crying to Sufjan Stevens when uve pissed of ur friend and don't know why is both fun And sexy!
Not today Justin
occasionally subtle
TVSTRANGERTHINGS
Three Goblin Art
styofa doing anything
One Nice Bug Per Day
Monterey Bay Aquarium

Janaina Medeiros

JVL
2025 on Tumblr: Trends That Defined the Year
Jules of Nature
Cosmic Funnies
Sade Olutola
i don't do bad sauce passes

Origami Around
$LAYYYTER
Sweet Seals For You, Always

JBB: An Artblog!
Alisa U Zemlji Chuda
noise dept.

seen from United States
seen from Malaysia

seen from Spain
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from Malaysia
seen from United States
seen from United Arab Emirates
seen from Germany
seen from Türkiye

seen from Malaysia

seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from Malaysia

seen from United States

seen from United States
@pinkcourse
crying to Sufjan Stevens when uve pissed of ur friend and don't know why is both fun And sexy!
Bert and Ernie have been written as a gay couple, but Sesame Workshop has confirmed Muppets aren’t sexual. Based on this evidence, we can conclude that the two of them are asexuals in a homoromantic relationship. In this essay I will
So i hate to make this post but ive been freaking out and i have no idea what else to do
My roommate moved out on me without giving me any warning at all while Im currently unable to work bc im recovering from top surgery and have had some complications thats prolonging my healing
So if you want to help a gay trans man and his bisexual boyfriend not lose their house in the next couple days bc we dont have enough money for rent on our own if you could donate to my paypal ignore the deadname or signal boost this post if you cant it would be greatly appreciated
the whole inclusionist movement is so fucking awful and such a waste like. there could have been a great discussion about ///whether or not/// we could have added or allied (most likely allied) our two communities and then like,,,, ya know actually helped eachother,,,, but instead youse have literally inserted yourselves in our community w /o even asking and are acting like you’ve been with us the whole time??? like?? fuck right off tbh
in addition. any sort of ace / aro movement could have been fucking great but instead youse are so caught up in being #valid or w/e the fuck you think being lgbt is (hint its. being lesbian gay bi trans or nonbinary) (and its being illegal in like 50 countries lol) that i can honestly say ive never seen any real activism from youse at all,,, not to say it doesnt exist but where it does??? youse must be no playforming them or somethung bc ive never seen any
in summary. stop trying to hard to be smth ur not and actually like. do something about all this shit you complain about.
My thoughts in a comic
so we just makin shit up now huh
WE ARE LITERALLY JUST DISREGARDING THE DICTIONARY NOW HUH JUST THROWIN THAT SHIT AWAY HUH
[Image description - Images of a nonbinary, lesbian, genderflux, genderfluid, bigender, black and brown rainbow, agender, omni and ply pride flag with the text: I’m queer, not gay. End description.]
how do we unpack this bad boy lads
Why are so many lesbians aphobic like what the actual fuck is wrong with you? We experience just as much oppression and discrimination as you do.
The latest exclusionist bullshit is claiming they became exclusionists after they “began thinking critically”.
If “thinking critically” is “unironically spouting terf rhetoric word-for-word and intentionally misunderstanding every single post coming out of the other side, arguing in bad faith, sealioning, strawmanning, misgendering and misidentifying the person I’m speaking to, rewriting community history, and devolving to ad hominems and slurs” then sure. Sure you are.
I hope u don’t mind me adding my 2 cents on this post, friend!! But I’ve met a lot of kind and friendly exclusionists. I’m sorry that you have been treated this way though, no one deserves to be talked to like that!!
I consider myself an exclusionist but it is only because I’m afraid of cisgendered heteroromantic asexuals/ cisgendered heterosexual aromantics entering the LGBT community because they have “cishet” privilege and are “cishet” and I don’t really think they could benefit from anything the community has to offer.
Hope this is ok to add to your post and hope it helps!!
“I’ve met lots of kind exclusionists!!” False there are none, you think people who lack access to straight privilege have straight privilege and are vehemently denying them access to the only spaces they could access resources for oppression based on the axis of aspec identities, and refuse to listen to them and other aspecs telling you that they do need those spaces and those resources because we do face issues on those axis. This means you are actively engaging in things like abuse and rape apologism because denying aspecs face any oppression on that axis requires these things to happen, and historical revisionism to erase aspecs from the community they have long been a part of and to regress to the TERF go-for of screaming queer is a slur (It’s actually not, and if you read the books you keep telling us to read, you’d actually know that).
You’re buying into and using radfem ideology to support these statements, you reblog from and clearly follow a number of people who spend large amounts of time mocking and hurting people for being asexual (not for being cis, not for being straight, for being asexual), mock the language or strip the language used to describe our communities and experiences, and you don’t call that out. You are not against ‘cishets’ being in the community if you argue the ‘A is for ally’ you engage in erasure and apologism, and repeatedly ignore and refuse to listen to people, dictating to them how you believe their experiences actually happened.
This was not okay, didn’t help, makes you look like an asshole, and is blatantly a lie anyways. You are not kind and friendly. No exclusionist is, because of the nature of what your argument is, and the rhetoric and tactics required to sustain your position.
You: Tells exclusionists that we’re “buying into radfem ideology” and “spouting terf rhetoric word-for-word” (even though trans exclusionists have asked over and over again to not be compared to violent transphobes) and calling us “abusive” and “rape apologists” and other blatant lies (“A was for Ally first” is a literal historical fact, not erasure) and denies the history of a violent slur (queer)
You: Actually exclusionists are the bad ones
Lmfao, I literally do not give a shit if being told ‘We’re trying to keep our oppressors out of our safe spaces!’, ‘They have STRAIGHT PRIVILEGE (They have MALE PRIVILEGE)’, and ‘They’re causing violence against us in our SAFE SPACES’ is TERF rhetoric makes you uncomfortable. Because it’s literally word-for-word TERF arguments.
If having your argument called out as a word-for-word terf argument makes you uncomfortable: Stop using it.
It’s literally that fucking simple. Additionally: Trans women have been very loudly telling you that your rhetoric is TERF rhetoric, and you, TME nb, trans, and cis people whine about how it makes you uncomfy.
Your discomfort does not come before the safety and lives of trans women, end of.
Also, considering the HUGE number of exclusionists who have insisted no aspec person has ever been correctively raped, insist it wasn’t their aceness or aroness that was a motivator, or have insisted we’re lying about our rape or even wishing rape upon us, yeah, I think we get to say you’re rape apologists at this point.
Considering also y’all deny that aspec people can and DO get sent to conversion therapy, I’d say that DOES in fact make you an abuse apologist (these aren’t lies, whether you like it or not).
(And no. A didn’t stand for Ally initially’, and Queer was used as a derrogatory term, yes, but it was OUR WORD FIRST, which y’all would know if you opened those history books you keep insisting we haven’t read.)
So yeah. Exclusionists are the bad ones.
You engage in rape and abuse apologism, use terf rhetoric and demand that your comfort at being blind to this be put before the safety and lives of trans women, and engage in historical revisionism, while stripping the language and words from communities all while denying you do it. Sounds pretty bad to me.
The first recorded use of the word “queer” in reference to lgbt people was derogatory, it was never our word first. And A for Ally is a literal historical fact!! You are fucking denying literal historical facts!! And trans exclusionists have been asking y’all forever to stop comparing exclusionists to terfs. You literally told me, a trans person, that I’m not allowed to be uncomfortable with being compared to transphobes! And exclusionists who are rape victims have asked not to be compared to literal rape apologists but I guess you only give a shit about people who agree with you.
And there are plenty of inclus who are homophobic, transphobic, serophobic, lesbophobic, equate ‘lesbian’ with ‘terf’, made fun of the pulse shooting, insist that children can feel sexual attraction, called lesbians “terfs” for not wanting to date trans men, even threatened to bring a gun to pride so maybe work out your own issues first and quit acting like the discourse is “big meanie exclusionists versus poor innocent inclusionists”
1) Read Gay New York by Chauncey, Coming Out Under Fire: The History of Gay Men and Women in World War II by Allan Berube or My Queer War by James Lord and then get back to me about it never being our word first. So if you want to talk about who’s denying historical facts, I’ve got testimonies written by actual queer people in the 40′s and you have……… tumblr.
2) The A was not ‘first and foremost and always for Ally’ because when it was added it initially represented BOTH Asexual and Ally UPON IT’S INTRODUCTION. So while it did initially stand for Ally, it also initially stood for Asexual. I was alive for that, I remember shit. Additionally, it stopped being for Ally almost immediatly because Allies didn’t need a letter, but Asexual’s did, so the A remained.
3) I’m trans. I also get a fucking say in this. You are allowed to be uncomfortable with people pointing out your arguments originated with TERF’s. You’re not allowed to tell us we can’t point it out to you. No one is saying you ARE a TERF. You need to learn the difference between “You are a TERF” and “You are using TERF arguments and rhetoric to argue your position”. The former would be wrong for someone to say if you were not a terf. The latter is not.
4) Rape survivors can, in fact, be rape apologists. Being a rape survivor DOES NOT give you a free pass to tell someone else that they are lying about their rape, about aspects of their rape, or tell them they cannot use the correct term for what it was. AS a survivor of CORRECTIVE RAPE, I am telling YOU that I have encountered DOZENS of rape apologists who were themselves, survivors, who told me, another survivor, that I was lying about or mistaken about my rape in some form. This is still rape apologism, regardless of the fact that they are rape survivors themselves, and you don’t get to act like it’s wrong of me to call rape apologists, rape apologists when that is what they engaged in.
5) No one has said there aren’t any bad inclusionists, but considering I’ve been called a homophobe for literally saying that exclusionists exclude people, have seen a comic BY A LESBIAN about her GIRLFRIEND a ‘homophobic mess’ because it talked about asexuals not realizing that other people experience sexual attraction (a very common ace experience), and seen people called a homophobe for saying nothing more or less than ‘I support aspecs’, I’m willing to bet a sizeable sum of money that most of what you think is homophobia, seraphobia, and transphobia is people existing innocently, or people calling you out for being a bigot. (Hell, I’ve been called a lesbophobe by TERF’s for saying that trans women are, in fact, women, so look there, another tactic you stole from them?)
6) Show me the ‘plenty of inclusionists’ who made fun of the pulse shooting. I did see one post, by a TROLL run by an EXCLUSIONIST do that, that was blamed on inclusionists since none of y’all can tell what a troll looks like, but beyond that I saw dozens of people blaming the shooting on asexuals, and people pointing out that was not the case, and then being accused of mocking the shooting, but I did not see a single actual inclusionist mocking it. Show me proof.
7) I have not seen any inclusionists call lesbians terfs for not wanting to date trans men either. Show me some proof, put your money where your mouth is. If REAL inclusionists are saying that, I’m willing to bet good money that they’ve already been no-platformed, because unlike exclusionists, we don’t put up with that shit.
8) It’s literally a scientific fact that sexual attraction and sexual feelings begins at 10 on average with a standard deviation of 2 to 3 years. This is a fact, you don’t get to deny it because you don’t like it.
9) Again, show me proof that inclusionists want to bring guns to pride, that are not troll blogs and are not already no-platformed/been called out by inclusionists, then we can talk. And if you find them, I’d be very happy to call them out myself, but until then, don’t act like this is nearly as wide-spread a problem as you claim it is, and don’t act like just because there are handfuls of inclusionists who are genuinely bad, it gives all exclusionists a free pass to be as bigoted as you want. Consider also ALL exclusionists are bigoted by nature, but inclusionists are not, you just choose to see your bigotry as justifiable.
im jw why it's perfectly Cool to reclaim f*g and d*ke but anyone reclaiming q*eer is "an idiot tumblr freak" like i don't get it
darn i wish i cared enough to join the dots up for you
damn anon maybe it’s by Woke Cishet Liberals aren’t casually calling me a dyke or saying the “dyke community” in casual conversations because the weight of the word as a slur hasn’t had the rug pulled out from under it.
maybe it’s because i went straight from being called a queer by homophobic rednecks in school to being called queer by people who claim to be my allies.
maybe it’s because this word which is a violent slur against our community is now Our Brand for the sake of inclusionism of cishets who are ace or into kink or have more than one partner.
there are a ton of reasons, you literally just have to look around at cishet cutesy youtube vloggers calling us “the queer community” and then look at those like me who grew up around that word being shouted alongside faggot and dyke by someone who wanted us dead.
A sexual orientation is WHO you are attracted to, not HOW you experience that attraction
Bad-endings-and-breaking-hearts hm edgy
lively-peaasant
the hell’s the opposite of a heart throb?
adult-hated-dr-jekyll, i guess???
stayingstill-asingularobjectonearth ??
youhateoaks
alive
Ok that last one was uncalled for.
The… 6th. .. pawn
Idk-idk?
@cinnamon-ginger salt-blueish
Thenomagical342
PepperTheUmbreon
That’s my side blog tho so I don’t think it counts lmao
lengthyclearcat
hm.
Villain-isn’t-front
woundexpensive
Multiple-Sociable-Peasants
pyrophobic-prep
cisshuns
Less-moon-finger
I- I don’t like it
soggy-lettuce dhakhfahfhksfhafkhadh
Agreement-adult? Wat
can trolls please fuck off you’re not helping anything and aren’t remotely funny
the fucking irony of a cishet “ally” speaking over me, a trans woman, while also insisting that every person criticizing this post is a terf, and then preaching about “performative social justice” and “cognitive dissonance” is so fucking funny
they tagged my original response with “TERFs” which i really don’t need to explain why responding to a trans woman with that is shitty, and on a side blog (since they blocked me on my main after the first response) i called them out on continuing to speak over trans people and comparing us to our oppressors and their response was to just block me again and continue talking about terfs
@ cis “allies” this is why we aren’t comfortable with you and why we don’t trust you have our best interests at heart
HOLY SHIT LMAO
H-hewwo? Promo???
RB if you’re an exclusionist blog and I’ll follow from my main!
Opinions ;^)
• Cishet aros, cishet aces, and cis aroaces arent lgbt
• he/him and they/them lesbians are valid
• “sexual privilege” and the term allosexual are stupid
• kinks are inherently sexual
• the dysphoria and trans argument is for the trans community, not me
• pansexual is a biphobic and transphobic label, as bisexual has always included trans people and nb people
More: I’m a 15 y/o girl, which means I’m a minor. Non minors are free to interact but keep in mind that I am a minor. My name is aaliyah, and I’m a cis bi girl! I am an artist and uhhhh you can catch my resources under #receipt and #metapost !
Tag time? Berhaps?
@discouwse @discourseful @dumbasscourse @lesbocourse @allosapphire @allobottomprivilege @clovercourse @dishcourses
TUMBLR SURVEY
LIKE this post if you think asexuality is inherently LGBT+
REBLOG this post if you have critical thinking skills and understand how oppression works