Tags provided by Head Archivist, Magnus Institute, yours truly.
almost home
occasionally subtle

tannertan36
EXPECTATIONS
No title available
Not today Justin
Aqua Utopia|海の底で記憶を紡ぐ
official daine visual archive
🩵 avery cochrane 🩵
tumblr dot com
Sade Olutola
No title available

Love Begins
NASA
Cosimo Galluzzi
Doug Jones
Cookie Run:Kingdom Official!

#extradirty

No title available
The Bowery Presents
seen from Italy

seen from United States

seen from Singapore

seen from Italy

seen from Türkiye
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from France

seen from Malaysia
seen from Maldives

seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from Malaysia

seen from United States

seen from India

seen from Türkiye
seen from Dominican Republic

seen from Italy
@pop-tartarus
Tags provided by Head Archivist, Magnus Institute, yours truly.
.
the thing about chekhov's gun is that the gun does not literally "need to go off by the third act." the story works just as well if someone merely grabs the gun and starts threatening people with it, or if the Jewish protagonist recognizes the particular model as a Politically Concerning piece of world war 2 surplus, or if the gun's owner waxes nostalgic about the last time he fired it, etc. etc. etc.
unfortunately I get the impression that a lot of people do not understand that and therefore build theories around the idea that if the gun is not Specifically taken down from the wall and fired, it serves no purpose to the story, so why the hell was it there in the first place
reading the glass family compilation of short stories and why do some of them scream pedophilia? started with a perfect day for bananafish and seymour and sybil's interactions leave me deeply distressed each time
the tardis medicating her beautiful wife
READING A NEW BOOK SO ITS TIME TO DOCUMENT IT!!
it's 1 pm and I have plans tomorrow but i want to start the book so I'm going to try and get 30 pages in before bed!
vapid vapid vapid its what i am
deserted my favorite social media platform for a bit, and life got unimaginably worse. so im back!
Today I read a substack that described iris murdoch as looking "a little like a potato." what a wonderful world.
simultaneously too much and not enough at all
An experiment in language change
Nifty little language game here.
I can read back to 1500 with basically no difficulty
at 1400 I have to read slowly and carefully, but I can understand all of it save a couple words
at 1300 I can still comprehend most of it if I read slowly, but a much larger percentage of the words are unfamiliar to me, even with context
1200 and earlier are almost totally unintelligible
and what if you picked the wrong girl? i don't make you laugh as loud or think as hard or grow as fiercely. will I grow into one of your regrets?
Thoughts as I reread Good Omens:
- I can now successfully differentiate Pratchett's writing. This is wonderful news.
- WHY IS MANCHESTER SATANIC? also, very curious what crowley turned the engine into.
https://literature.stackexchange.com/questions/3072/what-is-so-satanic-about-manchester
(Everytime I reread this book, I come back to this post. I have now returned to it about 7 times)
-Starting to realise how much of my vocabulary came from this book lmao
-"left-footer". Also, C of E is a protestant sect
-Call me St beryl articulatus of cracow the way i never shut up and stolidly avoid sex with men.
-Did not know syphilis could be congenital, although it makes sense
I truly think a lot of RF Kuang haters are just frustrated white people who can’t stand that an Asian woman has brains, creativity, and challenges colonialism and whiteness in every one of her novels. She doesn’t fit the “lotus woman” stereotype they’re so used to. She is beautiful and soft spoken yet opinionated and funny, does research, and still writes novels as a second career. Meanwhile, prolific white authors like Sanderson (whose work I also enjoy, no hate to him) are idolised without the same double standards.
Of course, not every book is for everyone. But its the specific criticisms she faces : “too pretentious,” “too intellectual,” “spells things out too much,” “villainises white people,” and now “her books are written by AI”... come on. That’s not just about taste, it’s rooted in racialised stereotypes about who gets to be seen as intellectual, complex, or authoritative.
It’s not the writing that bothers them, it’s who’s writing it.
∘₊✧──────✧₊∘
Edit :
Katabasis full Book Review
Katabasis Reading log : my reaction to a bunch of different quotes
A recount of RF Kuang's talk in Cambridge
I like #4.
Recurring visions of death have been finding me of late: Bloody, or weightless and quick. They come like a stab to the gut, and leave like a lover pulling away from a warm embrace.
The terrors loom, and they grow, and the visions free me momentarily. Every spirit is more corporeal and vicious than the last when I return. In my incapacitated state however, they cease to matter. Their truth no longer grants them power. The spirits gain on me now. Choices, choices. They are ugly, and slow, and they tower over me. Oh look! My feet are melded to the ground. Downwards I go. Hold my breath, wait to come out on the other side. My choice is being made for me, I fear. They get taller, or I sink deeper, and seeing past them is a lie. I will suffocate alone in this ditch. No one will hear my screams. They use me to fuel them, burn me at the stake. Soon, I am them. I am the coal in their eyes, the debris on their body, and the grate of their voice. They are loud and all encompassing and transparent because they ARE me. You meet them, you burn your hand at their shake, and you back away from their hunching dis-figures. You will not see me cowering behind them, and if you do, know you cannot save me.
They are my truth, and they will sizzle out when my visions take me.
I... may have just created an entire Doctor Who version of Cards Against Humanity, with 150 black cards and 750 white (plus a lot of blank cards that automatically got included in the pdf version of the deck so you can make your own cards).
I'll definitely print a copy to take to the next con I attend, but if anyone else wants it, the link is below. It includes things from Classic, Modern, various corners of the EU (those parts that I've explored so far), and behind the scenes. I'm not a huge fan of the original CAH's focus on sexual humor, so while I have included a handful of cards designed for producing sex jokes, most of my choices lean more toward producing absurd humor or inside jokes for people who know a lot of Doctor Who lore.
Cards Against Doctor Who
Antis: Romeo and Juliet is just a satire of stupid teens in love!!!!
Edward Dowden in 1900: Shakespeare did not intend to represent more than a fragment of human life in the tragedy. He did not aim at a criticism of the whole of human character; he cared to show us his hero and his heroine only as lovers, and as exemplary in the perfection of their love; faithful even unto death; choosing, with a final election of the heart, love at all costs. Here is no view of the whole of life; we are shown merely what befell a young pair of lovers during four days long ago in Verona. But Shakespeare felt, and we all feel, that if such love as theirs can be taken up into a complete character, modified and controlled by the other noble qualities which go to form a large and generous nature, the world will be the better for such pure and sacred passion. Such, it appears to me, are the ethics of the play. And the personages by whom the lovers are encircled are so conceived as to become the critics of ideal love from their several points of view, honouring and exalting it by the inadequacy of their criticism. To old Capulet, in his mood, it seems that the passions of the heart are to be determined by parental authority. To Lady Capulet marriage is an affair of worldly convenience. To the Nurse it is the satisfaction of a pleasurable instinct. Mercutio, a gallant friend, is too brilliant in his intellectuality to be capable of a passion in which the heart shows that it is superior to the brain; he mocks at love, not because he really scorns it, but because he is remote from it, and cherishes before all else his freelance liberty. The Friar views human passion from the quietudes of the cloister, or amid the morning dew of the fields; but botany is not the science of human life. Even Romeo’s earlier self, with his amorous melancholy, becomes the critic of his later self, when a true and final election has been made, and when love has become the risen sun of his day. As for Juliet, her words—
My bounty is as boundless as the sea, My love as deep; the more I give to thee, The more I have, for both are infinite, —may serve for an inscription beneath that statue of pure gold of which Shakespeare was the artist.