(This is in response to the post you made with the message to MAPs)
for the record, I’ve seen proshoantipara arguing with several other pro para blogs that also had the proship tag (some of which did in fact mention being proship.)
if proshoantipara wanted to avoid them, they could have filtered out #pro para, #MAP and other para tags ages ago instead of seeking them out to call them disgusting.
If they want their comfort to be prioritized, they can prioritize it themselves like they’re supposed to in a situation like this.
Being proship and being pro-para are intertwined to an extent, and if I think that paraphiles who are proship are absolutely allowed in the tags.
the proship tag is never fully safe anyways, antis put violent threats in the proship tags all the time and I think that’s much worse than you telling people that they’re not bad people for their attractions.
I used to follow @parafessions and this person would go into the comments to accuse paraphiles of being okay with doing things (regarding contact for the big three) that nobody even said they condoned. I argued with them once and it SEEMED like we came to an agreement but they went on to say that parafessions blocked them “just for saying they shouldn’t be in our sacred proship tags!” When they were also putting words in anons’ mouths and sending hate.
Now parafessions is gone because anti-paras got it termed.
I don’t believe it’s only just about staying in our own tags. I think Proshoantipara doesn’t like that paraphiles have a place on the internet at all.
“Para-Neutral” my ass, how can you say you’re neutral to people you harass and insult for a problem you can fix with a few taps of your screen?
I don’t think it’s fair for people to be calling you selfish for that.
"Para-neutral" is never actually neutral

















