whatever. im just going to reblog whatever i want to here. there are no parameters it's just what i feel like putting here sorry
oh yeah my main is @ralsei-fluffyboy-darkprince-stan for people who find this before that one

oozey mess

Origami Around
𓃗

No title available
cherry valley forever
Doug Jones
Show & Tell

blake kathryn
Keni
EXPECTATIONS
Monterey Bay Aquarium
Misplaced Lens Cap

#extradirty

Discoholic 🪩
let's talk about Bridgerton tea, my ask is open

Love Begins
The Stonewall Inn
official daine visual archive
Cosimo Galluzzi
ojovivo
seen from Germany

seen from United States
seen from Netherlands
seen from Israel
seen from United States

seen from Bangladesh
seen from Bangladesh

seen from Bangladesh
seen from United Kingdom

seen from United States
seen from Indonesia

seen from Russia
seen from United States
seen from Bangladesh
seen from Morocco

seen from United States
seen from Pakistan

seen from T1

seen from South Korea
seen from United States
@ralsei-fluffyboy-darkprince-rbs
whatever. im just going to reblog whatever i want to here. there are no parameters it's just what i feel like putting here sorry
oh yeah my main is @ralsei-fluffyboy-darkprince-stan for people who find this before that one
EVERYONE GET NICER TO KIDS NOW
i always mean it when i say i love you btw
‘but thats a stranger you dont know’ and i love them. i love that they exist and i love that they passed through my life. and i love u too btw
reblog to tell your mutuals you love them for existing
can someone please be proud of me like fuck I’m trying
reblog to let prev know you’re proud of them
hi mutual!! !!! !!!! !!!!!
HI HI HI
Sure you're a queer inclusionist but are you normal about the identities of plural folks
Examples of being strange about plural identities:
Treating fictives like they're your blorbo as opposed to a whole guy.
Deciding for yourself how a fictive or factive should relate to their source, if you think fictives & factives *must* be different from their source in some amount, you are not normal about plural identities. If you make moral judgements on an introject for the contents of their source material, you are not normal about plural identities.
Looking at spiritual aspects of plurality with undue skepticism and doubt when they don't apply to you.
Talking down to a fictive or factive for having a "problematic" source, and assuming that everyone gets to pick exactly who they are.
Refusing to use everyone's individual name when asked, or only recognizing one person in the collective.
Gatekeeping and fakeclaiming. You're not normal about plural identities if you insist all plural people need to have trauma. You're not normal about plural identities if you think someone has "too many alters" or perceive their conversation as "roleplaying".
Dictating what someone is or is not able to experience based on your personal understanding of their history.
Reacting to someone's plurality by imagining and feeling sorry for the trauma you assume they went through.
Finding the idea of plurality scary. Even past the evil alter stuff, if you think someone switching without you noticing is frightening, you are not normal about plural people. If you read or watch horror based around a killer with DID or a tulpa who kills its creator, you are probably not very normal about plural identities.
Any "eww" or "cringe" reaction to someone talking about themselves.
Dismissing experiences because you personally don't view them as valid or real.
reblog to tell prev she's pawsome <3
Did you ever just feel so lucky for knowing someone you met online? Like.. I was one click away from not following you. I was one second away from never even knowing of your existence.I would never have been this happy!!!...
@marshmallow-gem @a-weird-moth-swarm @evil-robot-overlord @jorunna-mochi @suspish-fish @ghost-of-a-swarm-of-bees @ralsei-fluffyboy-darkprince-stan @on-course-for-commotion @iamineskew @4eyedloser @saffronscales Thanks for being some of my longest standing and/or closest mutuals. Trust me I notice you in my activity
collaborative making a post help me out here everyone
okay'll start it:
never
you're supposed to start it now???
Thank you @ralsei-fluffyboy-darkprince-stan and everyone who got me to 1000 reblogs!
why can i post this on a different account. hello
*open [tumblr]* "10+ notifications" Ah, good morning Garden.
happy to help 🙂↕️
i have no idea what you're talking about
i mean yeah you're probably right
woah... reblog blog communication...
image of brains psychically linking
*open [tumblr]* "10+ notifications" Ah, good morning Garden.
happy to help 🙂↕️
i have no idea what you're talking about
i mean yeah you're probably right
"lock in" is probably one of the most important phrases to enter the public lexicon in the 2020s
'and no one reblogged This version/i see you not reblogging this version'
hm. i wonder why that could be.
one might be tempted to wonder whether it's because most people who reblogged the original fundamentally disagree with the addition, but lets see whether we can think of any other contributing factors.
could it plausibly have anything to do with the way the post is structured? that's right! tumblr additions are structured in such a way that a. there is more time for people to see the original than any additions (and the more time passess between additions the more true this is), and b. may people, particularly those who don't follow you, are likely to only see whichever version of your post gets reblogged onto their dash - this means the initial, base post (without any of the additions) is often the most likely to get traction, regardless of the extent to which anyone agrees or disagrees with any later additions to the post. this is especially true if the original version of the post manages to take off.
now let's think about the addition itself. might it have differed from the original in a way that could impact people's inclination to reblog, even if they didn't necessarily disagree with the subject matter? well, is the addition phrased the same way? maybe some people don't like reblogging posts that are actively manipulative and attempt to guilt trip their intended audience, for example. alternatively, is the addition simply much more niche, and more more likely to appeal or be relatable to smaller audience than the original?
all of these and more could be important factors to consider when trying to understand why more people aren't reblogging the version of your post with all your additions, preferably before jumping to the worst faith possible conclusion and using that in an attempt to guilt trip people into reblogging your post 👍.
great work! now you can go forward and be dramatically less insufferable on tumblr.com. congratulations
you will never be a bad person for not reblogging a post on tumblr, please remember that
you will never be a bad person for not reblogging a post on tumblr, please remember that
you will never be a bad person for not reblogging a post on tumblr, please remember that