If complementary Patronuses are such a thing, and an important one apparently, why did no one think that Tonks and Luna (as an adult) had matching Patronuses and thus were "meant" to be together?
Tonks’ Patronus was a jackrabbit, which is a type of hare, and Luna’s Patronus was a hare too. Give a few more years and there, perfect match. Supposedly.
As a second point though, Tonks’ Patronus changed to match Lupin’s. So Patronuses that seem to be originally complementary do not stand against the manifestation of pure, true love, which is a Patronus changing to match another’s. Yes, it does make me think of how the Patronuses for Snily are way more meaningful and indicative of true love than what we got with Lames.














