~Kids aren't Sexy~

Ash | he/him or they/them | 16 | I tag all triggers | if you're transphobic/disrespect trans women block me and also choke!!  |  if you need me to delete something i reblogged from you just ask!! 

[pussysoupforthesoul-deactivated]

“shaming pedophiles makes them not want to seek treatment and actually leads to them hurting children”

[russelhusselhobbs]

Say it’s fictional all you want but if you see a child, and your next thought is, “I wanna see this child fuck”, newsflash, you’re a pedophile.

[johnnyjoestarrelatable]

“actually if they’re a teenager it’s technically ephebophilia-”

[navyasarchive-deactivated201905]

a lot of the “anti-anti” rhetoric i see is “survivors are allowed to cope with their trauma by writing violent fanfiction if they so choose” and what’s funny about that rhetoric, besides how it’s not empirically supported at all, is that these people are weaponizing survivors against survivors and simultaneously acting as if survivors are above criticism and can do no wrong. survivors can harm other survivors. people who have been abused can themselves be abusive. if you’re an adult and you’re getting off to child p*rn, you’re a p*dophile, and that doesn’t change if you’re a survivor. same thing with inc*st or r*pe. the thing is, though, that 99.9% of the people who get off to sexual violence are NOT themselves survivors, lol, so this rhetoric falls flat on all counts. 

[daddy-doms-are-gross]

just so we’re crystal clear the argument that kinks aren’t inherently sexual is a tool that is overwhelmingly used by predators and abusers to excuse or encourage the involvement of minors in kink. regardless of how ‘innocent’ the kink in question may seem, its exposure to minors or its aggressive marketing as ‘sfw’ or nonsexual easily becomes a cover for grooming or the progressive exposure to increasingly ‘nsfw’ or dangerous kinks

[princess--kinkshamer]

yall don’t understand that ddlg and things like it are all sexual. “non-sexual ddlg” is called age-regression, which is used to cope from trauma.

yea ^^^

[princess--kinkshamer]

so do you have a problem w cgl/re even tho its not sexual and people just sexualize it?

im a little behind on some of the acronyms but from my understanding, cgl/re is stil caregiver/little which is basically like a catchall for dd.lg, md.lg, dd.lb, md.lb, etc instead of little x its just little. these are all kink dynamics, terms, etc. people sexualize it because its a kink.to me, people trying to do this "nonsexually" sound like age regressors (and their carers). if you're an age regressor and dont want people to sexualise that (perfectly understandable!!!!!) then don't call yourself a little in a cg/l relationship.there is no such thing as "non-sexual" cg/l because again, it is derived from kinks (dd.lg, etc)(but again i could be wrong because communities and labels are so fractured nowadays and im like really not involved so idk!! lmk)

[princess--kinkshamer]

Its so hilarious to me how people ask you if things they do are morally pure enough as if YOU are some kind of authority on that lmao like bitch ur some 15 year old dipshit who doesn't understand psychology very well but ok 😂😂

its hilarious how angry you are that people trust my advice and opinion because im not a nasty freak like you and have good morals but die mad about it 😂😂😂

[princess--kinkshamer]

think you can spread the word about this?? all the pedo receipt blogs I know of deactivated so I've made my own, the url is pedophile-receipts

^^^

[princess--kinkshamer]

What do you think about ddlg relationships where the little goes into little mood to feel safe and to cope with a trauma he had in the past.And that both parteners never "do it" when the little acts childish,and they never roleplay sexually as a child and a older man.Also the little doesn't have a "little age" and doesn't like stuff like dipers or those baby bed,etc.

i think that this person isn’t really practicing d.dlg but coping with his trauma in a healthy manner by regressing and being cared for by someone you love and trust, and that there is nothing wrong with it at all. 

and i would encourage the little to move away, if he can, from the d.dlg community/labels because i don’t think interacting with/exposing himself to a kink community that sexualizes and fetishizes his trauma is the best thing for anyone’s wellbeing or recovery. 

i understand distancing yourself from a community (especially one like the hellfire that is the kink/d.dlg community) is scary and hard, so i’d like to remind this person/couple to please take it easy and keep their own mental health in mind and watch out for each other 😊❤️🌸

[princess--kinkshamer]

hey so im a HUGE anti for the ddlg/nymphet communities (i used to vaguely be in the nymphet community, i was disgusted by the kink aspect of it but i loved the fashion so when you look at my blog you see the nymphet tag but i deleted EVERY post from it) and my blog is pink and i really worry that when i rb from anti blogs theyre gonna think my blog is nsfw which im not. i just feel like a bad anti because i like lana del rey and my blog is softish :(

you’re not a bad anti!! everyone has different aesthetics and interests (i mean... look my blog) but that usually doesn’t have anything to do with their morality or if they’re a good person (within reason). just because you like pink and cute stuff doesn’t disqualify your morals

if any misunderstandings happen it’s not your fault! sometimes it just happens and trust me, most active anti blogs have dealt with much much worse

and besides like “anti” isn’t even like, a cohesive label at this point because it means something completely different depending on who’s using it. it’s just thrown around to make anybody who disagrees with them seem like a bad person. even if what they disagree with is a very bad things. basically what i’m trying to say is don’t worry about being a ‘good anti’ too much it doesn’t really mean anything

[princess--kinkshamer]

idk i just wanna show you this heckin cute tamagotchi i got

//

i love him!!!! he’s like a lil egg i love it ☀️🥚😊💗

[princess--kinkshamer]

okay, so i don’t know if this will make sense or if you’ll be able to answer. am i in any way doing something bad by acting childish and kinda,, sfw age regressing if i don’t have trauma?

it’s the anon about the sfw age regression with no trauma. I don’t know if it’s still called that if i don’t have trauma? anyways, i feel like i’m doing something gross by acting childish and everything. :/

I’m so, so sorry to get to this so late and I know you probably won’t see it now but maybe I can help out some others, too. You’re not doing anything wrong!! (imo) You don’t need trauma to age regress it’s a coping mechanism that can help with different disorders/states of mind. You don’t necessarily need to be traumatized to use an escape mechanism. 

[princess--kinkshamer]

Out of curiosity, how exactly were you able to find NSFW unless your account states you're 18+? Unless the blogs posting said content aren't 1) marking their blogs as explicit and 2) at least adding an 18+ or NSFW tag to it, you shouldn't be able to see it. Tho honestly ddlg blogs that aren't marked explicit/tag properly disgust me, as that can get minors into spaces not meant for them.

that filter was added within the last half year (i believe) and i made the post over a year ago. also, the filter barely works and the main issue of the post was that these posts and blogs are so often not marked as explicit. 

[princess--kinkshamer]

Is it still pedophilia if it occurred online? A 20 y/o dated my best friend(14) and pretended to be 15 (so reasonable age difference). He’s not blackmailing my best friend and threatening him.. and he’s still making sexual comments. Now, this has all occurred online and while I don’t think any nudes have been sent I’m unsure. Is this still pedophilia?

that man is definitely still a pedophile. an adult being romantically interested in a child and trying to be sexual with them (the comments) is always pedophilia, regardless of what happens or how the contact, if any, occurs. 

pedophilia just refers to the attraction to children (as someone not the same age/older/an adult). even if one doesn’t “do” anything, if they are attracted to a child, they are a pedophile. the fact that he lied about his age shows that there is definitely a problem, because he knows it should be wrong for an adult his age to date a 14 year old. 

[princess--kinkshamer]

Would it be wrong to give a pedophile a virus? My friend made one and is having me store it.. I’m tempted to use it...

morally? absolutely not ethics only apply to people so a pedo is fair game just be careful (idk how they work lol)

legally? yea thats still against the law

[jasprosetheanti]

not only should killing pedophiles be legalized it should be considered a sport