Evolution of bacterial DNA appears to be sped up by the position of specific genes along the route of expected collisions between DNA-reading enzymes. Certain genes are in prime collision paths for the moving molecular machineries that read the DNA code. Replication (the duplicating of the genetic code prior to cell division) and transcription (the copying of DNA code to produce a protein) are not separated by time or space in bacteria. So clashes between the associated molecular machines are inevitable. Replication traveling rapidly along a DNA strand can be stalled by a head-on encounter or same-direction brush with slower-moving transcription. The researchers are trying to understand the evolutionary consequences of these conflicts in the model organism Bacillus subtilis. The major focus is on understanding mechanistic and physiological aspects of conflicts in living cells – including why and how these collisions lead to mutations. Impediments to replication can cause instability within the genome, such as chromosome deletions or rearrangements, or incomplete separation of genetic material during cell division. To avoid unwanted encounters, the majority of bacterial genes are oriented along the leading strand of DNA, rather than the lagging strand. The terms refer to the direction the encoding activities travel on different forks of the unwinding DNA. Head-on collisions between replication and transcription happen on the lagging strand. Despite the heightened risk of gene-altering clashes, in B. subtilis 25% of all its genes, and 6% of its essential genes, are oriented on the lagging strand. The scientists observed that genes under the greatest natural selection pressure for mutations, a sign of their adaptive significance, were on the lagging strand. Based on their analysis of mutations on the leading and the lagging strands, the researchers found that the rate of accumulation of mutations was faster in the genes oriented to be subject to head-on replication-transcription conflicts, in contrast to co-directional conflicts. According to the researchers, the mutational analyses of the genomes and the experimental findings together indicate that head-on conflicts were more likely than same-direction conflicts to cause mutations. They also found that longer genes provided more opportunities for replication-transcription conflicts to occur, so lengthy genes were more likely to mutate. More: • Head-on collisions of proteins create mutations













