I did read the Angelica biography by Molly Beer. I found it not bad! I hated the last ten years of her life being condensed into one chapter though.
occasionally subtle

Discoholic 🪩
Stranger Things

祝日 / Permanent Vacation

blake kathryn
will byers stan first human second

Origami Around
Today's Document
h
RMH
Monterey Bay Aquarium

Love Begins

⁂
tumblr dot com
ojovivo
hello vonnie
Peter Solarz
Cosmic Funnies
almost home

tannertan36

seen from T1
seen from Poland

seen from Malaysia

seen from Canada
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Malaysia

seen from South Africa

seen from France

seen from Canada
seen from United States

seen from France
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from France
seen from United Kingdom

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
@runawayforthesummer
I did read the Angelica biography by Molly Beer. I found it not bad! I hated the last ten years of her life being condensed into one chapter though.
Unfortunately this was NOT GOOD
Hi! Hope you are well. I noticed you made a recent post and had a quick question for you. So I was scrolling through iaintapatientphase tumblr and saw an interesting response to one of her post about Hamilton on his death bed. You said Hamilton told his friends that they couldn’t marry Eliza after he died...is that true? I can’t find any information on it. And it sounds ridiculous but totally in character. Can you expand on this? I really need to know more about Hamilton telling his friends he they can’t become his kids step father lol
I was just joking. Sorry if I got anyone excited!
Slutshaming women is not ok Slutshaming Alexander Hamilton is totally ok Tumblr logic
he cheated. on his wife.
he’s also been dead for several hundred years this is the funniest post ive ever read in my life
fave things about this post:
the idea that thousands of people are calling alexander hamilton a slut
calling any founding father a slut
the idea that people are SHAMING Alexander Hamilton for being Such A Slut he is being SHAMED for being such a naughty little tart, SPREADING HIS LEGS FOR EVERYONE IN CONGRESS
that this was probably prompted by people expression dissaproval for Alexander Hamilton cheating on his wife - that the OP thinks “slut shaming” and “Isnt it gross that he cheated on his wife” are the same thing
Alexander Hamilton has been dead for 210
210 slutty, slutty years
the way that this is presented in such a CHECKMATE SJWS way when they’re talking about a founding father who cheated on his wife and has been DEAD FOR 210 YEARS
the fact that the words “Slutshaming” and “Alexander Hamilton” have been used in the same sentence
i mean just apply what we’d traditionally think of as “slut shaming” to Alexander Hamilton.
His frock coat is too tight, his breaches are so short, have you SEEN how often he powders his wig??? I heard he gave Thomas Jefferson a handy behind the stables AND that he got fingered by John Hancock
i barely know who alexander hamilton is
date of origin: 2014
The Hamilton discourse extends beyond time.
Why am I here? Just to suffer?
Finally I see this on tumblr and not instagram
he has existed for 267 slutty, slutty years
Slutshaming the twink is ALWAYS okay and it’s s fun recreational activity all of us prticipate in 🥰
Hamilton shitposting looooooooong predates the musical
“This country was founded by a group of slave owners who told us that all men are created equal. To my mind, that is what’s known as being stunningly and embarrassingly full of shit.” - George Carlin
…PolitiFact going through history to fact check this guy was like that time CNN went through history to dig up dirt on Bernie, and all they found were videos of him planting trees, and telling kids that racism is bad.
Nothing shows the United States’ cultural Christianity like the way the Founding Fathers are treated like the Biblical patriarchs (or better) and the way the texts they wrote are treated like divine revelation.
inauguration but make it fashionable 😌✨
#group chat said JEWEL TONES BABES - @themysteryvanishing
I would write an angsty fic from Eliza’s POV based on tolerate it by Taylor Swift
An indifference to property enters into my character too much, and what affects me now as my Betsey is concerned in it, I should have laughed at or not thought of at all a year ago. But I have thoroughly examined my own heart. Beloved by you, I can be happy in any situation, and can struggle with every embarrassment of fortune with patience and firmness. ... My heart overflows with every thing for you, that admiration, esteem and love can inspire. I would this moment give the world to be near you only to kiss your sweet hand. Believe what I say to be truth and imagine what are my feelings when I say it. Let it awake your sympathy and let our hearts melt in a prayer to be soon united, never more to be separated.
source.
Humblelin. That’s the word to describe Lin Manuel. Humble.
Yeah that's exactly what I would call selling enamel pins of your face. Just make an emoji sticker pack, dude.
Some dude in 2020: You should not judge a historical figure, a man from the past, by the modern ethics! He was a product of his time. 500 years ago his actions were completely normal! It’s present-ism, we can’t judge… bla-bla-bla…
People from 500 years ago: Oh my, this guy is such a bastard, a genocidal butcher, a total piece of garbage. Let’s keep records of this douche so people from the future shall hate him too.
Columbus’s crew were writing about what a genocidal monster he was. There were mutinies and uprisings by his crews and colonists constantly. If his contemporaries were willing to risk the ire of the queen of Spain to oppose him, we have every right to call him out on it too.
My fave professor always says “there have always been antiracist people doing antiracist work”. So yeah, I can hold historical peeps to a higher standard because there were good, ethical people who knew better
Saying “you can’t judge the founding fathers on slavery” because “they didn’t know any better” or “that’s just how it was back then” is a cop out. It’s a standard whitewash that is still used to excuse racists today.
And I can promise you that there absolutely positively were people back then who knew slavery was wrong, and voiced their opinion that slavery was evil. Starting with the slaves themselves.
And if the words of the slaves somehow isn’t good enough, then listen to what one of the founding fathers had to say about the evils of slavery: (x)
Saying people didn’t know any better is whitewashing history, and perpetuating a false image of white purity and innocence. Slavers knew exactly what they were doing. All in the name of free labor and profit. The exploitive nature of capitalism hasn’t changed very much. I’ll bet 100 years from now people will argue that Jeff Bezos didn’t know he was risking the lives of his employees in the middle of a pandemic. Because “times were different back then.”
So yeah, people who insist that “times were just different back then” are racism apologists, whether they realize it or not. That worn out excuse is as old as slavery itself. Call those fuckers out.
CALL THOSE FUCKERS OUT.
this is ridiculously funny
@nothisiscarlie
It’s the She and Him Christmas CD for me
IN PHOTOS: Celebrations spread after Joe Biden is projected to win 2020 presidential election
Within seconds of the race being called, a crowd outside the White House broke out in cheers. Celebrations also erupted in New York, Atlanta, Philadelphia, and Chicago, among other cities.
Click here for more.
The Talleyrand Letter
Many, many thanks to @derevko and @intheheightsandfluff for all their work on the french! This post is because of them.
As many people know, the University of Virginia houses a collection of Angelica Schuyler Church letters.
This online exhibit, which is based on a 1996 exhibit they had in their physical library, has descriptions of many letters written to her.
Of most import for the purposes of this post is a letter written by Talleyrand (stealer of portraits) to Angelica soon after his arrival in America. Talleyrand and Angelica were great friends in Europe and she sent Eliza many letters about him.
Here’s a link to the letter and the description UVA gives of the letter. Their description:
Letter of the Marquis de Talleyrand to Angelica Church Philadelphia. May 11, 1794 Talleyrand has left France and has taken the opportunity to renew his friendship with Angelica’s father, Philip Schuyler. He has met Mr. Hamilton, who speaks too much of “grandes personnages,” and notes too little of the beauty of his wife, Angelica’s sister Elizabeth. In a coy compliment, Talleyrand reports that Elizabeth’s beauty resembles her sister’s, but that his own lack of English prevented a comparison of their character: “If she is spiritual, amiable, and has your sensibilité, then there is the resemblance.”
The problem?
That’s really not what he said.
Here’s a translation of the part about the Hamiltons:
Almost every day, I have seen M. Hamilton ; he is accurately described in England as a most deserving man; his conversation on all the events of the envoy and on the great characters playing a part in it surprised me. He knows the envoy like a well observing man who has never left it, even though he has never been there.
Your sister, whom you had told me is so similar to you, does not look like you at all, at least physically; if she is spiritual [witty], amiable, sensible, then she is in those ways similar to you, but I cannot vouch for these myself because she only spoke English to me and I did not have as good a translator with me as when I met your father.
So, let’s break this down, shall we?
1. He’s not saying it’s a bad thing Hamilton knows all these people! He’s saying it’s impressive! Hamilton is well read and educated!
2. Talleyrand says nothing about Ham and Eliza’s relationship or what Ham does or does not notice about his wife?
3. He also says nothing about Eliza’s looks, besides that she doesn’t look like Angelica. He’s like “well, you and your sister don’t really look alike, so it must be in your personalities, but I couldn’t get to know her because of the language barrier.”
So there’s a lot going on and some interesting stuff (like Angelica telling people she and Eliza were similar!), but nothing about Ham’s obsession with famous people or not noticing Eliza.
And because I can’t not take this guy to the fucking cleaner every chance I get, Chernow, who does not source, basically relied on UVA’s description (or someone else using that description) in his book, rather than doing any work himself, saying:
Talleyrand confess to only one complaint about Hamilton: that he was overly enamoured of the grand personages of the day and took too little notice of Eliza’s beauty.
No, Chernow, that’s absolutely not what he said.
Hi! Hope you're doing well these days! :) So I've been reading through your Eliza tag (again) and one of many things struck me (I'll try not to bombard you with them) - Charles Talleyrand noted at one point that Hamilton did not appear to appreciate Eliza's beauty. Do we know any details of what caused the man to think so? I mean, Hamilton makes it pretty clear that he thinks Eliza is the bee's knees in all respects, physical or otherwise.
Hi!
This message is from a long time ago, but I wanted to dip back into Eliza discourse for a moment because I miss her!
I actually wrote about this before. (I’ll reblog the post right after I post this answer).
Essentially, Talleyrand actually didn’t say anything like what Chernow (and others) assumes he did.