(Amorvavi) Cake's Lol Account: Transphobia, Ableism, Doxing, Libel, Stalking, and Harassment
Due to Tumblr's 30-image limit per post, this exposé has been divided into three parts. Click here for Part 1 and Part 2
When the victim's friend, who is another one of Cake's victims, joined this Solar Opposites Creativity Discord server several months prior, he was instantly kicked out. According to his testimony, all he shared was one SFW piece of his art, which people liked. Although he had no intention of sharing his pro-ship art, his pro-ship status was what immediately got him kicked. No questions asked.
Below is the second last page in Cake's 2025 Google Document. Charlotte's final image spread like wildfire on social media. The victim's friend may have known, but this does not prove that Terrence knew or that they are the same person. Regardless, Cake pretends to care about transgender people until she targets her victim. As we saw on her Lol account, there was much deadnaming, misgendering, speculation about Terrence being trans, and the belief that a transgender person's choice to stealth should antagonize them.
Notice how Cake has heavily monitored Terrence's posts. She mentions every little piece of drama but completely ignores what happened to Terrence between May 29th and June 1st, going so far as to not list the post she replied directly to by block evading him with her Lol account, where Terrence outed her and Shroomers as predators, which would have been a perfect post for her Google Doc.
Now think back to all the tweets Cake's Lol account posted. If you need a refresher, click here. (Ctrl + Click) Notice how none of these tweets accuse Terence of being a predator. If Cake genuinely believed these allegations at the time, why were they never mentioned to Cassie, Shroomers, or in the Discord server where Cake bullied the victim into leaving? Why did she wait five months after allegedly learning this information before making such serious accusations public?
This is because the predatory allegations against minors were completely fabricated and used as revenge against Terrence for calling Cake and Shroomers out for discussing an adult show with minors. Despite the clear evidence against Shroomers, Cake was quick to defend them. Considering Cake's public mockery of CSA victims and willingness to discuss Solar Opposites with minors, it is obvious Cake is not motivated by concern for protecting children.
Many were quick to believe these allegations. The "friends" of one of the victims of these allegations immediately abandoned them without verifying these accusations with them. Almost a year has passed since the incident, yet Cake's supporters continue to harass these victims.
Yao, the minor who Cake frequently claims was groomed, later shared a screenshot of their former friend's (the victim's) Instagram profile that showed they were 18 when they first met, while Yao was 15 (as confirmed by the birth date listed on Yao's Strawpage). According to the victim, Yao told them they were 16 because in some parts of China, they count the nine-month gestation period as a year.
Despite the narrow age gap and their friendship being completely platonic, Cake portrayed it as predatory by relying on heavily cropped and edited screenshots that omitted important context. Yao never suggested she was groomed or that there was anything romantic or sexual in their relationship, but rather expressed her frustration that people kept clocking her as a minor because she was accessing adult spaces by pretending to be older. After Cake published these Google Docs, Yao claimed the victim deserved to be smeared and doxed for "exposing" their personal information, but not for allegedly grooming them. Interesting to note.
Yao's claim that their personal information was exposed refers to a different victim pointing out Yao's age using information that was already publicly available, including their WeChat ID, Twitter handle, and Strawpage, all of which listed their name and full birthday. According to this victim, this information was cited solely to establish that Yao was a minor.
Yao lists, "Say, [Victim's name], I hear you like 'em young," as their display name on both Twitter and Bluesky. The display name jokes about a topic that Yao has publicly described as a serious personal experience, which I found difficult to reconcile.
The other "minor victim" was the victim's ex. She was 17, and the victim was 18 when they started dating. To claim a 1 to 2-year age-gap relationship is predatory is false and ludicrous. According to the victim, they met due to their shared interest in Solar Opposites on Instagram and were later introduced to their friend Yao a couple of months later.
Proof is provided below that the victim's ex was 17.
When I reached out to this other supposed minor victim, who Cake claimed was too traumatized to come forward, they switched from listing their former partner as a girlfriend when I asked if they knew this person by name to a groomer the moment, I stated I was investigating possible predatory allegations. This abuser failed to provide me with any evidence of this alleged predatory behavior. You can read about it here. (ctrl + click)
You can also read about how the same supposedly groomed minor was very abusive towards their ex, constantly flooding their inbox with hate messages while they were dating, creating many alternate social media accounts and emails months after the victim gained the courage to finally break up with her in her desperate attempt to get back with them, and fantasizing about them being brutally killed for breaking up with them here: (ctrl + click) I have listed this link multiple times throughout this callout and I highly suggest you read through the entire thread because it clears up so much confusion in Cake's Google Docs.
Additionally, nudes were never solicited as Cake claims, and no solid evidence was provided for her claims in any document. Despite the gravity of these allegations, Cake never reported them to law enforcement. It was not until four days after Cake published those Google Docs that an investigator, meaning someone else had filed a report, arrived at their doorstep. The case was dismissed the same day after they showed the detective evidence proving they had not preyed on these minors and heard the victim's side of the story. (See Testimony)
This leads us to one obvious question: if the victims did not do what Cake accused them of, why is she attacking them so relentlessly?
Based on the evidence presented throughout this document, I do not believe these actions were motivated by a genuine concern for protecting others, especially not minors. Cake has contributed relatively little to the Solar Opposites fandom in comparison to the amount of time she has spent targeting her victims. One possible explanation is that online callouts and public accusations provide a sense of purpose, validation, or moral superiority for her. Social media can make it easy for abusers to convince themselves that harassment is justified if they believe they are punishing people they have labeled as "stalkers."
From that perspective, each new accusation reinforces a narrative in which the targeted victims deserve whatever happens to them. Small disagreements become interpreted as further evidence of wrongdoing, and increasingly implausible conclusions can begin to feel reasonable to the person making them. If someone has already convinced themselves that another person is malicious, it becomes much easier to reinterpret ordinary interactions in the worst possible way.
This is, of course, my interpretation and should not be treated as an objective fact. No one has direct access to another person's thoughts or motivations, but we are free to speculate. Regardless of why Cake behaved this way, the documented actions speak for themselves. Readers should evaluate her conduct based on the evidence presented in this document rather than on any speculation about her motives.
None of these criticisms from Cake or her Lol account, up until she published her Google Doc, were predatory accusations. I believe the vast majority of people would agree that an accusation of child predation is substantially more serious than an accusation of harassment. This begs the question: if Cake genuinely believed these predatory allegations she was spreading, why were they not mentioned until the publication of her Google Docs? This was because Cake wanted revenge on who she believed was running Terrence's account for outing her and Shroomers as predators and the victim had reached past their teen years between this incident and the publication of her Google Docs, which gave Cake leverage in defaming them and others she believed to be predators, especially since messages had missing timestamps and Cake was vague about each of the three people's exact age.
Here, Cake admits that she takes sadistic pleasure in watching her victim have panic attacks and cry. The harassment claims were anonymous messages Cake received, which she believed the victim sent. Those messages were lists of several personality disorders and their definitions. By contrast, Cake repeatedly deadnamed and misgendered the victim, accused them of predatory behavior at just 18-years-old towards people only slightly younger than them, mocked their escape from CSA, and engaged in months of persistent online harassment, libel, and stalking. The conduct documented throughout these posts is not comparable in severity to those anonymous messages.
Cake also claims not to care, yet she typed up several essays about a situation that easily could have been ignored. Ironically, I cannot complain too much about the mention of my Tumblr blog because, after she posted that thread, I began receiving anonymous messages from more of her victims. It is also difficult to reconcile Cake's expectation that she should publicly defame and criticize others without eventually being the subject of criticism herself. The thread she posted mostly serves as her personal ego boost, citing her intelligence as superior. Yet even after the Lol account was linked to her, she has not acknowledged responsibility for the conduct documented here.
The lesson I hope readers take away from this is that sustained harassment often has little to do with uncovering the truth. Instead, it can become an exercise in scrutinizing every aspect of a person's life in search of something that can be weaponized against them. Throughout these posts, I have shown repeated examples of Cake focusing on minor and innocuous actions while making serious accusations without adequate support. Whatever the underlying motivation may be, the result was a prolonged pattern of harassment directed at multiple people.
I suspect she is currently working on another Google Doc to further harass her victims because I have been publicly calling out her behavior since September. She had mentioned earlier she would ignore my blog because she was focused on school, and now she is on summer break and is hardly active on Twitter (X), so be prepared!
Cake's defamatory callouts have brought her victims much distress that still affects them to this day. Ironically, those same defamatory callouts ultimately helped expose her own conduct on her Lol account by revealing information only she would know.
As of writing this, I feel like I have discussed everything that needed to be addressed regarding Cake's Lol account and her abuse. Provided there is no further escalation or retaliation from Cake, I do not intend to escalate these matters further because they happened quite a while ago. Any attempt to interfere, intimidate, or retaliate will only result in further documentation and disclosure.
As stated in the beginning, this callout is not a call to harass Cake or her allies. It is best not to engage with these abusers and to block them at your leisure. Thank you for making it to the end, and stay safe!
