Roy Orbison's modern fandom
It might just be my own personal bubble, but I do think there's something to it.
Roy Orbison's younger fans (people under 30) tend to be (in high degree) represented by:
Seems to me Roy Orbison resonates with these folks for a few very specific reasons (apart from the fact his music is pretty great).
1. His demonstrative anti-machismo was, and still is, gender-nonconformist cultural and social pracitice many people can appreaciate. His gender presence was not, like the other nonconformist performers (like Mick Jagger and later David Bowie), a flamboyant performance. He was quite serious and natural in his visual image, it was rather spontaneous, not put-together that much.
2. His demeanour in interviews and public appearances is relatable. He just answered questions, didn't know how to react to journalistic small-talk, didn't try to be brilliant, clever, nor funny. This anti-charisma is refreshing and makes very good representation for many neuroatypical folks. But it's also refreshing to watch. It's raw. At least more than usually when it comes to famous people.
3. His lyrics, which are extremely direct, intense, and rarely use metaphors, are often described as "high drama" and even "too much", also sometimes labeled as strange/creepy/dark/confusing. But imho they can be viewed as reflecting the raw nature of neuroatypical experience, also when it comes to love/relationships and so on. These frank and literal lyrics often convey the feeling of not being enough, not fully understanding the social situation the protagonist is in, the extreme devotion as well as despair. And constant existential pessimism tbh.
4. The dominant narratives about him actually encourage neuroatypical and/or queer people to identify with him. The media have consistently failed to understand him (canon event), portraying Roy Orbison as a fatalist and depressed loser. Comments about how much he hated the dominant model of masculinity (tough guys and macho types) were often ignored. They (the media) prefered to focus on the fact that the guy liked black clothes (which he had worn since he was a teenager, not as a sign of mourning), his tragic experiences and to pathologise the emotional expressiveness and rawness he revealed in his songs. Paradoxically then, many people identify with him because they themselves feel misunderstood by the majority, which is all too easy when you’re neuroatypical or queer.
5. Roy Orbison is well-known, but he lacks the mainstream popularity or cult following comparable even to David Bowie, an icon of bisexuality and androgyny. People don't tend to want to be like him, he's not on the pedestal, he's relatable as much as someone who sings in more than 3 octaves can be. He's splendid, but not aspirational in the most popular sense. This creates a rather favourable situation: albums, biographies, merch et cetera are available, so the necessary conditions exist to analyse his art and become obsessed with him, yet he remains unwatered down by the mainstream. The general public simply associates him with being "that ugly dude singing Oh, Pretty Woman or You Got It". It’s a superficial view, but thanks to this, Roy Orbison is only to a small extent a product, and has largely remained a flesh-and-blood human being who represented sth really interesting, important and unique.