Zines have a gendered origin story, which has mostly gone untold. Most studies of zines identify them as resistant media originating in male-dominated spaces. They are positioned as descendants of the pamphlets of the American Revolution and Dadaist and Samizdat publishing, emerging from the fanzines of the 1930s and the punk community of the 1970s. According to this narrative, the zine proliferation was triggered by the convergence of punk culture and technology. Punk culture provided the "zine" terminology, along with a non-elitist, do-it-yourself (DIY) structure and aesthetic, and these ideologies were channeled into the production of zines because of technological innovations such as desktop publishing and inexpensive, widely available photocopying.
Alison Piepmeier, Girl Zines: Making Media, Doing Feminism
The author goes on to explain that this narrative is insufficient, because it ignores the involvement of suffragists and women’s involvement in the history of zines in general.
Personally, I think that it is important to note, that throughout every analysis of culture and counter-culture and sub-cultures that we partake in, we are still viewing things as people who have grown up internalizing and ingraining in our views: the oppressions dominant in our times. When we look at history, so much of what has taken place has been erased by not only the narrative of male dominance, but of all the different aspects of intersectional kyriarchy that we face. Even this analysis ignores racial discrepancies in the narrative, and the all too real and harsh elitism within punk culture.