scared to lose everything that he ends up losing everything" makes sense for the character we're shown, and instead it should have been something like "dude truly believed he could save anyone and everyone and it blinds him to how serious of a problem what Ben was dealing with actually was and even potentially made Ben less interested in listening to him and thus harder for Luke to reach" for it to feel like Luke to me.
by Uobih
When I (an Indian kid with no noticeable accent) say anything, there’s no reaction, but when another Indian kid with a very heavy accent answers a question in a 12th grade math class, most students burst out into laughter. like what’s the joke?
this is orientalism.
Thank you undertale for making nonbinary kids
never ask a woman her age a man his salary your mutual how late it is in her timezone when she starts posting about that bisexual man
can people stop saying insane things on this post
I think one of the main things I want people to take away from my Elliot Page post is that too many people online will see a character that haunts the narrative and thinks that makes them a well-rounded, complex character without thinking why the Dead Wife trope is specifically called that, why female characters usually take on that role, and why Elliot Page being given that role is not a sign of Nolan respecting his male identity more than his pre-transition identity. People on this website will decry misogyny without even noticing the misogyny right in front of them, because in their minds it doesn’t exist when it’s happening to a trans man. Nolan literally gave Elliot Page one of the most classically female roles in cinema history and everyone said “that’s fine” because the role happened to be a man. A young man more importantly, when Elliot Page is a grown ass 39 year old, but no one has ever treated him like an adult in his fucking life so I don’t see why that would change now.
the concept of vocaloid fans being so insanely racist towards one of the most exciting up and coming underground rappers that the very talented producer behind fujo miku and mikumiku beam revealed that he’s black
anyways, go stream Slayr and Sawtowne
Could Faline solve the Kira murders?
Could catch Kira, would survive
Could not catch Kira, would survive
Could catch Kira, would not survive
Could not catch Kira, would not survive
youre in the circus while my money is reaching Amazing Digits
Why does the KKK have to have the term grand wizard, like every time I want to make a high ranking wizards, I think oh he's the grand wizard, then I remember, that's the leader of the KKK, and I have to change it to royal wizard or something
Not the white European in the notes saying that I should still use the term grand wizard because it makes the KKK seem less serious...
They don't use Grand Wizard anymore, so you could steal it. Also even if they did still use it, fuck the KKK, dilute their ownership of the term. You could also use High Wizard, Lord Wizard, Great Wizard, Chief Wizard, or Master Wizard.
They still use the term, there are living people with the title. And I don't think I, as a white Midwesterner have any right to "reclaim" grand wizard as a term. Why do white people want so badly to be allowed to use KKK terms?
The whole point of the KKK using silly sounding words was as dog whistles that the white press would see as frivolous and ignore while still being able to invoke terror in Black Americans. I have no right to use their language as a white person in some sort of sick reclamation
thunderstorm warninggggggggg
While we are at it I need nonblack people to stop saying “YN” and “🥷🏾” just to get around saying antiblack racial slurs. Yes that includes that stupid shit where white people go “ooh but I said nega not-“ I don’t give a shit. You know damn well what you meant. Fuck off. It’s a insta block from me for anyone who does this shit and think it’s funny or whatever don’t pmo.
And before someone fucking says “erm are you referring to the fanfic / shipping term? How is your name offen-“ obviously no I’m not referring to that and anyone who is using it to mean “your name” types it with a slash -> (y/n) *NOT* “yn”. Like. I need nonblacks to stop randomly regurgitating aave they see or hear without knowing what it fucking means and misusing it to hell and back thinking it’s cool/ trendy/ or something worthy of mockery. It means young nigga. Stop fucking using it if you’re not black lol