Untitled @radioactivewisdomreactivated - Tumblr Blog

"Men and women need each other!"

Outside of reproducing, abusing their children, and making the lives of everyone who is not like them a living hell what do the average osa man and woman even enjoy doing together? The world would be better off if men and women stayed away from each other more. When they get together they only know how to destroy everything around them. They also do not like each other at all and need all kinds of rituals and religions to tell them how to effectively roleplay their household roles because they do not actually like the other's true self.

This is poetry, so sufficiently stated. I have nothing else to add, only admiration.

https://youtube.com/shorts/7-u37_BhnnA?si=EJYaFtPUFBVSl6Ql

The comments in this are so blackpilling. Intrasexually competitive women are crazy. They will even accuse you of having an incestous relation with your cousins. That's not even touching mothers who feel jealous from their own daughters...

Thank you for sending the link. You’re spot on bringing up women’s intersexual competition, as it's still taboo to discuss in feminist spaces.

Women are more competitive than males, and it’s not even close. Once women enter a relationship with a man, their only concern becomes being able to keep him around. They perceive all others as a threat, even children. It’s normal for them to accuse women simply doing their jobs of trying to “steal” their man. I recently saw a video of them discussing how women in hospitality positions shouldn't acknowledge a male who is accompanied by another woman. They even stated that eye contact can be inappropriate, and that they should take a mans order by asking the woman he's with . Women know that all males are sex addicts who would go to bed with anybody who offered, so they have to threaten other women in order to keep their males “faithful.” Women would rather engage in a one-sided completion with their own daughters, than go without dick. It’s incredibly pathetic and a sign of their mental instability, but that's to be expected from those who willingly partner with males, as it is a sign of mindlessness.

It's deeply deeply distressing and disturbing to see older women whoring it out like that. Recently found out about the Oscar nominated movie Marty Supreme in which Gwyneth Paltrow is in a shower scene with Timothée Chalamet. And it's just. Fucking fuck man. I. I don't know how to explain it. Seeing young foids go at it is one thing but seeing women in their 50s, heck 80s (Helen Mirren), get naked like that on screen, really makes my heart sink. The other day came across a comment where someone said she and her partner both in their 80s. Have the best sex. What the fuck? Why do we need to know that? Someone's grandmother in her 90s is still having sex and has no qualms bringing it up with the grandkids. Jesus. Please. Not knowing how inherently submissive the whole act is for women even at that age. Makes me lose hope. All hope. I mean.. I know there is no hope sure. But getting reminded of it on a daily basis really fucks me up.

Unfortunately, they never age out of pandering to males. There’s been an enormous effort on feminists part to expand the definition of “fuckable” to include old women, because being seen as desirable by males is their life long objective. Women and men are equally obsessed with sex, and they're always seeking new ways to be validated through their physicality. They'll be the first to express happiness vibrating on an animalistic frequency, citing their "biological urges" nonstop, thus, resulting in what've you've described. Enjoy your ability to live and think rationally, even if it's at times distressing, it's preferable to see this primitive society clearly.

https://www.instagram.com/reel/DYnFC9zxt_X/?igsh=MXcxeW1ucXpmd3RmZg==

This is foreplay for heterosexuals. Women and males enjoy stimulating each other negatively. Such strong reactions make them feel desirable, it's a reminder that their compulsive drive to populate overrides their enduring disdain. Women and men are incapable of fulfilling each other's "needs," because they're both ego driven sex addicted black holes. Hetslop content is nothing more than a proverbial shouting match, with both sides hoping to have their way.

Heterosexual society is hellbent on destroying itself through the meaningless accumulation of billions of bodies because reproduction is a consumptive act in itself, heralded as the purpose of existence, and thus replicated all throughout civilization. The nuclear family is the first corporation, and the breeders desire for endless propagation manifests on all levels. As above, so below. Human life is created on a hedonistic conveyor belt, no different than one that pushes out Pepsi products. Quality versus quantity is the ultimate assessment one must make in order to evolve past rudimentary survival. Males and their devotees have made their choice incredibly clear, scaling their low quality primitive sex obsessed existence to industrialized heights. Accusing anyone who wants to rise above the exploitation of both bodies and landmass, of being "antihuman." Meanwhile, mans desire to dominate all that surrounds him, begets destruction, misinterpreted as "legacy." Depleting and devouring. He wants to see a permanent physical change in all that he comes into contact with, whether a womb or the world itself, he must force his way into every corner of existence. A selfish desire to see oneself replicated, and to alter or annihilate all that doesn't mirror humanity's flawed reflection, is reason for our opportunistic reality.

What makes you happy?

Reading, wind chimes, carbs, my days off, large bodies of water, music, lying in the grass, and going out after midnight.

https://www.instagram.com/reel/DX9we0xK1u0/?igsh=cTJrcHl0MWt3ZGp5

Hetslop.

Genuine question, but why do you not disagree with these blatant mras and male worshippers just because they happen to agree on some negative observations about women? The last anon is right about how women are fine with oppression if they get princess treatment but that anon is clearly not saying that being with a man or being oppressed and being a servant to a man is a bad thing.

What is there for me to disagree with? They’re simply describing heterosexuality, and its resulting dynamics. I’m not going to ignore information just because I don’t completely align with the source. It makes no difference to me who is stating the obvious. Being with males isn’t a bad thing for the women who desire them. Women willingly choose to seek out males, and that results in servitude on their part. If that was truly such a bad deal, women would avoid them all together, but they don’t. “Relationships” between women and males require rigid rules that result in women’s lower status in society, and they enjoy being on their knees.

I like how you didn’t actually address what I said lol you are so intellectually dishonest.

I don’t care who the messenger is, if a moid correctly identifies a woman’s behavior, so be it. I don’t subscribe to women’s neurotic manufactured social games. “You’re agreeing with something a man said? That’s against the rules!”I’m not a feminist, and I will never believe that willingly entering partnerships with males is a form of oppression.

Like, agreeing with these people that men are actually not oppressive or harmful at all to women kind of undermines your own points, no? Like why promote 4B if you and that anon think that there’s no oppression men are doing to women? I’m not trying to remove accountability from women btw before you try and twist my words but I’m just saying that it couldn’t hurt to stop and think about what someone is actually saying to you.

I promote 4B for individuals who want to put their words into action. I have no interest in changing women’s minds, and don’t expect them to give up males. I simply pose the question of, “why do you want to keep living with, having sex with, and reproducing with the same people you claim to be scared of?” I believe women, and they tell us time and time again, that they want to be with males, regardless of the consequences. Males are harmful, but women don’t actually care, which is made clear by their choices. My point has always been that women can either wake up to reality, or remain in delusion.

Have you seen the discourse over the game Pragmata? It features a robot character designed to look like a child and supposedly encouraging men to "want to become fathers." The reddit for the game was banned because too many of them were sexualizing the child robot and getting mad they couldn't look under her skirt. But somehow acknowledging that pedophilia is a tendency in heterosexual men's attractions is too controversial. No matter how much evidence people see they'll keep denying and denying.

Repulsive, but unsurprising. Males make it known that they’re pedophiles all of the time. It would be a statistical anomaly to find a male who is solely attracted to other adults. They should never have access to children, and that includes all forms of media as well. As you’ve said, It’s genuinely mind boggling how anyone can see such an obvious deficiency in behavior, but ultimately keep their heads buried in the sand.

If a woman is married to a provider, a protector, or a "good guy," she will still tell you that "men are trash" or that "society is patriarchal." Why? Because she feels entitled to that level of treatment from all men. If she admits that her husband is a good man, she has to admit that men can be good, which undermines her entire grievance industry. She isn't fighting for equality; she is fighting for superiority. She wants to be treated like a queen without being a servant.

Excellently stated. Women naturally embody cognitive dissonance, which is why they create conspiracy theories about the state of the world, using one hand to point fingers, and another to jerk off Nigel. She resents what she creates, because it never remains within her control, wanting credit for the world without culpability. Women want worship for existing, forgetting that the male is her responsibility, with whom she's entered into a sycophantic contract.

Thoughts on the 4b movement?

It's a good idea for women who take it seriously.

The way conservatives’ darlings like Sydney Sweeney, with great genes, get humiliated in the mainstream media right now (they put her in a diaper, for goodness’ sake) indicates that the girlboss era is well and truly over. Their revenge is only beginning.

Women have always sold their souls for mass recognition and clout. Wearing a diaper is nothing. Any woman who amasses male fans is nothing more than gooner bait. "Girl bosses" were just putting blazers on over their lingerie, and wearing eyeliner "so sharp it could kill a man," aka, doing nothing of note. Sweeney is taking the more honest route, holding onto boners for as long as she can, before aging into irrelevancy. The betrayal is only felt by women delusional enough to think that they're adored for more than their physicality, the passage of time is revenge enough for such ladies.

I very much enjoyed your commentary on the topic.

why do you call them jackies it’s jakeys

My mistake.

I’d rather be a cocksucker than spend my days screaming into the void about problems that won’t be solved in my lifetime. I hope you go outside today and eat a good meal.

You can just suck moids off. There is no need to try and justify your behavior beforehand. Jakey is waiting for you.

maybe it's my impression but many blackpilled blogs got taken down or becae inactive a few while ago. do you have any idea about what's going on? thanks.

I’ve noticed that as well, but I’m unsure as to why. I was being spammed a lot these past couple of months, that could potentially have something to do with it. Perhaps, some posters no longer feel compelled to share their thoughts. I wish them all well, and I still admire so many of them.

Trending Blogs

Recently Viewed Blogs

Untitled