🚨veronica👺 @skinip - Tumblr Blog

people who uphold the tenets of “sex positivity” are taking issue with people pointing out that neil gaiman couched his abuse under the language of kink and freedom of speech. many such cases. people who question men that take sexual pleasure in humiliating women are seen as insufficiently liberal and even sexually “defective” if they critique sexual subordination—if you oppose the eroticization of male violence and female subordination, then you are broken and in need of fixing, you are sexually repressed, and they will misuse the word “puritan” to dismiss you (note: the christian puritan movement was not anti-sex).

it is 2025 and we cannot afford to keep tiptoeing around how this retrograde “sex positivity” sanitizes abuse and rape. sexual behaviors are not beyond critique simply because they give you an orgasm in the private sphere. no, women and queers and all manners of gender identity configurations are not exempt either. the idea that any act is completely beyond reproach if it causes arousal, the idea that any sex act is morally neutral if you consent, that abuse is impossible if you consent, that physical injury can be ignored if you consent to violence, all need to be flushed. i had a joke here but i deleted it cuz i’m being deadass serious for once. this is dangerous ma’am!!!!

manoelt-finisterrae

ur-daily-inspiration

moishe-pipick

ur-daily-inspiration

frengerino

whenever i'm trying to talk myself out of buying something i don't need i always hear my old russian professor's voice echoing in my head: "WHAT??? WILL YOU DIE THE RICHEST MAN IN THE GRAVEYARD?" and then i make an unwise financial decision