Riaz Uddin Roney

Designing web & mobile apps that users love. Let’s connect and discuss building amazing digital products for your startup! #UXDesigner https://riazuddinroney.com/

[riazuddinroney]

From Voice to Interface: The New Era of Vibe Design

A designer opens their laptop, not to draw wireframes, but to describe an idea.

Create a clean fintech dashboard with transaction history, charts, and quick actions.

Within seconds, a structured interface appears. Layout, hierarchy, components—already in place. No dragging, no manual alignment, no starting from a blank canvas.

This is not a concept anymore. This is what tools like Google’s upgraded Stitch are beginning to offer.

By introducing features like voice input, an infinite canvas, AI-assisted critiques, and instant prototyping, Stitch is turning the design process into something more conversational. Instead of building step by step, designers can now express intent and let the system generate a starting point.

It feels fast. Almost too fast.

For years, designers have been trained to think through problems carefully—mapping user flows, structuring layouts, testing assumptions. The process was slow for a reason. It encouraged reflection and iteration.

Now, that process is being compressed.

On one side, this is incredibly empowering. Designers can explore more ideas in less time. Startups can validate concepts faster. Product teams can move from idea to prototype without long delays. Creativity becomes less constrained by time and more driven by exploration.

But there is another side to this shift.

When tools generate solutions instantly, there is a risk of skipping the thinking behind them. The danger is not that AI produces bad designs, but that humans might accept outputs too quickly without questioning them.

Design is not just about creating interfaces. It is about understanding people.

AI can generate a layout, but it does not experience frustration, confusion, or satisfaction the way users do. That understanding still comes from designers.

This is why the idea of a “vibe design partner” is both exciting and complex. It suggests collaboration between human and machine. But like any partnership, the outcome depends on how both sides contribute.

The designers who benefit most from this shift will not be those who rely entirely on AI, but those who use it as a starting point. They will question outputs, refine ideas, and bring human insight into the process.

In a way, AI is changing not just how we design, but how we think about design.

Instead of asking how to build something, designers may start asking how to guide the system to build the right thing.

That is a subtle but powerful shift.

As you imagine your future workflow, would you trust AI to generate your first draft, or would you still prefer to start from scratch and build your ideas manually?

[riazuddinroney]

Why Humans Still Matter in an AI-Driven World

A designer once used an AI tool to generate a complete interface in minutes. The layout looked clean, the typography was balanced, and the overall structure seemed polished. On the surface, it appeared that the tool had done an impressive job.

But when the design was tested with real users, something unexpected happened.

Users felt confused. They struggled to complete tasks. The flow did not match their expectations. Despite looking visually correct, the design failed to solve the actual problem.

This situation highlights a key truth about AI.

AI can generate outputs, but it does not understand problems in the same way humans do.

The tool followed patterns based on existing data, but it lacked the context needed to create a truly effective solution. It did not know the users, their frustrations, or their goals. That understanding still came from the designer.

This is why the relationship between AI and humans is not one of replacement, but of collaboration.

AI tools empower humans by speeding up execution. They allow designers to generate ideas quickly and explore multiple directions. But humans empower AI by providing meaning, context, and purpose.

Without human input, AI outputs risk becoming generic.

For creators, product teams, and entrepreneurs, this creates a new kind of responsibility. The goal is no longer just to produce work, but to guide the tools that produce it.

The most impactful results come from combining AI speed with human insight.

As AI continues to evolve, the role of humans becomes even more important, not less. Creativity, empathy, and critical thinking are what transform raw outputs into meaningful experiences.

So while AI may handle the work, humans still shape the outcome.

When you use AI tools in your workflow, are you guiding the process with intention, or simply accepting whatever the tool generates?

[riazuddinroney]

From Idea to Interface Faster Than Ever: 5 Free AI Tools Changing UX in 2026

A few years ago, designing a new interface often meant starting with a blank canvas. Designers would sketch ideas, build wireframes, refine layouts, and iterate slowly until the final product began to take shape.

While that process still exists, something new is transforming the design workflow today: artificial intelligence.

In 2026, designers are discovering that AI can act as a creative assistant rather than a replacement. Tools like Figma AI, Framer AI, Uizard, UX Pilot, and Google Stitch are becoming part of the modern design toolkit.

Figma AI helps designers quickly explore layout possibilities. Instead of manually adjusting every element, designers can generate variations and focus more on refining the experience.

Framer AI is helping designers create interactive experiences more easily. Startups and product teams often use it to turn ideas into working prototypes quickly.

Uizard takes a different approach. It focuses on transforming simple ideas, sketches, or prompts into digital interfaces. For designers working on early concepts, this can dramatically speed up brainstorming sessions.

UX Pilot focuses on improving the structure of the user experience itself, offering suggestions that help designers build clearer user flows.

Google Stitch supports consistency by helping teams organize interface structures and design systems.

The beauty of these tools is not automation alone. It is the freedom they create. Designers can experiment more, explore different directions, and refine ideas without spending hours on repetitive tasks.

In many ways, AI tools are allowing designers to focus on what matters most: understanding users and creating meaningful experiences.

As these tools continue to evolve, designers will likely discover new ways to combine creativity and AI assistance to build better digital products.

Which AI design tool do you find most exciting right now?

[riazuddinroney]

Why Real Users Care More About Speed Than Beautiful UI

Design inspiration is everywhere today. Platforms like Dribbble, Behance, and various design galleries provide endless streams of beautifully crafted interfaces. These platforms have helped designers explore creativity and push visual boundaries. They encourage experimentation, bold layouts, and imaginative concepts that inspire the design community.

However, inspiration can sometimes create an illusion about what successful design actually means.

When designers spend a lot of time consuming highly polished visual work, it becomes easy to assume that design success is measured by how impressive a screen looks. The number of likes, shares, or comments can feel like validation that a design is effective. But outside the design community, real users rarely evaluate products this way.

Most users interact with digital products because they want to accomplish something quickly. They might be paying a bill, booking a ride, checking their email, or tracking an order. In these moments, they are not thinking about the design as an artistic creation. Instead, they are focused on completing a task with minimal effort.

This is where the true purpose of UX design becomes clear.

Good user experience design removes friction from the process of achieving a goal. It simplifies navigation, clarifies choices, and makes interactions predictable. When a product is well designed, users do not have to pause and think about what to do next. The interface guides them naturally toward completion.

Unfortunately, designs created primarily to impress other designers sometimes introduce unnecessary complexity. A creative layout may look interesting, but if it makes information harder to scan, it becomes a usability problem. An elaborate animation might look beautiful in a portfolio, but if it delays user interaction, it becomes an obstacle.

Real users value speed and clarity more than visual spectacle.

This does not mean visual design should be ignored. A thoughtful interface can build trust, communicate professionalism, and strengthen brand identity. But aesthetics should support the experience rather than distract from it. Every visual decision should ultimately help the user move forward more easily.

The most successful digital products often share one important characteristic: they respect the user’s time. Their interfaces are structured to minimize effort and reduce confusion. Instead of asking users to adapt to the design, the design adapts to the user.

Designers who understand this perspective approach their work differently. They focus less on creating screens that look impressive in isolation and more on creating flows that feel effortless in real use. They observe user behavior, test interactions, and refine experiences based on real feedback.

The result is a product that quietly works.

Users may never praise the design publicly, but they continue using the product because it consistently helps them achieve their goals.

That quiet success is the real measure of great UX.

When designing your next feature or interface, it might be helpful to pause and think about the person who will actually use it. They may be tired, distracted, or in a hurry.

With that in mind, are you designing an experience that impresses designers, or one that genuinely helps users finish what they started?

[riazuddinroney]

Dribbble vs. Mobbin: How Top Designers Turn Ideas into Actionable Patterns

Scrolling through Dribbble can feel like a creative adventure. Stunning visuals, playful concepts, and endless “what if?” scenarios fuel your imagination. But as inspiring as this may be, it’s not always actionable. Likes, shares, and admiration don’t translate to user adoption or conversion.

That’s why designers turn to Mobbin. It’s a repository of real-world design patterns implemented in live products, showing “how it is” rather than “what could be.” Mobbin gives insight into what works, helping designers avoid guesswork and focus on functionality, accessibility, and measurable results.

For designers, product managers, and entrepreneurs, the key is knowing when to explore ideas and when to implement tested patterns. Use Dribbble to ignite your creativity and Mobbin to execute solutions that have been proven to succeed.

By combining the two, you can design smarter, not just prettier, during your sprints. It’s not about choosing inspiration over practicality—it’s about blending both for maximum impact.

How do you decide which creative ideas are worth implementing in your design projects?

[riazuddinroney]

Why Dribbble Isn’t the Same as Real UX

The first time I discovered Dribbble, I was amazed.

Every design looked perfect. Bright colors, elegant layouts, and smooth animations filled the screen. It felt like stepping into a world where every interface was a masterpiece.

But after working on real products, I realized something interesting.

Most real products don’t look like Dribbble shots.

And that’s actually a good thing.

Dribbble reminds me of a fashion runway. On the runway, designers present bold and imaginative clothing that grabs attention. The goal is creativity and inspiration.

But everyday fashion is different.

People choose clothes that are comfortable, practical, and suitable for daily life.

UX design follows the same idea.

Real users don’t open apps to admire the interface. They open them because they need to accomplish something. They want to complete tasks quickly and without confusion.

Great UX helps them do exactly that.

Instead of dramatic visuals, it focuses on clarity. Instead of complex interactions, it simplifies workflows. Instead of impressing users, it supports them.

And that’s why good UX often goes unnoticed.

When the experience works well, users move smoothly through the product. They don’t think about the interface—they simply reach their goals.

It’s like wearing comfortable shoes.

You rarely think about them when they fit perfectly. But the moment they’re uncomfortable, you notice immediately.

Digital products work the same way.

Bad UX creates friction. Good UX removes it.

So while Dribbble is an incredible place for creative inspiration, it represents only one side of design.

Real UX lives in the everyday experience of users trying to get things done.

And sometimes, the best design isn’t the one that looks the most impressive.

It’s the one that feels the easiest to use.

What design do you personally value more—visually stunning interfaces or seamless user experiences?

[riazuddinroney]

Designing a My Course Screen for an EdTech Online Learning Mobile App That Learners Want to Return To

The My Course screen is where motivation either survives or fades.

When designing this screen, I focused on how learners actually feel when they return—often busy, distracted, and unsure where they left off. Instead of adding features, I removed friction. Courses are grouped by status because users think in progress, not categories. This eliminates unnecessary decisions.

Progress bars play a quiet but important role. They aren’t just indicators; they’re reassurance. They tell users, “You’re moving forward.” Supporting details like ratings and lesson counts build trust without pulling attention away from the main action: continuing the course.

Visually, the layout favors scanning over exploration. Spacing, hierarchy, and typography are tuned for speed and calm—especially important for users opening the app multiple times a day.

This screen isn’t about looking impressive. It’s about making learners feel confident enough to keep going.

What small UX detail do you think has the biggest impact on user motivation?

[riazuddinroney]

Designing a Course Detail Screen That Reduces Doubt Instead of Adding Pressure

This course detail screen was designed around a simple UX truth: learners hesitate when they feel uncertain.

Instead of treating the screen as a marketing surface, I approached it as a decision-support space. The layout prioritizes trust signals early—course title clarity, instructor identity, student count, and ratings—so users can evaluate credibility before thinking about cost.

Pricing is transparent and placed intentionally after value indicators to avoid early friction. The course description focuses on outcomes rather than features, helping learners understand what they’ll gain. Lesson previews act as a confidence layer, allowing users to experience structure and depth before committing.

One of the biggest challenges was information balance. Too much detail overwhelms; too little creates doubt. Progressive disclosure helped manage complexity—showing essentials first and depth only when needed.

This screen doesn’t push users forward. It respects their decision-making process.

If you redesigned this screen, what would you simplify first?

[riazuddinroney]

Designing an EdTech Mobile App Home Screen That Helps Learners Decide Faster

This EdTech mobile app home screen began with a behavioral problem, not a visual one. Learners often open learning apps with motivation but leave without starting anything. The challenge was helping users move from intent to action without feeling overwhelmed.

The UX process focused on clarity and confidence. A personalized welcome establishes relevance. Search supports goal-driven users. Categories are icon-based to reduce reading effort and support scanning behavior. Instead of long descriptions, popular courses and instructors provide social proof—helping users trust their choice quickly.

One of the hardest design challenges was restraint. It’s tempting to show everything. Instead, I used progressive disclosure to reveal only what supports the next decision. Spacing, hierarchy, and visual rhythm quietly guide users forward.

This screen isn’t about showcasing content. It’s about reducing friction between curiosity and learning.

If you were measuring success for this screen, what outcome would matter most to you?

[riazuddinroney]

UX Thinking Behind a Healthtech Telemedicine Mobile App - Live Video Calling Screen

Live video calling is the most emotionally charged moment in a telemedicine journey. When I designed this screen, I didn’t start with components—I started with feelings. Patients arrive here with questions, uncertainty, and often anxiety.

That insight shaped the hierarchy. The doctor’s video dominates the screen to reinforce presence and trust. UI elements intentionally step back, remaining familiar and predictable so users never have to think about how to interact during the conversation.

One of the biggest challenges was balancing simplicity with control. Users must feel empowered without being overwhelmed. I solved this by limiting visible actions to essential ones and placing them where muscle memory expects them. Subtle signals like call duration and connection status quietly reassure users without interrupting focus.

This design doesn’t aim to impress visually. It aims to disappear—so the human connection can lead.

If healthcare UX is about trust, what moment in the journey deserves the most design attention?

[riazuddinroney]

Designing Trust: UX Thinking Behind a Doctor Detail Screen for a Healthtech Telemedicine Mobile App

In telemedicine, the Doctor Detail screen is where uncertainty peaks. Users pause here. They evaluate. They decide. My UX goal was to support that decision without pressure.

I approached this screen as a trust-building narrative. The doctor’s identity, expertise, experience, and availability are arranged in a clear visual flow so users don’t hunt for reassurance—it finds them. Typography and spacing emphasize readability, while visual hierarchy separates credibility signals from action points.

The biggest challenge was information density. Medical profiles carry a lot of data, but too much at once creates doubt. I solved this by prioritizing what matters most at decision time and progressively revealing secondary details.

The CTA placement was intentionally delayed until trust signals were established. In healthtech, pushing action too early can feel aggressive. This design lets confidence form first, then invites action.

Good UX here isn’t about persuasion—it’s about respect.

What signals help you feel confident enough to book a doctor digitally?

[riazuddinroney]

Designing a Telemedicine App Home Screen for People Who Are Already Stressed

When users open a telemedicine app, they’re rarely relaxed. They’re worried, uncertain, and often in a hurry. That reality shaped every UX decision behind this home screen.

The primary goal was clarity. A dominant search experience supports urgency, while specialist categories rely on recognition instead of memory to reduce cognitive effort. Rather than overwhelming users with options, the interface guides them step by step.

Trust became the most complex challenge. Doctor cards were designed to answer critical questions instantly—credibility, relevance, and affordability. Ratings, reviews, specialty, and pricing appear upfront to minimize hesitation and reduce unnecessary taps.

Even the visual language plays a functional role. Soft spacing, rounded components, and a restrained color palette help lower emotional tension. In healthcare, visual calm is usability.

This design reflects a core UX belief of mine: when users feel vulnerable, clarity and reassurance matter more than novelty.

How do you intentionally design for emotional comfort in digital health products?

[riazuddinroney]

Designing a Transactions Screen That Reduces Financial Anxiety

Most people don’t open a transactions screen out of curiosity. They open it to confirm something, to double-check, or to feel reassured. That insight shaped every decision in this fintech Transactions screen.

I placed the total transaction value at the top to give users immediate context before asking them to interpret details. The time-range filters were designed to feel lightweight — quick comparisons without forcing users into advanced analytics.

The bar chart intentionally avoids visual noise. It shows trends, not decoration. In fintech, overly expressive charts can undermine trust. Simplicity communicates stability.

For the transaction list, I optimized for recognition over reading. Clear merchant names, subtle icons, and color-coded amounts allow users to scan confidently, even during stressful moments.

The real challenge wasn’t designing features — it was removing distractions. When money is involved, calm interfaces build confidence faster than clever interactions.

When you review transactions, what helps you feel most at ease?

[riazuddinroney]

Designing a My Wallet Screen for a Fintech eWallet App That Builds Trust in Seconds

Designing a fintech wallet screen is less about visuals and more about psychology. When I worked on this My Wallet screen, my primary question was simple: what does a user need to see first to feel safe?

The answer was clarity. I placed the total balance at the top with strong visual hierarchy so users can instantly confirm their financial state. Quick action buttons follow immediately, reducing friction for frequent tasks like adding money or managing cards. These actions are visually distinct but not overwhelming, keeping decision-making effortless.

Transaction history is designed for scanability. Clear labels, color-coded amounts, and predictable spacing help users verify activity without reading every line. This is especially important in fintech, where uncertainty creates anxiety. I intentionally avoided visual noise so users could trust the data, not question it.

Every spacing, icon, and alignment choice serves one goal: confidence. Instead of showing more features, I focused on showing the right information at the right moment.

If users only glance at a wallet screen for three seconds, what must they understand immediately?

[riazuddinroney]

Designed a Fintech eWallet Mobile App Home Screen That Feels Calm, Not Crowded

When users open a fintech app, they aren’t exploring—they’re checking. That mindset shaped every decision in this eWallet home screen design.

The balance is placed front and center because clarity builds trust. Before users move money, they want certainty. Primary actions like Transfer, Withdraw, and Pay Bill are immediately accessible to reduce friction and support muscle memory.

Quick Transfer was designed around repetition. Most users send money to the same people, so familiar faces replace long lists. This small shift reduces cognitive effort and makes the experience feel more human.

Transactions are structured for scanning, not reading. Visual hierarchy and color help users understand inflow and outflow instantly, without tapping deeper.

The biggest challenge was restraint. Fintech products tend to grow quickly, but confidence drops when screens feel busy. Progressive disclosure helped keep the interface calm today while scalable for tomorrow.

Good fintech UX doesn’t demand attention—it earns trust.

What makes a financial app feel trustworthy the moment it opens?

[riazuddinroney]

Designing a My Cart Screen That Reduces Checkout Anxiety

The cart screen is where many good shopping experiences quietly fail.

When designing this My Cart screen, I treated it as an emotional checkpoint, not a summary page. Users arrive here with intent—but also doubt. So every design decision focused on reducing anxiety and reinforcing trust.

Product cards are clean and editable. Users can adjust quantities or remove items without leaving the screen, which keeps them in control. Pricing is broken down into clear components: product subtotal, delivery, discounts, and final total. No surprises. No hidden costs.

The promo code input appears before the total, reinforcing value at the exact moment users evaluate price. The Checkout button is visually strong but calm, anchored so the next step is always obvious without being aggressive.

Good UX doesn’t push users to buy. It reassures them they already made the right choice.

Which moment in your checkout flow do users hesitate the most?

[riazuddinroney]

Designing an eCommerce Fashion & Apparel Mobile App - Product Details Screen That Actually Converts

This product details screen of an eCommerce Fashion & Apparel Mobile App started with one core problem: users love browsing fashion apps, but hesitate at the moment of purchase.

To solve that, I focused on decision confidence. The layout places the product image front and center to build emotional connection first. Variant selectors for color and size are intentionally simple, minimizing cognitive load while keeping options visible. The pricing and rating are positioned to reinforce trust before asking for action.

Spacing, typography, and contrast work together to support scanning. Instead of overwhelming users with information, the description is structured for progressive reading—users can dive deeper only if they need to.

The Add to Cart button is persistent and visually dominant, ensuring the primary action is never lost. This isn’t about pushing users—it’s about guiding them when they’re ready.

Good eCommerce UX doesn’t rush users. It removes uncertainty.

If you had to redesign one product details screen today, what single change would most improve buyer confidence?