shitpostroundhouse

just what it says

[everyteenager4free1]

[fading-out-jade]

DID I FUCKING STUTTER?!

[shitpostroundhouse]

My what 69 months will do!

I'm not saying anyone has to or wants to, but one could look (again?) 😅

[yappacadaver]

Doudou gets in trouble for saying “AWAWA”

[everyteenager4free1]

[shitpostroundhouse]

[everyteenager4free1]

[craftypantscarol]

[shitpostroundhouse]

He proposed this bill when he realized he would never be able to reach the level of yoga where he could suck his own dick.

[binabadaboom]

forgot the word for scarf because I am a dumb stoner so I called it neck stuff which just sounds like a weird euphemism for a blowjob

[sometiktoksarevalid]

[shitpostroundhouse]

I... *loooove* it.

[staff]

We meant it. Let's work together

This place matters, and our goal is to keep Tumblr thriving for a long time. That means Tumblr has to keep evolving. There are things we know could be better. You probably have a list too. Some of it will be easy to fix. Some won't. That's exactly why we want to work with you.

The Tumblr User Panel will be a group of people on Tumblr who'll work with us over time to give feedback on how this place works today and where it's going. We know we have to earn your trust, and we want to change how we build features and include you more in the process. We’re looking forward to shaping this together.

If you're interested in joining: https://tumblr.survey.fm/tumblr-user-panel-interest-survey 

Here's what you probably want to know:

Why a panel instead of just listening to everyone?

We won’t stop reading tags, comments, reblogs, and support tickets, but a panel helps us paint a more complete picture before we build, and go deeper than a reblog thread allows.

Who are you looking for?

A mix of experience levels, devices, countries, posting habits. People who've been here a decade and people who showed up last month. 

Will everyone who fills out the survey get in?

No. We're keeping it small enough to have real conversations. If you're not selected, it's because we're balancing across a lot of dimensions, not because your response wasn't good enough. We may expand or rotate members over time.

Will critical feedback affect my account?

No! We want your feedback and criticism, and that will never result in any action against your account. 

Can I leave?

Whenever you want. No penalties. 

Questions before filling out the survey? Leave a comment. 

[cat-mermaid]

[shitpostroundhouse]

I hope your arms are long enough to scroll down to the gif...

[staff]

for april fools we’re deleting this entire site sayonara you weeaboo shits

[jagalart]

Eurasian blue tit

[sandmandaddy69]

[goldenaxe]

Mindenki mas az mvm ugyfelszolgalaton:

[shitpostroundhouse]

[memesnotwelcome]

I’m not a quiet person. I’ve just stopped accommodating the socially incurious.

[memesnotwelcome]

[shitpostroundhouse]

I'll put this down as a shitpost, since I'll just be misunderstood anyway.

So, you know how immature men are obsessed with tiny, young women. I want to devise a formula to represent how shallow a man is. Like if you're 45 y/o guy, and your only ideal woman is a 110 lb, 21 y/o woman, that says something, right? Like that's your main criteria, or even your only criteria. Not interests or... just what kind of person somebody is. (We must also admit that straight men call women shallow, and straight women call men shallow. There's a blame game. A few bad apples ruin everybody's cred. But then people go, nuh uh, we're not like that! When they're are totally a ton of rotten apples.) How about we spend more time being honest, and less time criticizing people. If you keep meeting the wrong people in a certain context, then try somewhere else, don't blame the context for being what it is, whether it's your favorite club or the school library.

Weight + 3×Age = ? pts.

300 = 180 lb + 40 y/o or 150 lb + 50 y/o or 210 lb + 30 y/o

240 = 150 lb + 30 y/o, or 90 lb + 50 y/o, or 120 lb + 40 y/o

210 = 120 lb + 30 y/o, or 150 lb + 20 y/o, or 90 lb + 40 y/o

So that unrealistic ideal of 21 y/o, 110 lbs = 173 pts. And this is becoming dehumanizing and chauvenistic all over again. We're talking about what people "deserve" and defining people as a score. But hear me out. Guys complain that women are too demanding, while having certain very shallow, narrow requirements. And for having those requirements, what if we define what stats they must fill in return?

And then we get into what everyone's scores look like? Money. Looks. Physique. Intelligence. Some people aren't into smart people. That's fine. They're probably dumb. "I just want a woman who's young, thin, and hot!" Then what do you got? Are you young, attractive, and fit your own self? "No, but why do women have to be so shallow?" What do you got? Are you funny? Do you have money? If you're broke and your personality is accurately described as a toilet, then what do you got? Are you a model? Did you donate a billion dollars to find homes for orphans with cancer?

We see people saying all the good ones are taken, when they haven't tried lowering their standards.

I'm a 383 with a 366. I must have some combination of looks, money, and/or personality. A little, anyway.

[boop428-deactivated20260202]

Chess piece depicting a frenzied warrior biting into his shield

Found in Uig - Scotland

12th Century AD

[shitpostroundhouse]