Untitled @radioactivewisdomreactivated - Tumblr Blog

Posts

Men are only concerned about the “problem” of falling birth rates because it will prevent them from having access to a new supply of girls.

genderisareligion

lobotomy-lady

I'm surprised that she didn't mention this, but it's not only the men in the affected zone of the conflict who take advantage of these women, it's the men who are working for the very charitable humanitarian agencies she's referring to that send people in to the zone of conflict in order to "help." multiple men who work for charities that went into Haiti after the earthquake were caught routinely refusing to give women the food and water that was meant to be freely provided unless they exchanged sexual favors for it. this also happened to mothers who were forced to let themselves be raped not only for their survival but bc the men in question were withholding these resources from their babies as well.

haiti is not the only place this has happened by a long shot, just one particular example that is at the forefront of my mind. the "helpers" can't be trusted either when they're men.

benyw

Its also near impossible to solve, because if your answer is to just send female aid workers, well then you're putting those women in danger of being raped and murdered by the men they were sent to help.

I guess you could set up two different systems, where men give out resources to men and boys, while women give out resources to women and girls but from within a guarded compound?

radioactivewisdomreactivated

Surprise, surprise, when the circumstances allow for it, males become even more predisposed to acting on their degeneracy. These creatures will use their last breath to engage in assault. They’re always seeking opportunities in which they’re more likely to get away with their crimes. Another clear cut example of why socialization is cope. Males only “behave” when there’s civility and consequences. Let a disaster strike, and they morph back into their true forms. They take advantage of these dire situations, knowing that chaos acts as a cover. There is no such thing as solidarity with males. You’ll think that you’re both fighting for your lives, but he’s actually angling to ruin yours, before saving himself. You’d throw him a life raft, but he’d rape you before considering doing the same. This insane asylum of a society, has to implement extra safety protocols on top of the ones that already exist, because males are always one mishap away from going caveman mode. Why resources are even being wasted on XY’s in such situations is beyond me.

If you insist on playing Russian roulette with your womb, the havoc your moidlet inflicts, ultimately comes back to you. Why do women feel as if their personal desire for motherhood overrides everyone else’s safety? Why must women and girls everywhere suffer because you wanted to play house? Not to mention that beforehand, these women insist that male degeneracy is just due to bad socialization, and that they can raise “one of the good ones.” A risk they’re willing to take, but if you hold them in contempt after their moid harms you, it’s “you can’t hold a woman responsible for a man’s actions!” Once again, what about your actions? These women want to keep running their failed social experiment at the detriment to all life on Earth, but we’re not allowed to question them for it. Every man was once someone’s baby, but now we’re the ones facing the consequences of his existence. Go figure. These women want nothing more than to have a seat at the table with males, and never be questioned for their self serving egotistical behavior. Every time I see a moid act in accordance to his lower nature, I curse him and his stupid parents for unleashing him upon this world. Any woman who births a male willingly chooses and accepts all of the pain and turmoil he subjects others to.

It's always so funny when handmaidens are like "you can't just say that you could never be in an abusive relationship bc you could easily get tricked!"

Don't date men. That is all you have to do to avoid an abusive relationship 🤷‍♀️

No wonder I became so blackpilled lmao enough of the fawn response

Exactly. That response always receives an eye roll from me. They believe that their inability to stay away from men is universal. The average woman seeks solidarity in stupidity, and wants to rope you into her stagnant lifestyle of repetitive misery. This is why she wants you to believe ending up like her is inevitable. They lack an internal locus, because they willingly give up control in order to satiate their sexuality. Oh well, they’ll have plenty of self loathing company amongst their fellow feminists.

The 50/50 relationship will ruin libfems. Because now they will get nothing out of being fucked, and destroying their bodies with babies

They never got anything from it in the first place. There is no such thing as 50/50 in nature. Men overwhelmingly benefit from biological reproduction, despite all of the theory driven “reversals,” such as womb envy that feminist propose. There is no amount of monetary compensation that makes up for birthing new cannon fodder into this Hell. Not only do men on an individual level get domain over a “family,” but they also benefit on a wide scale, while women only lose. She will either bring a new girl into this world to be preyed upon, or a son who will grow to socially dominate her. For men such a dynamic is invaluable, and worth its weight in gold. Even if a man provided 100 percent outside of pregnancy, it still wouldn’t be a fair or worthwhile exchange.

https://www.instagram.com/reel/DaLh12qRyQC/?igsh=MWFnY2tsem45bG52

I am so disgusted by women's eternal cope about pregnancy being a "source of power." What power is there in being able to spread your legs and put more slaves on the planet? Any female who is fertile enough can be impregnated, including against her will and including girls as young as 9 or 10 as a result of sexual abuse. What's powerful about an ability billions of other women can do and has been the source of female exploitation for all of human history? Pregnancy is a liability and decreases your own ability to be autonomous. There is nothing powerful about sacrificing your own body and health. The only people who believe in this crap are mommies and future wannabe mommies.

I agree wholeheartedly. Your analysis is spot on, incredibly intelligent and perceptive. You write nicely as well.

Another point of "feminist" cognitive dissonance. They're addicted to the idea of receiving credit and validation for their ability to create life, but will then turn around and claim that men are the source of suffering here on Earth. As always, this is yet another confession on their part. Reproducing with men is their ultimate achievement, and birthing another moidlet is on par with possessing supernatural abilities for such women.

there are many pedophiles but also many men who are disgusted by csam and who work hard against it. It’s absolutely false that all men are pedophiles

https://www.instagram.com/reel/DYfOPv4zLAL/?igsh=cW1sdWFwdHcxOGk2

Mens supposed disgust means nothing. They're morally inconsistent, perfectly content condemning a particular behavior, only to then partake themselves later on. Men jerk off with one hand, while pointing accusingly with the other. I can poll the entire male population, and most would respond that they're disturbed by pedophilia and rape, yet, we can see the contradiction in their actions. How many people are going to admit to enjoying or engaging in criminal activity, especially while on camera?

Mens morality is dependent on whether or not their dicks are hard. Unsurprisingly, when asked beforehand during a study, men said they were disturbed by rape. When they were shown graphic material of sexual assault taking place, their arousal correlated with downplaying the severity of what they previously stated was a crime. You stop being a child the moment a man is aroused, he will rationalize his attraction, and wont think of himself as a predator.

Beginning at age 13, every single time I stepped outside, adult men cat called, ogled, groped, and approached me. I am not exaggerating, it was nonstop, and happened in every context imaginable. Many of those men were fathers themselves, and I promise you, they'd be disturbed if it was their child on the receiving end. Still, that wont prevent them from doing the same to someone else. Men are perfectly content with believing that "their" women and children should be protected, while they actively seek to victimize others.

Most men are attracted to children. That doesn't mean that they're all going to sit at the park trying to lure five year olds into a van. Instead, they steal glances, and look for other opportunities in which they can discretely perv out, while still having deniable culpability. There are men who aren't attracted to anyone under the age of 18, but they're exceptionally rare, and that doesn't mean they're not sexually degenerate in other ways. The percentage of men who have a non predatory sexuality is incredibly minuscule.

Although men state pedophilic preferences, their relationships only function when the woman is very much an adult, and takes on most of the heavy lifting and adult responsibilities. Women on the other hand, claim to be repulsed by the idea of pursuing a partner for youth alone, but are consistently “one upping” each other by stating how much mothering they do for an infantile man. Men seek an adult in a child’s body, while women uphold the reverse in their “relationships.” Heterosexuality doesn’t function between equals, especially not psychologically. Both parties put on an elaborate social performance, but behind closed doors, they each embody the exact opposite.

"Men and women need each other!"

Outside of reproducing, abusing their children, and making the lives of everyone who is not like them a living hell what do the average osa man and woman even enjoy doing together? The world would be better off if men and women stayed away from each other more. When they get together they only know how to destroy everything around them. They also do not like each other at all and need all kinds of rituals and religions to tell them how to effectively roleplay their household roles because they do not actually like the other's true self.

This is poetry, so sufficiently stated. I have nothing else to add, only admiration.

https://youtube.com/shorts/7-u37_BhnnA?si=EJYaFtPUFBVSl6Ql

The comments in this are so blackpilling. Intrasexually competitive women are crazy. They will even accuse you of having an incestous relation with your cousins. That's not even touching mothers who feel jealous from their own daughters...

Thank you for sending the link. You’re spot on bringing up women’s intersexual competition, as it's still taboo to discuss in feminist spaces.

Women are more competitive than males, and it’s not even close. Once women enter a relationship with a man, their only concern becomes being able to keep him around. They perceive all others as a threat, even children. It’s normal for them to accuse women simply doing their jobs of trying to “steal” their man. I recently saw a video of them discussing how women in hospitality positions shouldn't acknowledge a male who is accompanied by another woman. They even stated that eye contact can be inappropriate, and that they should take a mans order by asking the woman he's with . Women know that all males are sex addicts who would go to bed with anybody who offered, so they have to threaten other women in order to keep their males “faithful.” Women would rather engage in a one-sided completion with their own daughters, than go without dick. It’s incredibly pathetic and a sign of their mental instability, but that's to be expected from those who willingly partner with males, as it is a sign of mindlessness.

It's deeply deeply distressing and disturbing to see older women whoring it out like that. Recently found out about the Oscar nominated movie Marty Supreme in which Gwyneth Paltrow is in a shower scene with Timothée Chalamet. And it's just. Fucking fuck man. I. I don't know how to explain it. Seeing young foids go at it is one thing but seeing women in their 50s, heck 80s (Helen Mirren), get naked like that on screen, really makes my heart sink. The other day came across a comment where someone said she and her partner both in their 80s. Have the best sex. What the fuck? Why do we need to know that? Someone's grandmother in her 90s is still having sex and has no qualms bringing it up with the grandkids. Jesus. Please. Not knowing how inherently submissive the whole act is for women even at that age. Makes me lose hope. All hope. I mean.. I know there is no hope sure. But getting reminded of it on a daily basis really fucks me up.

Unfortunately, they never age out of pandering to males. There’s been an enormous effort on feminists part to expand the definition of “fuckable” to include old women, because being seen as desirable by males is their life long objective. Women and men are equally obsessed with sex, and they're always seeking new ways to be validated through their physicality. They'll be the first to express happiness vibrating on an animalistic frequency, citing their "biological urges" nonstop, thus, resulting in what've you've described. Enjoy your ability to live and think rationally, even if it's at times distressing, it's preferable to see this primitive society clearly.

https://www.instagram.com/reel/DYnFC9zxt_X/?igsh=MXcxeW1ucXpmd3RmZg==

This is foreplay for heterosexuals. Women and males enjoy stimulating each other negatively. Such strong reactions make them feel desirable, it's a reminder that their compulsive drive to populate overrides their enduring disdain. Women and men are incapable of fulfilling each other's "needs," because they're both ego driven sex addicted black holes. Hetslop content is nothing more than a proverbial shouting match, with both sides hoping to have their way.

Heterosexual society is hellbent on destroying itself through the meaningless accumulation of billions of bodies because reproduction is a consumptive act in itself, heralded as the purpose of existence, and thus replicated all throughout civilization. The nuclear family is the first corporation, and the breeders desire for endless propagation manifests on all levels. As above, so below. Human life is created on a hedonistic conveyor belt, no different than one that pushes out Pepsi products. Quality versus quantity is the ultimate assessment one must make in order to evolve past rudimentary survival. Males and their devotees have made their choice incredibly clear, scaling their low quality primitive sex obsessed existence to industrialized heights. Accusing anyone who wants to rise above the exploitation of both bodies and landmass, of being "antihuman." Meanwhile, mans desire to dominate all that surrounds him, begets destruction, misinterpreted as "legacy." Depleting and devouring. He wants to see a permanent physical change in all that he comes into contact with, whether a womb or the world itself, he must force his way into every corner of existence. A selfish desire to see oneself replicated, and to alter or annihilate all that doesn't mirror humanity's flawed reflection, is reason for our opportunistic reality.

What makes you happy?

Reading, wind chimes, carbs, my days off, large bodies of water, music, lying in the grass, and going out after midnight.

https://www.instagram.com/reel/DX9we0xK1u0/?igsh=cTJrcHl0MWt3ZGp5

Hetslop.

Genuine question, but why do you not disagree with these blatant mras and male worshippers just because they happen to agree on some negative observations about women? The last anon is right about how women are fine with oppression if they get princess treatment but that anon is clearly not saying that being with a man or being oppressed and being a servant to a man is a bad thing.

What is there for me to disagree with? They’re simply describing heterosexuality, and its resulting dynamics. I’m not going to ignore information just because I don’t completely align with the source. It makes no difference to me who is stating the obvious. Being with males isn’t a bad thing for the women who desire them. Women willingly choose to seek out males, and that results in servitude on their part. If that was truly such a bad deal, women would avoid them all together, but they don’t. “Relationships” between women and males require rigid rules that result in women’s lower status in society, and they enjoy being on their knees.

I like how you didn’t actually address what I said lol you are so intellectually dishonest.

I don’t care who the messenger is, if a moid correctly identifies a woman’s behavior, so be it. I don’t subscribe to women’s neurotic manufactured social games. “You’re agreeing with something a man said? That’s against the rules!”I’m not a feminist, and I will never believe that willingly entering partnerships with males is a form of oppression.

Trending Blogs

Recently Viewed Blogs

Untitled