why we gotta pit two bad bitches against each other. I think Sam and Frodo should kiss, perhaps even fuck.
Average "Sam is the Real Hero" enthusiast:
Average Frodo Appreciator:
noise dept.
★
ojovivo
Sweet Seals For You, Always
taylor price
Noah Kahan
No title available

@theartofmadeline
hello vonnie
𓃗
No title available

blake kathryn
cherry valley forever
occasionally subtle
Not today Justin
Interview Vampire Daily
RMH

bliss lane

Jar Jar Binks Fan Club
"I'm Dorothy Gale from Kansas"
seen from Ecuador

seen from Brazil

seen from United States
seen from Azerbaijan

seen from Malaysia

seen from Canada

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Argentina
seen from United Kingdom

seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from Brazil

seen from United States
seen from Brazil
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Singapore
seen from Singapore
seen from United States
@repossessedspeculative
why we gotta pit two bad bitches against each other. I think Sam and Frodo should kiss, perhaps even fuck.
Average "Sam is the Real Hero" enthusiast:
Average Frodo Appreciator:
Sometimes a character says something creepy or rude that's really out of character and it's obviously bc the creator thinks it's funny, and you just have to say "I know my boy and I know he wouldn't say that" and move on
jon: has a super close relationship with his non-confirming sister, gifts her with a sword, falls in love with a wildling woman (ygritte), has a crush on a wildling woman (val), describes val as ‘lonely, lovely and lethal’ and thinks that he ‘could’ve had her’, describes val as ‘A warrior princess, he decided, not some willowy creature who sits up in a tower, brushing her hair and waiting for some knight to rescue her’, admires alys when she says ‘let him be scared of me’ (‘winter’s lady’):
jon: ‘I have no need of blushing maidens looking to be protected, but I will take as many spearwives as will come.’
jonsas: so clearly jon’s type is sansa and catelyn
thoughts about your local dystopian baker boy: while Peeta’s end goal is peace and his capacity for empathy and hope is so beautifully, importantly strong, he is just as rebellious as Katniss* and I think that’s something that often gets lost in translation ... Peeta is kind, but Peeta “hold-them-out-I-want-everyone-to-see” Mellark is the furthest thing from a pitiful, people-pleasing puppy who just wants everyone to hug it out ...
*and Gale 🤭 (but differently)
Peeta is arguably even more rebellious than Katniss. He was already rebelling in the first games by fighting for someone else. And by doing that the capitol was unable to control him because his actions weren’t predictable since he wasn’t playing by the rules which is to fight for yourself. Peeta knew the cycle could only be broken if everyone refused to play by the rules because if there are no players there is no game. That is how the capitol asserts its power and control. When everyone submits to their ego and thinks of themselves, there is division. And a divided nation can’t defeat its tyrannical government. Only a united nation can do that. And union is created by getting over your ego and thinking of something or someone outside of yourself. That is essentially what Peeta does and what he represents and why Katniss is always admiring him. From the start he was doing something the capitol tried so hard to prevent: Not letting his survival instinct control him and not submitting to his ego which is the hardest thing to do because it‘s human nature.
I think that they are both most rebellious when they do the things that preserve their humanity in the face of the dehumanizing system. I think Katniss is plenty rebellious in this way too, though I think her recognizing that she isn’t the entirely pragmatic survivor she thinks she has to be is coaxed out by her relationship with Peeta, even if she’s already doing it for Prim and Rue and Thresh and all.
Katniss is definitely rebellious! But I do think that most of the time she’s not aware of that. There are moments when she consciously rebels but most of the time it‘s her impulsive and fiery reactions that lead to rebellious acts. It‘s her heart not her head that eventually turn her into a symbol of rebellion whereas Peeta is much more calculated in his rebellion, his actions are thought-out and planned. No one knows what he’ll do next, only himself. Of course no one knows what Katniss will do as well, but the difference is, even Katniss herself doesn’t know that because she acts on instinct and impulse. That is why I believe she gets more recognition within the universe because she has this rawness, this realness that draws people in. She’s a revolutionary, she’s all fire and action. Peeta is a politician. He’s precise and understands patterns and excels at abstract- and forward-thinking while Katniss excels at practical thinking, surviving immediate danger. She’s not trying to rebel, she’s trying to survive. But her care for other people and her strong emotions lead her to do things that are eventually interpreted to be acts of rebellion which she is not aware of for most of the time.
the gale/prim stunt was so cheap too bc narratively killing prim didn’t do ANYTHING and it was only written so suzanne collins could easily solve the dumbass love triangle She CREATED. so katniss loses her sister, her mom leaves, And her best friend from childhood leaves. and what she has at the end is fucking uhhhh Peeta Parker and some kids she never even wanted ???? like ?? gale was a whole antifa legend for 2.9 books and she ruined All that at the VERY end for some romance?! completely glossing over the fact that katniss did not romantically want to be with either of them!!!!
the whole reason prim died is because it IS senseless. like that is literally the point.
suzanne collins and ka applegate are cut from a similar cloth and that cloth is refusing to shy away from depicting how brutal, how senseless, how cruel war is. prim died for no reason and that is the point. it had absolutely nothing to do with resolving a love triangle.
also Y’ALL COME ON the presence of romance in a book does not make the book A Romance; the ‘love triangle’ was literally never ever the point - which is why it’s what the capitol focuses on.
also katniss’s happy ever after: she fuckin grew up, y’all, come on. listen, I get the knee jerk hate for a baby boomer-style happily ever afters (I will sue jk rowling in court for the epilogue) but the fact that katniss, after everything she went through, felt comfortable enough to settle down with peeta and actually have kids - kids she knew were not going to be thrown into a gladiatorial arena for the entertainment of the super wealthy - is proof that what she did mattered. it cost katniss goddamn near everything she had - her family, her friends, her hearing, her home - but it was still the right thing to do.
the hunger games is about the cost of revolution: it’s so, so high, but in the end, it’s necessary.
Furthering this, Katniss said she didn’t want kids because she didn’t want to bring them into the world she grew up in. The fact that Katniss grows up to have kids is supposed to show the reader that the world has indeed changed for the better. Not wanting kids was conditional, and the conditions changed.
Also, just– that’s the point, that gale does it. That’s the other point Suzanne Collins likes to make, and if you look at her earlier Gregor the Overlander she makes it even more brutally clear. war lets people do terrible things. war encourages people to do terrible things. some people stop. some people don’t, because they don’t know how, or because they can’t until the war is over, or because they’re just that good at it.
Collins said in an interview that Gale and Peeta were “less as two points in a love triangle, more as two perspectives in the just-war debate” (as in, whether a war is justified) “Katniss isn’t just deciding on a partner; she’s figuring out her own worldview.” And in Katniss’s case, she lost everything to war. She chose to be done with it.
(Mind you, this all being true does not mean you have to either like it, or think Collins managed to pull it off in a satisfying or narratively plausible manner: I don’t! I don’t think you GET to jump from where the main story ended to the epilogue without showing us how they got there because that’s a hard and potentially ugly road. So. among other things i found unsatisfying about it. )
Also, not to insult anyone, but there was literally never a love triangle in The Hunger Games. Initially, Katniss was forced to pretend that she and Peeta were star-crossed lovers so the Capitol audience (upon whom she was dependent) would be invested in their relationship and thus their survival.
Later, after realizing that Peeta’s feelings for her were — inexplicably to Katniss — genuine, Katniss regretted leading him on but if she chose to not lead the audience on, neither she nor Peeta would have survived. Period. The Hunger Games is a story of the optics of war centered around a teenage girl, and as survival was the goal, faking the relationship with Peeta was the smart choice. She felt guilty about it and if you read the books she frequently ruminates over how she believes Peeta is a much better person than her, how he deserves to survive more than her, how he is kind and gentle and warm, unlike (she thinks) her.
Gale, in contrast, is justifiably angry at the Capitol for their farce of the Hunger Games, how they plunge the districts into poverty and waste so they can profit off their time and labor without recompense, and division between the merchants and the people of the Seam, between all of the districts, for the Capitol’s benefit. Gale has lived his entire life impoverished and exploited, just like Katniss, and both frequently break the law so they can keep themselves and their families fed. Before she was sent to the Capitol, Gale was the person who understood Katniss best.
What Gale doesn’t realize after she returns is that Katniss has learned that killing innocent Capitol civilians and forcing them into the poverty the districts endured isn’t going to fix anything. It just prolongs more suffering. Katniss desires peace; Gale craves revenge.
Peeta has known this the entire time.
The bomb that killed Prim was designed to kill innocents. The Capitol delivered life-saving supplies to tributes in the arena with silver parachutes. Gale’s plan was to do something similar, to deliver bombs packaged in those same silver parachutes to Capitol citizens. They would reach out eagerly for them thinking that they were food or medicine, and then some of the bombs would go off. Those Capitol citizens would be killed and injured. Other people would rush in to help them, to get them out. And then the rest of the bombs would go off. And these people being killed are not President Snow or the Gamemakers; they’re just people in the Capitol who have been fed this lie that the districts want to hurt them and they have no way of fact-checking this information. There’s no point to killing these people.
Prim’s death was senseless for this reason. Even though Gale wasn’t directly responsible for killing Prim — that was confirmed to be Coin to gain Katniss’s loyalty — he came up with the concept and was never able to understand why it was so cruel and pointless.
In the end, Katniss didn’t want to be a part of the Capitol’s Games, and that included not wanting to kill people who had no part in them. She fell in love with Peeta because he felt the same and Gale didn’t.
There was never a love triangle because there were never 2 paths; it was never about Peeta, it was about peace.
Arya Stark and Allies + “Swords”
Fear cuts deeper than swords, she told herself. “Arya.” She whispered the word the first time. The second time she threw it at him. “I am Arya, of House Stark.”
… Polliver had stolen the sword from her when the Mountain’s men took her captive, but when she and the Hound walked into the inn at the crossroads, there it was. The gods wanted me to have it. Not the Seven, nor Him of Many Faces, but her father’s gods, the old gods of the north.
The Many-Faced God can have the rest, she thought, but he can’t have this.
thinking about that quote that’s like “it’s better to know one book intimately than a hundred superficially” and how a lot of readers and social media try and pressure others to read a million books super fast and complete absurd book challenges when everyone has different lifestyles and different amounts of time to read. forcing others to go through books like cigarettes stops a lot of readers from really enjoying what they’re reading. what’s the point then? if you can’t properly analyze and enjoy what you’re reading? appreciating books takes time and that’s okay
Happy International Women’s Day!
you have invited strangers into your home, helen pevensie, mother of four.
without the blurred sight of joy and relief, it has become impossible to ignore. all the love inside you cannot keep you from seeing the truth. your children are strangers to you. the country has seen them grow taller, your youngest daughter’s hair much longer than you would have it all years past. their hands have more strength in them, their voices ring with an odd lilt and their eyes—it has become hard to look at them straight on, hasn’t it? your children have changed, helen, and as much as you knew they would grow a little in the time away from you, your children have become strangers.
your youngest sings songs you do not know in a language that makes your chest twist in odd ways. you watch her dance in floating steps, bare feet barely touching the dewy grass. when you try and make her wear her sister’s old shoes—growing out of her own faster than you think she ought to—, she looks at you as though you are the child instead of her. her fingers brush leaves with tenderness, and you swear your daughter’s gentle hum makes the drooping plant stand taller than before. you follow her eager leaps to her siblings, her enthusiasm the only thing you still recognise from before the country. yet, she laughs strangely, no longer the giggling girl she used to be but free in a way you have never seen. her smile can drop so fast now, her now-old eyes can turn distant and glassy, and her tears, now rarer, are always silent. it scares you to wonder what robbed her of the heaving sobs a child ought to make use of in the face of upset.
your other daughter—older than your youngest yet still at an age that she cannot be anything but a child—smiles with all the knowledge in the world sitting in the corner of her mouth. her voice is even, without all traces of the desperate importance her peers carry still, that she used to fill her siblings’ ears with at all hours of the day. she folds her hands in her lap with patience and soothes the ache of war in your mind before you even realise she has started speaking. you watch her curl her hair with careful, steady fingers and a straight back, her words a melody as she tells your eldest which move to make without so much a glance at the board off to her right. she reads still, and what a relief you find this sliver of normalcy, even if she’s started taking notes in a shorthand you couldn’t even think to decipher. even if you feel her slipping away, now more like one of the young, confident women in town than a child desperately wishing for a mother’s approval.
your younger son reads plenty as well these days, and it fills you with pride. he is quiet now, sitting still when you find him bent over a book in the armchair of his father. he looks at you with eyes too knowing for a petulant child on the cusp of puberty, and no longer beats his fists against the furniture when one of his siblings dares approach him. he has settled, you realise one evening when you walk into the living room and find him writing in a looping script you don’t recognise, so different from the scratched signature he carved into the doors of your pantry barely a year ago. he speaks sense to your youngest and eldest, respects their contributions without jest. you watch your two middle children pass a book back and forth, each a pen in hand and sheets of paper bridging the gap between them, his face opening up with a smile rather than a scowl. it freezes you mid-step to find such simple joy in him. remember when you sent them away, helen, and how long it had been since he allowed you to see a smile then?
your eldest doesn’t sleep anymore. none of your children care much for bedtimes these days, but at least sleep still finds them. it’s not restful, you know it from the startled yelps that fill the house each night, but they sleep. your eldest makes sure of it. you have not slept through a night since the war began, so it’s easy to discover the way he wanders the halls like a ghost, silent and persistent in a duty he carries with pride. each door is opened, your children soothed before you can even think to make your own way to their beds. his voice sounds deeper than it used to, deeper still than you think possible for a child his age and size. then again, you are never sure if the notches on his door frame are an accurate way to measure whatever it is that makes you feel like your eldest has grown beyond your reach. you watch him open doors, soothe your children, spend his nights in the kitchen, his hands wrapped around a cup of tea with a weariness not even the war should bring to him, not after all the effort you put into keeping him safe.
your children mostly talk to each other now, in a whispered privacy you cannot hope to be a part of. their arms no longer fit around your waist. your daughters are wilder—even your older one, as she carries herself like royalty, has grown teeth too sharp for polite society— and they no longer lean into your hands. your sons are broad-shouldered even before their shirts start being too small again, filling up space you never thought was up for taking. your eldest doesn’t sleep, your middle children take notes when politicians speak on the wireless and shake their heads as though they know better, and your youngest sings for hours in your garden.
who are your children now, helen pevensie, and who pried their childhood out of your shaking hands?
#the lion the witch and the wardrobe is a horror story (via @linkswings)
suzanne collins killing prim after everything katniss did to save her.......... THATS how you write a story about the brutality and futility of war ma'am thats what we call a compelling and fucked up narrative yessums thats storytelling babes!!!!
“That was one of the first questions I asked her when we sat down: 'Did you always know that [Prim] was going to die?' And she said, 'Oh yeah, of course, that's the whole point.'” (x)
FANTASY MEDIA TO INSPIRE SETTINGS : PART 2
this is a part 2 to my fantasy books to inspire your rps post, also known as please stop making harry potter rps
Keep reading
And again she looked at Faramir. ‘No longer do I desire to be a queen,’ she said. Then Faramir laughed merrily. ‘That is well,’ he said; ‘for I am not a king. Yet I will wed with the White Lady of Rohan, if it be her will. And if she will, then let us cross the River and in happier days let us dwell in fair Ithilien and there make a garden. All things will grow with joy there, if the White Lady comes.’
funniest thing in the lord of the rings is how no one can kill gollum because whenever they get close they're like "oh my god he's so pathetic and ugly i can't bear to fucking look at him. jesus christ." so they just imprison him and then he slips through the fucking bars like a looney tunes character. and this happens multiple times.
what better birthday gift than to be trending on Twitter
yet another howl and sophie post movie i guess, i wanted to give a spin on their classic clothes, white shirt - black pants and blue dress but i can’t not give sophie her final-scene-white-hat
Also ruffles. Just…. ruffles.
YOU CAN NOW GET IT AS A PRINT HEREEE
the way I know in my soul that if percy flipped and went against the gods, nico would be such a sinister right hand man..
These tags *chef’s kiss*