Later in the movie:
Cosimo Galluzzi
RMH
dirt enthusiast
will byers stan first human second
Jules of Nature
"I'm Dorothy Gale from Kansas"
art blog(derogatory)
we're not kids anymore.

shark vs the universe

@theartofmadeline
PUT YOUR BEARD IN MY MOUTH

blake kathryn

JVL

Discoholic 🪩
Claire Keane
Aqua Utopia|海の底で記憶を紡ぐ
i don't do bad sauce passes
🪼
todays bird
Three Goblin Art
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from Philippines
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from Malaysia
seen from France

seen from T1
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from China

seen from France

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from Norway
seen from United States
seen from United States
@punster-2319
Later in the movie:
My warriors are chosen by the path of the Golden Arrow. Only the worthy are spared.
Frankenstein in Kids' Media: Toonsylvania (1998-1999)
Frankenstein and the Monster Themselves Or A Parody Of Them: Frankenstein and the Monster themselves, given that Dr. Frankenstein is called Victor here (or Dr. Vic more commonly)
Is the Monster Called Frankenstein: The Monster is called Phil.
Is there an Igor/Fritz: Yes, and he’s the main character.
Premise: The misadventures of Dr. Vic Frankenstein, his monster Phil and assistant Igor, as Igor attempts to show what a scientific genius he is to disastrous results. Other segments include Night of the Living Fred, about a family of zombies, Igor’s Science Minute, where the titular assistant shows off his scientific knowledge and Melissa Screetch’s Morbid Morals, Hilaire Belloc-esque poems about a rude young girl learning macabre lessons.
Connections to the Frankenstein Novel And/Or Adaptations: The whole show is based on the typical pop culture version of Frankenstein, with Victor’s name being the sole reference to the original novel (to be fair, he does wax poetic like Shelley’s Victor, especially when he thinks the Grim Reaper is to collect him). The show’s name seems more suited to a cartoon about Dracula, but Transylvania has been used as a setting for Frankenstein spin-offs in the past like Young Frankenstein. It might very well be a reference to Young Frankenstein, given Dr. Vic’s pencil-moustache being similar to Wilder’s.
Other Notes: I won’t say too much, as there is little I can say that hasn’t been said by these two videos:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NqvQhc7GVN4
The least fondly-remembered of Spielberg’s animations, Toonsylvania is not what I’d call a bad show, but there is something slightly cynical behind it that mars the experience slightly. It is the combination of how it tries to be another Animaniacs while using the most generic Frankenstein-inspired set-up, taking more from osmosis than the novel or any adaptations aside from perhaps Young Frankenstein. At least when Mary Shelley’s Frankenhole included a Dr. Frankenstein who lived in a gothic castle with his Monster and Igor, it included references to the original novel and the 1931 movie that went beyond the more popular elements. That said, it does have some amusing references to other horror movies, like a recurring character obviously based on Norman Bates, and some well-done dark humour, especially the over-the-top ways Melissa is punished for her mischief (at one point, she lies so much, her nose grows and pokes God, who then sentences Melissa to Hell).
The Deadman siblings
Yeah so I ended up fully drawing these two, well more like drew fred then used fred as a base to make ashley, one of my better arts for this game. Did briefly consider characters from the other segments in Toonsylvania but just kinda figured these 2 were the best options for the game
Clark Kent gaslighting Lois Lane into believing he’s not Superman.
Man, I still wish to this day that they did a full Sonic cartoon in this style.
What makes it even more frustrating is that this same studio worked on Sonic X a couple years later. They also worked on a few episodes of Adventures of Sonic the Hedgehog (most notably the multi-part “Quest for the Chaos Emeralds” episodes).
My Animaniacs inspired outfits
Ma-ia hi
Ma-ia ho
Ma-ia ha
Ma-ia ha ha
alo
Salut
sunt eu
un… haiduc???
dont you sick fucks make me relive this
SI TE ROG…. IUBIREA MEA PRIMESTE FERICIEEEEEAAAA
ALO?
Alo?
sunt eu
PICASSO
ti-am dat beep
Dar sa stii nu-ti cer nimic😂😂😂
Nu mă, nu mă ieei
NU MĂ, NU MĂ IEI
nu mă, nu mă, nu mă iei
I have no idea what happened here
Lucky bastard. It’s stuck in my head now
CHIPUL TAU SI DRAGOSTEA DIN TEI
Mya mintesc day oki tay-yay
am i having a stroke
What is this? What is this from? Why do thousands of people know what this is. Apparently it’s Romanian. What is it??
They’re the lyrics to the song Dragostea Din Tei by Moldovan pop group O-zone. It was a very popular song in the early 2000s
We’ve finally reached the point where the old memes are too old for today’s generation… Fs in the chat.
For any wretched zoomers…one of the original viral videos aka the finest of vintage memes
We must not despair as long as we are here, we can teach the children about the ancient texts
Time warp for my fellow elder millennials
Beyond the Pedestal and the Pyre: How Disney's Darkest "Love Square" Teaches Us True Autonomy
Let's talk about the absolute exhaustion of the modern shipping wars. We have all seen it—whether it’s the boundary-crossing whiplash of Miraculous Ladybug or the painful, persistent tracking in TMNT 2012, modern television loves to reduce romance to a chaotic arena where characters fight like wild animals over a love interest. It strips away character agency, breeds toxic entitlement, and quite frankly, makes me want to turn off the screen entirely.
But once in a generation, a narrative comes along that completely subverts our expectations. It uses a tangled web of desire not for cheap romantic drama, but to deliver a profound, masterfully written commentary on human nature. We saw glimpses of this maturity when The Legend of Korra subverted early love triangles to forge deep, foundational partnerships. But the undisputed blueprint for this storytelling device remains 1996’s dark Disney masterpiece: The Hunchback of Notre Dame.
Through what can only be described as a thematic "Love Square," this film dissects the stark, terrifying boundaries between Infatuation, Lust, and Genuine Love.
At the absolute center of this narrative web stands Esmeralda—the film's brilliant deuteragonist and a fierce Romani dancer. In lesser hands, a character described as universally desirable would be reduced to mere fanservice, a bland prize to be won, or a tool for the male gaze. But Disney gave us a powerhouse. Esmeralda drives the moral compass of the entire film through her razor-sharp wit, bottomless compassion, and absolute selflessness. She isn't wandering around waiting to be saved; she is actively fighting a system of corrupt authority to secure justice and freedom for her marginalized community.
To understand how her presence dismantles traditional romantic tropes, we have to look at the three radically different vectors of desire surrounding her.
1. Quasimodo: The Trap of Holy Infatuation
Quasimodo's attraction to Esmeralda is completely natural, but it comes from a place of deep psychological scarcity. Sheltered, isolated, and continuously abused by a tyrannical father figure who told him he was a monster, Esmeralda is the very first person to look at his face with genuine kindness, patience, and respect.
Naturally, he falls fast. But in his beautiful ballad "Heaven's Light," we see the hidden trap of his affection: he completely deifies her. He views her as a flawless, untouchable angel. While it is completely normal to develop a crush when someone shows you warmth, putting women on a holy pedestal is inherently unhealthy. It denies them their humanity, their flaws, and their reality.
Quasimodo has a heart of pure gold, but he isn’t emotionally ready for a romantic partnership—he needs to discover his own identity outside of his stone tower first. The beauty of his character is that when he discovers Esmeralda loves someone else, he completely subverts the toxic "Nice Guy" trope. He doesn't get bitter. He doesn't get possessive. He chooses radical, platonic allyship, remaining her protector and celebrating her happiness with the man she chose.
2. Claude Frollo: The Incel Logic of Holy Lust
On the absolute opposite end of the spectrum sits Judge Claude Frollo—the definition of a predatory, narcissistic abuser. Frollo’s obsession with Esmeralda is a toxic cocktail of systemic racism and violent sexual projection. He spent decades trying to ethnically cleanse her people, but the moment he sees her command the stage at the Festival of Fools, his rigid, self-righteous worldview shatters.
Because he cannot handle his own lack of discipline, he projects his sin onto her body. To Frollo, she isn’t a human being; she is a witch, a temptress, and a sexual object that must be conquered, dominated, and put in her place. The sheer visceral horror of him sneaking up behind her to sniff her hair and grope her neck remains one of the most chilling depictions of sexual harassment in animation history.
Frollo's entire psychology is built on modern incel logic: he blames the victim for his own desire. In his mind, it’s not his fault that he’s a predator. It’s not his fault he’s a stalker. It is always "Esmeralda's fault" for just existing and breathing. His legendary villain anthem "Hellfire" is a terrifying manifesto of patriarchal entitlement. When she escapes, his bruised ego burns down half of Paris, leading to the unlawful imprisonment and off-screen murder of countless innocent citizens. His ultimatum at the pyre—"choose me or burn"—proves that predatory lust would rather destroy a woman completely than allow her to possess her own bodily autonomy. Her spitting in his face is the ultimate rejection of his entire oppressive system.
3. Phoebus: The Clarity of Genuine Love
Finally, we have Captain Phoebus—the green flag that anchors the narrative. What sets Phoebus apart from both Quasimodo's deification and Frollo's objectification is that Phoebus sees Esmeralda as an equal.
He doesn't look at her and see an angel or a witch; he sees a brave, sharp-witted, soulful, and brilliantly confident woman. He respects her combat skills, listens to her political ideals, and is willing to throw away his entire military career and risk execution to protect her people. His love isn't built on what Esmeralda can do for his ego; it's built on a mutual, grounded respect for who she fundamentally is as a person.
The Ultimate Takeaway
Disney's "Love Square" is a timeless blueprint for media literacy. It teaches us the profound difference between loving an idea of a person and loving a real person. It reminds us that true love can expand far beyond romance—manifesting as the beautiful, platonic, chosen family that Quasimodo, Phoebus, and Esmeralda build together at the film's conclusion.
Most importantly, it delivers an uncompromising message on consent and autonomy: You are never, under any circumstances, entitled to someone else's body just because you are attracted to them. You don't get to manipulate, harass, or burn down the world because your feelings aren't reciprocated. True love values the safety, choice, and freedom of the other person above all else.
- Given what happened, I wish you had accompanied us last night, Hudson. - Hudson?
When you think about the process of how traditional animation is done, then yes, this is a great scene to study for its attention to detail. Considering that the 1970s were considered as the dark age for American animation, it’s impressive that some of the animators were still able to have these subtle moments (but that’s the amazing Milt Kahl for you).
2-part video analyzing Howard Ashman’s lyrics for The Little Mermaid
Here's a fun fact for ya: Passion's Promise was Danielle Steel's second book. Apparently, Slappy is a fan of trashy romance novels and you know what? Good for her. Also this is the same comic where the "I better not need therapy after this story" meme comes from.
Happy Fridayyyyyyy and happy PRIDE MONTHHHHHHH
Hey, uh…speaking of Ferngully, does anyone else find it strange how so many official documentaries on Robin Williams tend to leave out or flat out ignore Ferngully, when discussing his filmography? I’m sure they had no ill intentions in doing so, but I find that just a tad disrespectful, considering how excited Robin was to work on that movie.
Ferngully underperformed in theaters and was overshadowed by the other major animated film he starred in that year. The behind the scenes shenanigans with Katzenberg is still messed up.