Introduction
Hello! Welcome to The Plants of Red Dead Redemption II, AKA, rdr2 plant blog. I'm Loopy and I'll be posting ongoing snippets of my rdr2 plant accuracy analysis and random commentary here.
WHY THIS BLOG?
So as to keep my thoughts organized mostly. Everything about Red Dead Redemption 2 is considered a masterpiece by many; its environment is no different, and yet it's spared only passing mention by so many critics and fans! Both the game’s interactive plants and its “environment assets” are endlessly fascinating to me. Although I’m only an amateur botanist, I thought I’d take a look at the classic question of “is rdr2 accurate?” and throw in my two cents from a botanical perspective. How am I going about gauging that accuracy? Same as any old hack looking to get clickbait attention:
NUMERICAL RATING SYSTEM
Because I like a nice neat little numbered rating, I’m rating each plant (not including the rdo exclusive ones, most trees, or orchids) for accuracy on:
Growth habit (does it look true-to-life at a glance?)
Fine details and diagnostic features (bracts, leaf shape, flower definition)
Proper biome distribution (is it found in an equivalent habitat to its real-life counterpart?)
Proper historical placement (was it introduced by human activity? When? Where?)
Each criterion is worth 2 points for of a total of 8.
Has this taken me a long time? Absolutely. But I've been thinking about tackling this project since the game came out, and its release and the ease of interaction with its plant life is what really kicked me into a pointed interest in botany. I figured I'd pay it back by nitpicking everything I possibly can about a field I have a lot of fun studying in my free time.
Thanks for stopping by!
















