YOU ARE THE REASON

izzy's playlists!
No title available

Andulka
he wasn't even looking at me and he found me
official daine visual archive

â
we're not kids anymore.
I'd rather be in outer space đ¸

bliss lane

No title available

Origami Around

oozey mess

blake kathryn
Xuebing Du
No title available
taylor price

#extradirty
Today's Document
EXPECTATIONS

seen from United States

seen from Peru

seen from United Arab Emirates

seen from Austria

seen from United States
seen from Malaysia
seen from Malaysia
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from United Kingdom

seen from Poland

seen from Singapore

seen from Ireland

seen from Germany
seen from Argentina
seen from Malaysia
seen from Lebanon
@silverbullet808-blog
A class enemy of Social Justice Warriors oppressing them with his budgie smugglers!
throwingqueers:
I live in Australia. Apparently, that means Iâm living in the best country in the world, where people are happy, free, good-natured, warm-hearted, spirited, fun-loving, generous, smart, clever, and generally just the best people you could ever meet. Itâs the âlucky countryâ, after...
The creepily named 'throwingqueers" ( more like "throwing hormonal hissy fits" ) raves against  her SJW evil boogeyman the muscular, good looking, hard working, successful, emotionally stable, white masculine guy. Why is the deluded Miss ThrowingTantrums foaming at the mouth about her fictional "oppression ( sob! sob! )" at the hands of these tormenting chippies, sparkies and their late model Holden utes? Because she lacks those qualities herself and has failed miserably in her desperate efforts to score a hot masculine guy.Â
She is not dealing with her emotional baggage - all that Catholic school childhood trauma, her on going failure to attract masculine men into her lonely life. Miss ThrowingTantrums, has unconsciously been driven by this negative emotional trauma and her failed romantic life into the extreme politics of the Radical Left, a location populated by unhappy, sexually frustrated souls.
Until Miss ThrowingTantrums faces her inner demons she will continue to spin in circles of depression, pills, vein popping rants against hot tradies, lack of emotional and sexual fulfillment, more pills and declarations that she just wants to "throw herself off a building".
Good luck cupcake, you are going to need it, because Social Justice Warriors do not have a reputation for insight or open mindedness.
Fat Feminism
Masculinity is an awesome thing!
What do gay men mean by the word âpreferenceâ?
Something about how gay men use the phrase âItâs just a preferenceâ unsettles me. I get the sense they think the phrase is self-explanatory, and excuses away any form of racism, misogyny, homophobia, or bigotry, exonerating the user from all accusations of wrong-doing.
But hereâs the thing:Â it doesnât.
One dictionary defines âpreferenceâ in the following way:
preference | ËprÉf(É)r(É)ns | noun
a greater liking for one alternative over another or others: her preference for white wine | he chose a clock in preference to a watch.
a thing preferred:Â nearly 40 per cent named acid house as their musical preference.
from Latin praeferre âcarry in frontâ
Based on this definition, the gay men who use this word to defend the language they use online are using it wrong! They donât seem to understand what the word actually means!Â
Preference is the word one uses when one likes many different things, but likes one of those things more than the others. Take ice cream as an example. Most people like more than one flavour: chocolate, vanilla, strawberry, cookies & cream, etc. And most people, if they didnât have a choice, would be happy to eat any one of them, but if they did have a choice, theyâd probably decide on their favourite (letâs say chocolate). This is called having a preference for chocolate ice cream. And even if chocolate ice cream was your personal preference, you would occasionally still decide to eat something different, just for a change.
A sexual preference is no different. You might find Asian, Black and Latino guys attractive, but your preference, if given the choice, is Asian. Or you may have a preference for really butch masculine men, but also some that are not so masculine do it for you on occasion.
So to say one has a preference, in the spirit of the word, is to say one pretty much has an open mind to a variety of things. Or at least to more than one thing.
Yet, as we all know (many of us first-hand), thereâs a lot of gay men out there who have absolutely no attraction to anything other than white, hypermasculinised men. They have no preferences, because what they are attracted to occupies only one single point on the entire racial and gender spectrum. So, when these guys attempt to defend themselves using the word âpreferenceâ, I donât think theyâre being very genuine, or that they understand what the words they use even mean.
The word they are looking for, but refuse to use, is requirement.
requirement | rÉŞËkwĘÉŞÉm(É)nt | noun
a thing that is needed or wanted: only one type of window fits the requirements of this building.Â
a thing that is compulsory; a necessary condition: applicants must satisfy the normal entry requirements.
Let me repeat this definition:Â A thing that is compulsory. A thing that is wanted.Â
And again:Â COMPULSORY. WANTED.
And in context:Â COMPULSORY WHITENESS. COMPULSORY MASCULINITY.
So why donât gay men say âItâs just a requirement?â I suspect itâs because for the everyday gay, that word doesnât feel so easy to hide behind as preference. Preference sounds so benign, so unobtrusive, so open-minded, so nice.
"Oh no, weâre not trying to tell anyone that they are excluded, we really believe all the diverse people of the rainbow community are equal, weâre just expressing our personal preferences.â
No, I donât think you are. I think youâre demanding whiteness and straight-actingness, to hell with anyone that doesnât fit your neat little manufactured ideal of hotness. And youâre hiding behind a word that doesnât apply, in order to deflect the guilt one normally associates with exclusion and prejudice.
If there were more races and gender-expressions promoted as âhotâ over a sustained period of time, rather than just the one version, this really wouldnât be such an issue. But with the white masculine male promoted as the overwhelming frontrunner in the attraction stakes, these requirements masquerading as preferences have the stench of âmaster raceâ written all over them.
If youâve been conditioned to find only one âtypeâ of man attractive, so be it. Many people canât help being who they are, including all the aspects of ourselves that have been conditioned into us from birth. We have to find ways to love and respect ourselves, and that includes all our imperfections (even the unconscious ones). But perhaps it really is time to stop promoting that conditioned attraction as a personal âpreferenceâ, mainly because it isnât. Not even slightly.
Every time a gay man publishes online his long list of (white, hypermasculine) sexual requirements, anyone not fitting into that narrow definition of hotness feels like rubbish. Personally, Iâd love to live in a world where gay men threw a little queer into the mix and took into account how their words, and their sense of entitlement to those words, affected the rest of their community.
You seem ignorant of the fact it is the anti sexual racism crusaders who have said guys should use "prefer white", "prefer masculine" instead of using "no asian" or "no blacks". I have pointed out that this is just politeness and somehow the anti sexual racism crusaders would still be unsatisfied. And here you are proving my point by still banging your gavel about it.
Being sexually disinterested in narrow eyes, or flat noses, or dark skin associated with certain races is not racist. It is creepy and Totalitarian to REQUIRE that all men be attracted to more than one race or else face persecution for thought crimes.
As for your hilarious claims about social conditioning, you have no science to back them up. You regurgitate 1970s neo marxist and 1990s Deconstructionist psuedo intellectual propaganda. You obviously have chosen to ignore the spectacular failure of the socialist attempt to create a "Soviet Man" via the methods you allude to in your rant.
Plenty of ethnic gay guys and various mixes have no trouble getting a date with a white guy. Your ideological crusade boils down to little more than some disgruntled users of Grindr bitching about not scoring a hot masculine white guy.
You seem incredibly uptight, when did you last get laid? - you need to stop obsessing about who other gay guys are sleeping with and learn to relax, the world is not out to get you.