Today's Document
No title available
Aqua Utopia｜海の底で記憶を紡ぐ
YOU ARE THE REASON
No title available
ellievsbear
The Bowery Presents
noise dept.
Game Changer & Make Some Noise
almost home
PR's Tumblrdome
Cosmic Funnies
ojovivo
RMH
Jar Jar Binks Fan Club
untitled
NASA
Origami Around
todays bird
official daine visual archive
seen from France
seen from Lithuania
seen from Türkiye
seen from Jordan
seen from Türkiye
seen from France
seen from United States
seen from Argentina
seen from Mexico
seen from France
seen from India
seen from Brazil
seen from United States
seen from Italy
seen from United States
seen from Indonesia
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Iraq
seen from United Kingdom
@sentient-noodle
let's get basic opinions out of the way:
forcefem is a kink
forcefem is morally neutral
kink is not activism
pedophiles have no place in lgbtq+ community or any community with minors in it
children cannot consent
pedophiles are not oppressed
apparently people who made up the triad/quartet are making alt blogs to shit on each other now. and i will say for the sake of plausible deniability that i cannot 100 percent fully say it's them. but i am 99 percent sure it is. and i will say: they would be more believable pretending it's not them, if they did not feel the urge to be racist and talk about how two poc they falsely accused of doxxing "deserved it".
nah bc these cunts owe deej an apology. they owe many people an apology. they have the fucking BALLS to say "if you call me aggressive then ur a misogynist and hate trans men and hate autistic people and and and-" when these white mfs literally stood there calling SEVERAL poc "aggressive and angry" for being rightfully upset at their baseless claims and accusations. oh and apparently rox deadass went "fuck you <3" to a victim stating boundaries regarding (i believe) the marchy doc. rox rlly has some balls to claim someone saying he used his trauma as an excuse for cropping evidence malicious (bc thats literally what he fucking did) isnt safe for victims, when he effectively told a victim to go fuck themselves and that they "didnt have the right" to say who they are and are not comfortable with reblogging the marchy doc (it was chee they were uncomfortable with reblogging it. for the obvious reason)
rox, if anyone isnt safe for victims, its you and chee. yall are just evil little shits that dont even see victims as people
THAT FUCKING PART THANK YOU.
idk maybe stop being a misogynist and your head will clear a little
you're so close. you're so close.
If your first instinct of an insult is to label an autistic trans man as "aggressive" because of his tone, you are ableist and transandrophobic.
Good. Okay. So, you get it. Follow-up questions, though:
-What do you call it when you label a disabled Romani aggressive because of her tone, dangerous because of how she speaks, and overall rude? Is this not racist and xenophobic? Is this not ableist?
-What do you call it when you label a schizospec and autistic trans person as aggressive and hostile because of a PTSD episode and because of, overall, their tone and decision to leave? Is this not ableist? Is that not ableist?
-What do you call it when you label a Polish woman aggressive and rude because of her tone? Is this not xenophobic? Is this not misogynistic?
-What do you call it when you label a disabled (and autistic) Black transmasc petty, gossipy, insincere, and aggressive because of his tone? Is this not racist? Is this not ableist?
-What do you call it when you label a Black trans woman as a hostile, manipulative, litigious liar only paying lip service to causes she cares about because of her tone? What do you call it when you insinuate she is a homophobic conservative? Is this not racist? Is this not transmisogynistic? Is this not weird to do?
-What do you call it when you label a FL Cracker woman, one who you know is auDHD and has OCD, as petty, arrogant, annoying, and prone to fake apologizing? Is this not classist? Is this not ableist? At the very least, is it not misogynistic?
I could go on. Just food for thought, really.
I did not deserve to be accused of doxxing Eden, a person who donated to me. I did not deserve to bear the full brunt of that accusation in MY circle. Fuck Ocelot, fuck Chee, for stalking me and lying about me for months but when I say I had to keep forging trust in mutual aid in the face of the accusation, all those people talk to me like I'm fucking stupid. Do you know that that could have ruined me? If i was more interested in burying the accusation, if I had even more going on, if the connection between my own received aid and the trust I bring to the campaigns of others were more linked, as linked as they used to be when I was young, I could have been homeless and my friends could have stopped eating.
None of those people would tell me the basis of those claims, none of them would tell me how to contact Eden and more importantly they questioned me constantly and stalked my page whenever I spoke against it. It culminated in then then lying, yes lying that they never made the accusation at all as they continued to stalk me for two months and I'm supposed to just water under the bridge that shit??? This happened as a man threatened to come to my house with a gun and I'm not allowed to have been psychotic and loud about that overlap???
Those people were sick. I'm glad they're friendless, I'm glad they've disavowed each other. I'm glad no one takes them seriously but losers online because when I think about them, I think about the third group of people on here in a year watching my conduct like a hawk for the perfect moment to report my blog so I can lose it all.
Tumblr is the reason I am not homeless!!!!
Not to mention the accusation of doxxing was a psychotic projection. The same group was threatening to doxx others for a month and that's why I stopped associating with them and even succeeded to doxx someone brought to my attention recently and that's fucking horrific because I could have been NEXT.
I'll be honest: I am extremely certain that nothing in this post indicates in any way that ISFF is being lolcowed, KFed, or anything in that vein, nor that innerchildabortionclinic is "cozying up to" those who partake in such forums and behaviors. What about "this post isn't saying you can't be opposed to lolicon/shotacon it's me PERSONALLY saying it's not something typically on my radar" or "if you disagree I understand but don't twist my words" or even "the arguments related to patriarchy & colonialism make more sense" in any way buys into the rhetoric of kiwifarms? "This is my personal opinion and you are allowed to disagree" is... "ideologically identical to the people reporting tgirls that post loli stuff" because... she said "this post isn't saying you can't be opposed to lolicon/shotacon [but i personally have my attention elsewhere]"?
"You're allowed to disagree with me" = "en masse violence against trans women"?
once again, i am just putting screens here with tiniest bit of commentary.
but from implying that people spreading awareness and talking about something she has at least partially admitted to herself, is abuse towards her. on top of refering to it as lies, when she did admit to doing things she was accused of. to outright implying all of the victims accusing her are doing so because she was "too good for them and they did not want anyone else to have her". to again minimizing her own actions and trying to at least partially excuse it by the fact she was "quite unwell".
it's just...i cannot even comment all that in a civil way.
ofcourse isff is again at the scene of crime.
addition from comments
once again, i am just putting screens here with tiniest bit of commentary.
but from implying that people spreading awareness and talking about something she has at least partially admitted to herself, is abuse towards her. on top of refering to it as lies, when she did admit to doing things she was accused of. to outright implying all of the victims accusing her are doing so because she was "too good for them and they did not want anyone else to have her". to again minimizing her own actions and trying to at least partially excuse it by the fact she was "quite unwell".
it's just...i cannot even comment all that in a civil way.
ofcourse isff is again at the scene of crime.
I admit I am confused. I am sorry. Did wokerevolverocelot delete his own account or did staff do it? Was wokerevolverocelot actually the alt of another blog or was it his main blog?
he deactivated due to backlash caused due to the backlash, as far as i know.
wokerevolverocelot rolls worst attempted defamation campaign ever, asked to leave Niche Blogging Website
.
this is so dumb im sorry but im gigglinggggg eden deleted the "stop fucking talking about me" post
maybe stay gone when you claim to be gone from tumblr eden lol you lying racist little shit
the fact it apparently gave ur phone number away randomly is crazy shit btw holy shit
yeah it needs to actually get the fuck off the site. it and its little clique of doxxers. "stop talking about me" no, actually, you don't get to keep up a protracted harassment campaign through nearly a third of a year and just walk away now that your googoo gaga docky wocky revenge scheme flopped, you klanbinary fuck.
you are a danger to yourself and others who desperately needs to log the fuck off and work on yourself.
for context, since it's gone now
"unsavoury rumors" you mean accusing two black people of doxxing with no proof? you mean harassing ten fucking people at once? you mean justifying racist malgendering of a black trans man? you mean joking about daisy's destruction, the physical and sexual torture of an infant, the thing you admitted to doing multiple times across multiple different platforms a year ago? you mean harassing several children so hard they left the platform?
are we also blackfishing, sparklenazi?
(anon) re: this https://www.tumblr.com/sentient-noodle/823061860956979200/some-pedophile-defender-possibly-a-pedophile
There is such a thing as a “minor pedophile” and this refers to minors who commit COCSA against much younger children. Technically the youngest you can be formally diagnosed with pedophilic disorder is 16 (for minors it’s defined is 5+ years’ difference being abnormal, so a 16 year old being attracted to a 10 year old for example would qualify because they’re at a majorly different stage of development). But according to a couple sources I’ve seen (I forget the other but one was CBC Hunting Warhead*) the average age of first offending is 14-15, again usually against children under 10.
So actually this idea that The Minor Pedophile is a vulnerable youth and perpetual victim in need of support—but SPECIFICALLY not from parents, family or therapists; from online support groups of strange adults, is actually both false and dangerous, for the minor pedophiles and for the kids around them. They should not be in adult spaces because there are adults who can and will not only groom them to be victims, but groom them to be offenders.
I think it’s super important to divert minors from offending AND help support them with therapy and support for talking to their parents etc, because it’s extremely common for them to keep secrets and rates of suicidal ideation and severe depression are HUGE for kids who realize that this is who they’re attracted to, and those are problems they deserve solutions too—which is why stuff like B4 U ACT and Stop It Now! exist. There is support there, though there’s always space to improve it. The problem is when people reject that support because they’re not being told what they want to hear (that CSA isn’t that bad and there’s a way to engage in it safely, usually), which is actually what the online “support” is for.
*I actually really recommend this series to anyone who’s trying to understand the background of ‘MAP discourse’ etc in the bigger picture of child abuse, because among other things it has a very in-depth exploration of how an abuser who started committing crimes against children as a teen and eventually hosted 5 of the worlds biggest CSAM distribution platforms got to the Dark Web in large part due to rejecting therapy and instead seeking out pedophile/MAP support groups online… and then later going back to advertise his own dark web services in those spaces and try to cajole anti-contact people into offending. It’s a REALLY chilling case study of how even people who are in online-support spaces with the best of intentions and firmly anti-contact can find themselves being, essentially, groomed by pro-contact people because they can and do profit off CSAM offending. I strongly suspect this is part of why toonimal made oddballs.online, which ultimately went from an “all-ages pro-c safe space” to a place where people groomed minors and traded CSAM.
.
some pedophile defender (possibly a pedophile themselves) got really upset over one of my posts. and i am gonna be honest, i will not entertain any such bullshit. not when what any self-proclaimed pedophiles and/or pedophile defenders claim contradicts their actions. self-proclaimed pedophiles describing themselves as anti-contact yet seeking out minors. self-identified pedophiles being upset at any sort of age restriction rules/etiquette within online communities, such us "minor only" or "adult only discord servers" or heck even people putting mdni on their blogs. self-identified pedophiles being against sex offender registry. self-identified pedophiles positioning themselves as the only demographic minors can truly trust because "they're the only ones who truly care about them". self-identified pedophiles trying to argue that showing porn to minors as an adult is not predatory. i could go on. but many members of the pro-paraphilia communities (at least, strictly in regards to pedophilia) are either enabling and creating the enviroment for predatory behavior or outright predatory themselves.
i'm also just sick of those people carrying around the strawman of "minor pedophile" as some holy grail of theirs. as some "get out of jail" card to the "pedophiles should not seek out minors" argument/point. there is a difference between your adult ass wanting to seek out kids online and a teenager interacting with peers within their age range.
hope you get raped
hi morg
https://www.tumblr.com/sentient-noodle/822780412956901376/wrt-morg-having-sex-with-trans-women-while-saying?source=share
i was this anon, i realized i failed to word myself correctly anyway despite writing a entire paragraph just to make my point clear. "...the existence of manhood in a multigender trans women not being morg's case-which is just as valid." is not what i meant to get across. i don't think it's valid to be a gay man/turian that is only attracted to mono-gendered men/male-alligned people and sleep with multigender trans women that are also men, not unless it's a really specific situation of consensual sex with someone you aren't attracted to and even then i will think you're a closet-case of some kind if you do it regularly with multiple different people you aren't attracted to even if that's something i will normally keep to myself. that or think you are just flat out transphobic given you, by your own admittance in this example, are only attracted to people that are strictly men with no room for multigender people. what i was trying to get across was that that is valid but by morg's own words that is not what is going on with him. by his own words he does not find any kind of women attractive-even women that are also men.
not to mention-even if he was that kind of gay man the way he is treating his transfem sex partners is highly transmisogynistic. the anon that came after me expressed what i was trying to get across with my "but then i remembered morg is [INSERT THING HERE]" spiel far better than i tried too. i don't trust someone as a openly transmisogynist and exorsexist as morg to not be misgendering the trans women he sleeps with, even if it's only behind their backs- and even if they are all multigendered baddies that normally don't feel misgendered by sleeping with gay men/turians/whatever term you want to use here i still don't trust that morg isn't being transmisogynistic and generically transphobic towards these women.
morg has proven himself time and time again to not be the type of person who deserves the benefit of the doubt with these things.
.
