the difference is this is more random thoughts and rambles throughout the day, whereas my essays are more proper and less frequent - but are a lot more detailed. i cover the same fandoms on both
here, you can also gather specfic fandom posts under
#Spence does Rambles (fandom)
and my asks are similarly under the tag:
#spence does asks (fandom)
just wanted to throw this out there
(also, my asks are totally open here as well as on essayist for anyone who wants to talk about fandoms. on essayist - i try to keep it to essays and longer responses - here you’ll get whatever fits the question, nothing long unless i get rambling)
((i also now run three DC rp accounts - @spacey-supernova (Kon El rp) and @super-sunburst (trans konstance el rp) and @thezesti-hummingbird (Tim Drake rp) so yeah, those exist)
I notice alot of my followers on here skipping these posts just to mess with my lgbt ones, suspiciously the white popular ones.
Heres a not so friendly reminder, as an lgbt metis person, i dont give a single fuck what your blog is themed or if this is too painful for you to look at. Reblog this post. Reblog this post with the sources of the 751 children who were found.
Your compliance and silence as well as the compliance and silence of your ancestors is what allowed these schools to open and kill first nations children. The children of MY people.
Dont follow me if you cant reblog this post or the one with sources to your political blog or your most popular blog. Add trigger warnings if you must but if your political blog is only focused on the harms you personally face like being lgbt then you need to see some bigger pictures and stop being afraid of angering your racist mutural or actually saying some shit about racism. If you can reblog some antifa graphics or add blm to your bio to be a surface level ally, you can reblog some sources on the genocide first nations people faced and still face today.
I’d like to add this photo I took last night in Victoria of the statue of Captain Cook. Though I myself am not indigenous, I 100% agree that these murderers, kidnappers and rapists shouldn’t have huge statues and plaques that decorate them and say how “great” they were.
Here’s another photo of the legislative assembly from yesterday. Later on there were more items, candles and signs at the memorial, as well as a big poster with 1505 painted on it but I didn’t get a picture
People need to see this. Not just quickly glance at the photos and keep on scrolling. They need to see this.
I had seen the first picture of the church, but not the second.
I went to a “Cancel Canada Day” event and burst into tears - not because I was surprised to learn of the unmarked graves (survivors told us they were there. Our government pushed it aside, and we let them), but because seeing all the people gathered in mourning drove it home: They. Were. Children.
This is my country’s legacy - and it’s not history. The last schools closed during my lifetime. My Father went to school with students who lived at the local residential school, after it was changed to a boarding house (read: holding centre) for indigenous youth who went to local schools.
They were all children, injured, abused, and killed in my country’s attempt to erase them. I want the world to see this and hold the state accountable to *active* reconciliation> I mean we could at least truly adopt UNDRIP in action instead of words for god’s sake.
here you can read an article about a survivor of the church and some of the things he experienced to help put into perspective how awful and just how recent it was
yk what i hate though. is when i find a meme and im like THIS IS SO [cool intimidating mutual i never talk to] I SHOULD SEND IT TO THEM but then i remember ive never talked to them ever and so i cant just like give them a meme out of the blue and so the meme just withers and rots in my camera roll 😔
Shame Post of people in the DC community that from what I know SUCK BALLS. /neg
CW; RAPE, PEDOPHILIA, PROSHIPPING, GROOMING, CHEATING, SH, INCEST, AND MORE.
screenshots included on most not all
@wayneenterprise-pr -
Flirted with a blog ran by a minor (multiple times and one made by my lovely friend @cheerioosintooblivion their muse was ALSO a MINOR)
Also made @mindless-finley and @questionables-archives uncomfortable by making it seem like their muses were dating when they weren't.
They did a cheating arc on their wally blog without consulting the person that their muse was dating (aka @dickgraysonoffical) and got made when dick made a friendship with someone during their relationship (that was not cheating mind you) They stated that Dick was dating @nightwingdickrider's Harley despite Dick clearly having it posted that THEY ARE NOT THE SAME TIMELINE. And acting like Dick was cheating when they were in fact NOT cheating.
@marthahajo i know it won't tag most likely but idgaf I PUT A FUCKING LINK. (i think she blocked my ass lmfaooo)
Proshipper, thinks that shipping batkids is ok because they are adopted (Its still incest dipshit)
Arguing about a minor allowing a kid to make believe that they are his uncle and she butted into the conversation for no apparent reason
Consistently reblogged incest related content supporting it
@sophiaqueen-qg
Doesn't follow their own MDNI and interacts with a 14-year-old (the lovely @m-ozzy) (most tame on list I fear)
donkoogur-
Also likes incest (x2 on incest)
@tarantulaofficial-
Harassing @dickgraysonoffical and glorifies the rape that happened to him saying it wasn't rape (fuck you rape is rape no matter the gender) If you see any/all posts its them being weird towards dick. Also saying 'since when was he gay' SINCE WHEN WAS HE STRAIGHT?' ALSO ITS FUCKING RAPE DIPSHIT.
Lychee-
Sent NSFW to @m-ozzy
@rubywayne-
Sent SH plots without asking people first, which could y'know CAUSE PEOPLE WHO ARE TRYING TO STOP TO FUCKING RELAPSE.
Tried to vent to mozzy (it is clearly stated to not do so)
Posted something that looked like batcest claimed it wasn't and said they don't support batcest yet they stated that they go on missions acting like lovers (aka batcest..)
Defended lychee
upset that Dick and Wally broke up and kept mentioning it
@bat-phantom
Said weird shit about her alters (aka that her deadpool alter was getting gangbanged..)
Threatening people for changing pfps
Kept asking fully grown adults for NSFW art (V is 13 years old mind you)
Kept trying to guess where I lived + said they were a serial killer near my house after they day before someone was found dead right next to my friend's house (a few miles away from me)
Said that people should go harass their GF (who is 12 iirc)
Kept saying they were a psychopath (not something anyone should be admitting and if they do, they don't do it the way she did it.)
more that I fear I do not wish to explain so screenshots we go! (sorry.)
I hit image limit. sadly. I have more screenshots of vesta.
Doesnt change the fact that it's a fetish. Something kids shouldn't parade around that they know, since it can put them in danger, no matter if he'd allow NSFW or not.
Mozzy’s Kryptonian oc was not a fetish blog at all. it was a character who was put into that position by force and then broke out. if anything, the blog was closer to a victim recovery storyline than anything else. to say that the oc is a fetish character is just disrespectful to the story that the character had.
and let’s not act like children are ignorant or stupid. yes, children know about nsfw topics. and yes, that does not mean they should be apart of nsfw spaces. that being said - the DC RP community is not an inherently nsfw space. a character who’s backstory is sexual is not inherently a fetish character. Mozzy made a character with a nsfw backstory because he is not ignorant to nsfw topics. Mozzy made it clear that the blog was not for nsfw roleplay because he is not stupid - he knew that would be a thought but that was not the purpose of the character.
if you cannot tell fetish from recovery, then i suggest that you relearn media literacy. the oc made was a character who was recovering from a past that was more akin to sex trafficking than anything involving a fetish. the character was not the issue nor was Mozzy at all. it was other people’s perception and lack of media literacy that caused issues.
It was the fucking wording that made every fucking adult uncomfortable. Calling them a "Sex doll" made the character sound like people are allowed to lust over them, while the "No NSFW" was used to suggest that nothing explicit is allowed. I assume that wasn't Mozzy's intention.
"Kryptonian Clone that broke out of the lab after being abused in multiple ways, including sexual, which is now trying to heal from the trauma" would likely have avoided the fucking situation.
personally, i would say that “No NSFW” is pretty clear in what it’s saying. that paired with Mozzy’s intro’s having that he’s a minor makes it fairly obvious that this was not a character to “lust over”.
the wording of “sex doll” is simply the creation purpose in the backstory of the character. it’s blunt but i don’t think that it’s the wrong thing to say. i wouldn’t immediately make the connection of a character whose backstory was that of a “sex doll” being a character made for NSFW roleplay. again, especially not with Mozzy saying “No NSFW” on the blog and him being a minor.
i think that it’s okay to be concerned about the character but in the end there’s nothing wrong with it. i think that the adults who were uncomfortable also took it out the wrong way given that Mozzy never had bad intent. if there was actual concern, had anyone ever advised Mozzy to change the wording of the blog? because if there was an open discussion that clearly stated “the wording of “sex doll” makes us worry that the character will be seen as a nsfw roleplay character” then maybe something would have been resolved. instead it seems like there’s too much emphasis on the idea of a “fetish” blog instead of actual concern. it sounds more like you want to slander a child who made a character with a history of sexual slavery instead of help him stay safe on the internet.
We aren't his parents/caretaker. We don't want to be his parents/caretakers either. It is not random adults job to teach random kids how to stay safe on the internet.
And we were FREAKING out, for very obvious reasons. And got uncomfortable for the same reasons. Which is why he got kicked in the first place. Noone was comfortable with him after that.
so, personally - i think it’s up to every adult to help a minor stay safe on the internet. i think that’s a morality and empathy thing that every adult should want a child to be safe. not even just on the internet but everywhere.
i understand that you were uncomfortable but that does not change that you sexualized a character that Mozzy did not make to be sexualized. the character was sexualized by the adults in the situation who apparently could not understand the character’s backstory of sexual slavery.
there is a concerning lack of care here. you only cared about your perception of Mozzy and the character. you only cared about your comfort. there was no concern for Mozzy nor the hate that was placed onto him because of the adults misinterpretation of his character. the misinterpretation that lead to y’all sexualizing the character a minor made and was roleplaying.
i can’t see what Mozzy did wrong. he simply made a character that had a disturbing backstory - one that isn’t even all that unrealistic given what real people go through. the issue here is the adults involved
good, do so then, we do not have to do so. because again, we are not his parents/caretakers.
I did not, nor did most other people, interact with that character, because we were grossed out by even just the idea.
Then you must be just as young as him. Or being fine with kids going out and loudly exclaim that they do know kink and fetishes, in a place that is known to be inherently unsafe for kids to talk about it. nor that they should.
you may not have interacted with the character yet you spread misinformation that does affect Mozzy. namely that the character was a “kink” or “fetish” blog. that does more harm than good and does put Mozzy in danger of creeps.
i’m 19, turning 20 soon. i’m not a kid. i recognize the dangers of the internet because i’ve been groomed online before. i worry immensely for children who have access to online spaces. i do what i can to help people understand internet safety because of my own experiences.
what i also understand is that Mozzy did not make the character for any sexual purposes and that the backstory was simply disturbing. something you don’t seem to realize. i agree that the wording was brash but i disagree that it invited sexualization. i likely would have also advised some changes but i cannot be certain because the blog no longer exists. and kids should stay out of kink and fetish spaces but this is a roleplay space. this a space where people make characters to have fun with. and adults should be looking out for kids and keeping them safe. informing them when something is wrong or might catch the wrong attention.
since you care so much about him and are sitting on your moral high horse, why didn't YOU tell him to perhaps rephrase it? Why didn't you pick up the role of his caretaker to hold his hand, like you are demanding adults do, hm?
if i had known Mozzy at the time - i would have. because i care about people.
again - i did not see the blog. the blog has been removed. and i can’t go back in time and advise him to be careful about his wording and how adults will twist anything related to sex even if it’s about sexual trauma like the blog was exploring.
if this is what you consider a “moral high horse” then i happy to have one. especially considering i believe that informing a kid is basic morality. i’d be scared of myself if had your morals.
it’s not bending over backwards to inform a child of internet safety. it’s not bending over backwards to inform a kid how something may be taken when that isn’t their intent.
“sex doll” is one part of the character’s description. it sounds bad out of context, i won’t deny that. but in context? i do think it’s weird that you were sexualizing a character who was actually a victim. i think it’s weird for that to be the thought.
i especially think it’s weird that you focus on that and that it’s how you describe the character to others when that shouldn’t be the main focus.
it also isn't some random's person job to raise someone's kid.
you are the weird one for defending it instead of accepting the fact that it was worded shitty. But sure, let kids run around on the internet and say that they know words that come from something folks under 18 shouldn't know about in normal cirumstances.
again - it’s not raising somebody’s kid to tell a minor about internet safety. at all.
and i’ve agreed that i don’t like the wording. i’ve called it brash, i’ve said it sounds bad, i’ve called it blunt. none of these are words that i use in a positive way. i cannot say this enough - if i had known about the blog and knew Mozzy, i would have said something. i did not have that opportunity. you did
i’m not saying kids should “run around on the internet and say that they know words folks under 18 shouldn’t know”. what i’m saying is that Mozzy needed to be told about the issues not attacked for making a character with dark themes.
maybe we’re from different times but it’s all too easy for children to get online without their parents knowing. does it suck? yes. is it the truth? also yes.
therefore, adults who aren’t predators should probably help out minors. make sure that they’re okay and know internet safety. even just by redirecting them to other resources.
it’s the right thing to do. it’s not raising another person’s kid or anything. it’s just being a good person
i’m not going to deny that legal guardians should be informing minors of internet safety, never said that they shouldn’t. but again it’s not hard to help look out for children
when i have the chance, i do my best to inform people. because it’s important to me and it’s the right thing to do. it’s very unfortunate that we don’t agree on this.
because it isn't random people's responsibility. There likely will be a time where you bite off more then you can chew and burn yourself out about it in the process.
i have other things to worry about in life. other things that take my time and stress me out. but one thing that i will not be tired of is helping people with internet safety.
Until you are not even the oldest in a group and repeatedly say how it is not okay for a mid 20 year old to roleplay porn with a 13 or14 year old, but the others keep telling you to fuck off because they are all besties with the mid 20 year old, Until everyone hates you, because the mid 20 year old attempted to commit suicide cause you kept repeating yourself. But nooooo, it was supposed to be fine because they weren't planing on doing anything physical until the 13 to 14 year old turned 18!
And you are left all alone, with nobody that supports you, starting to believe that those other fuckers were right.
You will get tired. Not now. Not in the next year. But eventually. And then you will be left with nobody on your side.
it sounds to me like you’re talking about the Lychee situation. and it sounds to me like you’re defending Lychee for sending NSFW for a minor.
i will never be so tired of my own morality that i excuse that. i will not cave to peer pressure when it comes to the safety of a minor. a mid-20s person, an adult of any age, should never send NSFW content to a child. if you think anything different - you are the problem. 100% you are. because there is no excuse.
i will never excuse anybody for sending NSFW content to a minor. i am, to put it mildly, disgusted that anybody could start to doubt their stance on an adult sending NSFW content to a minor. to a child.
so there was a different situation that made you doubt how wrong it was for an adult to send NSFW to a child? teenagers may be impressionable but not so impressionable that they should start to excuse grooming or any sort of csa. online or in-person. i say this as somebody who’s had friends try to excuse that kind of behaviour. who has cut people off for trying to defend it. because it’s wrong and i don’t let that kind of thing slide.
and 1 meme is all that it takes to make somebody uncomfortable, especially when they’ve stated “no nsfw” before on their account. it doesn’t change that an adult sent nsfw content to a child. that is still at the core of the situation.
ROLEPLAYING PORN. R O L E P L A Y I N G. EROTIC R O L E P L A Y I N G.
That was what was going on, learn to READ. And the fuckass 13 to 14 year old was into it, which is also why EVERY FUCKICKING BASTARD went after me. Glad you never became completely alone because of it though! Good for you! Have a cookie or some shit! Glad that you never had a partner go against you because of that! Fucking good for you!
And fair! Fucking fair that a single mem can make someone uncomfortable, not trying to argue that! But people acted like Lychee send the most disgusting explicit feral shit known to man, which wasn't the case! And it was an accident! No idea if they ever got around to apologise, but it doesn't even matter now anymore, now does it? Jesus fuck.
roleplaying erotic content with a 13-14 year old is still sending NSFW content to a minor. i genuinely do not understand what you think is different there. that’s still online grooming if you want to admit it or not - which it sounds like you don’t.
the 13 year old liking it does not matter. it does not change the fact that they were a victim. i’m disturbed that the people around you thought that the minor being okay with it changed that it was completely inappropriate. i’m disturbed that they convinced you that you were in the wrong because you thought that the situation was bad - which it was.
a minor can not consent to that kind of interaction, no matter if it’s online or in-person, roleplay or actual genuine interaction. there are laws against that. there’s a reason children are given internet safety courses in school. there are reasons why we as people need to help children.
and i would feel a lot more sorry about your loss of friends and a partner back then if it didn’t sound like you now agree with them. your attitude is genuinely disgusting and it makes it sound like you blame the child victim for liking it when they were a child being taken advantage of by an adult.
I know that it's still grooming. Just like to be more specific to the situation.
I do not agree with them. I would still constantly bitch and moan about it, if it happened in close proximity to me again. Keyword: close proximity. I was avoiding Mozzy even before everything because I didn't vibe with him. I wasn't friends with him. I don't even think i was anything more than vague aquaintance with him.
I don't see why I should help a kid I am not even remotely close with besides vaguely knowing who they are.
alright well - it’s pretty clear that we are not going to agree and i have better things to do than waste any more mental energy on you.
i still believe that it is the job of an adult, no matter how close you are to the person, to help a minor stay safe. be it in person, online, doesn’t matter. i do not need to be close to somebody in order to care about their safety. that’s empathy for you. i’m sorry that you seem to have a limited source of it.
Shame Post of people in the DC community that from what I know SUCK BALLS. /neg
CW; RAPE, PEDOPHILIA, PROSHIPPING, GROOMING, CHEATING, SH, INCEST, AND MORE.
screenshots included on most not all
@wayneenterprise-pr -
Flirted with a blog ran by a minor (multiple times and one made by my lovely friend @cheerioosintooblivion their muse was ALSO a MINOR)
Also made @mindless-finley and @questionables-archives uncomfortable by making it seem like their muses were dating when they weren't.
They did a cheating arc on their wally blog without consulting the person that their muse was dating (aka @dickgraysonoffical) and got made when dick made a friendship with someone during their relationship (that was not cheating mind you) They stated that Dick was dating @nightwingdickrider's Harley despite Dick clearly having it posted that THEY ARE NOT THE SAME TIMELINE. And acting like Dick was cheating when they were in fact NOT cheating.
@marthahajo i know it won't tag most likely but idgaf I PUT A FUCKING LINK. (i think she blocked my ass lmfaooo)
Proshipper, thinks that shipping batkids is ok because they are adopted (Its still incest dipshit)
Arguing about a minor allowing a kid to make believe that they are his uncle and she butted into the conversation for no apparent reason
Consistently reblogged incest related content supporting it
@sophiaqueen-qg
Doesn't follow their own MDNI and interacts with a 14-year-old (the lovely @m-ozzy) (most tame on list I fear)
donkoogur-
Also likes incest (x2 on incest)
@tarantulaofficial-
Harassing @dickgraysonoffical and glorifies the rape that happened to him saying it wasn't rape (fuck you rape is rape no matter the gender) If you see any/all posts its them being weird towards dick. Also saying 'since when was he gay' SINCE WHEN WAS HE STRAIGHT?' ALSO ITS FUCKING RAPE DIPSHIT.
Lychee-
Sent NSFW to @m-ozzy
@rubywayne-
Sent SH plots without asking people first, which could y'know CAUSE PEOPLE WHO ARE TRYING TO STOP TO FUCKING RELAPSE.
Tried to vent to mozzy (it is clearly stated to not do so)
Posted something that looked like batcest claimed it wasn't and said they don't support batcest yet they stated that they go on missions acting like lovers (aka batcest..)
Defended lychee
upset that Dick and Wally broke up and kept mentioning it
@bat-phantom
Said weird shit about her alters (aka that her deadpool alter was getting gangbanged..)
Threatening people for changing pfps
Kept asking fully grown adults for NSFW art (V is 13 years old mind you)
Kept trying to guess where I lived + said they were a serial killer near my house after they day before someone was found dead right next to my friend's house (a few miles away from me)
Said that people should go harass their GF (who is 12 iirc)
Kept saying they were a psychopath (not something anyone should be admitting and if they do, they don't do it the way she did it.)
more that I fear I do not wish to explain so screenshots we go! (sorry.)
I hit image limit. sadly. I have more screenshots of vesta.
Doesnt change the fact that it's a fetish. Something kids shouldn't parade around that they know, since it can put them in danger, no matter if he'd allow NSFW or not.
Mozzy’s Kryptonian oc was not a fetish blog at all. it was a character who was put into that position by force and then broke out. if anything, the blog was closer to a victim recovery storyline than anything else. to say that the oc is a fetish character is just disrespectful to the story that the character had.
and let’s not act like children are ignorant or stupid. yes, children know about nsfw topics. and yes, that does not mean they should be apart of nsfw spaces. that being said - the DC RP community is not an inherently nsfw space. a character who’s backstory is sexual is not inherently a fetish character. Mozzy made a character with a nsfw backstory because he is not ignorant to nsfw topics. Mozzy made it clear that the blog was not for nsfw roleplay because he is not stupid - he knew that would be a thought but that was not the purpose of the character.
if you cannot tell fetish from recovery, then i suggest that you relearn media literacy. the oc made was a character who was recovering from a past that was more akin to sex trafficking than anything involving a fetish. the character was not the issue nor was Mozzy at all. it was other people’s perception and lack of media literacy that caused issues.
It was the fucking wording that made every fucking adult uncomfortable. Calling them a "Sex doll" made the character sound like people are allowed to lust over them, while the "No NSFW" was used to suggest that nothing explicit is allowed. I assume that wasn't Mozzy's intention.
"Kryptonian Clone that broke out of the lab after being abused in multiple ways, including sexual, which is now trying to heal from the trauma" would likely have avoided the fucking situation.
personally, i would say that “No NSFW” is pretty clear in what it’s saying. that paired with Mozzy’s intro’s having that he’s a minor makes it fairly obvious that this was not a character to “lust over”.
the wording of “sex doll” is simply the creation purpose in the backstory of the character. it’s blunt but i don’t think that it’s the wrong thing to say. i wouldn’t immediately make the connection of a character whose backstory was that of a “sex doll” being a character made for NSFW roleplay. again, especially not with Mozzy saying “No NSFW” on the blog and him being a minor.
i think that it’s okay to be concerned about the character but in the end there’s nothing wrong with it. i think that the adults who were uncomfortable also took it out the wrong way given that Mozzy never had bad intent. if there was actual concern, had anyone ever advised Mozzy to change the wording of the blog? because if there was an open discussion that clearly stated “the wording of “sex doll” makes us worry that the character will be seen as a nsfw roleplay character” then maybe something would have been resolved. instead it seems like there’s too much emphasis on the idea of a “fetish” blog instead of actual concern. it sounds more like you want to slander a child who made a character with a history of sexual slavery instead of help him stay safe on the internet.
We aren't his parents/caretaker. We don't want to be his parents/caretakers either. It is not random adults job to teach random kids how to stay safe on the internet.
And we were FREAKING out, for very obvious reasons. And got uncomfortable for the same reasons. Which is why he got kicked in the first place. Noone was comfortable with him after that.
so, personally - i think it’s up to every adult to help a minor stay safe on the internet. i think that’s a morality and empathy thing that every adult should want a child to be safe. not even just on the internet but everywhere.
i understand that you were uncomfortable but that does not change that you sexualized a character that Mozzy did not make to be sexualized. the character was sexualized by the adults in the situation who apparently could not understand the character’s backstory of sexual slavery.
there is a concerning lack of care here. you only cared about your perception of Mozzy and the character. you only cared about your comfort. there was no concern for Mozzy nor the hate that was placed onto him because of the adults misinterpretation of his character. the misinterpretation that lead to y’all sexualizing the character a minor made and was roleplaying.
i can’t see what Mozzy did wrong. he simply made a character that had a disturbing backstory - one that isn’t even all that unrealistic given what real people go through. the issue here is the adults involved
good, do so then, we do not have to do so. because again, we are not his parents/caretakers.
I did not, nor did most other people, interact with that character, because we were grossed out by even just the idea.
Then you must be just as young as him. Or being fine with kids going out and loudly exclaim that they do know kink and fetishes, in a place that is known to be inherently unsafe for kids to talk about it. nor that they should.
you may not have interacted with the character yet you spread misinformation that does affect Mozzy. namely that the character was a “kink” or “fetish” blog. that does more harm than good and does put Mozzy in danger of creeps.
i’m 19, turning 20 soon. i’m not a kid. i recognize the dangers of the internet because i’ve been groomed online before. i worry immensely for children who have access to online spaces. i do what i can to help people understand internet safety because of my own experiences.
what i also understand is that Mozzy did not make the character for any sexual purposes and that the backstory was simply disturbing. something you don’t seem to realize. i agree that the wording was brash but i disagree that it invited sexualization. i likely would have also advised some changes but i cannot be certain because the blog no longer exists. and kids should stay out of kink and fetish spaces but this is a roleplay space. this a space where people make characters to have fun with. and adults should be looking out for kids and keeping them safe. informing them when something is wrong or might catch the wrong attention.
since you care so much about him and are sitting on your moral high horse, why didn't YOU tell him to perhaps rephrase it? Why didn't you pick up the role of his caretaker to hold his hand, like you are demanding adults do, hm?
if i had known Mozzy at the time - i would have. because i care about people.
again - i did not see the blog. the blog has been removed. and i can’t go back in time and advise him to be careful about his wording and how adults will twist anything related to sex even if it’s about sexual trauma like the blog was exploring.
if this is what you consider a “moral high horse” then i happy to have one. especially considering i believe that informing a kid is basic morality. i’d be scared of myself if had your morals.
it’s not bending over backwards to inform a child of internet safety. it’s not bending over backwards to inform a kid how something may be taken when that isn’t their intent.
“sex doll” is one part of the character’s description. it sounds bad out of context, i won’t deny that. but in context? i do think it’s weird that you were sexualizing a character who was actually a victim. i think it’s weird for that to be the thought.
i especially think it’s weird that you focus on that and that it’s how you describe the character to others when that shouldn’t be the main focus.
it also isn't some random's person job to raise someone's kid.
you are the weird one for defending it instead of accepting the fact that it was worded shitty. But sure, let kids run around on the internet and say that they know words that come from something folks under 18 shouldn't know about in normal cirumstances.
again - it’s not raising somebody’s kid to tell a minor about internet safety. at all.
and i’ve agreed that i don’t like the wording. i’ve called it brash, i’ve said it sounds bad, i’ve called it blunt. none of these are words that i use in a positive way. i cannot say this enough - if i had known about the blog and knew Mozzy, i would have said something. i did not have that opportunity. you did
i’m not saying kids should “run around on the internet and say that they know words folks under 18 shouldn’t know”. what i’m saying is that Mozzy needed to be told about the issues not attacked for making a character with dark themes.
maybe we’re from different times but it’s all too easy for children to get online without their parents knowing. does it suck? yes. is it the truth? also yes.
therefore, adults who aren’t predators should probably help out minors. make sure that they’re okay and know internet safety. even just by redirecting them to other resources.
it’s the right thing to do. it’s not raising another person’s kid or anything. it’s just being a good person
i’m not going to deny that legal guardians should be informing minors of internet safety, never said that they shouldn’t. but again it’s not hard to help look out for children
when i have the chance, i do my best to inform people. because it’s important to me and it’s the right thing to do. it’s very unfortunate that we don’t agree on this.
because it isn't random people's responsibility. There likely will be a time where you bite off more then you can chew and burn yourself out about it in the process.
i have other things to worry about in life. other things that take my time and stress me out. but one thing that i will not be tired of is helping people with internet safety.
Until you are not even the oldest in a group and repeatedly say how it is not okay for a mid 20 year old to roleplay porn with a 13 or14 year old, but the others keep telling you to fuck off because they are all besties with the mid 20 year old, Until everyone hates you, because the mid 20 year old attempted to commit suicide cause you kept repeating yourself. But nooooo, it was supposed to be fine because they weren't planing on doing anything physical until the 13 to 14 year old turned 18!
And you are left all alone, with nobody that supports you, starting to believe that those other fuckers were right.
You will get tired. Not now. Not in the next year. But eventually. And then you will be left with nobody on your side.
it sounds to me like you’re talking about the Lychee situation. and it sounds to me like you’re defending Lychee for sending NSFW for a minor.
i will never be so tired of my own morality that i excuse that. i will not cave to peer pressure when it comes to the safety of a minor. a mid-20s person, an adult of any age, should never send NSFW content to a child. if you think anything different - you are the problem. 100% you are. because there is no excuse.
i will never excuse anybody for sending NSFW content to a minor. i am, to put it mildly, disgusted that anybody could start to doubt their stance on an adult sending NSFW content to a minor. to a child.
so there was a different situation that made you doubt how wrong it was for an adult to send NSFW to a child? teenagers may be impressionable but not so impressionable that they should start to excuse grooming or any sort of csa. online or in-person. i say this as somebody who’s had friends try to excuse that kind of behaviour. who has cut people off for trying to defend it. because it’s wrong and i don’t let that kind of thing slide.
and 1 meme is all that it takes to make somebody uncomfortable, especially when they’ve stated “no nsfw” before on their account. it doesn’t change that an adult sent nsfw content to a child. that is still at the core of the situation.
ROLEPLAYING PORN. R O L E P L A Y I N G. EROTIC R O L E P L A Y I N G.
That was what was going on, learn to READ. And the fuckass 13 to 14 year old was into it, which is also why EVERY FUCKICKING BASTARD went after me. Glad you never became completely alone because of it though! Good for you! Have a cookie or some shit! Glad that you never had a partner go against you because of that! Fucking good for you!
And fair! Fucking fair that a single mem can make someone uncomfortable, not trying to argue that! But people acted like Lychee send the most disgusting explicit feral shit known to man, which wasn't the case! And it was an accident! No idea if they ever got around to apologise, but it doesn't even matter now anymore, now does it? Jesus fuck.
roleplaying erotic content with a 13-14 year old is still sending NSFW content to a minor. i genuinely do not understand what you think is different there. that’s still online grooming if you want to admit it or not - which it sounds like you don’t.
the 13 year old liking it does not matter. it does not change the fact that they were a victim. i’m disturbed that the people around you thought that the minor being okay with it changed that it was completely inappropriate. i’m disturbed that they convinced you that you were in the wrong because you thought that the situation was bad - which it was.
a minor can not consent to that kind of interaction, no matter if it’s online or in-person, roleplay or actual genuine interaction. there are laws against that. there’s a reason children are given internet safety courses in school. there are reasons why we as people need to help children.
and i would feel a lot more sorry about your loss of friends and a partner back then if it didn’t sound like you now agree with them. your attitude is genuinely disgusting and it makes it sound like you blame the child victim for liking it when they were a child being taken advantage of by an adult.
Shame Post of people in the DC community that from what I know SUCK BALLS. /neg
CW; RAPE, PEDOPHILIA, PROSHIPPING, GROOMING, CHEATING, SH, INCEST, AND MORE.
screenshots included on most not all
@wayneenterprise-pr -
Flirted with a blog ran by a minor (multiple times and one made by my lovely friend @cheerioosintooblivion their muse was ALSO a MINOR)
Also made @mindless-finley and @questionables-archives uncomfortable by making it seem like their muses were dating when they weren't.
They did a cheating arc on their wally blog without consulting the person that their muse was dating (aka @dickgraysonoffical) and got made when dick made a friendship with someone during their relationship (that was not cheating mind you) They stated that Dick was dating @nightwingdickrider's Harley despite Dick clearly having it posted that THEY ARE NOT THE SAME TIMELINE. And acting like Dick was cheating when they were in fact NOT cheating.
@marthahajo i know it won't tag most likely but idgaf I PUT A FUCKING LINK. (i think she blocked my ass lmfaooo)
Proshipper, thinks that shipping batkids is ok because they are adopted (Its still incest dipshit)
Arguing about a minor allowing a kid to make believe that they are his uncle and she butted into the conversation for no apparent reason
Consistently reblogged incest related content supporting it
@sophiaqueen-qg
Doesn't follow their own MDNI and interacts with a 14-year-old (the lovely @m-ozzy) (most tame on list I fear)
donkoogur-
Also likes incest (x2 on incest)
@tarantulaofficial-
Harassing @dickgraysonoffical and glorifies the rape that happened to him saying it wasn't rape (fuck you rape is rape no matter the gender) If you see any/all posts its them being weird towards dick. Also saying 'since when was he gay' SINCE WHEN WAS HE STRAIGHT?' ALSO ITS FUCKING RAPE DIPSHIT.
Lychee-
Sent NSFW to @m-ozzy
@rubywayne-
Sent SH plots without asking people first, which could y'know CAUSE PEOPLE WHO ARE TRYING TO STOP TO FUCKING RELAPSE.
Tried to vent to mozzy (it is clearly stated to not do so)
Posted something that looked like batcest claimed it wasn't and said they don't support batcest yet they stated that they go on missions acting like lovers (aka batcest..)
Defended lychee
upset that Dick and Wally broke up and kept mentioning it
@bat-phantom
Said weird shit about her alters (aka that her deadpool alter was getting gangbanged..)
Threatening people for changing pfps
Kept asking fully grown adults for NSFW art (V is 13 years old mind you)
Kept trying to guess where I lived + said they were a serial killer near my house after they day before someone was found dead right next to my friend's house (a few miles away from me)
Said that people should go harass their GF (who is 12 iirc)
Kept saying they were a psychopath (not something anyone should be admitting and if they do, they don't do it the way she did it.)
more that I fear I do not wish to explain so screenshots we go! (sorry.)
I hit image limit. sadly. I have more screenshots of vesta.
Doesnt change the fact that it's a fetish. Something kids shouldn't parade around that they know, since it can put them in danger, no matter if he'd allow NSFW or not.
Mozzy’s Kryptonian oc was not a fetish blog at all. it was a character who was put into that position by force and then broke out. if anything, the blog was closer to a victim recovery storyline than anything else. to say that the oc is a fetish character is just disrespectful to the story that the character had.
and let’s not act like children are ignorant or stupid. yes, children know about nsfw topics. and yes, that does not mean they should be apart of nsfw spaces. that being said - the DC RP community is not an inherently nsfw space. a character who’s backstory is sexual is not inherently a fetish character. Mozzy made a character with a nsfw backstory because he is not ignorant to nsfw topics. Mozzy made it clear that the blog was not for nsfw roleplay because he is not stupid - he knew that would be a thought but that was not the purpose of the character.
if you cannot tell fetish from recovery, then i suggest that you relearn media literacy. the oc made was a character who was recovering from a past that was more akin to sex trafficking than anything involving a fetish. the character was not the issue nor was Mozzy at all. it was other people’s perception and lack of media literacy that caused issues.
It was the fucking wording that made every fucking adult uncomfortable. Calling them a "Sex doll" made the character sound like people are allowed to lust over them, while the "No NSFW" was used to suggest that nothing explicit is allowed. I assume that wasn't Mozzy's intention.
"Kryptonian Clone that broke out of the lab after being abused in multiple ways, including sexual, which is now trying to heal from the trauma" would likely have avoided the fucking situation.
personally, i would say that “No NSFW” is pretty clear in what it’s saying. that paired with Mozzy’s intro’s having that he’s a minor makes it fairly obvious that this was not a character to “lust over”.
the wording of “sex doll” is simply the creation purpose in the backstory of the character. it’s blunt but i don’t think that it’s the wrong thing to say. i wouldn’t immediately make the connection of a character whose backstory was that of a “sex doll” being a character made for NSFW roleplay. again, especially not with Mozzy saying “No NSFW” on the blog and him being a minor.
i think that it’s okay to be concerned about the character but in the end there’s nothing wrong with it. i think that the adults who were uncomfortable also took it out the wrong way given that Mozzy never had bad intent. if there was actual concern, had anyone ever advised Mozzy to change the wording of the blog? because if there was an open discussion that clearly stated “the wording of “sex doll” makes us worry that the character will be seen as a nsfw roleplay character” then maybe something would have been resolved. instead it seems like there’s too much emphasis on the idea of a “fetish” blog instead of actual concern. it sounds more like you want to slander a child who made a character with a history of sexual slavery instead of help him stay safe on the internet.
We aren't his parents/caretaker. We don't want to be his parents/caretakers either. It is not random adults job to teach random kids how to stay safe on the internet.
And we were FREAKING out, for very obvious reasons. And got uncomfortable for the same reasons. Which is why he got kicked in the first place. Noone was comfortable with him after that.
so, personally - i think it’s up to every adult to help a minor stay safe on the internet. i think that’s a morality and empathy thing that every adult should want a child to be safe. not even just on the internet but everywhere.
i understand that you were uncomfortable but that does not change that you sexualized a character that Mozzy did not make to be sexualized. the character was sexualized by the adults in the situation who apparently could not understand the character’s backstory of sexual slavery.
there is a concerning lack of care here. you only cared about your perception of Mozzy and the character. you only cared about your comfort. there was no concern for Mozzy nor the hate that was placed onto him because of the adults misinterpretation of his character. the misinterpretation that lead to y’all sexualizing the character a minor made and was roleplaying.
i can’t see what Mozzy did wrong. he simply made a character that had a disturbing backstory - one that isn’t even all that unrealistic given what real people go through. the issue here is the adults involved
good, do so then, we do not have to do so. because again, we are not his parents/caretakers.
I did not, nor did most other people, interact with that character, because we were grossed out by even just the idea.
Then you must be just as young as him. Or being fine with kids going out and loudly exclaim that they do know kink and fetishes, in a place that is known to be inherently unsafe for kids to talk about it. nor that they should.
you may not have interacted with the character yet you spread misinformation that does affect Mozzy. namely that the character was a “kink” or “fetish” blog. that does more harm than good and does put Mozzy in danger of creeps.
i’m 19, turning 20 soon. i’m not a kid. i recognize the dangers of the internet because i’ve been groomed online before. i worry immensely for children who have access to online spaces. i do what i can to help people understand internet safety because of my own experiences.
what i also understand is that Mozzy did not make the character for any sexual purposes and that the backstory was simply disturbing. something you don’t seem to realize. i agree that the wording was brash but i disagree that it invited sexualization. i likely would have also advised some changes but i cannot be certain because the blog no longer exists. and kids should stay out of kink and fetish spaces but this is a roleplay space. this a space where people make characters to have fun with. and adults should be looking out for kids and keeping them safe. informing them when something is wrong or might catch the wrong attention.
since you care so much about him and are sitting on your moral high horse, why didn't YOU tell him to perhaps rephrase it? Why didn't you pick up the role of his caretaker to hold his hand, like you are demanding adults do, hm?
if i had known Mozzy at the time - i would have. because i care about people.
again - i did not see the blog. the blog has been removed. and i can’t go back in time and advise him to be careful about his wording and how adults will twist anything related to sex even if it’s about sexual trauma like the blog was exploring.
if this is what you consider a “moral high horse” then i happy to have one. especially considering i believe that informing a kid is basic morality. i’d be scared of myself if had your morals.
it’s not bending over backwards to inform a child of internet safety. it’s not bending over backwards to inform a kid how something may be taken when that isn’t their intent.
“sex doll” is one part of the character’s description. it sounds bad out of context, i won’t deny that. but in context? i do think it’s weird that you were sexualizing a character who was actually a victim. i think it’s weird for that to be the thought.
i especially think it’s weird that you focus on that and that it’s how you describe the character to others when that shouldn’t be the main focus.
it also isn't some random's person job to raise someone's kid.
you are the weird one for defending it instead of accepting the fact that it was worded shitty. But sure, let kids run around on the internet and say that they know words that come from something folks under 18 shouldn't know about in normal cirumstances.
again - it’s not raising somebody’s kid to tell a minor about internet safety. at all.
and i’ve agreed that i don’t like the wording. i’ve called it brash, i’ve said it sounds bad, i’ve called it blunt. none of these are words that i use in a positive way. i cannot say this enough - if i had known about the blog and knew Mozzy, i would have said something. i did not have that opportunity. you did
i’m not saying kids should “run around on the internet and say that they know words folks under 18 shouldn’t know”. what i’m saying is that Mozzy needed to be told about the issues not attacked for making a character with dark themes.
maybe we’re from different times but it’s all too easy for children to get online without their parents knowing. does it suck? yes. is it the truth? also yes.
therefore, adults who aren’t predators should probably help out minors. make sure that they’re okay and know internet safety. even just by redirecting them to other resources.
it’s the right thing to do. it’s not raising another person’s kid or anything. it’s just being a good person
i’m not going to deny that legal guardians should be informing minors of internet safety, never said that they shouldn’t. but again it’s not hard to help look out for children
when i have the chance, i do my best to inform people. because it’s important to me and it’s the right thing to do. it’s very unfortunate that we don’t agree on this.
because it isn't random people's responsibility. There likely will be a time where you bite off more then you can chew and burn yourself out about it in the process.
i have other things to worry about in life. other things that take my time and stress me out. but one thing that i will not be tired of is helping people with internet safety.
Until you are not even the oldest in a group and repeatedly say how it is not okay for a mid 20 year old to roleplay porn with a 13 or14 year old, but the others keep telling you to fuck off because they are all besties with the mid 20 year old, Until everyone hates you, because the mid 20 year old attempted to commit suicide cause you kept repeating yourself. But nooooo, it was supposed to be fine because they weren't planing on doing anything physical until the 13 to 14 year old turned 18!
And you are left all alone, with nobody that supports you, starting to believe that those other fuckers were right.
You will get tired. Not now. Not in the next year. But eventually. And then you will be left with nobody on your side.
it sounds to me like you’re talking about the Lychee situation. and it sounds to me like you’re defending Lychee for sending NSFW for a minor.
i will never be so tired of my own morality that i excuse that. i will not cave to peer pressure when it comes to the safety of a minor. a mid-20s person, an adult of any age, should never send NSFW content to a child. if you think anything different - you are the problem. 100% you are. because there is no excuse.
i will never excuse anybody for sending NSFW content to a minor. i am, to put it mildly, disgusted that anybody could start to doubt their stance on an adult sending NSFW content to a minor. to a child.
so there was a different situation that made you doubt how wrong it was for an adult to send NSFW to a child? teenagers may be impressionable but not so impressionable that they should start to excuse grooming or any sort of csa. online or in-person. i say this as somebody who’s had friends try to excuse that kind of behaviour. who has cut people off for trying to defend it. because it’s wrong and i don’t let that kind of thing slide.
and 1 meme is all that it takes to make somebody uncomfortable, especially when they’ve stated “no nsfw” before on their account. it doesn’t change that an adult sent nsfw content to a child. that is still at the core of the situation.
