Win Elections or Win the Argument?
"The party’s got to focus on winning again...Sometimes I feel like our party cares more about winning the argument than they care about winning elections.” Gov. Chris Christie in a CNN interview conducted by Jack Tapper Here is video of that interview: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GA6wVX74JEY.
Opinion
I really do not like the statement from Gov. Chris Christie. I think the people want someone who can win the argument, but they need to explain it in a manner that is easily understood by the public to win over the middle of the road voter. Maybe convince even some Democrat voters. Gov. Chris Christie did win in New Jersey and I think you have to be a "RINO" to win New Jersey in this current political climate, and no one would call Gov. Chris Christie a true conservative. It is also bad taste to bash other people in the same political party publicly.
Argument Against Gov. Chris Christie's Statement
It took Ronald Reagan 3 times to win his first presidential term. He ran in 1968, 1976, & 1980. Every time Reagan lost, he supported whoever the GOP nominated afterwards. In 1968, Reagan basically was testing the waters. Then it was a nail-biter in 1976 when Reagan almost stole the GOP nomination from the GOP establishment candidate, Gerald Ford, with 1070 delegates for Reagan & 1187 delegates for Ford. Finally in 1980, Reagan beat out incumbent President Jimmy Carter. He did such a tremendous job as president those first 4 years, that it was basically a "no contest" win in 1984. He kept to his principles and Reagan kept building momentum every time he ran for president.
By the way, what was President Reagan's nickname? "The Great Communicator"







