your incest toddlercon torture-rape fic is not "queer writing". it is wanabe baby rapist writing. stop calling it queer writing. it is not queer to wanna rape toddlers

seen from United States
seen from Finland
seen from United States
seen from Türkiye

seen from Türkiye

seen from United States

seen from Poland

seen from Chile

seen from United States

seen from Kazakhstan
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from Germany
seen from China
seen from South Korea
seen from Finland

seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from Canada

seen from Uzbekistan
your incest toddlercon torture-rape fic is not "queer writing". it is wanabe baby rapist writing. stop calling it queer writing. it is not queer to wanna rape toddlers
Joel is not having it with the antis.
this has nothing to do with Hazbin, i just felt like drawing Charlie because shes cute, but also wanted to draw this, and im tired so might as well knock out two birds with one stone
i need to make her ears look better
as I saw someone on Reddit say
"Proshippers say all the time that nobody should have to trauma-dump to be allowed to give rapist headcanons to their favorite characters on main, but I have to trauma-dump to be "almost understandable" for being uncomfortable by finding rapist headcanons of my favorite characters on main."
wait what does proshipper actually mean
I've seen two different definitions. One is someone who defends artistic expression in stories, even stories that feature controversial themes like rape, incest, pedophilia, zoophilia, etc
And another definition is someone who writes or defends such stories for the purpose of sexual gratification. And like these are wildly different things - so when I look at something that says "proshippers DNI" I have to wonder if it refers to someone like me who likes freedom of artistic expression or if it's just a common sense "don't interact if you're a pedo". I guess conversely I also am confused about the definition of antishipper - is it someone who dislikes pedos or someone who would stir up a moral panic about Lolita the novel?
Sorry for the basic question I am basically a stranger to this corner of the internet, excuse my ignorance.
With the situation of credit card companies censoring video games, I kinda remembered the pro-ship/anti-ship situation
That was a relatively successful censorship campaign because I keep seeing people be like "I don't do pro-ship ships" which is complete nonsense because "pro-ship" means "in favor of shipping without censorship" but some ghouls managed to create the false narrative that "Pro-ship" is short for "problematic ship" (pro is for "in favor of" like "pro social" or "pro choice")
Just finished dissecting the proship vs antiship results. I won't post them now (because I need to sleep) but I have a few Thoughts.
First, apparently the "anti-ship" side of this debate is COMICALLY overinflated (at least in the silm fandom). Out of 418 respondents, I think maybe 5-10 had a slight anti tilt? Maybe not even that many?
Also, 26-30yo's, you're not that old. I promise! Don't go blaming "kids these days" for fandom problems, they're not THAT much younger than you.
Speaking of the young'ns, we... really can't blame them for this one 🤣 Most of them Don't Know What It Is! (Seriously, I think 15/20 either put "idk" or left it blank)
Finally, Fandom Olds (41-50 mostly) came in clutch with this one! I've never seen such scathing remarks about purity culture and I am HERE for it!