Hey Paul, just curious...why do you think some of these extreme shippers keep holding on to their fantasies about Sam and Cait? This recent one, sgian-dubh, is really hateful to anyone who dares to question her and swears she knows things, but never tells what those things are.
As much as Sam travels and works, do they seriously believe he and Cait have multiple kids- or do you think they keep stirring this shit for some other reason?
I am fairly new to following all this and I find it appalling how they attack any woman Sam dates or that they think he dates. It's really sad that such a good guy can't just have a normal relationship or a normal date without them ruining it. It really saddens me that he may have lost some good relationships because of these nutcases.
I promise I am definitely not a shipper or a hater. I truly admire Sam and Cait and their work. It's just such a shame that they have had to endure all of this.
Hi Carpediem!
Nice to meet you. I guess the best way to answer your question is - why do people believe the earth is flat when there are images and proof positive that it's not?
People believe what they want to believe but I do think a LOT of Supershippers use the belief that Sam and Cait are together for power, attention and popularity. As for the "black knife" she should call herself the black widow. It's kind of cheesy of her to be stealing from other Supershippers "schticks" to further her bizarre ideas. I guess it's better than black shirt; too close to the Squadrismo group I would assume but she does have the same terrorist qualities.
My advice would be to ignore the moots, the wives, the shirts and any others who will post that they are together. They are not and I think that any person who believes they are together are ridiculously oblivious to real life. Maybe it's because of soap operas where millions of watchers suspend belief that everyone is a doctor or a lawyer or business tycoon in real life versus a cashier in a supermarket or something that common people do for jobs. Also apparently on soaps it's quite easy to switch DNA tests or move to Europe when the going gets tough. I guess if you can believe that; you are capable of believing in flat earths and Sam and Cait's secret marriage and the stupidity used to explain their proof.
Hope this answers your question and apologies for the late response. I don't spend a lot of time on Tumblr.
I some people spreading the rumor that Sam and Paul had a fallout and that's why Paul basically moved on from Tumblr and this fandom.
Do you know anything about this?
Haters LOVE to spread false info about Paul and Sam's friendship...especially Extreme Shippers, who are still bitter that Paul and William Shatner called out Extreme Shippers for their lies and bad behavior. The last time ES said that Paul was no longer friends with Sam...Paul was invited to the Outlander Seasom premiere personally by Sam as "friend" š
And Sam and Paul are STILL friends. There has NOT been any falling out. I know this with 100% certainty.
Paul isn't active as much on Tumblr anymore because there isn't much left to say. And he's busy with a lot of work projects. But, I'll stop there and let him speak for himself if he wants to. @paulcamuso not sure if you want to add anything or not. But it seems ES and assorted haters are spreading LIES about you again...and about Sam. Gee, what else is knew? š¤š
Haha! Sorry I'm late to pity Paul party....
Thanks for defending my honour, @p-redux I do love that that I'm still a threat to some crazy, fucked up fans of Outlander.
In 20/20 hindsight, it's all just funny to me. The craziness of a 26 year old woman who went from fandom to fandom trying to push her "shipping" beliefs when she came to Outlander and found all these gullible grannies who believed her stories and launched a movement that despite all the truths staring them in the face - they came up with bizarre, sometimes ludicrous excuses to explain it all away.
A couple have tried that "Paul and Sam are no longer friends" routine before - one even went so far as to create a complete fictional friend of Sam who came to her to specifically tell her that Sam and I were not friends. I believe she is still blocked by Sam as are most of the old shipping community. #finallyhegotitright
Sam and I are still friends. We don't communicate as much as we did: he's busy, I'm busy, and the whole crazy community of damaged women (mostly) just gets wicked tiring (to use my Boston vernacular) after a while. When we talk or text ..it's about what's going on in our lives and the Outlander world is left in the dust. He is Sam; not Jaimie and he has tons of other things going on besides being in a cable TV show.
Sam is a saint for all he puts up with from these demented types. That is the one fault I have with Sam - he's too good and too trusting. He eventually learns that you cannot give these weird people even an inch because they take up a yard and that came out on his famous Hawaiian holiday where the Outlander world saw just how far the idiots would go to force Sam back to the UK so they could continue the lies about the fake marriage, debunking marriage certifictes, priests, children and that hilarious "no fraternization clause."
I do pop in from time to time when I need a chuckle on how invested some of the new mob are and to check out the desperate ones who are still trying to peddle how "connected they are" to things that they know the truth.
They aren't connected to reality let alone the truth.
I don't have to prove anything to crazies (yeah, I know bad word because it brings up whatever the freaking hell it brings up - how about unbalanced & brainsick? That's probably closer to reality.)
Some of those that got blocked blame me. Well how could I be responsible if I'm not his friend? Come on ladies, really - you cannot have both be truths. BTW, neither of them really are the truth.
And then you get the types that have to explain that away...and so on...and so on...
BTW just for the record since I'm here talking about it: Sam is still not with Caitriona as I told all of you in June of 2016 when I made that Twitter comment that started all this. It's been 6 freaking years and you still think about me? #flattered #getalife
Caitriona is still very happily married to Tony despite what the damaged ones will pontificate and Tony is the father of their child. I hope they are living a blissful life just to piss off those old crones!
You guys take care. I'll be back from time to time.
Video š¹: Reserved Magazine, Instagram Live, 24 April 2020
Stop writing nasty shit.
More than one fan who recently reposted this video clip asserts Cait is standing up for her man. She is not. She is standing up for her friend and co-star.
But when I listen to her say Stop writing nasty shit, I donāt think about any Hawaiian holiday or resulting commentary. I think about:
From Harperās Bazaar, 10 May 2020: Five seasons in, Balfe says, both she and Heughan have largely learned to navigate this aspect of the fandom, but there are momentsāespecially latelyāwhen it has felt harder to manage.
ā¦.when people go after the people that weāre withāwhen they go after my husband, or the people that (Samās) datingāthatās when it gets really hurtful. You realize that because of the career that youāve chosen, other people in your life are getting hurt, and they didnāt choose any of it. Thatās when it crosses the line.
From the Irish Mirror, 31 May 2020
My husband has known Sam since we started dating and he understands the situation very well. I try not to read too much of the fan whispering and all of that stuff. Itās important to me that people in your life who are not part of your work are not harmed by your job and what people say about you.
From Gold Derby on YouTube, 4 June 2020
I would say that itās not incessant negativity. I do think itās a very small group of people. And for the most part, you can ignore itā¦ But inevitably, at some point, you come across it or you see it and it can be hurtfulā¦ I think trying to keep it in perspective, trying to remember that itās a small fraction of people and also just realizing that itās probably coming from a place of hurt for them, that this is something that we are in public so theyāre using us in some way to work out something thatās actually very sad and very hurt within them. And if I try to approach it from that side, then I know itās really not about me, but when it affects my husband or people in our lives, well, then, you get a little bit like grr... So, occasionally you might zip back, but I try to not.
When I hear Cait say Stop writing nasty shit, I think about the people who:
say sheās a liar and a hypocrite
say she faked an engagement to promote Outlanderās Season 4, faked a marriage to promote LeMans ā66, and is faking a first-born child to promote Belfast
say she hides her three older children and real partner, emasculating him
say a 9 July 2016 first-child birthdate is a fact
say her actual husband is her gay, paid employee
say the certified copy of an entry of (her) marriage is fake
say she purposely switches out her wedding ring set
say a divorce is in progress
post and discuss images of perceived changes in her body, attributing these changes to multiple pregnancies
post images to ridicule her actual husband
extend congratulations on the birth of her first and only child to her friend/co-star, implying he is the babyās father
I think of these unkind assertions and actions, and I imagine Cait might like to tell the people behind them to stop writing nasty shit.
Rememberā¦ she married for the first time in 2019, and gave birth to her first child in 2021. Full stop. #Facts
Sending this out to to the Shirt, the lying SHWife, CRT, all the haters and shippers out there.Ā Get a life, get off your ass and go try and do some good in the world.Ā Caitriona has spoken.
Missed you @whylimewhyanything ! And whoomp, there it is! Can't be more clear than a drawing of Cait AND Tony AND their baby's hand AND Cait commenting "Gorgeous!! Thank you š" that Cait is once AGAIN acknowledging Tony is her husband and the father of her baby. But you know the delusional aka Extreme Shipper babygaters will dismiss it...or worse photoshop Sam in Tony's place. Wait for it in 3, 2, 1...
Great point @caitrionabalfestanclub ! When people Tweet her saying Sam is her husband, she corrects them. If Tony wasn't her husband and the father of her baby, she would have said "Thanks, but Tony's my assistant." Hahaha you wish, babygaters. But NOPE, not only did she not NOT correct the fan sending her that drawing of her REAL family, but she THANKED her. Can't be more CLEAR than that. But there are none so blind than those who will not see aka Extreme Shippers. Oh well.
And here is more positive proof that the marriage between Caitriona & Tony exists. Take note @samheughanswife and other types that waste countless hours trying to disprove it & fabricate proof via blurry pics. Thereās no way Caitriona would acknowledge the drawing if Tony was her āassistant.ā They are a married couple; now move on to some other topic you can spin because this issue is settled.
You cannot spin this away so you are probably just going to ignore it or are you going to make up stories that āTony the assistantā runs Caitrionaās Twitter or maybe the powers that be again control it and Caitriona doesnāt know about it? Haha with all the current attention Caitriona is getting for Belfast; sheāll be doubly sure her social media is perfect.
We went through this in 2016 when the previous set of shippers spent their time making up non-fraternization clauses and that S&C had their social media accounts locked up by Starz over the Lionsgate merger. None of that was believable at all with metoo and timesup in full force yet they kept pushing it as an agenda until their ship fell apart & like rats; they quickly jumped ship only to have you inherit their Titanic.
Iād love to see how you are going to spin this drawing & explain it away.
I wanted to add an updated to this,Ā I did get the actual video. Itās a Sam story from October of last year.
Here it is in its original format.
Notice the stripes are brownish.
When you take this cap an make it black and white you will see why I thought the sheets were added in in my original post:
My image is on the left and the shipper image is on the right.
They made the top and the bottom darker (thatās why the emoji is darker on theirs to make the brown stripes look black like Caitrionaās photo.
If they just took my photo you would see that itās definitely not the same fabric or colour.Ā Also I think Samās photo is of a pillow.
What they did was they darkened the top and the bottom to get to a reasonable facsimile of black - thatās why when I tried to restore the colour the top and bottom stayed black and white.Ā They had been manipulated to appear to be black.
They still manipulated the photo to make it appear that it was the same.Ā They just did it from an existing image that they darkened.
Iām back with even more stupidity from the Shippers.
So Iām sure youāve seen this image by now:
Notice the sheets?
So a group of shippers are floating around this image purportedly from a Sam Instagram Story:
They want you to take notice of whatās UNDER the book - purportedly the SAME EXACT SHEETS!
OH MY GAWD!!!!Ā How crazy is that?
Then you begin to take a look at the image itself...
First off - every single copy of this photo has the words:
The words are in Italian and mean Active Now.Ā Why canāt I find any other versions of this photo with English, French or Spanish words?Ā There seems to only be one version of this photo.
In continuing to look - the photo is in black and white - just like Caitrionaās baby photo.Ā Not only is the photo b&w but the š³emoji is ALSO in black and white.Ā Why would the emoji be in black and white?
Well the only reason can be (since emojis donāt come in black and white) is that someone took a colour photo and made it black and white and thus the existing caption with the yellow emoji also became black and white.
Whatās even odder is that if you attempt to restore colour to the photo you see that the bottom and top halves still stay black and white showing that there is a layered image with both colour and black and white effects going on.
And notice the emoji still stays black and white.
Also the colour of the white text matches the caption and the āAttivo/ a oraā line. If this was someone who posted a b&w decoloured photo the Attivo would be bright white. This proves that the transfer to b&w happened after a screen cap of an Instagram was captured. Another indication this photo isnāt real.
This appears to be a deliberately faked photo.
You can even see more photoshopping by changing up the exposureĀ and brightness of the black and white photo:
Notice the choppy effect on the pages.Ā This isnāt due to the pulp of the page but someone carelessly cutting out the background with a mouse.
The doctoring of the photo becomes even more apparent in changing the brightness of the over exposed image but looking at the bottom around the caption reveals a distinct rectangle around the caption.:
This is also an indication that the caption was not applied to the actual bottom layer but another layer - a likely transparent one.
And then in looking at the word picture you notice that the lines go a little wonky here:
Between the E and the S in Pictures you can see that one of the lines goes off at a seemingly 45 degree angleĀ ā/ /āĀ for no reason:
Also notice within the āEā in pictures that the stripe angle goes even more extreme.Ā
Then under the ED in Bedtime you can see that a stripe forks - thatās not in any of the rest of the pattern.Ā
Thatās again a good indication that itās been tampered with.
On top of all of this you have the hysterical assertion by yet ANOTHER shipper that Caitrionaās baby photo is based on an Instagram filter from 2016.
So if this is true then Sam kept his sheets for 6 years?Ā Or are the stripes THAT good that they bought tons of them and have been using them for years?
I wish that Shippers who want to concoct lies at least try to make things plausible.Ā One set is claiming this is a 2016 photo while another set of Shippers creates a fake Sam story post with sheets that they not only have to turn black and white to be able to match Caitrionaāās photo sheets but then thereās not enough material so they have to play around with photo shop and they cannot keep their lines straight.
What kind of mental case goes through this trouble to try to refute what every one else is saying?
Just terribly sad that they expend so much work and energy in the hopes that this will make them well known in their crazy little fandom.
So one of the ridiculous shippers (you know her - the Stalker from Down Under) posted this tidbit to try to set the shipper world celebrating.
So what she really wants us all to believe is that there is a divorce pending between Caitriona and Tony and this VERY THOUGHTFUL shipper chooses a time when thereās no possible way to make Sam the Baby Daddy.
She is desperately hoping that the Shipper World is too dumb to see what this is.I'm not and if you carefully read it you will see what a farce this is, too.
So letās take a closer look at this post:
So she previews It with baiting the crowd that the baby's arrival "beat" the divorce. Ā Her "proof" is that she has this form generated from a website presumably and wants us all to think that a divorce is pending.
But is it a reality?
Read on...
Letās look at the form itself:Ā why would a form ask what country if the search was on a UK government website? Ā
It's the UK. Ā It's based on the court in the jurisdiction you live; thatās where you file the petition. Ā The truth is - this image not an official government website.
All this is basically is a generic search form to see if there is actually a divorce pending and it seems to break things down into geographical areas.Ā Ā
Now why wouldnāt she have just gone to the horses mouth and looked at the UK Government website?Ā Weāll get to that.
If you look after the screen cap you can a bit more information includining the phrase:"Please check all the information again and contact us if there are any changes..."
Why would it say that if it's proof positive that there's a divorce happening?
Also see the line:
"No trace confirms that a divorce has not been issued and the case is stuck at the nisi stage"
So let's go over Divorce Terms in the UK:
Decree Nisi:
The decree nisi is a provisional decree of divorce pronounced when the court is satisfied that a person has met the legal and procedural requirements to obtain a divorce.Ā
Decree Absolute:
The decree absolute is the final decree which actually dissolves the marriage.
So now knowing those terms go back to: "No trace confirms that a divorce has not been issued and the case is stuck at the nisi stage"
Now itās clearer - that means that the courts legal and procedural requirements have not been satisfied. Ā
Well we know from shipper deep dives that both Tony and Caitriona are fairly wealthy.Ā So if this divorce decree nisi would have actually been submitted, it would have been by very competent solicitors. Ā
So that shows yet another flaw in the logic presented.
The only "public" information available to anyone about a UK Divorce is the Final Decree Absolute. Ā Here's it right from a divorce solicitors website in the UK:
Now going back to the form that the Shipper posted - there's no court name or case number assigned. That means no divorce has even been started or itās a screen cap of her filling in what little information she has.
If thatās so - then what is the result?Ā Its that the bottom part of the screen cap that states that no trace means thereās no final divorce?Ā If thatās the case why is the court and the case number blank?
This is all just a way to trick the feeble minded types in the Shipper World to get the ship floating again because there's a divorce happening.
Itās clear:Ā There isn't a divorce happening.Ā Ā
This is just yet another smoke and mirrors trick to make shippers "feel good about yourselves and break out those lemons with happy faces on them" moment by someone who has a reputation for creating fantasies and lies.
If you are a shipper and want to believe her - go ahead but the only way to get any kind of paperwork is to make an inquiry directly to the court.
In fact I'll give you the website info: Ā https://www.gov.uk/copy-decree-absolute-final-order
BTW, there are Caveats:
If you know the case number and the court
It costs Ā£10 if you know both the case number and the court.
Send an email or letter to the court and include:
your name and address
the case number
how you want to pay
If you do not know the case number (which we don't)
If you know which court issued the decree absolute or final order (which we do NOT), you can ask them to search their records. It costs Ā£45 to search a 10 year period.
Give the court the date you think the case happened. The court will search 5 years of records either side of that date.
If you cannot give them a date, the court will search the last 10 years of records.
Send an email or letter to the court with your name and address, and how you want to pay.
Here's the link to the form which you can fill out and print: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/958048/d440-eng.pdf
So why is the UK Government Websites require that you fill out forms and send them in with payment but Shipper from Down Under thinks that she can find a website to search for a divorce without any kind of payments?
I guarantee that the search will prove that there's absolutely NOTHING pending but have your party while the Truthers all laugh at the stupidity of how you are all being tricked by someone who keeps trying to trick you over and over.
You shippers called Sam's Girlfriends "thirsty" but this fraudster is proving over and over that shippers are the "thirsty" ones here.
If you go and pay the Ā£65 (about $90 US) drop me a line with the non-results. Ā
You should also take a moment if you are a shipper and ask yourself - why does one of your own think you are dumb enough to fall for this charade that just reading and using common sense can easily solve?
Is it because she thinks you are dumb and gullible?
Iāve already talked about her bizarre behaviour here.
Now sheās riling up some new person over what looks like harassment by shippers.Ā I havenāt gone in to look but I assume that the woman on the beach who was harassed over the photo she took with Sam.Ā
Is she actually suggesting that we may be behind it?
And the craziness continues.Ā Does Deborah think sheās doing herself any favours by talking to me on another platform that she blocked me on or does she just love exposition without fear of being corrected?
Let me speak directly to Deboarah here:
Deborah, you need to look at what the optics are about what you did yesterday.
Stewart was trying to explain his viewpoints on what happened to the woman who took photos with him at the beach and how the SHIPPERS harassed her off of the platform.Ā That happens CONTINUOUSLY within the Outlander fandom.Ā And what did you do?Ā
You veered the discussion about what the Shippers did to make this about poor little ole you.Ā That makes me think that you donāt want the conversation on what Shippers did to occur.Ā Why?
How is the evil, despicable acts of a group of crazy women who will do whatever it takes to terrorize another person off a social media platform so she takes her photos offline as well even compare to a group of people suggesting that your very public and petty posts about what number of followers that Sam had when you followed him?
Yet thatās exactly the comparison you want to make here.Ā People have a right to an opinion on a public post.Ā Why does that bother you so much that you call it bullying?Ā Did anyone come to your account and try to harass you to leave Twitter?
No.Ā Ā
And why do screen caps bother you?
They tell the truth - and maybe something that you donāt want?
You know who else hates screen caps?Ā Shippers.Ā
Didnāt you say that you were going to stay out of Samās life?
You are hardly proving it by making this about my friendship with Sam when I didnāt bring Sam into this.
Yet you have done that SEVERAL times (and here comes another one of those screen caps youĀ āloveā so much):
Arenāt you the one who berated Mackenzie for posting photos with Sam?
I also heard that you said some things about Tony as well?
Did you not have a problem with the Heughliganās Be Kind T-shirt?Ā You wanted shippers to be included in the Be Kind movement
How in the world does that even happen when itās been my experience since June 7, 2016 when a friend of mine got a death threat because someone thought she was the new blonde that Sam was dating ever warrant inclusion?
Do you want the people that harassed the beach woman offline to also be treated with kindness as well?Ā Where do you draw the line?
All of this type of behaviour seems to point to you secretly supporting shippers by trying to include them in kindness when they show absolutely none at all.
So when I say you are a closet shipper, all of the things you have done make it seem like you secretly side with them.Ā Even the berating of Emma in Paris from the Paris convention has all been deleted by you.
You casually brushed off Amandaās threat to punch your lights out at the New Orleans convention as if it is a common occurrence in your life. Ā Thatās a threat Deborah, I donāt know if you can see that but it is.
Yet a group of people on another platform who laughed at the pettiness of your posts in a cyber pissing contest translates to usĀ bullying of you?
That is laughable and the fact that you wonāt let it rest yet are completely dismissive of the actions of shippers making personal threats to you, harassing other fans to keep a fake ship afloat while you try and divert attention from it by pointing fingers at Breezy, Purv and myself (amongst others) is just another optic that myself and others really find quite odd.
And here comes another one of those nasty things you donāt like:
If you were to go and reread what you tweeted Deb it sounds horribly condescending to Sam by stayingĀ āand the ladies/fans whom he spends time...ā
To me that sounds a bit like you donāt approve of it.Ā Again, Iām going to point out that you said you were not going to get into Samās personal life yet this seems to scream that you are making a judgement here.Ā Maybe Iām reading it wrong but thereās a lot of screen caps that suggest otherwiseĀ
Sorry if we call you a shipper but actions speak louder than your feeble attempts to divert attention to those of us in the fandom you donāt like.
I havenāt seen you call out the folks behind harassing that woman off Twitter.Ā Ā
Maybe you deleted those tweets already?
Have a great day, Deboarah and try to stay out of peopleās lives.Ā I know that may be difficult but those gosh darn optics are what people are going to use to judge you.
Iāve already talked about her bizarre behaviour here.
Now sheās riling up some new person over what looks like harassment by shippers.Ā I havenāt gone in to look but I assume that the woman on the beach who was harassed over the photo she took with Sam.Ā
Is she actually suggesting that we may be behind it?
Obviously this guy is innocent and just listening to her BS about bullying.Ā What was her take on being the one calling out the young woman on the Paris convention?Ā Ā
Doing her Outlander Girl Scout duty?Ā Ā
Sheās the one who harassed and went on and on about the womanās lies.Ā And when we tell the truth- she runs to Twitter and starts posting about Purv and myself?
This just shows her loyalty towards shippers because if she had even one brain cell working she be able to differentiate people on another platform discussing her bizarre behaviour in a pissing contest to actual harassment of a woman who got her account taken down over sick jealousy of crazy women who want to believe that Sam and Caitriona are a couple.Ā Ā
This fandom is filled with all kinds of crazy types. I just find it really sad that Deborah is actually taking attention away from what happened with this woman in the beach photo and what shippers did to her and is trying to get attention for herself by maligning Purv and myself.Ā That is really selfish and petty.
I found it funny today to learn that Deborah blocked me on Twitter because she read my "doozy" of a claim that a person named Amanda threatened to punch her lights out.Ā So hereās what she says pretending to laugh it off but she has been going on for days and days about this.Ā Who the freaking hell cares what strangers think of you.Ā Deborah isĀ going crazy flipping out over this; making her look very guilty.Ā Ā
You know the saying:Ā
āThe lady doth protest too much, methinks...ā?
Thatās whatās going on with Deborah.Ā Hereās yesterdayās posts:
So before I go any further let me talk about which convention and what happened.
Deborah attended the Paris Convention in November 2019.Ā After that convention a woman named Emma posted about some negative things she originally said she heard Sam say.Ā Then she changed it to she heard about it after Deborah outed her.Ā Ā
Emma ended up deleting her Twitter account.Ā Deborah looked like a hero(to use truthers) but then Deborah started caving in to the shippers.Ā
And soon after her tweets about what happened disappeared.
and
Let me get to Amanda story.
The shippers were NOT happy with Deborah.Ā They had a LOT to say:
You can see the end frame is the Amanda threat:
So if Deborah chose to ignore that - not my problem.Ā Amanda went on and on about it too:
Thatās what I was referring to and why I mixed up Paris with New Orleans because Amanda was going to New Orleans.
That wasnāt the only outrage from those wonderful shippers.
And weāve just seen what the shippers saw in 2019 - Deborah goes on and on and on and on ad nauseum.Ā It makes her look super shady.Ā Ā
Beyond what we all read in the OTHER THREAD about Deborah that shows her tweets talking to some of the worst shippers out there from Mama Tumblz to SamHeughansWife (the Aussie stalker who is still stalking Sam, btw.)Ā Ā She also appears to shame Mackenzie about her posting photos (again a veryĀ āshipperyā thing that the shippers do to silence people and keep their ship afloat) this all started as a pissing match with Angela.Ā Ā
I think I know the reason why.Ā Deborah doesnāt like the Heughligans or Angela.
I have proof.Ā Back in 2017 I posted about the HeughligansĀ āBe Kindā shirts thatĀ
I attended the Star Trek convention in Las Vegas and those shirts were everywhere.Ā It was great and the only person to give me shit about it?Ā Guess who?
Yep, it was Deborah:
The fact that she goes out of her way to reply to me when she didnāt even follow me just shows how freaking petty she is ;especially with the Heughligans.Ā They do nothing but good things and they donāt tolerate shippers crap but Deborah just HAD to find a fault with the kindness by defining the word Kind.Ā So I think the pissing match has been long standing with Angela as here it is just about 4 years years ago - so this is long term not just something you can dismiss.
Deborah needs to get a life.Ā I think itās wonderful that in her retirement that she can travel to fan events and have fun but for someone 4 years ago toĀ āschoolā me on a Heughligans t-shirt about kindness, to embrace EVERYONE not just those whoĀ āagreeā with me and then go to Paris and call out a shipper and rant and rave on and one - where was that kindness she preached about 2 years before 2019?
And now 2 years later sheās still being persnickety with Angela shows that Deborah doesnāt practice what she preaches to others.Ā Thatās not a surprise to me.Ā Ā
Here was what I said in Breezyās post about the incident:
āShe tried to āschoolā me when I joined the fandom. Her opinions are the only ones she values plus she didnāt want me saying S&C werenāt dating. She is absolutely a shipper. The best Deborah story that never happened is when the Shirtās crazy sidekick Amanda threatened to punch out Deborah after the New Orleans convention because Deborah-always being the one in the know- called out a new shipper who made up what Sam said during a panel & caught the wrath of A. Deb always needs to be in control.ā
The only thing I got wrong was the convention and I donāt know if that Amanda is the Shirtās Amanda - she acts a lot like that Amanda so I just assumed they were the same person.
She schools people constantl;y
Her opinions are the only ones that matter (I have demonstrated that with the Be Kind Shirt)
She tries to have a rapport with the worst of the shippers but as soon as a new shipper gave wrong information - she was right on top of it and then cowardly deleted her tweets once the other mean girl deleted her account.
And she is/was targeted by a shipper named Amanda for it.
So the fact she blocked me 5 years after I joined this community because she didnāt like what I said is hysterical.Ā I know she blocked me over the past week because I was able to go and see her dust up over who was first in Samās fandom from my Twitter account last week and then when someone sent me a link today saying the Pickle Lady referred to you: I found I was blocked. We havenāt directly communicated with each other in 4 years so no loss there - just pathetically funny.
Anyway, I thought Iād clarify some of this to show that I was fairly accurate in my post and wanted toĀ show that there was history with the Heughligans and her.Ā Ā
This anon is a shit-stirrer who wrote "would you like to hear the latest cockamamie CONSPIRACY THEORY by the Outlander ex-shippers? Okay, here it goes. Sam is behind the posting of Caitās marriage certificate because he wanted to be the one to sink the ship." That's a LIE. It was from an anon ask that was denied and disagreed on by ex-shippers and neutrals. Please don't spread lies. Don't we have enough lies from extreme shippers?
Hi Anon, I answered that Ask last night right before I went to bed and read "ex-shippers" as extreme shippers. My apologies. Now in re-reading it when I'm wide awake, I realize the Anon meant ex-shippers, as in former shippers, not current extreme shippers. Again, my apologies for the oversight
As for me thinking that Extreme Shippers are saying negative things about Sam and and Cait and Tony, and the marriage certificate, it's because I get screencaps like these sent to me...
So, forgive me for having an itchy trigger finger when I read ex_____ and shipper together like that, my mind instantly goes to Extreme Shippers.
As for ex as in FORMER Shippers, I'm glad they acknowledge that Tait is real and that the marriage and the marriage certificate are real. But I, of all people, am the LAST person you should be coming to to lecture about not posting lies, when those very SAME ex aka former shippers spread lie after lie about Sam and Cait and Tony and me, and everyone who sunk their faux ship for YEARS. And the ones you're referring to specifically like cantresisttemp, etc STILL say some very shitty things.
So, because my main purpose all these years has been to post THE TRUTH, I'm posting your Ask.
Me, NOT posting LIES about Cait and Tony. And Sam with not Cait...since 2014. EX-Shippers can't say the same. š¤·āāļø
The hilarious thing is that both of the certificates weāve seen are different yet the same.
So we have both certificates. The redacted one:
and the somewhat redacted one that came a couple days later:
If you go and look at them one of them one was folded (top) and the other (bottom) seemed to be rolled up.
If you go look at the printing you will see where they are exactly the same and where they are different.
I took 90 degree lines and put them through the small I in District, the Captal S in Somerset and I placed the last one next to the second H in Church.
If you compare them they line up perfectly with each other.
Then if you go look at the April date on the two certificates you see that the heavily redacted April date at the bottom doesnāt line up withĀ āday ofā and on the less redacted one the April 2021 is much lower.Ā Ā
That shows me that they were printed on different dates and are two separate certificates otherwise, if they were photoshopped - they would line up exactly like they do in the certificate information.
The randomization of the printed dates shows me that itās a form fed into a printer that prints out the known information exactly and then when it comes time to print out the date it can be off.
Also those people who are claiming that the Hague Apostille company in the UK is aĀ āForms R Usā where you can download a fake form havenāt bothered to look up what the word Apostille means:
A certified Birth Certificate (that you need to get a Passport here in the US) is a Apostille document.Ā A Death Certificate is another one.Ā Itās a legal form that certifies that the information it contains is a true record of what has been recorded in a government record book.
And the blank example from 2019 doesnāt have the bottom bits nor does it have the seal:
Iāve been getting these bizarre anons for months now. I donāt have any idea what they mean.Ā Thereās two different versions; the all lowercase and the capital W one.Ā Maybe two bots?
Canāt you just go look it up yourself or tell me what this is in reference to?Ā Iāve mentioned a podcast once but itās just recently: Monicaās podcast.Ā
Oh Monica - your podcast just makes you seem pathetic. This is real life. Actors are busy people and single, handsome ones will always have their choice of willing partners. He helped your fundraiser (although he didnt contribute - as you pointed out). He didnāt get to meet you because his schedule didnāt allow. He kept in contact, wishing you happy birthday etc but you behave as if he spurned you at the alter. You claim he invited you and other would be girlfriends to Hawaii - but as only Gia took him up on the invitation, I donāt see the relevance of that comment. Or your assertion he was visiting another girl in Hawaii - as you donāt know him, have never met him (nor are you likely too) I find your allegations spurious.
You didnāt like him blocking you because you started to contact and follow his ex girlfriends (who interestingly didnāt wish to contribute their feelings about him for various reasons!). When he did reconnect to tell you why he had not managed to meet with you, you demanded an apology - you admit you made a TikTok making fun of the situation, you tried to recruit his exes to add credence to your story and you speak about how his gaslighting behaviour is totally unacceptable and you want to warn other women of his womanising ways.
Monica, you also insult his fandom, his right to date who the hell he likes and who are you? - Mother Theresa - he didnāt follow up on meeting you - not exactly crime of the century is it - he is not, as you suggest, a narcissist - but I think you very well maybe.
I wrote my off the cuff initial reaction comments about this yesterday, and was going to follow up with more detail today, but now I don't have to. What you wrote is spot on, thank you! š And her final assertion that Sam threatened legal action....yes, AFTER she publicly SLANDERED his name. Sorry, but Sam's only crime was "he's just not that into you," the narcissist here is Monica, not Sam. And now she keeps talking about it, thirsty 15 minutes of fame. I'm thinking she's going to get a shut the fuck up pretty soon, or as law folk like to call it, a cease and desist. If Sam was still contacting her after he didn't want to meet up with her, and this bothered her,there's a handy dandy feature called the block button. What she's doing is so harmful to REAL victims of real bad guys. She needs to put on her big girl panties and get over it and leave Sam alone. And maybe get some dating experience under her belt. She clearly has no clue how things work and what actually constitutes ghosting, gaslighting or bad behavior.
I heard about this issue a week or two ago. Ā The bizarreness ofĀ Monicaās assertion of having people āchat you upā (as the English say) and then having them go silent is pretty common everywhere - in real life, online, etc...Ā The fact she is trying to make it a case for this being abusive behaviour is really a huge reach.Ā Ā
In her Therapist Video she talked about 3 guys who all did the same to her.Ā They chatted with her and then stopped chatting with her.Ā She calls it ghosting.Ā
Ghosting is defined as:
The second definition is the one to look at.Ā Even the use of the word in the example sentence is spot on:
"I thought ghosting was a horrible dating habit reserved for casual flings"
āCASUAL FLINGSā
So we know from the defintion itās for endingĀ āpersonal relationshipsā suddenly and itās casual flings.
If you listen to her blog she only interacted with him in direct messages on social media.Ā Thatās it.Ā How much of aĀ āpersonal relationshipā can one have in DMs?Ā Sheās put a lot of weight into these āsliding into DMsā thing.Ā Ā
One has to ask themselves - why now?Ā In her King of Gaslighting she made it pretty clear that the incidents happened in 2019.Ā So probably at least 18 months ago.Ā Ā
Well letās see:
Men in Kilts
To Olivia
SAS Red Notice
Kind of coincidental; kinda not, imho.
Her podcast talked about 3 guys that ghosted her. Ā Ā When does it dawn on her that - maybe itās her and not the guys? Ā (Just a theory.)
And how long before that therapist guy āghostsā her?Ā She seems to be all up in his grill about his follower numbers, his dog, etc.. and she justĀ āhappenedā to find him on TikTok?Ā Ā
She did bring up that SamĀ āhelpedā her with crowdfunding.Ā I think the reality is that without him she wouldnāt have gotten most of the $20K she needed.Ā Yet she makes it clear that Sam didnāt dig into his pockets to fund her.Ā Thatās kind of odd that she makes note of that because doesnāt that show that he really wasnāt into her back in the day either?Ā Ā
As for dinner - āletās do dinner when Iām in townā is not a promise of a date or relationship.Ā If she thinks it is then she needs to speak with her therapist guy.Ā
Then she talks about all the other women that Sam was with in between his sliding into her DMs and how she took it upon herself to contact these women?
Sheās playing the jealous girlfriend when she never even met Sam?Ā She never spoke with him, she just shared some DMās with him and then called him out?Ā Isnāt having someone like that a good reason to stop communications?
How can she even justify her opinions when itās crystal clear she knows what happened with Sam and the other women?Ā Ā
Also what I find weird is that according to this story: she was stuck in Europe in mid to late March so when did Sam invite her to Hawaii? After she got back home from being stuck?
If Sam knew her predicament of needing to use GoFundMe to be able to afford flights - then how did he expect her to fly to Hawaii?Ā None of this makes sense.
If you do a search on her youāll find that she broke her back and has fallen into hard times financially in a story from November of last year.Ā Ā
She also apparently submitted it to the DeuxMoi gossip site.Ā What kind of person does that?Ā Ā
I just find it all confusing that she is saying these things as if sheās an injured party and acting as if sheās a scorned girlfriend when she says sheās never met him or spoke with him.Ā Ā
Apparently from her latest Podcast and IG Story she wasĀ āthreatened by Samā who told her he would go to the US Olympic Committee.Ā
Why is that surprising to her?Ā Thereās a series of DMās that Monica maintains have no obscene or graphic content.Ā They exchanged G-rated photos according to her podcast.Ā Sheās obviously trying to muddy Samās career and as an Olympic Athlete she is bound to uphold a certain standard.
Thatās pretty much extortion.Ā Hereās the policy she agreed to be bound by:
In fact itās in black and white on what she is upheld to and see that the code prohibitsĀ āBullying....and Harassmentā?Ā Ā You can find the page here:
https://www.usafencing.org/safe-sport
Seems like with her investigating Samās other relationships and trying to label him as some kind of abuser because he stopped talking to her that he does have a case to report her bullying and harassment.Ā Ā
I imagine that Samās lawyers would have a field day with all the proof sheās provided on what she did.Ā Whatever the case she probably either realises sheās gone too far and is trying to bluff her hand at this poker game or sheās naive to think that her actions didnāt break the rules.Ā Either way itās not good.Ā
She does have a handle on the shippers and the crazy things they believe; I just hope she realises that itās those same types that are egging her on.Ā Ā
Anyone who befriends her from this fandom is only out for one thing- dirt on Sam and I donāt think this woman has anything but a few DMs that say nothing.Ā Ā Ā
File this under āNo good deed goes unpunished....ā
Unfortunately Iāve caught you in yet ANOTHER lie.
You are so damn tiring with your hyperbolic psychobabble.
Iām referring to your latest lie:
You have Statcounter.Ā Itās not some fantastic secret agent program. And anyone on this planet can verify what Iām saying by going to your blog (any page) and looking at the source code.
There is no way to hide code from view because if itās hidden then the web browser would not pick it up.
The way it works is that Statcounter calls a 1 pixel by 1 pixel graphic from a specific directory that is created for your account.
This is the code:
What Statcounter does is looks up what IP address is calling for that 1x1 pixel graphic and records the IP address.
Thatās how it works - thereās no magic to it and thereās no other code on your site pages to call any other program so please get your facts correct before you try and lie about these fables.
And the only reason one pays for it is to keep the log history longer so they can look for patterns on views.Ā I do that and I see where repeat visitors go all the time.Ā Hereās what you get for $19/mo.
Iāve gone through the source code of your blog pages.Ā You are on Wordpress.org not a private server so the only additions you can make to that server is adding the statcounter code to your footer.Ā Private Investigators - even those with expertise in computer science would not be able to do much with Wordpress.org because any changes to the actual source code to put a tracker in wouldnāt be allowed other than adding code to the footer.
Your follower base may be gullible but to the rest of us who understand how things work - you continue to insult our intelligence with you constant lying.
And if you need independent proof of that - itās pretty easy to find:
source:Ā https://www.htmlgoodies.com/beyond/article.php/3875651/web-developer-class-how-to-hide-your-source-code.htm#:~:text=The%20bottom%20line%20is%20that,That's%20the%20bottom%20line.Ā Ā I even highlighted it on the page for you.
So I ask everyone who wants to believe the Shirt to go to her blog and then (depending upon the browser find the menu selection that shows you the html page source.Ā
In Chrome itās found under the View/Developer/ViewSource menu
In Firefox itās found under the Tools/Web Developer/Page Source menu
Once you are there do a search on āStatcounterā and you will find the code.Ā Then feel free to find some other program that the Shirt has been bragging about that she got from her special ex-CIA/Secret Service/Special Police team that she hired (supposedly) with the money from the Go Fund Me.
Where is it?Ā Itās just like all her other stories - just smoke and mirrors with a lot of mumbo jumbo words that donāt mean a damn thing.
And Shirt, to speak to your comment about someone is looking for information about Purv and myself.Ā Did you think that perhaps whomever is looking for information is a lawfirm or the police trying to gather as much data as they can on your posts so criminal charges and a lawsuit can be filed?Ā
Thatās a more plausible reason that someone would be roaming your blogs to see all the crap youāve written about us.Ā Plus, donāt forget the Go Fund Me stuff you did.
Ā Just imagine how simple it would beĀ for a California resident to get a lawyer to get in front of a Judge to obtain a subpoena from Go Fund Me (a California based corporation) and get all that delicious information on both of your Go Fund Meās including addresses and information of backers and what bank took the money and into what account.Ā Ā
You really exposed yourself there and with the dog pics and it narrowing down to a specific house. You are really exposed but continuing to try to lie about the PI and anything you can to make idle threats.Ā
So Iād be worried if I were you because you actually donāt have clean hands in any of this with what youāve done and written.Ā
Are you just trying to avoid the egg on your face over the Caitriona and Tony pic that proves they have been a couple forever and not just for āpap walksā?Ā Letās face it; your track record, your sources and yourĀ ādeep throatā crap looks about as reliable as those fake invoices you tried to pass off for the Private Investigators.Ā Ā
If you are going to leave Shirt, leave.Ā You arenāt the big scary woman you think you are.Ā Youāve really screwed up in the past few years and you are one of the few hangers on that still trying to prove you are right but photos like the photo below that Jess and company kept hidden show that the entire world of Outlander shipping was just a house of cards.Ā And if anyone still believes you; they really are delusional.Ā Sorry.Ā Ā
Oh and btw, bye!!!!Ā 2021 is the end of Outlander shipping and you will eventually see why.
