I go by Dearie, or Darling for those close to me. I use They/Them pronouns, and Fae/Faer occasionally. My partner, who I will likely mention, also uses They/Them pronouns.
This is an NSFW + kink blog. Minors are free to observe, as I intend to post educational resources when possible, but please do not try to contact me or otherwise interact.
NSFW and kink content will be tagged as much as I am able, to allow for filtering and blocking of specific topics such as CNC, knifeplay, etc.
I am a switch presently taking a more dominant role in many scenarios. I enjoy bondage, primal play, medical play, and ravishment, among other things. I am trained in fleshing and similar forms of fireplay.
I am NOT looking for any additional partners, but discussion of scenarios, general compliments, and other such interactions are fine.
OK terms/honorifics: Fairy, Prince, Sir
OFF LIMITS terms/honorifics: Anything familial, anything explicitly feminine
Any dubious consent or consensual non-consent content in particular WILL be tagged.
I have this dream of making porn the same way I make my audios. Short scenes, well-acted, the plot plays into the sex itself so it's not just like, the plumber shows up and fucks the housewife, it's like this alpha has a rough exterior and a soft heart and this omega has abandonment issues and they keep fucking about it without admitting the fact that they're definitely falling in love. And the cinematography is actually cinematic. No full frontal spread open shots. Sensual kissing, heavy breathing, lighting that would put several renaissance paintings to shame, encapsulating the feeling of having sex with someone, not just the visual, physical act. This is the future in porn that liberals (me) want.
Nuanced answer that being normally I hate the monarchy, it's hot in this case BECAUSE they were stolen in a heist.
Also don't know about these jewels specifically but I'd be more concerned about returning jewels to their rightful home cultures, honestly (specifically thinking about the huge ass diamond Britain refuses to give back to India and can't even like wear anymore because it's too controversial anyways). Anyways basically hot to fuck around if theyre stolen and not very specifically blood jewels (the exact definition of what makes a jewels a blood jewel is iffy, but ones with known history to them are more likely to be).
Mmmmmm no you're so right though. Getting hurt in pursuit of a cause? That's just life. You only really do it the one way. Wartime royals, though... you get the tear between loyalties (what's right for the kingdom vs those I care about vs my morals vs God's commandments vs weight of expectation vs can I control the nobles if they decide they want to stand against me), the agony of parting with the knight who'll die and kill for you but whose willing submission means less than what it says about you, that you'd ask. Do you accompany the soldiers to the front, knowing you're the dove glowing in the storm, hope and beacon and bullseye-target, siren-covered cliff drawing your own sailors to their deaths and never subsiding on the same crusts of bread as them, no matter how much you play their equal? Or do you hang back, maintain the peace you have them defending, signing forms and debating whether new requisitions and armaments and grave-shovels are worth the tariffs on your gentry while the men who swore their lives to you die cleaved and bloody with smashed-in heads for crows to pick at on battlefields you'll never be allowed to see?
When you've carried your knight's weight as a gallows around your neck, can you really let him rush back to you and check you over, relieved to find you unwounded in his absence? When the jester catches your eye and makes merry wink, can you muster a laugh at the bells jingling as the fool well occupies your lap, at your mercy and still making a mockery of your throne? Can you ever be yourself again, without the ghosts draping themselves over your shoulders, all weapon with no weaponry and the hands holding your collar tugging you six different ways?
You can. You will. There's boar and pheasant on the table and the maids dance gaily when the bards play, and what are you that you can learn to enjoy these things while Death waits at your right hand (you did this, you turned your knight into this; last stage evolution of the training that makes her what she is but couldn't she have held off the metamorphosis if you hadn't demanded her hands stain red)?
(Can you really afford to be guilty, when it's your knight whose sleep suffers for a reality as a weapon they've actually seen?)
It is the weight and pain you were always prepared for, but told you would never have to face. It is the guilt and the feeling that it will never end, that neither you nor anyone you care for can be safe now. It is knowing that no matter how benevolent and loving you are, you must now become the one who holds lives in your hands that you must crush instead of cherish.
You were told you are something to be protected and worshipped, yet now you are faced with a force that reviles you, that would see you dead.
And in the face of that, you must accept the choice you are given. Will you eschew the safety you have been blessed with up until now, and join those loyal to you as a harbinger of destruction, cleaving the way to your own freedom?
Or are you not able to? Must you look out upon the fires and screams knowing that you are not capable of the same as your knight, that you must do what you can from here, because this fight is to protect you?
Will you still feel guilt when this is over? Over those you and yours struck down? Or merely relief, knowing that if you had not, they would surely not feel the same having slain you?
What will you do when the war ends, and you are inevitably scarred? Is your knight still there to stand by your side, or is your survival through sacrifice? Have you still a fool to make you smile, or do they now turn on you as well, for what they have heard of you?
You were the vulnerable made to fight. Who will lie you down again and tell you that finally, it is over? Who will assure you the danger is not to return? Who will stop you from hurting those you swore to protect, out of the fear now ingrained in your heart?
Can you and yours ever be the same, hearts now weighted with memory?
you know how some people sleep with guns or knives under their pillows for protection? KEEP YOUR KNIGHT IN YOUR BED INSTEAD!! FOR SAFETY REASONS!! THAT'S YOUR LIVING WEAPON!!!! #mylivingweapon
I'm just a pretty pretty princet and I need to be bridal carried and tenderly laid on my plush bed and threatened into relaxing because it's my duty to both my kingdom and those who care for me to do so as my closest knight massages the tension of out my shoulders and I fall asleep right there. Vulnerable
a doctor/scientist who has you strapped to a table because he's conducting an [unethical] experiment. it's agonizing and it feels like your entire body is stiff with pain. he notices your distress and stands at the side of the table. he offers to soothe your pain and rubs his large hand over your thigh. then gently brings his fingers between your legs to rub your cunt to make you feel better while stroking your hair and shushing in your ear and telling you it'll all be over soon. 😵💫
pathetic tops!! pathetic, overwhelmed tops who mumble "pleasepleasepleaseplease—" against your neck while rutting into you, and then incoherent "thank you"s after they come, kissing you all clumsily, lips pressing against shoulders, collarbones, the line of your jaw, shaking a little, desperately clingy in the wake of the moment.
⚔️ op is a trans man | minors and ageless blogs dni ⚔️
Seconding this. It's not fun and it's not cute when you get hurt in a way that can't be fixed. Even if it feel like just pretend to you it is still real life with real people, and can have real consequences.
You guys think I'm joking about the experimentation kink, but I think if I ever found out that a partner WAS taking notes on me and what I liked somewhere- I would pass out from how horny that would make me
Oh- you have spreadsheets on my preferences like a fucking weirdo? My dude, this is exactly my brand of freak, our autistic asses shall be married in the morning
In order to stop the culture of faking orgasms, we need to stop the culture of shaming others for their sexual experiences.
Can’t get your partner off on the first try? Cool. You can still be thoughtful and make them feel good.
Can get your partner off within 30 seconds? Awesome, good for you both, don’t let it get to your head.
Can make someone cum in less than 5, but for others, it’s a process that takes an hour? That’s alright, everyone’s different.
Does it take you 30 minutes to cum? That’s okay, you’re not broken, you’re not a failure.
Does it take you 10 seconds to cum? That’s great, you’re not a slut, you’re not overly sensitive or dirty.
Can’t cum without toys/vibrators? That’s awesome, that’s a valid part of sexual play!
Can only cum with loving, vanilla sex? That’s perfectly normal, and you will find lots of great partners to experience that with!
Can’t orgasm at all? THAT’S ALSO COOL. It’s not a bad thing, you can still enjoy sex TONNES just like others.
Orgasms are NOT the defining characteristic of your sexual prowess. They are great, they’re lovely when they happen, but for the love of science, stop bringing them up higher than they need to be.
Can’t cum because of side effects of certain meds? that’s perfectly okay and more common than you might think, and there’s still lots of ways you can still enjoy yourself
It is one thing to serve a royal, to serve a lover, unconditionally or otherwise - the simplicity of an order, of a hierarchy, the comfort of knowing exactly what is expected of you.
You know what I have not seen nearly enough of though? The desperate conflict of service when both partners long for it, the eternal back and forth of both giving and following orders, of working with all your ability to make life easier for someone you love and the reverberating warmth as they do the same.
Plenty sexy, on so many levels, the push and pull of attempting a cycle of mutual pleasure, but nothing compares to the general utility of that thought in my mind, of both of you looking at the other doing chores and taking care of yourself and the pride and satisfaction, or being able to get those things done because you're doing them for the person you love. Just a little game where everyone wins. And then like, you can fuck about it, I guess. That would also be nice, after you argue about whose turn it is to lie back and feel good.
They’re not the same thing. Sex positive, neutral, and negative describes someone’s opinion on the morality of sex in general and its place in society. Sex favorable, indifferent, averse, and repulsed have to do with your own interactions with sex.
Favorable, indifferent, averse, and repulsed is mostly used for asexual-spectrum people, and a lot of aromantic-spectrum people use the same scale to describe their feelings towards romance. But allosexual (non-asexual) people might also find it helpful. Like, there are people who feel attraction towards other people but are sex averse and don’t want to have sex with anyone they’re attracted to. (There are also people fitting the same description who do identify as aspec, and that’s valid, too.)
Here’s the chart that’s commonly used used to explain the two scales. I’m going to add an image description afterwards, but I’m not really familiar with doing them so it may not be great.
[Image description: A picture divided vertically into two halves. The left half is white with black text and the right half is black with white text. Each half has several terms written in bold with a smaller description under each one. The text is in a handwriting-style font.
On the left side, it says, “Sex-positive: To have a positive attitude towards sex in general. Not necessarily for yourself, but any safe sex between consenting people. Sex-neutral: to have no opinion on sex in general, neither positive nor negative. Sex-negative: to have a negative attitude towards sex in general. To think sex is bad/wrong, even safe and between consenting people.”
On the right side, it says, “Sex-favorable: to have a positive attitude towards sex for yourself. To desire sex. Sex-indifferent: To have no opinion on sex for yourself, neither positive not negative. Sex-averse: to have a negative attitude toward sex for yourself. To not desire sex. Sex-repulsed: To be repulsed by the thought of sex.”
End description.]
People get these two scales mixed up constantly, and/or leave out words. Y’all, I know it’s hard. I have to go through both of them in my head before I mention either one to make sure I’m saying the right thing. But we can do better. Please! Like, one of my friends was angry at me when I came out as asexual to her because she thought I was attacking her sexuality. And yeah, I’m sex averse, but that has no bearing on what I think of her. It’s actually a common myth that the concept of asexuality is inherently sex negative, and we don’t need to encourage that by conflating sex negativity with being sex averse or repulsed.
Actually, most people fit somewhere on both scales. So I made a chart of my own that shows how they fit together. Personally, I’m in the top right corner, sex averse and (doing my best to be) sex positive.
[Image description: A three-by-three chart, similar to an alignment chart. The left column is labeled “sex favorable”, the middle column is labeled “sex indifferent”, and the right column is labeled “sex averse/repulsed”. The top row is labeled “sex positive”, the middle row is labeled “sex neutral”, and the bottom row is labeled “sex negative”.
The box in the top left of the chart reads, “I don’t think there’s anything wrong with people having consensual sex, and I personally like to have sex.” The box in the top middle reads, “I don’t think there’s anything wrong with people having consensual sex, and I personally don’t mind having sex.” The box in the top right reads, “I don’t think there’s anything wrong with people having consensual sex, but I personally don’t want to have sex.”
The middle-left box reads, “I think it’s sometimes all right for people to have sex, and I personally like to have sex.” The center box reads, “I think it’s sometimes all right for people to have sex, and I personally don’t mind having sex.” The middle-right box says, “I think it’s sometimes all right for people to have sex, but I personally don’t want to have sex.”
The box in the bottom left says, “I think sex is immoral, but I personally like to have sex.” The bottom middle box says, “I think sex is immoral, but I personally don’t mind having sex.” The bottom right box says, “I think sex is immoral, and I personally don’t want to have sex.”
End description.]
So yeah, you can be sex positive and sex repulsed, or sex neutral and sex averse, or whatever! I’d say that a lot of American politicians are both sex negative and sex favorable. If you need more information, I added my own descriptions of the seven terms below the cut.
(I really wish I hadn’t made this so long, LOL. It took me way too long. Please reblog so it’s worth it?)
