A Bug! 🐀

the hip new zone   (she/her)🏳️‍⚧️

[rodentian]

oh and incase anyone asks in the future, the header is MAP02 of the Doom megawad Lost Civilization by Jaska

[happypineappleart]

[zethsgraphix]

here's an aesthetic i think a lot of you like but don't know the name of: frutiger aero! mainly popular from around 2005-2013. basically.... lots of shiny and glossy things! also sometimes nature themes! c: these are web examples.

please check my other posts for more about it!

[ultra-nohai]

#AIisUseless

[star01007]

[sillydegu]

Maple's Pancakes by Pawlove

[mylifeinwindows]

[mylifeinwindows]

[sweetheart-haely]

Parigul loves nothing more than screaming a warcry from atop a speeding Trukk, or preferably, from atop a wreckin' ball on a Trukk. Literally leaping into the fray makes his life

Blue and purple- okay okay but really, I used the muted green as an offplay this time. Also, this dude's pose, while silly, is kind of energetic. I feel like doing something with that...

36/100

[mylifeinwindows]

it's getting late..computer time is almost up ۫ ּ ⊹ ִ˖

[mastomysowner]

hotelratau

[otterpuppss]

king chubbs (in profile)

[vintagewildlife]

Roland, an elephant seal who lived at the Berlin Zoo 1935

[filigreefields]

“Emile Corsi” is not real. anything claiming to be done by an artist named Emile Corsi is ai generated art, it does not exist. what’s worse is that the person behind this “artist”, these “artworks” is that they are falsifying the historical record. these images are not from the 1800s; they were not generated until just a few weeks ago… this is intentional misinformation folks

here’s an article that talks about it and gives some tips on how to identify ai, beyond the member’s only wall it goes on to tell us that research is the biggest tool in pinpointing misinformation from ai art to radical claims in the news cycle. even just simply looking something up is enough to help counter misinformation

It’s Not About the Hands: Identifying AI Art

Identifying AI art should be an exercise in research skills, not finding “tells.”

[bogleech]

Yes unfortunately we are FAR beyond the point at which the actual "quality" or "mistakes" in AI art are giveaways, and that was always a foolish standard to have because real artists also make those mistakes. I even know artists who always liked painting figures with surreal many-fingered hands. And I know artists who spent their whole lives honing a shiny, 3-d looking, realistically textured style that now gets their work retroactively accused of being fake, despite being older than public AI generators. There was never a style or motifs unique to AI art, because it based itself on styles artists already developed by artists for generations. It still has enough repetitive quirks that I can correctly pick it out quite often, but I still get fooled, and I hate saying I find myself assuming some things must be AI art now that were in fact fully hand drawn.

[marissasketch]

Quick style and color experiment featuring some lil dinos

[girlnephew]

[thbstvrdthmtlbndndntn]

I don’t have anyone to send this to so I’m posting it here bc it made me laugh so hard I don’t want to lose it when twitter dies

[parkchanwoohoo]