If your feminism isn't leading you to become antinatalist, atheist and a little anarchist, then what are you doing

titsay
AnasAbdin
Cosmic Funnies
Mike Driver
Sweet Seals For You, Always
d e v o n

★

roma★

izzy's playlists!
Lint Roller? I Barely Know Her
i don't do bad sauce passes
NASA
almost home
art blog(derogatory)
we're not kids anymore.
todays bird
Monterey Bay Aquarium

Kiana Khansmith

@theartofmadeline
$LAYYYTER

seen from Italy

seen from Italy
seen from Malaysia
seen from Netherlands
seen from United States

seen from Algeria

seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from Algeria
seen from Canada
seen from Pakistan

seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from Malaysia
seen from Singapore

seen from Türkiye

seen from Spain

seen from Türkiye
@summercoldd
If your feminism isn't leading you to become antinatalist, atheist and a little anarchist, then what are you doing
What's the difference between Mohammad's Islam and Andrew Tate's alpha male course? Nothing. They're the same. Both attract MEN with promises of hoes, booze, and universal brotherhood. And men haven't evolved over 1400 years because they still continue to fall for it.
omff muhammed x andrew yaoi is such a peak idea someone please make it
What's the difference between Mohammad's Islam and Andrew Tate's alpha male course? Nothing. They're the same. Both attract MEN with promises of hoes, booze, and universal brotherhood. And men haven't evolved over 1400 years because they still continue to fall for it.
The world is at a point where one cannot determine, out of the entire history of human civilisation, who exactly was a "good person". It's not just a matter of it being difficult to determine because it's so subjective yada yada. It's also about how fame is only awarded to people who are of a certain type, who are willing to do whatever it takes to have that fame, to survive history and to be known. And that involves doing literally every possibly bad thing imaginable.
This is explored more deeply by Dostoevsky in crime and punishment. Raskolnikov went out to kill an old woman so he could prove that HE was one of those ruthless people. Of course he wasn't. Most of us aren't. But then, most of us also won't survive history. We'll be forgotten. I don't fear being forgotten, but Raskolnikov did.
What I'm trying to get at, essentially, is that most people we know- the ones written in our books, in our histories, in our brains, in our collective unconscious- were bad people. Like genuinely bad. Because even the slightest amount of "good" doesn't make you survive history. No famous person is actually good, because fame is awarded only to people who are ready to trample, betray, kill, maim, rape, and torture people.
Pot bellied men exist so women can pretend they're pregnant when they're pegging them.
I still think about this constantly btw💔
Fyodor Pavlovich Karamazov and Pyotr Alexandrovich Miusov from "The brothers Karamazov" have a high potential of some toxic yaoi, I believe
YES YES YES
My history teacher encouraged us to use AI to help us revise for our upcoming history test
You know what I'm gonna do?
Revise like a MAN 🗣️🔥🔥PAPER🔥🗣️🗣️PEN🔥🗣️🗣️ INFINITE KNOWLEDGE 🗣️🔥🗣️🔥🗣️
An imperfect feminism is better than no feminism. I will always choose uncomfortable feminism over patriarchy because that discomfort gives rise to change.
let's talk about rage bait
some images are not neutral, nor are they accidents. they're designed to provoke a reaction--shock, jealously, disgust, even defensiveness--because emotion drives engagement, and engagement drives profit.
when you see a room full of makeup, a 30-step skincare routine, a even just a "quick haul", the goal isn't to inform you, but to make you feel something. that feeling is usually insecurity or outrage, mainly because both keep you scrolling.
some people feel inferior and ask "why don't i have this? am i behind?" others feel morally superior and declare "this is disgusting. people are so wasteful." both reactions still boost the post. both still feed to algorithm. the key point is that neither reaction threatens the system that produced the image in the first place.
that's usually why context is always missing. you never really hear whether products were gifted, returned, written off, expired, unused, etc. or whether the person is a professional, sponsored, or staging excess for attention. ambiguity is the point; confusion keeps you arguing in the comments instead of questioning why your questioning in the first place.
and i understand! professionals may need an excess of items to get their jobs done, but the system doesn't target professionals. it targets everyday people like you and me.
late stage capitalism doesn't need you to want these things, but it just needs you to be emotionally activated by them. outrage is just as profitable as aspiration.
so when people say "this is just meant to make you upset," they're right. But not in the way that they think. The issue isn't that you felt something, but more so that you're trained to emotionally respond to excess instead of critically interrogating it.
calling it out doesn't make you a buzz-kill (and believe me, people may call you that.) it's recognizing that when a system benefits from your insecurity, anger, or self-doubt, those feelings didn't come from nowhere.
Another performance of femininity that's often overlooked is how women are required to be ideologically perfect, with perfect actions and follow the perfect role models etc., while a man can get away with being a die hard fan of people convicted of rape and pedophilia and no one will bat an eye. Like I know "leftist" dudes who're Kanye West fans and I've never seen them have a cognitive dissonance about it.
I have a mutual that everyone "unfollowed" cos she was a big taylor swift fan and still kept posting stories about her new album yada yada. And don't get me wrong, I despise greedy billionaires too. But it's important to not overdo it perhaps?? Its okay if women are not perfect and if they make poor ideological choices. Its okay to forgive them sometimes.
I feel its just so easy to hate women, it almost feels like everyone is waiting for an opportunity to hate them. In contrast, its so easy to love a man. Everyone is just waiting for one good action they commit so you can show them some love.
It makes me vomit just how accepting of men people are. Next time you find yourself "cancelling" your friend over anything, just remember how many of your male friends you've forgiven for far worse, and show your female friends the same mercy. Be more accepting of women's wrongs. I know there are nuances, but I hope I was able to get what I wanted to say across.
Currently selling some jewelry if anyone is interested :3!!
Came across your post on reddit about hijab not being a choice. I don't want to wear the hijab anymore and have been feeling this for a good year or so; and yes, I take it off whenever I can. Triggers me how men can dress how they please for the most part while I can't even show MY GODDAMN ARMS CAUSE some man might be turned on. And everytime someone expresses this sentiment, some fucktard will go "you just want the attention of boys/be a whore" or the classic "yOU JuSt WaNt To BE NaKed! 🤪"
It's still shocking how absolutely nothing is mandatory for men. They just get to be?? Even the beard is not mandatory on them for some reason. No matter where a Muslim man is, he gets to adapt to the culture of that particular country while a woman is always stuck in a bygone era.
What series is your reddit pfp from?
It's from a yaoi manga called "therapy game". 10/10. Really recommend.
Just saw someone calling frequent chatgpt users "promptstitutes". That is permanently entering my vocabulary now
The fact it's called New Zealand suggests there was an Old Zealand. Which imposes the question what happened to the old one, and why did they need a new one?