Perhaps we&#x27;ll have to agree to disagree.

resonantrepetition:

Perfect, then, thank you.

Should you ever need my attention, I assure you my DMs are open. I don’t bite. My musical talents likely aren’t particularly helpful, but I’m also a seamstress and a chef should the occasion ever arise.

ehehehe

good two know, and generou2 of you

II followed becau2e you’re talkiing two my moiiraiil about beiing a kniight of doom! And II thiink that2 pretty neat, and iit look2 liike you u2e doom way diifferently than II do, whiich ii2n’t that 2urprii2iing 2iince the bard of doom II know ii2 al2o extremely diifferent

#I did extensive research on the class/aspect system during my session.#Though I'll admit I focused more on more 'conventionally' useful aspects.

It seems as though every player uses their aspect drastically different from the next. The beauty of the classpect system, I suppose, though I’ll admit Knight is quite an unfortunate class for someone opposed to violence. There’s always much to learn from how other peoples interpret and make use of their aspect.

A pleasure to make acquaintance with another Doom player, of course.

resonantrepetition:

The information is very much appreciated. Monsieur Artifex would be it, then?

iit would be! iif you want two go wiith that 0u0

#I make so much more food than I could ever eat.#It's a problem.#I'm five feet tall.

Perfect, then, thank you.

Should you ever need my attention, I assure you my DMs are open. I don’t bite. My musical talents likely aren’t particularly helpful, but I’m also a seamstress and a chef should the occasion ever arise.

@resonantrepetition hey thank2 for the follow back, II’m Artiifex Captor, the 2aboteur

But of course.

My name is Echo Taeper. It’s a pleasure to make your acquaintance. You may feel free to refer to me as you please.

IIt2 niice two meet you, Taeper. Artiifex *ii2* actually my formal name, iif iit make2 any diifference two you, II don’t u2e my iinformal addre22 on tumblr u2ually

#I'll keep a mental note.#I do much better with remembering sounds than text so do forgive me in advance.

The information is very much appreciated. Monsieur Artifex would be it, then?

@resonantrepetition hey thank2 for the follow back, II’m Artiifex Captor, the 2aboteur

#I will always default to last names and madam/monsieur as I find formality to be the best way to go about things.#But if this makes you uncomfortable to any degree please do inform me so I may rectify it.

But of course.

My name is Echo Taeper. It’s a pleasure to make your acquaintance. You may feel free to refer to me as you please.

resonantrepetition:

The surface level applications very much are. I am a strict pacifist for personal reasons, so these applications had no use to me beyond Sburb. The nature of one’s aspect alone does not indicate the nature of the person.

I’ve made quite considerable progress with practical applications, albeit strange. It turns out to be incredibly easy to make objects function better than normal after they’ve been broken.

mmh, yeah, pretty sure everyone i know with a classpect is post-game. so it makes sense that i wouldnt see only those surface applications. i presumed that the nature didnt indicate that of the person, just - exposure bias? ive never seen doom used that way, so i never thought of it that way, thats all. sorry, i used too many words again, didnt i?

thats fascinating. do you have any idea as to why? and what would qualify as a thing in this situation?

#You very much could determine it the other way around yes.

Not at all. I’d be a terrible hypocrite if I were to judge someone for using too many words.

Fortunately, god-tier abilities can be very loosely interpreted by their definitions. Knights, such as myself, typically bend their aspect to their will. Thus, if something is broken and as such having succumbed to Doom, I can make use of it and improve upon it.

I’ve been bending this as far as I possibly can, in hopes that I may be able to “enchant” objects to be more useful than their mundane counterparts. I would prefer not to need to break things before doing so. The noise is wretched.

Do you see?

Do you see what absolute buffoonery I have to deal with? Who do you think your are, traipsing in here with your greens and blues? You mock me.

Oh, you poor dears.

#Vague.#Dashwatching.

resonantrepetition:

I’ve been god-tiered as a Knight of Doom for two years, though I largely avoided most experimentation due to the volatile and often violent nature of the aspect. I’ve only recently been investigating more practical uses of it.

huh! cool, i think? i, uh, full disclosure, i understood only parts of that. i didnt know doom was violent! i mean. i guess that makes sense given the name? but the only other people i know of as being connected to doom are like….incredibly sweet? like, kris, one of my three close friends, and fex, my moirail, so. i havent really seen it applied like that?

have you made any progress with the practical uses?

#Due to destruction being a feature of Doom of course.#Classpects are assigned based on the personality of a person.#One can figure out a *lot* about someone from a classpect alone should one do enough digging.

The surface level applications very much are. I am a strict pacifist for personal reasons, so these applications had no use to me beyond Sburb. The nature of one’s aspect alone does not indicate the nature of the person.

I’ve made quite considerable progress with practical applications, albeit strange. It turns out to be incredibly easy to make objects function better than normal after they’ve been broken.

resonantrepetition:

Your consideration is very much appreciated, but truly, I don’t wish to be a hassle. I’m certain with enough experimenting with Doom I likely will figure out a fix after a small headache or three.

well, good luck! i have to say that experimentation can be awfully fun!

how long have you been - uh, words. not godmodded. uh. tiers?

#Feel free to psychoanalyze my classpect as you wish dashwatchers.#I was the same.#When I was sixteen.

I’ve been god-tiered as a Knight of Doom for two years, though I largely avoided most experimentation due to the volatile and often violent nature of the aspect. I’ve only recently been investigating more practical uses of it.

resonantrepetition:

Oh, goodness. I’m both a seamstress and a composer that uses pen and paper. Where would I start? I would never make you put in such labor.

ah, well - the paper may be a lost cause without magic, im afraid, although i am skilled enough with fire to likely take the lipstick and leave the paper unburnt.

as for the clothes - its difficult, but if approached correctly manageable. i could always direct you to my employee, xefros, if youd like? he does excellent work and is almost always looking for more, the dear.