Journalist: Polling Data. Overall, there were 62 responses to the candidate’s google form! 36 parties were represented, and 4 responders were not actually candidates. We’ve got quite a wide variety of parties this election, and I know that the 36 that answered our questions certainly aren’t representative of every group running!
Editor: Yes. Now, onto our first multiple choice question- It seems that only 19.4% of people involved in this year’s election were also involved in last (static) year’s elections. It’s great to see so many new faces-
Journalist: I’m- Sorry. I can’t quite hear you?
Editor: I’ll just move onto the next question then.
Journalist: First, let me turn down your audio- there’s a sort of noise in the background, and it’s giving me a headache.
(silence)
Journalist: Alright, done.
Editor: Okay. Well, 25% of a *certain subgroup* of candidates voted in the last election, while another 25% actually made fancontent and endorsed other parties! A full 41.7% were even candidates, and at least one respondee was a moderator.
Journalist: Enough about *that,* though. *Currently*, in an interesting note, 24% of people don’t have official policies for their parties!
Editor: Well, that’s a bit-
Journalist: *Currently,* it does seem like our parties do have a few overlapping goals as well. Unity between all part of mcytblr is a big one, and so is better treatment of Ghostbur. Violent suppresion of bigotry is a great one, and it seems to be appearing frequently! A few people would like to make being gay mandatory, i see some people saying they want better appreciation of Tubbo Underscore, and… what’s this about tapeworms?
Editor: Never mind that.
Journalist: But what-
Editor: It’s uh, well it’s in the past.
Journalist: Oh. Of course.
Editor: Uh, yes.
Journalist: Don’t look back.
Editor: ...Right.
Journalist: Anyways, new news is good news, and we’ve got some right here! With the recent addition of more ccs to tumblr, almost half of the people running say that they’ll be a fun addition to the elections! A further 19.4% say that they wish to take advantage of this new development, and I can’t wait to see how that turns out!
Editor: Yes. To our knowledge, at least 3 content creators are currently in the running, though I doubt one of them knows about it.
Journalist: A few people seem to think that there might be 4. They do keep bringing up Ranboo! And also something about a Tube as well. Also, uh, hmm..
Editor: What is it?
Journalist: It appears the godkillers have decided that some of these creators may be a worthy target.
Editor: That can’t be good-
Journalist: Everything will turn out fine, I’m sure! On to a more positive note: The opinions on other teams!
Editor: You call that more positive?
Journalist: Yes! After all, every response is talking about friendship and unity between parties, and with only a few mentions of the sheer *amount* of parties running.
Editor: What exactly did you put for the multiple choice options? Journalism is about (static) free speech, Ides, you can’t just-
Journalist: Maybe you should check your recording equipment- That sound is back, and it’s even more annoying this time.
Editor: Fine, Journalist.
Journalist: Thank you!
Editor: There are a lot of answers in the “why should people vote for you” section, so those will be on a separate post. Same with the “why *shouldn’t* people vote for-
Journalist: That’s not a question.
Editor: ...Right. Not a question at all. Just ignore that bit, alright? I misspoke.
Journalist: Okay! The final question was if anyone had any feedback for me, so I’ll answer a few of these directly! One, I’d love to put a picture of a dog on your article. Two, the happy birthday song goes-
Editor: If they have access to the form they can Google it.
Journalist: Right. Three, I’d love to do interviews with some artists! Please message us if you’re up for that! Four, nothing is wrong, therefore you cannot be helped. Five, awww, thank you! Six, I don’t actually have a mom, so I don’t know who you’re referring to. Five, bold to proclaim a rivalry when nobody actually remembers who you are. The past is the past, after all.
Editor: That was rather rude, coming from you.
Journalist: I don’t know what you’re talking about? Anyways, article over! Thank you so much to all our participants, and have a great day!
Editor: Wai-