Question! Should a mother be able to kill, say, a two year old child if she decides she doesn't want that child anymore? Technically, that child is entirely dependent on her (a "leech" as many pro-choice people so kindly diminish children to be). So that would just be a very late term abortion by pro-choice standards. The mother decided she didn't consent to providing for the child anymore, so she has every right to kill them by pro-choice logic
I've answered this kind of "gotcha" so many times. Short answer, no, a parent should not be able to just kill their 2 year old, but it's not comparable. How you should have asked the question is should a parent be able to refuse the use of their body to their 2 year old? Should they be able to choose not to breastfeed? Should they be able to want their own space and not have their child crawling and climbing all over them? Should they be able to choose not to carry their child all over the place? The answer to all of those questions is yes.
So to be clear, a zef is using someone's body and they are 100% dependant on that person and that person only. A 2 year old is not using someone else's body just to exist. They are dependant on help, but they can get that help from millions of people in the world, they are not dependant on one person.
And lastly, I hear so many parents (including anti choicers) call their children leeches, so don't even try to pretend pro choicers are evil because a few choose to use the term.
