Who can go wrong with a timeline within a timeline? Can you tell the story? Let’s start by saying that my trip to Paris was filled with expectations and sights of beauty that I did not get the ful experience of. One of my most valued senses in sight because without it, my love for art would not be as strong today. So in my first postcard, I was thinking about the night where we went to see the Eifel Tower and it was raining. I had lost my glasses that night and the trip was just starting. I decided to imitate raindops on my glasses so that you’d understandd why I needeed to take them off that night. As seen in the second post card, the rest oof Paris and it’s are was described as beautiful,however all I saw was colors of blur. So I decided to make a post card that would show off Parisian beauty so represent what I missed. Before, I had only seen Paris in pictures and to make that postcard, it was as if I was stuck only seeing Paris clearly through pictures. Now in my third postcard, I remembered having to have something to share with my community after thee trip. Meaning that I had to creat something that displayed exigence. I took the picture of the Parisian memory timeline diagnally with a very sharp clear filter to show that the trip could have went two different ways. The clear image of the timeline is to show how I could have seen Paris and still have ben clueless as of where t start with it’s beauty by the end. The blurry image is to show how it actually happened. As you can see in the blurry image, Only the poostcard with the glasses is clear. This was on purpose because it was the only time I had my glasses on and the only part where I could see. So by bluring out the other two images it allows you viewers too empathize, or see with my eyes how I saw the rest of this memory; colorful but unclear.
