Hey I know her!

PR's Tumblrdome
macklin celebrini has autism

shark vs the universe
★
$LAYYYTER
untitled

Game Changer & Make Some Noise
EXPECTATIONS
Sade Olutola

Product Placement

pixel skylines
The Bright Sessions
Not today Justin
PUT YOUR BEARD IN MY MOUTH
NASA
Doug Jones

tannertan36
Mike Driver
Color Me Curious

Jar Jar Binks Fan Club
seen from Vietnam
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Bolivia
seen from Indonesia
seen from Brazil
seen from United States
seen from Colombia

seen from United States

seen from Romania
seen from Philippines
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from Malaysia

seen from United Kingdom

seen from United States

seen from Malaysia

seen from United Kingdom

seen from Vietnam

seen from United States
@stfuprogressives-blog
Hey I know her!
Upon seeing me walk out in jeans.
Roommate: Hey, are you heading out? Me: “Yeah, I’m heading to class until 10.” Roommate: “It’s like 90 outside right now just so you know.” Me: “Oh, yeah, I love it.” Roommate: “And humid.” Me: “Even better.” Roommate: “What is wrong with you?” Me: “I love the heat. I wish I could live on the sun.”
The struggle.
Move to Florida.
Also, no income tax.
These cartoons sum up the “Hobby Lobby” SCOTUS decision perfectly.
This seems appropriate given the news media right now.
After claims that he was shot in the back running away, autopsy confirms no shots struck his back, debunking the claim.
Some things I immediately notice. But before you read, please read my “alternative theory” Its important that you do.
Alternative explanation of events other than execution hands up racist police mainstream version of events
Now lets look at the autopsy findings, and see if you agree.
—————————-
The spread of the shots.
This would indicate Brown was moving (the charging the officer claim from the cops side of the story) and/or the cops vision was impaired from being attacked earlier and increased nerves (based on cops claim he was attacked and the police chiefs words at the conference about being attacked and having jaw and eye injury) and/or the gun was fired rapidly to quickly put down brown (remember he claimed brown attacked and went for the gun and then charged at him)
Entry/exit wounds of his arm.
People and media might use this to spin the “on his knees with hands up” claim, but to me this shows the arm was outstretched. I do not see how you can have your arms up or crossed over your body or face and get that long bullet path through the arm unless it was out forward, the way they would be if you were running towards or charging someone. If he did have his hands up normally, the depth of the forearm and hand would not be enough to stop the round form going straight though, which you do not see here, instead we have that long path.
The head shots. 2 of them.
One facial and one at the top of the skull. People will almost certainly use this to also prove the “execution” theory. To me this just coincides with the first paragraph, the cops aim along with the rapid firing and possible visual impairment along with browns running movement made the shots hit everywhere, one just hitting his head, especially if the cop did indeed target that specifically if he found the previous shots had no effect in stopping the 6’4” 300lb Michael Brown. The top head shot may have been the last shot to hit brown as a followup to the first shot, brown at this point may have been falling finally, and the intended face shot hit the tip of his skull. According to the article "It was likely the last of bullets to hit him, he said."He also said "This one here looks like his head was bent downward, indicating the wound at the very top of Mr. Brown’s head. It can be because he’s giving up, or because he’s charging forward at the officer.”
The report also said “The bullets did not appear to have been shot from very close range because no gunpowder was present on his body. However, that determination could change if it turns out that there is gunshot residue on Mr. Brown’s clothing, to which Dr. Baden did not have access.”
So until the clothes are looked at, as of right now, this only dispels the execution claim even more, because part of that claim was the cop stood OVER brown and kept shooting him. This screams up close and personal and not “off at a distance”
So far the state has done their autopsy, the family had Dr Baden that did the MLK and JFK autopsies do a 2nd one, and now the DOJ is doing a 3rd. And the toxicology report has yet to be completed, which could back up the officers claim that Brown “may have been on something”
It just gets worse and worse for the Brown supporters.
———————
Other information
Look at all information I have gathered about this shooting here
Please reblog that new post and delete any old versions you have.
This image is now cropping up on various image boards, twitter, facebook, and various other places for online communication or socializing. Currently, I’m on the fence still because the video shown is too blurry and not in context yet. So, until the video is released, I say wait and do your own research, folks. On a side note, nothing edited here bu the “Black line” I did to edit out the blood as to prevent any gore freakouts. Other than that, same clothes it seems, which some on Twitter, I assume, pointed out.
If it IS Michael Brown, one has to wonder why the cops waited until now to leak these photos. It seems like they’re grasping for straws, scrambled to find any CCTV footage that might be Brown and then hammer it into peoples’ psyche.
ive seen the video footage now and i dunno, i think the cops are trying to say “look it, hes a criminal! we were justified in killing him! honest!” but shooting someone thats unarmed in the back (that isn’t actively threatening to harm himself or others) is murder, regardless of what he was doing, or has done prior to the incident.
It's definitely him.
And the key "witness," his buddy, was an accomplice of the robbery. Credible witness, huh.
We also don't know where he was shot yet. Witnesses say in the back, but pictures (like the ones above) show no wounds in the back. It's more likely, as the police said, he was shot in the chest while attacking the officer.
People started rioting and looting before the facts came out. And now that they're coming out, we're seeing that this officer didn't commit murder but rather defended himself against a criminal.
UPDATE 3 scroll to bottom ______________
Story goes a cop responded to a robbery and saw Michael Brown walking and matching the description exactly. The cop claims after he stopped and took the guy into his car he struggled and reached for his gun and shot him. Others give different accounts from the cop just executed him for no reason to he tried to drag him through the driver seat window LOL. Lets not forget the police said the cop was in the hospital with a busted jaw and swollen eye in their press conference.
>strong arm robbery >felony >fleeing felon >assault on an officer
he didnt do anything to die waa he did nothing wrong
>riot >loot >protest >world defends him and try to justify it all
If only people had waited for the facts to come out and let the investigation happen instead of freak the fuck out and “demand justice or no peace” thus halting any investigation while people rioted and looted for 4 days resulting in a death, a drive by, over a dozen looted stores, burned cars and a store and shootings all over lmao.
Every single person that defended this guy, and the looters and protesters and every single idiot that supported this shit shit on facebook and twitter, each and every single one of you are fucking morons.
There are much better things to be concerned about and protest and give world attention to.
From the look of things and the police report, its looking like Michael Brown was indeed the guy in the footage and might have actually tried to take the gun off the got and got shot. Investigation is still on going.
Anyway here is the police report
And the video Youtube Source
Some excuses on twitter and shit trying to run MAXIMUM damage control (and failing) >thats not him >photoshop >who cares it was just some cheap shit >doesnt look like a robbery to me >I dont believe its him and you cant change my mind >faked by police after the fact
Needless to say all the leftist media and mentally ill SJW liberals are mad as fuck.
Butt status #REKT
——————-
Update 1
Looks like one of the biggest witnesses to the shooting death of Michael Brown is also the guy who was with him in the robbery LOL
Dorian Johnson
Full size
MUH CREDIBLE WITNESSES WHY WOULD ANYONE LIE!
————————-
Here are some highlights of events from the first night of the riots and looting with pics. This was all sourced from at the time, live streams and police scanners and people on twitter at the scene.
Click Here
For more info on following nights, search for without quotes “ferguson missouri” in my search bar. Listed from newest to oldest.
You’ve probably seen a lot going around Tumblr about the Michael Brown shooting in Ferguson, MO and the ensuing madness. Here are some responses to typical liberal rhetoric.
"Michael Brown was murdered by Ferguson police!"
Michael Brown attacked a Ferguson police officer and bashed in his face. The officer fired his weapon, killing Brown, after retreating to his vehicle as Brown followed.
"But Ferguson protestors are peaceful!"
Liberals on Tumblr have portrayed Ferguson protestors as peaceful, with pictures like these showing them raising their hands.
But they aren’t peaceful. They’re throwing molotov cocktails and rocks at police. They’re looting and stealing. They’re lighting entire buildings on fire.
The actual peaceful protestors are telling the rioters to stop.
"The police are being violent!"
Yes, the police there have become militarized. Frankly, that scares me. But in this particular case, including the ensuing violence from Ferguson protestors, the police are doing nothing wrong.
Are they using tear gas and smoke bombs? They sure are - but only after protestors attack them with flaming bottles of alcohol used as explosives. If a huge group of people threw one of those at you, wouldn’t you want to use something that would make them disperse and go away?
The protestors are throwing fatal fire bombs and the police are firing nonfatal smoke bombs, and liberals are siding with the protestors?!
Ferguson police and city officials don’t represent the town’s 60% black population!
That’s true. It’s undeniable: Ferguson’s population is 60% black, but the police force and city officials are mostly white and Hispanic. Here’s my response:
SO WHAT? Who’s fault is that? If black people in Ferguson wanted to run for office, they would. And considering the population makeup, they’d probably win! The truth is, no black people step up to run for positions in the area, nor do they apply to become police officers.
How can you blame the city or the police for the population’s unwillingness to break through the “race issue” in the area? If the underrepresentation is such a bad thing, why do the citizens in Ferguson perpetuate it?
Don’t believe the myths you see on Tumblr. The Ferguson protestors are violent looters, not peaceful activists.
I agree with this except for two major things.
1. Unfortunately there is footage of the police attacking even the press. So they are acting beyond reasonable force.
2. Prior to these events the police have failed to maintain a level of trust with the public. While much of this outrage can be laid at the feet of the professional racial grievance industry the police have a duty to conduct themselves in such a manner that the public will be able to trust that the police will be investigated thoroughly when an officer shoots or is accused of wrong doing. The public is not in the wrong for distrusting an arm of government that fails to win their trust.
Clearly that was not the case in Ferguson. And I do not know how it can be the case anywhere where the police are not immediately investigated by an outside group.
I agree completely.
Let me be clear, because some have taken my statements out of context:
I do not 100% defend the actions of the police in Ferguson.
There are indeed cases of police misconduct, like firing tear gas as Al Jazeera journalists for literally no reason (as seen by video). There are numerous other videos of Ferguson police using force when unnecessary and unprovoked.
On the other side, however, there are numerous instances of the protestors throwing molotov cocktails, bottles, and rocks at the police. They've also been caught looting, stealing, and committing arson.
Here are my opinions:
The police are way too militarized. The fact that any police department, let alone a small St. Louis suburb, has access to many of these military-grade things is scary.
I do not support the police state, but do support the police using force when necessary against looters, thieves, and violent protestors.
I do not proclaim all of Ferguson's protestors to be violent, nor even a majority of them. But I do defend police actions against the few that are violent.
About the ferguson thing you posted, the link with mike brown allegedly bashing the officer's face in is a lie. The officer even posted a new pic on Facebook (with his face completely unscathed)
Source?
The only Facebook pages out there are obviously fake ones created this morning.
Lol stfu conservative. You aren't even human.
You aren't either, Mr. Gray Blob with Sunglasses.
(P.S. I'm not a conservative.)
Seriously why doesn’t all the gang violence in Chicago get this much attention? I mean we still don’t even know the whole truth about what happened in Ferguson.
Oh, yay. Another 17-year-old child who thinks they know everything about the world.
stratigraphies:
Look at this horrible shitty post. I’ll talk about the article first. To start, let’s address that it was written by a man who is the founder of an organization called Gun Rights Across America, who “wholeheartedly believes the second amendment is worth fighting for.”
So the writer likes guns... so what? Hundreds of millions of Americans believe in the Second Amendment. This is completely irrelevant.
Next, while pictures of Michael Brown’s dead body have surfaced all over the Internet confirming that he was murdered in cold blood by a Ferguson police officer, the police officer who was supposedly assaulted by Michael Brown gave no absolutely no specifics as to the severity of his condition regarding the “attack” besides saying “the side of his face was swollen.”
No, that's untrue. Pictures of Brown's body prove he was killed by a police officer, not murdered. If you want to be a high-and-mighty social justice warrior, you might want to look a little bit into the law: killing someone and murdering someone are two different things.
Brown was killed when he reached for an officer's weapon. He was not murdered.
Also, since the publication of this article, several videos of the events in Ferguson have been released, and in them the viewer can plainly see that there were no Molotov cocktails or guns to be found.
That's a lie. Again. You want pictures of molotov cocktails thrown by protestors in Ferguson. Here. Here. Here.
Now let’s talk about this post. What I’m honestly very disturbed by is OP’s statement of “So what?” I’m disturbed by pretty much everything else in this post because most of is poorly researched bullshit, but that part in particular is what bothers me the most.
"Poorly researched" says the kid who provides no sources when I provide dozens. Try again.
"Who’s fault is that? If black people wanted to run for office, they would. And considering the population makeup, they’d probably win!" Obviously this person has little to no grasp on a) history or b) politics, to say the least.
Funny enough, I have a history degree and I work in politics. Believe it or not, black candidates consistently win elections in districts that are majority black.
But few black candidates run for office in Ferguson.
"If the underrepresentation is such a bad thing, why do the citizens in Ferguson perpetuate it?" Because shit like this keeps happening, you fucking idiot! Because black people keep getting shot for no reason other than they’re black!
People keep getting shot because they attack police officers and reach for their weapons.
This comment literally makes no sense. Before this kid was killed, there were still few blacks running for office and black people weren't getting shot then.
Black people aren't staying out of politics because they're afraid to get shot. That's absurd. Are you that naïve?
Because racism is alive and thriving and nobody wants to admit it! Not even our president wants to admit it! The citizens are not perpetuating anything, you unbelievably dense moron, the oppressive society we live in is taking away their rights so constantly and consistently that they couldn’t perpetuate anything even if they wanted to.
That's disgustingly racist of you, that you assume that blacks "couldn't perpetuate anything even if they wanted to." Of course they could! They're people, just like anyone else, and they are just as intelligent and capable!
Now, of course racism exists. Unfortunately, it always will. But going around and proclaiming everything as racist does nothing to solve the problem.
There's no evidence that the altercation was racist, nor that the current police activity is. Period.
Pro-Choice: Your body your choice!
Pregnant teen: I want to keep my baby!
Pro-Choice: Are you sure? It's really hard to be a teen parent!
Pregnant teen: You're right, it is going to be hard. Maybe you can-
Pro-Choice: ISN'T IT SO GREAT THAT WE'RE HERE FOR YOU? YOU CAN SCHEDULE YOUR ABORTION RIGHT NOW!
Pregnant teen: Actually, I was kind of thinking maybe you could give me some sources for diapers or something? Because they're expensive.
Pro-Choice: THIS IS WHY THE GOVERNMENT SHOULD PAY FOR CONTRACEPTION AND ABORTION! DIAPERS ARE EXPENSIVE!
Pregnant teen: Yeah, they are, and I want help with THAT, not with-
Pro-Choice: BABIES ARE SO EXPENSIVE! LET'S PREVENT THEM FROM HAPPENING! YOUR BODY YOUR CHOICE!
Pregnant teen: Ok but I'm choosing to keep the baby!
Pro-Choice: HAVE SOME GOVERNMENT CONTRACEPTIVES! THEY'LL MAKE YOUR LIFE EASIER! WE ALSO COVER ABORTIONS!
Pregnant teen: BUT DO YOU COVER MATERNITY LEAVE? DO YOU COVER DAYCARE? DO YOU COVER PEDIATRICIANS? GYNECOLOGISTS? DIAPERS? BLANKETS? PACIFIERS?
HOW IS IT A CHOICE IF ALL YOU'LL HELP ME WITH IS CONTRACEPTIVES OR ABORTION?
You've probably seen a lot going around Tumblr about the Michael Brown shooting in Ferguson, MO and the ensuing madness. Here are some responses to typical liberal rhetoric.
"Michael Brown was murdered by Ferguson police!"
Michael Brown attacked a Ferguson police officer and bashed in his face. The officer fired his weapon, killing Brown, after retreating to his vehicle as Brown followed.
"But Ferguson protestors are peaceful!"
Liberals on Tumblr have portrayed Ferguson protestors as peaceful, with pictures like these showing them raising their hands.
But they aren't peaceful. They're throwing molotov cocktails and rocks at police. They're looting and stealing. They're lighting entire buildings on fire.
The actual peaceful protestors are telling the rioters to stop.
"The police are being violent!"
Yes, the police there have become militarized. Frankly, that scares me. But in this particular case, including the ensuing violence from Ferguson protestors, the police are doing nothing wrong.
Are they using tear gas and smoke bombs? They sure are - but only after protestors attack them with flaming bottles of alcohol used as explosives. If a huge group of people threw one of those at you, wouldn't you want to use something that would make them disperse and go away?
The protestors are throwing fatal fire bombs and the police are firing nonfatal smoke bombs, and liberals are siding with the protestors?!
Ferguson police and city officials don't represent the town's 60% black population!
That's true. It's undeniable: Ferguson's population is 60% black, but the police force and city officials are mostly white and Hispanic. Here's my response:
SO WHAT? Who's fault is that? If black people in Ferguson wanted to run for office, they would. And considering the population makeup, they'd probably win! The truth is, no black people step up to run for positions in the area, nor do they apply to become police officers.
How can you blame the city or the police for the population's unwillingness to break through the "race issue" in the area? If the underrepresentation is such a bad thing, why do the citizens in Ferguson perpetuate it?
Don't believe the myths you see on Tumblr. The Ferguson protestors are violent looters, not peaceful activists.
Good question.
(Via)
What?
LOL. STFU, Progressives.
being against gay marriage does in fact 100% make you homophobic sorry
LOL.
STFU, Progressives.