āPeople keep saying George and Max would be throwing hands if the FIA didnāt exist. They couldn't have been more wrong.ā
Disclaimer: This is not a hate post. I like Max, I ship Russtappen, and this is about media power and fandom dynamics, not moral judgment of real people. Or maybe yes about the moral judgment but I don't even know them.
I love Russtappen as a ship, and I like Max. I respect him for his talent. He is talented. But letās be honest for a second: every champion in elite sports has benefited from rule-bending, favoritism, political backing, or outright cheating. Thatās not unique, and itās not shocking. So I genuinely donāt understand why people are still having moral breakdowns over who ādeservedā a championship. If a driver has a team willing to do anything for them and a teammate who plays along, they deserve the title by the standards of the sport. Everyone but Stroll, frankly.
That said, this isnāt about that.
Iām here to debunk the idea that āGeorge and Max would throw hands if the FIA didnāt exist.ā I love Russtappenās dynamic, but my perspective is different from the common fandom fantasy.
They would not fight on camera. Why would they? Physical confrontation is for people without leverage. When you have influence, you donāt dirty your hands, you let others do it for you. This is exactly why Max went to the media instead of turning a press conference into a boxing ring. Heās not the same kid who once threw hands with Esteban. Heās evolved into something far more effective: someone who understands media power and fanbase dynamics.
These are classic tactics borrowed from the entertainment industry and political movements. Power in this world isnāt about who yells the loudest or punches first; itās about influence. In Formula 1, winning titles doesnāt just give you trophies, it legitimizes your behavior. The more you win, the more people excuse, rationalize, or outright deny your flaws. Success becomes moral armor.
Public statements, carefully phrased comments, or even pointed silence can all be weapons. Say just enough, and your fans will fill in the blanks. Sit back, drink your tea, and let the most unhinged parts of your fanbase do the dirty work, harassment, death threats, reputation damage. This tactic has destroyed careers. In extreme cases, it has pushed people to suicide. Some targets survive it; others donāt.
And when things inevitably spiral, there are two flawless exits. You can go silent and adopt the IDGAF persona, which only fuels idolization and reframes any emotional response from your target as weakness or guilt. Or you can apologize, condemn fan behavior, and present yourself as kind-hearted and reasonable. Either way, your image improves. Because in the public imagination, a ākindā person cannot be the villain.
This doesnāt require constant malicious intent. Manipulation isnāt always deliberate. Some drivers are highly strategic. Others simply benefit from systems already tilted in their favor. Power works even when the person holding it pretends not to notice it.
Let me be clear, acknowledging this does not mean hating the driver. It doesnāt negate their talent, their achievements, or why people admire them. It just means refusing to romanticize power. Iām not claiming my favorites are flawless. Iām tired of pretending that winning makes someone morally superior.
What exhausts me most is the holier-than-thou attitude coming from certain 33 fans and 16 fans, as if success equals purity. Welcome to reality. Money and influence are power, and those with power are protected by the systems that benefit from them.
This isnāt unique to Max, George, or even Formula 1. Itās an ecosystem problem. F1 just amplifies it because drivers are brands, teams are corporations, and fans are emotionally invested year-round.
Liking a driver doesnāt mean defending everything they do. And recognizing manipulation doesnāt mean you hate them.